It is assumed that the primary wave β€ will take the form of a large , subdivided into zigzags (1)-(2)-(3)-(4)-(5). Within the framework of the model, sub-waves (1) and (2) are formed, wave (3) is expected to develop.
The minimum target for (3) is to exceed the wavelength of (2). _______________________________________ β ETHUSDT, πTF: 8h Fig.2
The ascending wave marked as A of (3) can be interpreted as an , the subsequent correction of B as a completed β¦-β§-β¨. If our calculation is correct, then we are at an early stage of the development of the ascending five-wave C. The formed waves ((i))-((ii)) with the breakdown of the 0-β§ line will serve as an additional signal in favor of this hypothesis.
_______________________________________ ββ Alternative count β ETHUSDT, πTF: 1D Fig.3
Complicating the structure of wave (2) to a is the first thing we should be ready for. Wave X can take the form of any corrective figure, but based on the fact that the first wave in the model, designated β, is interpreted as an , at the current stage a bet is placed on the formation of X by the type of a .
The second variant of alternative labeling returns us to the previously preferred scenario, in the context of which wave (2) unfolds an expanded A-B-C flat with a at the end.
Provided the diagonal is completed, this calculation option can be designated as the preferred scenario.