Intuit

Super Long-term Wave Analysis for BTC

Long
BNC:BLX   BraveNewCoin Liquid Index for Bitcoin
Based on Neowave rules, It seems like Bitcoin has begun the last wave up of a diametric pattern. This wave could take us over 200k by the end of 2022, possibly as high as 1 million! After wave-(G) is complete, we could either see a multi-year correction (which could last up to 12 years) OR we could see an x-wave which will only take a couple years to complete, followed by another ~12 year bull run. It's not possible to know exactly what will happen after wave-(G), beyond knowing that we'll likely see one of the largest corrections in BTC's history, so it will be a good idea to take profit when it looks like wave-(G) is nearing completion.


Moving down to the monthly chart we can find a lot of supporting evidence for Wave-(G) beginning now:


The internals of Wave-(F) appear to have formed into a double combination which begins with a zigzag and ends with a diametric. Wave-g is a very strong "blow-off" wave which is common for the end of a diametric. We've also likely begun a bullish diametric starting at the low in march, and we are just now beginning wave-c which could take us to around the previous all-time-high at 20k.
LIVE CHART UPDATES POSTED HERE: https://www.tradingview.com/chat/#k2duaEvkzQaA6DrC

LIKE AND FOLLOW FOR MORE IDEAS

Comments

@Intuit, In the MEW book Neely has said that X waves are either smaller than 0.618 of previous three or larger than 1.618 of it in price length. Is that still the case? or he has changed his mind about it?

I see on some counts that X wave is between 0.618 and 1.618 of previous three.
Reply
this bulls going to be insane.. targeting milenial
Reply
Good to see som Neowave, Neely seems to have an interesting system of which I only ever got partially through his "mastery" book. That said reverting back to EW; for your "F wave" to be motive it would have to be wave 3 of the lower degree due to the previous LL at 3.1k. So 3.1k wave 1 low is fine, but then the wave 2 from 14k makes no sense at all by EW rules, and although now motive (perhaps on a lower degree) wave 3 from 3.8k looks very ugly too. Wave 3 should show strength, but this wave has only done so after considerable meandering.

A more fitting (but perhaps unappealing) answer could be that these motive waves "1" and "3" are actually B/X corrective waves which would mean that the dominant trend is still to to downside, despite volatility to the upside. @VladimirBashovski @NewYork888
Reply
Intuit dRends35
@dRends35, I don't think there are any impulsive waves here. Wave-(F) is a double combination, and it looks live we've begun a diametric pattern going up for wave-(G)
Reply
dRends35 Intuit
@Intuit, Disagree but good luck.
Reply
RezzaHmt dRends35
@dRends35 diametric is a corrective move. The structure is 3333333. This is something like actionary corrective wave in classic EW.
Reply
dRends35 RezzaHmt
@RezzaHmt, Proregressive? Complex Neowave or not, there's very little chance this is the start of the bull run imo. If it is its the ugliest impulsive move ever. And sorry to publisher but that long term log chart is noob-central.
Reply
Intuit dRends35
@dRends35, Funny that you say that because the author of Neowave (who wrote the book and has done EW for almost 40 years) is the one who came up with this count originally over a year ago.
Reply
dRends35 Intuit
@Intuit, Funny how you assume others to know nothing. "The author" - Neely, I have his Mastering EW book btw. Can you evident this supposed count? I very much doubt he would be bullish Bitcoin here. Also btw fairly obvious that you and @RezzaHmt are the same user @NewYork888
Reply
Intuit dRends35
@dRends35, We're definitely not the same people, @RezzaHmt doesn't even agree with my count, and I've never even seen the other guy.

To briefly explain this diametric count:

a) There's strong time similarity between waves
b) Channeling is conducive of a diametric
c) Lack of any impulsive action
d) Lack of any other logical count (if you have one I'd like to see it)

Neely came up with this count when I took his private classes over a year ago. It's not something he has published but you could try and email him about it and he might respond. I emailed him back in July and his response was that this count "continues to look good."

However, the jury is still out on whether or not NeoWave even actually consistently works on Bitcoin and cryptocurrency, as Neely has stated (and also in my own experience) there have never been any CONFIRMED impulsive counts on Bitcoin. https://www.neowave.com/qow/qow-archive-2379.asp
Reply
Home Stock Screener Forex Screener Crypto Screener Economic Calendar How It Works Chart Features Pricing Refer a friend House Rules Help Center Website & Broker Solutions Widgets Charting Solutions Lightweight Charting Library Blog & News Twitter
Profile Profile Settings Account and Billing Referred friends Coins My Support Tickets Help Center Private Messages Chat Sign Out