Because the rules are over the guides

186 1 0
Here is in red my first theory of how the dollar was rising in a impulsive way, this was my count till yesterday, let me first explain why i decided to extend the 5th of the wave 3) (remember in red). The main reason was because the same kind of acute retrace observed in 2) and the next one retrace, as they do not show alternance, then I assumed the most probable was that there was another elliott wave for wave 3)) extending, wich also coincided with the idea of the 3rd is ofthen the extended one. But we cant keep this counting because in order to extend this wave we need to see the 3rd wave of it as the less long of this wave 3) because as the wave 5 keep going higher became longer than the 3rd.
There fore, and because the rules are more important to observe, we must recount as i show in black, ignoring the lack of alternance thinking this rally as a first wave ending where we had the last 3 red wave, and then with a shallow retracement which makes me think that is possible a zigzag or an impulse (the impulse is more probable because the context).
There are another way to count this as a 3 sets of 1),2), 1,2,i)),ii)) as well but as all the retraces then are shallow I let this as the less probable count by now.
The other way to count to turn around the problems of lack of alternance and the 3 as the shortest
EN English
EN English (UK)
EN English (IN)
DE Deutsch
FR Français
ES Español
IT Italiano
PL Polski
SV Svenska
TR Türkçe
RU Русский
PT Português
ID Bahasa Indonesia
MS Bahasa Melayu
TH ภาษาไทย
VI Tiếng Việt
JA 日本語
KO 한국어
ZH 简体中文
ZH 繁體中文
AR العربية
Home Stock Screener Forex Signal Finder Cryptocurrency Signal Finder Economic Calendar How It Works Chart Features House Rules Moderators Website & Broker Solutions Widgets Stock Charting Library Feature Request Blog & News FAQ Help & Wiki Twitter
Profile Profile Settings Account and Billing My Support Tickets Contact Support Ideas Published Followers Following Private Messages Chat Sign Out