Akil_Stokes
Short

GBPJPY: Bear Gartley Formation (Follow Up On Last Week's Video)

FX:GBPJPY   British Pound/Japanese Yen
7 months ago
Following up on the video that I shared with you guys last week, making a few predictions on the GBPJPY             . We are now approaching a retest of the "B" leg for this potential Advanced Gartley Formation. (By the way well done 2618 traders!)

If you remember I was looking for a trend continuation opportunity & this advanced pattern formation would be a perfect entry point as it approaches our previous minor level of structure.

Best of luck with your trading this week!

Last week's trading video on the GBPJPY             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJhwOPSvlcc
7 months ago
Trade active
7 months ago
Trade closed: target reached: 1st positions hit targets for +84 Heck of a start to our week considering EURJPY & GBPUSD both rolled over as well!
7 months ago
Comment: If you have questions about this trade setup, I'll be live on Periscope today at 12:30 est. Username @akilstokesRTM or you can watch live at www.periscope.tv/akilstokesrtm
Akil Stokes -Head FOREX Trading Coach at Trade Empowered
Check Out Our Free Training https://goo.gl/5e8Jcr
TradeEmpowered On Youtube https://goo.gl/IscNch
Akil Stokes on Youtube https://goo.gl/u5kDC3
"Plan Your Trade, Trade Your Plan"




Gbprider
7 months ago
thanks akil
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP Gbprider
7 months ago
you're welcome
Reply
RamdzanY
7 months ago
Kinda exciting week ahead with quite a few patterns on the radar. Good Luck!
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP RamdzanY
7 months ago
Awesome, let's hope that they work in our favor
+1 Reply
TopSmileFx
7 months ago
Great idea!
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP TopSmileFx
7 months ago
Thank you
Reply
amitbnl07
7 months ago
GBPJPY
Reply
NafeesulHassan
7 months ago
Thanks for your consideration Akil,, i was wrong there and that was an invalid pattern but due to unknown issues with www.tradingview.com here i have to use mt4 instead,, so that was a mix up.. thanks anyway...
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP NafeesulHassan
7 months ago
No problem, data here on tradingview may be different than your personal brokers
Reply
suttos
7 months ago
Hi Akil, Is this pattern still valid?
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP suttos
7 months ago
Yes, it looks like the "D" completion was just hit
Reply
petery Akil_Stokes
7 months ago
If the price goes above point X is the pattern still valid?
+1 Reply
Nemo75 petery
7 months ago
A point D exceeding X could lead to a valid Butterfly formation, which is kind of more risky than the Gartleys because of the stops that need to be found in former structure (look left ...) and therefore usually are in a bigger distance to the entry than they use to be in Gartleys.
Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP petery
7 months ago
Technically no
Reply
Nemo75 Akil_Stokes
7 months ago
Hi Akil, I would appreciate if you explain why.
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP Nemo75
7 months ago
The no answer was to the Petery's question about the Gartley being invalid once X is violated
Reply
Nemo75 Akil_Stokes
7 months ago
I read that in Larry Pessaventos "Trade what you see":
Quote from page 69:
The Butterfly pattern is best described as an extension pattern. It is also a failed Gartley pattern where the D completion point completes above the X. Remember that a Gartley pattern is considered a failed pattern if this occurs, but with this failure a Butterfly pattern may be forming.
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP Nemo75
7 months ago
Once the X leg is penetrated the Gartley pattern is failed, however you're correct it could end up being another advanced pattern depending on your rules. I require a 78.6 retracement on the "B" leg for it to be a valid butterfly but many tradrs will look at a failed Garltey as Crab pattern
Reply
Nemo75 Akil_Stokes
7 months ago
Thank you for clarifying and your explanation.
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP Nemo75
7 months ago
No problem
Reply
No7855
7 months ago
This, the x will not have a problem.
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP No7855
7 months ago
I'm sorry but I'm not sure I understand your question
Reply
Callaghanind
7 months ago
Hopping in now, wish I would have seen this earlier.
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP Callaghanind
7 months ago
There will be more opportunities, there always are
+1 Reply
leitmotiv
7 months ago
Good call Akil ! Whats your rule for the C leg ? Because the C leg extends beyond the 786 retracement of AB. As of right now, a C leg at or beyond 786 nullifies my Gartley. Do you recommend more flexibility in the C ? Thanks again
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP leitmotiv
7 months ago
As long as it doesn't violate the A leg then it's valid for me
Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP leitmotiv
7 months ago
and thanks
Reply
PHL
7 months ago
thanks for the great idea Akil. i also saw this pattern after i woke up and traded it. i was so confident and glad to be in the trade since it had a great RR. Nevertheless my first position was stopped out at 155.52, the very high of the day! also i closed my second position at breakeven since prices went above X. frustrating lol. anyway keep up the great work!
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP PHL
7 months ago
man i hate when that happens Phl, unlucky, keep fighting and continue to follow the plan. The markets reward those who do
+1 Reply
Jimdandy
7 months ago
Nice trade Akil, I was wondering if you entered at 154.93... where was your stop and takeprofit. I see it made a roughly 60 pip move against you. How close did it come to your stop and what was the R:R on this trade? Again,,, way to go..
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP Jimdandy
7 months ago
my stops were a little more than an ATR above the X leg & my initial profit target was at the 38.2 fibonacci retracement
Reply
Jimdandy Akil_Stokes
7 months ago
I assume you use the 14ATR of the HOURLY chart. Unless you use a 7ATR like the 7RSI?
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP Jimdandy
7 months ago
I use a 7 Period ATR
Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP Jimdandy
7 months ago
Sorry forgot to say thank you for the kind comment as well
Reply
Interesting perspective on another currency pair USD/CAD and US Dollar Index:http://www.clivemaund.com/article.php?art_id=3773&PHPSESSID=4d9ed8c7c100f8eaaaca9fde4fbdc9d4
Reply
Well failed gartley can possibly make a butterfly not crab. For crab the B point retracement needs to be less than 0.618. clearly mentioned in harmonic trading by scott carney.
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP SaifurRahman
7 months ago
Nice! I'm not a Butterfly or a Crab pattern trader, so i fully admit that I'm not the one to be giving advice on those particular pattern formations. For butterflies to be valid I require a "B" retracement of a 78.6 which would invalidate the gartley formation before it's even formed which is why i don't think of a butterfly as a failed gartley, but I know we're also somewhat unique in our specific ratio requirements for these advanced formations
Reply
SaifurRahman PRO Akil_Stokes
7 months ago
HI Akil . Thanks for your point of view. you are right there are different ratio requirements that traders follow. Some trader does not require precise 0.618 B point retracement as gartley and consider any retracement between .618 & .786 as gartley.
+1 Reply
Akil_Stokes TOP SaifurRahman
7 months ago
Agreed
Reply
Ideas Scripts Chart
United States
United Kingdom
India
España
Italia
Brasil
Россия
Türkiye
日本
한국
Home Stock Screener Economic Calendar How It Works Chart Features House Rules Moderators For the WEB Widgets Stock Charting Library Priority Support Feature Request Blog & News FAQ Help & Wiki Twitter
Private Messages Chat Ideas Published Followers Following Priority Support Public Profile Profile Settings Billing Sign Out