Two Inverted Cup & Handles: Nestled, Equalized, and Critical 010 at their focal points. Anchored By Shadow Fractals, supported by the geometric linear matrices..
String Harmonic Sequences Supports link and junctions. = Levels defined.
Focal Points: Collapsed between Nestled C&H's; Shadow Anchored Equalization = Extreme Probability for Fractal Execution.
Follow the white fractal. The only change is IF it is to being shifted, known as 'fractal error'. Fractal Error was noted at 3 days. Fractal laid within 3 days of error.
Goal is nailing the timing. Seems I was off by 1 month from my initial April 20th, prediction. Nothing has changed.
Would love to be wrong. Would love to be right. Failure is a necessary component of success.
Be fluid like water. _______________________________________
Ask yourself..
Is the Cat Alive ? or Is the Cat Dead?
Or do we hang in the balance between suspended animation and the ideal that being alive and dead is acceptable?
Laugh now, cry later..
Thoughts to Ponder in these crazy times, Thanks for Pondering it with me,
Glitch420
Comment
⋅
Re-adjust idea template by sliding the lower axis bar sideways to stretch the image into focus.
Comment
⋅
Baseline:
Trade active
⋅
Trade active
⋅
Tic. Toc.
Trade active
⋅
Timing error of fractal placement was 3 days into the future.
We are now aligned with the placed fractal and entered the shadow channel..
Will be interesting if it plays forward or inversely.
My bet is it follows the continued tree. But i have been wrong quite a few times. ;)
Trade active
⋅
Shadow Wave Count is confirming as we speak.
Root-1-2-3-4-5-
Shadow Wave Count. Starts at Root > Ends at Wave 5.
Wave 5 is now active.
Trade active
⋅
Added 2 days to the timing error of the placed fractal in white.
Shadow Fractal Timing Error in Stage 1 was 3 days.
Shadow Fractal Timing Error in Stage 2 is now 2 days.
Error is placement of fractal within timing spread of the vector epoch.
Trade active
⋅
Proposition B formed. (light blue fractal placement-into white fractal sequence). Notice how the Yellow inverted Cup allowed a outlier to occur. Depicted by the orange box named Outlier.
Notice how we have a red inverted cup as well, whose outlier has still yet to occur.
This gears my evidence towards us completing an outlier on the Red inverted Cup and handle formation.
This would lead into an extension of the white fractal superimposed from the new Outlier Fractal from the red cup.
This gives me a small long potential.
Let's see.
Proposition A is the white fractal getting executed.
Trade active
⋅
We can either ; Proposition A or B.
A: Execute Proposition A. (White fractal execution).
OR.
B. Execute Proposition B. (Orange Outlier Range + Light Blue Fractal + into shifted White Fractal).
Comment
⋅
As stated before.
Inverted Cup and Handle formations like this are very unique, as they have specific requirements.
Cup Outlier.
Tip Execution.
Shadow Anchored.
Trade active
⋅
Proposition B is looking very juicy..
Lemme Held if it outliers over the red inverted cup and handle formation (mirroring that of that yellow cup before execution.
Comment
⋅
ETH.XBT long - play the range - enter for ETH.XBT short.
I love this pair.
Slow and steady baby.
Trade active
⋅
Proposition B is confirmed.
Trade active
⋅
Proposition B is still extremely active and valid.
Outlier on Red Inverted Cup and Handle is actualizing.
Order cancelled
⋅
New idea incoming shortly.
Comment
⋅
oppsss wrong idea. ignore that. above ^
Trade active
⋅
outlier complete.
awaiting confirmation of ending cup and handle formation.
Trade active
⋅
narrative about to actualize... which way.. who knows. :) Planning for both :)
Comment
⋅
looking for alignment :)
Trade closed: stop reached
⋅
Trade active
⋅
Order cancelled
⋅
Comment
⋅
its incredible. It simple repeat the formation.
remarkable.
if You look at te shadow cup in red, its linear continues the cup and acts as lower boundary for the future price.
Same with the yellow cup.
The mistake was missing the geometry of divergences and staying bias to a narrative that held little power.
What is very interesting is the equalization line where narrative was to be successive. Quite interesting.
Interesting binary mechanics. One i am watching very closely.
Comment
⋅
The defined narrative Failure was right before AUG started.
@ceesounds, i am told this constantly by my professors. Didn't work before, won't work now. ;).
Z3R0Matrix
⋅
are those pink waves angled through areas of least S/R. I have been reading up on a strategy that is similar to what I see here. Absolutely well done.
Glitch420
⋅
@Z3R0Matrix, the inverse M wave is found when the binary code is inversely played in and regurgitated over a phase shift of the wave functions.. Basically, the resting places of the inverse M wave and the physical junctions that connects the regression of the wave function lay out arbitrary points of interest in a hyperspace. These arbitrary points are not arbitrary at all but a part of a completely different system. The linear matrix of the M is hinged upon harmonic levels deduced by the formations created in geometric space. Majority of the time, fractal wave counts are wrong because majority of people think that the wave starts - progresses - and terminates on actualized data points, when in reality... The wave is rooted, progressed- and terminates in non-linear space-time. This hidden network is key to understanding wave-function of non-linear heuristics of space-time. The wave functions must validate at key points, (depicted by the green flags). Also not just linear networks but spin-networks as well. The spin networks are not shown currently. The curvature of space, must equalize with the linear mean of the wavefunction and in this case, the factor of numerous wave functions must collapse into focal junction points. True wave junction points are always hidden and are not as simple as finding a specific coordinate on the plot. Actually quite the opposite, its finding the vector of the plot, and using its geometric residual to further tease potential movements.