Instead of letting market forces play out they try to influence...
Comment
⋅
Comment
⋅
Comment
⋅
Pointing these machine to mine BCHABC against the market is expensive for pool operators. If no real market demand emerges for BCHABC, the forced hash will go back to BTC and the BCHABC chain will stop progressing because there won’t be enough miners to mine new blocks.
The bottomline here is that BABV does not reflect neither short term nor long term market demand, it is neither committed nor pragmatic hash. It is forced hash.
It is clear that ABC has forked away from the original Bitcoin design to the extent that there is no real technical way to combine the two technologies (ABC and original Bitcoin) anymore. Many are even suggesting that ABC has implemented so many changes (CTOR, OP_CheckDataSig, and especially their new checkpoints after November 15 hard fork) that they in fact created a new genesis block, and have forked off to something new which is neither Bitcoin nor even BCH anymore. I also saw some people are calling ABC’s new coin “BAB” because it’s no longer BCH, and even the Bitfinex exchange lists it now as BAB.
Expect some logic defying moves from both sides. Lots of manipuulaion and emotional trading at play. I fully expect BCHABC to take the throne, but I still see SV sticking around. I expect a 70/30 split by the time the war cools down and then both will rise as the market pulls back into a bull market
fortunekr
⋅
What a shitshow. Your analysis, though, is spot on. Stay far far away from these "coins".