Ethereum. P-Modeling Pt 11. Model G with a sprinkle of Doom?
Welcome back. This is part 11 of Ethereum's algorithm. Come back for update please..
Model G has been rendered. It does not look that good in the short term, but this is very calculated. We have a lot of room to fall according to Model G. Thus be careful. I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes. Mistakes and failure leads to growth. You need them to grow. Experience Pain.
But.. we have met the criteria of Model G. So we must break the Upper Boundary and head upward to the next tunnel or free fall like Model G predicts.
This will be interesting, we must leave Model G or fall. Period.
I think we are going to massively tumble. I have nothing in this sequence that is telling me the Master Operator can take control. We are in full control of the new evil operator and it's sentries. This is calculated. Very methologically manipulated by a variety of entities. I can see multiple hands at play here. Like a choreographed play.
Blue bubbles are current predictions.
Red bubbles are past predictions.
New Evil Operator : Orange Lines.
New Master Operator: Purple Lines.
We need a Master Operator Lower Boundary to appear.
We have the Upper Boundary, the connect, the intersect and one geo_operator but are missing the Lower Boundary. Some nice upward fractals will give me that confirmation of a Lower boundary being created.
I am still deciding on a couple of things with Ethereums algorithm. Being subjective in design, I can change it as long as it stays within the rules of my foundation theory in which the algorithm is built.. Following the geometry to the best of my ability.
Each Model created in the Modeling Sequence, creates a geometricc pattern of indicators in various forms. These indicators can be read to PREDICT future trend movement many days before traditional indicators appear.
The idea here is to convince you, that what i am doing is not arbitrary but unique and useful. I know the immediate inclination is to doubt what I am doing. That is expected.. and understandable.. But human nature is unpredictable. And you never know when you can learn new things and be completely shocked at someones EXTREMELY insane ideas.. I like going against the norm.. So join me please. :) If you enjoy this.. Hit that like button!
Understand the application of my modeling technique is not traditional by any means. It is theoretical in nature, and 100% experimentally designed and applied by me as we continue this insane experiment day after day.. It was not built for financial analysis, at all. I have literally 0 background in trading, TA's or anything to do with accounting or the stock market. It is being applied, through intuitive and creative means for fun so I could keep up with Bitcoin and Ethereum personally, and invest for myself..
I promise I will make many mistakes making these non-traditional TA's, or even incorrectly use traditional tools and indicators. That is the fun of it, to learn from scratch and apply another idea to a realm unknown to you. This realm is an unknown to me. A knowledge acquisition process. One i am quite enjoying.. If you confused on how we got to this point.. Please re-read my old charts. You can find links below and in bio. I take you step by step.
Model G has been rendered. It does not look that good in the short term, but this is very calculated. We have a lot of room to fall according to Model G. Thus be careful. I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes. Mistakes and failure leads to growth. You need them to grow. Experience Pain.
But.. we have met the criteria of Model G. So we must break the Upper Boundary and head upward to the next tunnel or free fall like Model G predicts.
This will be interesting, we must leave Model G or fall. Period.
I think we are going to massively tumble. I have nothing in this sequence that is telling me the Master Operator can take control. We are in full control of the new evil operator and it's sentries. This is calculated. Very methologically manipulated by a variety of entities. I can see multiple hands at play here. Like a choreographed play.
Blue bubbles are current predictions.
Red bubbles are past predictions.
New Evil Operator : Orange Lines.
New Master Operator: Purple Lines.
We need a Master Operator Lower Boundary to appear.
We have the Upper Boundary, the connect, the intersect and one geo_operator but are missing the Lower Boundary. Some nice upward fractals will give me that confirmation of a Lower boundary being created.
I am still deciding on a couple of things with Ethereums algorithm. Being subjective in design, I can change it as long as it stays within the rules of my foundation theory in which the algorithm is built.. Following the geometry to the best of my ability.
Each Model created in the Modeling Sequence, creates a geometricc pattern of indicators in various forms. These indicators can be read to PREDICT future trend movement many days before traditional indicators appear.
The idea here is to convince you, that what i am doing is not arbitrary but unique and useful. I know the immediate inclination is to doubt what I am doing. That is expected.. and understandable.. But human nature is unpredictable. And you never know when you can learn new things and be completely shocked at someones EXTREMELY insane ideas.. I like going against the norm.. So join me please. :) If you enjoy this.. Hit that like button!
Understand the application of my modeling technique is not traditional by any means. It is theoretical in nature, and 100% experimentally designed and applied by me as we continue this insane experiment day after day.. It was not built for financial analysis, at all. I have literally 0 background in trading, TA's or anything to do with accounting or the stock market. It is being applied, through intuitive and creative means for fun so I could keep up with Bitcoin and Ethereum personally, and invest for myself..
I promise I will make many mistakes making these non-traditional TA's, or even incorrectly use traditional tools and indicators. That is the fun of it, to learn from scratch and apply another idea to a realm unknown to you. This realm is an unknown to me. A knowledge acquisition process. One i am quite enjoying.. If you confused on how we got to this point.. Please re-read my old charts. You can find links below and in bio. I take you step by step.
Comment:
closer view.
Comment:
I do not think we have enough power to break these lines.
which means.. more downward thrust please!
which means.. more downward thrust please!
Comment:
perfectly called.
Comment:
Validated Pitchfork.
Validated Model G.
Validated Target 1.
Validated boundary Lines.
Exactly.
Validated Model G.
Validated Target 1.
Validated boundary Lines.
Exactly.
Comment:
More downward thrust. Target 2 is now probable.
Comment:
Comment:
Very suspicious... Both bitcoin and ethereum are tracking very close to one another, despite completely separate algorithms.
Comment:
^That is bitcoins. and this one is ethereums.
Comment:
They both end on the 31st.
The both have flat end.
Both come to a point.
Both models are roughly the same depth, height and consistency.
Weird. and so odd how two completely subjective algorithms can yield such similarities.
The both have flat end.
Both come to a point.
Both models are roughly the same depth, height and consistency.
Weird. and so odd how two completely subjective algorithms can yield such similarities.
Comment:
Ya you should be careful here..
Comment:
Batman head and wings..
Comment:
I still stand by my statement. You best be careful here. I do not think we have the juice yet. One more day... A finishing drop to complete our batman would be great and make the most logical sense.
Statistical Outlier #13 would be complete if we re-entered Model G.
I think this makes the most sense.
Statistical Outlier #13 would be complete if we re-entered Model G.
I think this makes the most sense.
Comment:
Re-entry into Model G imminent. Proposition .7
Comment:
Comment:
Target 502.
Comment:
Comment:
Target for Ethereum being called is still 502.
Proposition .8
Proposition .8
Comment:
Ya bitcoin and Ethereum are showing a very similar modeling sequence pattern.
Both are batmanning and barting.
Both are under 2 sentries and an evil operator.
I highly suspect we are going to re-enter into Model G.
Both are batmanning and barting.
Both are under 2 sentries and an evil operator.
I highly suspect we are going to re-enter into Model G.
Comment:
Model H and now we are beginning to render Model I.
Comment:
We validated Model H by re-entering the Model.
Ethereum and Bitcoin are geometrically MATCHING.
THIS IS A MASSIVE FUCKING DEAL.
SEE BITCOIN Pt 38.
Ethereum and Bitcoin are geometrically MATCHING.
THIS IS A MASSIVE FUCKING DEAL.
SEE BITCOIN Pt 38.
