TradingView
EXCAVO
Nov 26, 2017 9:03 PM

Decred Long

Decred / BitcoinBittrex

Description

Broke resistance line. Looking for next 38.2 level fibonacci

Comment

Above the support line

Trade closed: stop reached

Brok support line. i colse position - stop loss
Comments
DamjanLogar
I do not understand how you can be among Top 5, because you're not hitting anything
Superintendent
De1337
@DamjanLogar, agreed and hate reading ouatch. I’m out from this.
haraldlocke
@Cheslink, he postet this idea 21 hours ago.. how delusional u guys have to be, to bitch around allready? just keep chasing the hype and be to late as always. buy high, sell low!
Toni7
@DamjanLogar, I think you just do not understand this market.
JCBCrypto
@DamjanLogar @Superintendent @Cheslink You guys genuinely made my morning, thanks for the laugh.

This analysis is on the daily time frame and you're complaining because of ONE CANDLE?

The amount of ignorance and greed here is unbelievable.

It is sad because you make professional analysts like Excavo look bad, just because the price doesnt' move how you want it.

We can surely count on the next market correction to wipe out your weak hands.
DamjanLogar
@TheCryptoLabs, We also know that the whole will be repaired, this is not a science fiction, but that an analyst, such as EXCAVO, always has the wrong signal
JCBCrypto
@DamjanLogar, If so, why do you continue to follow?

Surely if you knew more than nothing you wouldn't be following someone who "always has the wrong signal".

Seems like you are the one who is always wrong.
accel
@TheCryptoLabs, "one candle" that's 30% drop. You can't possible claim that was a good call at this point. Why is it that people make excuses when analysts are wrong and they are given full credit when they are right.
JCBCrypto
@accel, 30% drop? lol.

it's around 9% down.

Not claiming it was a good call, do not assume so.

People who understand this game simply know you can't win them all.

even if it was not a good call, does not make him a bad analyst.

Both of your statements are incorrect.
More