1123 17 25
Here's where things stand.

On the year,
Safe assets outperformed risky assets.

Safe assets gained almost 2.5% post Brexit
While risky assets gained 3.9% since their Brexit lows

One of those is lying.
Thankyou for this interesting chart. I agree with your thesis.

I would have liked it even better if you showed what you have plotted to represent each of the asset classes. Good chart otherwise.
You're welcome.

As far as the tickers I used for Safe assets;

* Bonds - $VGIT, $VGLT, $VGSH
* Gold / Silver - $BPM

For risky assets I used CFD's for major indices
* S&P - $SPX500
* DAX - $GER30
* Nikki - $JPN225
* FTSE - $UK100
DanV PRO Silver-Silver
I see. Thankyou for reply. Are combining these in some form of formula, to derive representing lines for safe and risk assets?
The math is simple for the most part because I mostly aiming for direction of movement. The only thing worth noting is I had to multiply JPYUSD by 10000 to get it to be in the same range of decimals as the other tickers


For indices, I simply added them up with no adjustments, again...I'm looking for direction only.

- SPX500+GER30+JPN225+UK100

DanV PRO Silver-Silver
Right got that. Just wondering if it would make sense if you simply add percentage change rather than monetary change.
Good point. Here are the numbers individually (From the low of June 23 till where the ticker closed on July 1)

Risky assets:
SPX500 - 5.77%
GER30- 6.53%
JPN225 - 5.00%
UK100- 14.94%

Average for risky = 8.06% from low to close

Safe assets:
VGIT - 1.36%
VGLT - 5.97%
VGSH - 0.29%
BPM - 8.16%
JPYUSD - 4.28%

Average for safe assets = 4.01% from low to close

I summery, based on individual daily candle charts (where as the original chart is a line chart)
Risky assets gained 2% for every 1% safe assets gained since Brexit lows
DanV PRO Silver-Silver
Excellent, makes sense.
Silver, what's that histogram at the bottom of your chart?
So the histogram is the correlation between the two.

Regardless of whether they go up or down,

when they move in the same direction, you get a positive correlation coefficient - "CC" for short
when they move in opposite directions, you get a negative CC

Since the start of the year there has been a negative CC between the two asset classes 83.5% of the time.
Thank you Silver! I want to ask you a question: what if both are not lying at all? If they not, who's gonna compensate?
+2 Reply
EN English
EN English (UK)
EN English (IN)
DE Deutsch
FR Français
ES Español
IT Italiano
PL Polski
TR Türkçe
RU Русский
PT Português
ID Bahasa Indonesia
MS Bahasa Melayu
TH ภาษาไทย
VI Tiếng Việt
JA 日本語
KO 한국어
ZH 简体中文
ZH 繁體中文
Home Stock Screener Forex Signal Finder Cryptocurrency Signal Finder Economic Calendar How It Works Chart Features House Rules Moderators Website & Broker Solutions Widgets Stock Charting Library Feature Request Blog & News FAQ Help & Wiki Twitter
Profile Profile Settings Account and Billing My Support Tickets Contact Support Ideas Published Followers Following Private Messages Chat Sign Out