The accuracy of my previous idea strengthens this one. I am waiting for a confirmation to the down side before going short.
btw, your Elliott Wave counts are dangerous, need to incorporate, time, patterns and complexity into the analysis; at a minimum, wave 3 should never be shorter than 1.618 of wave 1 and should showed a much sharper angle (or it could easily be ABCxABC or double zigzag variant). From a time perspective, the 2 corrective wave should always exist the time frame of the impulsive waves, or there is very high chances your count is wrong. good luck.