Ethereum Criticality Shift. P-Modeling Pt 6. Supernova Time?
First, I would like to apologize for lacking on the Ethereum updates.. Ultra busy with finals.. But now I am free! Finally... Let us continue where we left off..
Make sure to come back for thy updates! Give this a like so i know you observing in the background like a ninja!
Where to start...
Model C has been fully rendered. Following the geometry I saw a whole bunch of new things begin to manifest.
Outlier #7 has occurred and completed. Market manipulation with a suppression zone.
Model B and C has a connect and a trend crossing through it which makes it true. Model C follows the geometry accordingly until we saw some intense upward movement. This created new geo_divergent vectors in which upward trend modeling can occur..
An evil operator has been identified. It is responsible for the sentry's helping keep us in suppression.
We must cross the horizontal Evil operator boundary in order to sit squarely between the foundation matrix of the new Master Operator.
Something insane now. Ready?
Bitcoin P-Modeling Pt 30 & 28 shows two things. Pt 28 explains a little on criticality fans and error. Pt. 30 (current idea) shows the time it has taken to reach the end of criticality from our suppression zone. 8 days. 12 hours. If measured between the upper and lower Master Operator boundary like shown it comes to exactly 8 days and 12 hours. I will post bitcoins current chart below to show you how long the criticality residual error was.. I can give you a hint.. 8 days and 12 hours on the dot. SEE LINKS TO RELATED IDEAS BELOW.
Coincidences? I do not believe in them. Validity +1. ;)
Next, I have been experimenting with Elliot Wave theory. It seems to be the "most popular method" in crypto for many instances in prediction modeling. Elliot waves are only medium trend decoders. Period. There are other dimensions of decoding levels present in a global signals such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. My TA style looks at a very misunderstood dimension of decoding of a global signal. The background noise. Order is found in Chaos. That is my motto at least.. :).
Review.
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.
The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me! Hit that like button, it lets me know you are watching like a ninja in the background!
If you are confused how i got here.. Please go back and look at my charts. They are sequentially marked by Pt's for easy identification.
As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420
Make sure to come back for thy updates! Give this a like so i know you observing in the background like a ninja!
Where to start...
Model C has been fully rendered. Following the geometry I saw a whole bunch of new things begin to manifest.
Outlier #7 has occurred and completed. Market manipulation with a suppression zone.
Model B and C has a connect and a trend crossing through it which makes it true. Model C follows the geometry accordingly until we saw some intense upward movement. This created new geo_divergent vectors in which upward trend modeling can occur..
An evil operator has been identified. It is responsible for the sentry's helping keep us in suppression.
We must cross the horizontal Evil operator boundary in order to sit squarely between the foundation matrix of the new Master Operator.
Something insane now. Ready?
Bitcoin P-Modeling Pt 30 & 28 shows two things. Pt 28 explains a little on criticality fans and error. Pt. 30 (current idea) shows the time it has taken to reach the end of criticality from our suppression zone. 8 days. 12 hours. If measured between the upper and lower Master Operator boundary like shown it comes to exactly 8 days and 12 hours. I will post bitcoins current chart below to show you how long the criticality residual error was.. I can give you a hint.. 8 days and 12 hours on the dot. SEE LINKS TO RELATED IDEAS BELOW.
Coincidences? I do not believe in them. Validity +1. ;)
Next, I have been experimenting with Elliot Wave theory. It seems to be the "most popular method" in crypto for many instances in prediction modeling. Elliot waves are only medium trend decoders. Period. There are other dimensions of decoding levels present in a global signals such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. My TA style looks at a very misunderstood dimension of decoding of a global signal. The background noise. Order is found in Chaos. That is my motto at least.. :).
Review.
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.
The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me! Hit that like button, it lets me know you are watching like a ninja in the background!
If you are confused how i got here.. Please go back and look at my charts. They are sequentially marked by Pt's for easy identification.
As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420
Comment:
Model C up close..
Comment:
So close.. No coincidences.. This is bitcoins current chart. From Pt. 30 Look for the yellow hazard signs .. Criticality error.
Comment:
15 minute view of current conditions..
Comment:
If you been following all the parts of ETH algorithm, i made a bubble on April 12th.
See Ethereum Pt 2 .. I called this target in April. (Green bubble). Go see for yourself..
Ethereum. P-Modeling Pt 2: Model A Theory.
Date called April 12th.
Green bubble target from April 12th is now in our view and very reachable.
See Ethereum Pt 2 .. I called this target in April. (Green bubble). Go see for yourself..
Ethereum. P-Modeling Pt 2: Model A Theory.
