Target 2- 61.8% level
The pattern you have outlined is not really anything at all.
Maybe a Butterfly and that would have a Point D at the 1.272
If you're interested these websites are a great resource
Have Fun ~~~~~
Wishing you lots of pips in 2014 and beyond !
ha ha ha hah ! (evil laugh)
I've read my comments again and just don't see where they
are immature. Unless, of course, your definition means
only those comments that agree.
I sent those websites for the free stuff
I was trying to let you know of websites that help identify the
I would have no trouble showing a profit if I posted charts
4 days after they are in profit as you did.
I would enjoy seeing you post a chart 4 days before.
Forgive me for trying to help.
I should know better by now ~~~~~~
" Wishing you lots of pips in 2014 and beyond ! "
I posted this 4 days after I was in profit because I forgot to post this pattern on tradinview.. Regardless, it wouldn't matter. On the screenshot you can even see what price I had entered.. I entered at 138.249.. Dead on at PRZ.. No harmonic has to be the exact ratio or a text book pattern . It would be a high probability pattern if the pattern matched the exact ratio but I am aggressive trader. And just because you couldn't see this pattern with your own eyes and i did, don't make this pattern wrong. I'm still in profit. You don't have to agree with me. But just make sure you come correct and mature with your comments and you'll be alright with me.
I was trying to laugh at myself ----- not you
I thought that was obvious.
And, I will stand corrected if you can find just one
other trader who thinks that the pattern you have labeled
is a Gartley.
If you are using proprietary technique perhaps you should
disclose that in our comments.
If you are stuck on technicals and you are text book trader, then no, I agree with you. This not a Gartley patteren, but this is close enough. And When I entered at 138.249 at the PRZ it revere zed and I am in profit. I had a friend who is in Fxground, he told me you can customize their indicators to have a flex rule. The flex rule gives the pattern some rule to break a few rules. Not every pattern has to be exact ratio. But when it is exact, it's high probability.
good year are insincere. We're obviously Ocean's apart
in the use of the English language.
If you think I've been out of line please contact one of the
moderators and have then get hold me to correct my
behavior towards a more positive outcome.
And yes, I actually do wish you a good trading year !!!!!
" In my opinion, some would say completely lacking in humility, ha ha ha hah !
The pattern you have outlined is not really anything at all. "
Instead of assuming this pattern is nothing at all, ask questions. You could have said
" Hey yuba, I'm having a hard time seeing if this is a legitimate pattern on your chart, could you maybe tell me you are you looking at? are you using a proprietary setting ?"
Then I would have replied
" Hi Dojitrader, I'm not necessarily following the text book on the Gartley, but this close enough to the ratios and it has the shape of a traditional gartley created H.M. Gartley before the use of fibonacci with these patterns"
This is how you build dialog and connect with traders worldwide. We could have had a different outcome if you were humble in your critiquing. and now you are upset because i checked you on it. Just be humble on here.