I’m not a certified financial planner/advisor, a certified financial analyst, an economist, a CPA, an accountant, or a lawyer. I’m not a finance professional through formal education. The contents on this site are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, accounting, or legal advice. I can’t promise that the information shared on my posts is appropriate for you or anyone else. By using this site, you agree to hold me harmless from any ramifications, financial or otherwise, that occur to you as a result of acting on information found on this site.
i respect your work and also respect Ark researches, just don't think picking 1 year of -45% return to be the reference point of a fund / stock / person's performance a good idea yes their stocks are overvalued by traditional method, so was Walmart in 1960s and P&G in 1970s
SaarTaranus
⋅
@louistran_016, The main different is that in an environment of 2.8% 10Y treasury yield + QT + High Inflation: these prices are not sustainable, thus growth getting fluctuates
yes their stocks are overvalued by traditional method, so was Walmart in 1960s and P&G in 1970s