Date called April 12th.
Green bubble target from April 12th is now in our view and very reachable.
Comment:
Here is the chart i made April 12.
Comment:
Here is the current frame of the algorithm. I tried to match it to the April 4th chart to the best of my ability in terms of angle.
As it stands today in comparison with April 12th. I even predicted with decent accuracy the big dips... Compare yourself. Let me know what you think.
As it stands today in comparison with April 12th. I even predicted with decent accuracy the big dips... Compare yourself. Let me know what you think.
Comment:
0_o.. goodnight. We should complete wave 5 shortly.. i think?
Comment:
Ideally we should blast thru the geo_cross indicator. This will keep us on track to finish the extension of wave 5. Once we finish wave 5, we can correct wave and begin a new impulse.. IF that is the direction it plans on going.
Many many things can change this though..
Many many things can change this though..
Comment:
Active movement towards finishing wave 5.
After wave 5. I will look for a correction wave.
I am trying hard to implement known theory into my TA theory.
That is how you blend theoretical constructs into a coherent framework.
Still waiting for supernova moments. Not sure if i will get it.. But we shall see now wont we. :).
After wave 5. I will look for a correction wave.
I am trying hard to implement known theory into my TA theory.
That is how you blend theoretical constructs into a coherent framework.
Still waiting for supernova moments. Not sure if i will get it.. But we shall see now wont we. :).
Comment:
We breached Model C. Completed re-entry into Model C with our outlier #7.
All indicators point to finishing wave 5.
But we are met with resistance.. Will manipulation succeed or will we complete wave 5.
Dun dun dunnnnnn
All indicators point to finishing wave 5.
But we are met with resistance.. Will manipulation succeed or will we complete wave 5.
Dun dun dunnnnnn
Comment:
Wave 5 completion imminent.
Comment:
I extended wave 5 just a hair. I will extend it one more time if need be. As there is one more point of extension according to the geometry available.
3 fractal waves. Extension of wave 5 rules.
Extension 1 is fractal 1.
Extension 2 is fractal 2.
Highest best 'fit' data point on fractal becomes new extension point.
3 fractal waves. Extension of wave 5 rules.
Extension 1 is fractal 1.
Extension 2 is fractal 2.
Highest best 'fit' data point on fractal becomes new extension point.
Comment:
You smell that?
Smells like herb and butter steak..
Medium-rare..
Coming up!
Smells like herb and butter steak..
Medium-rare..
Coming up!
Comment:
I see the waiter bringing me my steak now..
hmmmmhmmhmm
hmmmmhmmhmm
Comment:
Steak was delicious!! Took a minute but I enjoyed it..
Wave 5 is complete. I barely had to extend it. Any extension means it has to align with the data points in the best line of "fit".
Elliot waves are a different flavor of a geometric indicator. The Elliot wave is subjective to the data. This is why the waves patterns see to always be changing or altered slightly.
However.. If we know the micro-movements of the trend at 1, 3, and 5 minutes it seems to be much easier to predict where the wave count would be placed.
But don't trust me on that.. This is just from what i have synthesized, and it is solely my opinion. But any good construct has rules, and bending of those rules. People tend to bend the rules of certain prediction functions because they are missing key elements of the data.
Just saying..
Wave 5 is complete. I barely had to extend it. Any extension means it has to align with the data points in the best line of "fit".
Elliot waves are a different flavor of a geometric indicator. The Elliot wave is subjective to the data. This is why the waves patterns see to always be changing or altered slightly.
However.. If we know the micro-movements of the trend at 1, 3, and 5 minutes it seems to be much easier to predict where the wave count would be placed.
But don't trust me on that.. This is just from what i have synthesized, and it is solely my opinion. But any good construct has rules, and bending of those rules. People tend to bend the rules of certain prediction functions because they are missing key elements of the data.
Just saying..
Comment:
Correction wave.. Then new impulse waves..
We are getting very close to achieving enough fuel for supernova fun..
We are getting very close to achieving enough fuel for supernova fun..
Comment:
Tomorrow is going to be very interesting..
Comment:
Running out the door.. But this has supernova potential written all over it.. but i of course am probably wrong.. but never say never..
Comment:
Trying some new techniques.. bare with me please.
Comment:
Overlapping projections.. Trend is bouncing between the overlapped variance.
Comment:
We have reached the end of the overlapping projections. The stage is set for supernova action.
10k is major resistance.
FOMO will be in high gear soon..
Rapid price increase once we leave 10k.
*Systems Online*
10k is major resistance.
FOMO will be in high gear soon..
Rapid price increase once we leave 10k.
*Systems Online*
