Watch out to trade this one akyong; this is not a valid gartley. Look closer at the C point of this pattern that does not meet the requirements.
KarYong
⋅
why do you say that the c point does not meet the requirements? I've checked and it seems valid.
Aqua-Life
⋅
Where did you check? C must at least touch the 61,8 retracement of AB. Unfortunately a lot of inacurate vague explenations are available on google search.
KarYong
⋅
c leg just need a minimum 38.2 retracement only.
Aqua-Life
⋅
Well I'm not going to argue about this. I just wanted to give you a heads up about it. Do with it what you want.
KarYong
⋅
it's not about arguing, but more of different strictness of the rules only.