Here is a quote from NBC: "And even the relatively low $80 million-per-F-35 price tag is deceptive, because the F-35 has proven so expensive and challenging to maintain that every hour an F-35 is flown costs $36,000 on average, compared to $22,000 for an F-16. By an alternate metric, the F-35 is over three times more expensive per hour to fly."
UFO Fragments Are Likely In Lockheed Martin’s Possession, Says Ex-Sen. Harry Reid
In this day and age of meme stocks, let's explore some of the additional hype around this topic.
The space alien article is from Deadline, and in and of itself is not very meaningful on first glance. However its essential that we then evaluate the avalanche of additional information that has hit us on this Space Alien topic.
They seem to dwell, or spend an unusually large amount of time in the ocean There are countless examples including almost all authenticated DOD videos, and the Navy comment in politico advising the regular activity with oceans, and the Puerto Rico DOD video, along with the recent Hawaii confirmed video. These things seem to abide in the water - Top Gun Pilot Cmdr Favor from the Nimitz event encountered one 50ft above the ocean and he states it was above a much larger craft that was in the ocean. You can listen to Chris Mellon and other insiders to get a better perspective, but this is odd. (Citation) https://www.wwlp.com/news/what-flies-in-the-in-the-air-zips-through-the-ocean-and-splits-in-two-scientifically-investigating-the-aguadilla-ufo-incident/
Final concern was Donald Trumps comment when asked about it on Fox news near the end of his presidency. (This issue is bipartisan as we are all on team humanity) he countered the question by advising how "tough and great" our military is. And if you listen to Chris Mellon and Lue Elizondo and other insiders I think the 'sad' truth is what we find out in the June report (This comment is speculation) the military is going to confirm the phenomena is real to the senate (although they already have been to publications) they are going to need more money and funding, and they are going to say they do not know who is piloting them, or continue to be vague about it. The concern is our military and tech are not transmedian, or entirely invisible, powered with a propulsion system that can go over 3,000g's (Video Interview New York Post) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emn6jozxHxU&t=588s (Citation) https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/space/2020/11/20/pentagon-expected-to-increase-space-force-funding-in-coming-years/
My recommendation is just play the hype in this new day & age of meme 'stonks'. Even if ALL of this does not materialize and it is all fake - the rumor itself about Lockheed having alien tech is real, and the company is well run. I am long LMT from buying the dip and will continue to accumulate if we experience any further dips.
We can clearly see here that technically the trend has changed. The ema ribbon has "fipped" and to overly simplify this.. the lines are point up.
Recommend for those with further interest in researching the metamaterials that they are testing now as well. The leading researcher advised it was assembled at the "subatomic level" and "assembled in space".
If you enjoyed this content friends, and if you have ever seen a UFO/UAP/USO (yes USO, submergibles/transmedian!!) please be sure to share it with others! And please hit this with a like! Lockheed Martin is my favorite play when it comes to trading off the revelation that aliens are real.
complaints about the F-35 are dated and old. Their problems are mostly fixed. They work fine. We have orders of them for 70 years.
Frankly, do not ever trust NBC, CNN, FOX, whoever, or any MSM about things regarding the military budget. I am not trying to insist you go to some other worse source. What I would prefer you cited is the actual budget and explanations within the fiscal year proposals. I read them, and wrote a rhetorical analysis regarding misconceptions of the waste of the military budget (the costs you are listing are just... not correct, and no one ever gets them right, because no one REALLY READS THE BUDGET)
Regarding the UFOs. The Aguadilla UFO incident was a duck. It was just a duck. When a fighter jet is flying at a higher altitude and tracking a lower speed target far below it, it creates the appearance of speed when there is none really. There is nothing special about it.
What matters more is that we do not use UFO to refer to aliens. We use UFO as the LITERAL term (and I saw we here because I was an airborne analyst and actually operated with equipment that was meant to identify such things :V) to say UNIDENTIFIED, FLYING, OBJECT. If it was identified, then it would not be a UFO. It would be a duck, or a jet, or an alien. You do not call something a UFO if you suspect it is an alien; you call something a UFO when you don't know what it is.
Please do not read so much into these things with absolutely zero understanding of the ecosystem regarding these videos, why they are released at all, and perhaps consider why the government would just.. release such compromising footage?
perhaps because it's a duck.
I apologize for being irate but damn as a former cryptologic analyst, NSA op, 500+ sortie hours, two medals, this really grinds my gears at the sheer ignorance of the subject yet such confidence in citing awful sources.
Can you please share the sources that you are referring towards. I prefer msm as we could cite the NYT or WSJ or the DODs own website as there is a lot of woo woo on this topic. Kind regards
locus101
⋅
Why not just use The National Enquirer? They "get it right" just about the same percentage of the time....and it's coming from the same spoon.
EBITDAtiger
⋅
ARKX
NY2CaliTrader
⋅
Fascinating stuff. Especially that Aguadilla UFO Incident.