Few months ago, I posted an idea that the low is likely to be put in around 500 SATS. Yet, this idea considered that Bitcoin will not trave as low as it did; this got me thinking... I took a break from the charts due to personal matters and after a while I removed all my analysis from the EOSBTC count.
The current count "fits" better. An extension within a three, which is a common occurrence, working on its way to put in a corrective four.
Where would the count be invalidated?
PA travels beyond 1.5 Fib extension in an impulsive manner