TradingView
smitheric1970
Mar 26, 2018 1:58 AM

Oil Long - 70 Level Long

Crude Oil FuturesNYMEX

Description

My apologies for the short summary, I will add more later, but here is my view in short.

I believe the run up in oil will continue; potentially on a quick path to 68/69

I am advising a long entry at current price, initially looking for 68.18 and believe that prices will create higher support at the 68.18 level. Targeting 69.37 and 70.56 as profit levels.

Long Entry: 65.49-66.24
TP1: 69.37 (Close half positions at 69.37 - Re-add long positions on pullback to 68.18)
TP2: 70.56 (Close all positions)

Good trading all!

Trade active

Comment

Yesterday went no-where but... being long that is a better direction than down. This chart shows my current bullish bias maintained; however if prices break below 65.2 again then I am concerned that they will test the 64.6x level.
s3.amazonaws.com/tradingview/snapshots/v/v0zUsrck.png

Good trading all!

Comment

Did not get the press up to this trade that I was hoping for but I am still looking for prices to move up as; although quicker than I'd hoped, they have found the lower Demand level shown on my last update:
s3.amazonaws.com/tradingview/snapshots/s/syhT0BJN.png

Comment

Here is a simpler view of the last chart; using high/low pivots. Confusion on the far left is clarified; although there is still Supply/Resistance just overhead we still potentially have strong demand here following a break back above the last two strong breakdown levels at the 64 level. Short term, I am looking for a test of 67.00 and looking for 64.62 Demand/Support.
s3.amazonaws.com/tradingview/snapshots/n/NLPMw6wL.png

Comment

This H4 view looking left at 2014 side by side with current prices shows the potential for the 64.62 support and 67 test - and my overall view of the 69-70.x targets.

s3.amazonaws.com/tradingview/snapshots/r/rTWKbnYR.png

Trade closed manually

Unfortunately this one sold off at the zone I was looking to overtake; back to the drawing board.

63.43 has been a critical level since Jan/Feb; If prices move back above it short term then I'll go back to this same view and find another long entry; if prices continue down, I'll re-assess for a lower long entry.
Comments
kome-on
Eric,
What convinces you that the general direction is still long?
It does appear "long in the tooth" :-) but what do you think is actually holding it 'up'?
smitheric1970
@kome-on, Agree, getting long in the tooth but I believe we may see a few dollars higher: Venezuelan output falling; Brent/Crude spread above 3.5 favors US exports; technically - we have not yet seen a Lower Low on the Daily continuous chart and on front/back month the March swing high was a Higher High over Jan/Feb swing high; as well, back in 2010 when QE1 ended, monthly bars dropped and closed at the 71.5 level prior to re-initiation of QE2; there were many other production factors involved but I believe there may be the some confluence in where prices may see a near term cap without QE vs price drop when QE sessions ended. I believe we will see potential highs this year of 69.3-70.6
smitheric1970
@kome-on, This is what I was referring to on the higher highs and lows on the front and back month charts; prices created a lower high but followed that up with a higher high; so no sign of reversal or top yet.

s3.amazonaws.com/tradingview/snapshots/h/HfAkaOBh.png
smitheric1970
@kome-on, Or..... maybe it will do the opposite of what I said. :) Yikes!

s3.amazonaws.com/tradingview/snapshots/o/ObaShuCk.png
purpurato59
Agree on your supply/demand zones a.k.a POC ;)
It's showing support on the 64 area, but I rather say it's being attracted there, so wherever it goes, it needs a strong pull with volume on it.
smitheric1970
@purpurato59, Yes, currently above the POC, fingers crossed - month has ended so maybe price has some free range to run above the monthly 200 MA again
smitheric1970
@purpurato59, Showing current range I'm looking for and POC on CLK8 and comparison to the 2014 swing.

s3.amazonaws.com/tradingview/snapshots/m/MX8bV3bx.png
alexeyhoroshunvk
Agree! Thanks)
More