OPEN-SOURCE SCRIPT
Updated Gap Continuation Planner [AGPro Series]
TITLE
Gap Continuation Planner [AGPro Series]
🧠 Core Idea
Is the active gap being accepted for continuation, or is it losing the structure needed for a clean plan?
📌 Overview / What it does
Gap Continuation Planner [AGPro Series] is a chart-first gap planning tool built to evaluate what happens after a gap appears. Instead of treating every gap as an automatic fill candidate, it asks whether price is accepting the gap edge, following through away from the gap, and preserving a measurable defense line.
The script produces a gap defense zone, a continuation corridor, an acceptance edge, a defense line, a target guide, compact labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro decision panel. The panel converts the live context into a 0-100 continuation score, fill-risk reading, and next-action state.
It does not predict future price, automate trades, or tell the user to buy or sell. It organizes observable gap behavior into a more disciplined continuation-planning framework.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who do not want to reduce every gap to a simple fill-or-fade idea.
Many gaps initially look strong, but the important question is whether the market continues to accept the gap after the first reaction. Gap Continuation Planner focuses on that middle layer: gap acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, defense quality, fill pressure, and forward room.
The design supports a planner mindset. The goal is to slow the decision process down and review whether the structure is valid enough to deserve attention.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most gap tools focus on gap detection, gap fill percentage, or historical gap zones.
This script does NOT work as a generic gap-fill reaction tool, support/resistance map, imbalance catalog, or automatic signal generator.
Instead, it treats the latest gap as a continuation planning object. The model studies whether price is accepting the continuation side of the gap, whether follow-through is developing, whether the defense line remains intact, whether fill risk is rising, and whether there is enough forward room for the plan to remain clean.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script detects classic opening gaps, wick gaps, body-separation gaps, and controlled continuation launch windows when adaptive mode is enabled.
2. Reference Mapping
Each accepted gap creates a gap defense zone, an acceptance edge, a defense line, and a target guide.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The engine scores gap size, open acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, fill risk, and forward room.
4. Visual Output
The chart displays a centered gap-zone label, a centered continuation-corridor label, event labels, planner lines, and a compact AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the detected gap defense area.
Continuation corridor = the forward planning area between the accepted gap edge and target guide.
Acceptance edge = the side of the gap that price should hold for continuation structure to remain stronger.
Defense line = an ATR-buffered invalidation reference beyond the far side of the gap.
Labels = state changes such as new gap, acceptance watch, continuation ready, defense review, or failed acceptance.
Colors = bullish continuation context uses teal, bearish continuation context uses pink, watch states use indigo, and caution states use amber.
Panel = summarizes gap state, continuation score, defense line, fill risk, and next action.
🚦 Signals & States
• New Gap → a fresh gap continuation window has been detected.
• Acceptance Watch → price is holding the continuation side of the gap, but follow-through still needs confirmation.
• Continuation Ready → the gap has stronger acceptance, follow-through, room, and risk structure.
• Defense Test → price is retesting the gap edge or defense area.
• Fill Risk → the gap is being penetrated enough to reduce continuation quality.
• Gap Failed → the active gap has lost continuation acceptance.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a new gap continuation window appears, when the gap reaches READY state, when acceptance watch begins, when defense review becomes relevant, or when gap acceptance is lost.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions and do not guarantee that continuation will occur.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest continuation context appears when gap size, gap-edge acceptance, follow-through distance, stable volatility, low fill pressure, and enough forward room align.
When these elements align, the continuation score improves. When fill pressure rises or volatility becomes too hot, the score weakens.
📊 When to Use
• After opening gaps in stocks, indices, futures, or session-based markets
• During continuation attempts after a strong gap
• When reviewing whether a gap is holding acceptance or losing structure
• Around breakout continuation sessions where risk and target references need to be visible
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity markets
• Very noisy or overlapping session opens
• News-driven gaps with unstable spreads
• Markets where volume and session structure behave unusually
• Environments where price is already far beyond a reasonable risk reference
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Sensitivity → adjusts how strict the gap and score requirements are.
• Gap Mode → controls whether the script reads classic gaps only or adaptive continuation windows.
• Acceptance Bars → changes how many bars must hold the continuation side of the gap.
• Follow-Through ATR → controls the preferred travel away from the gap edge.
• Defense Buffer → sets the ATR spacing for the defense line.
• Forward Room Lookback → helps estimate whether nearby structure limits continuation room.
• Minimum Continuation Score → sets the READY threshold.
• Visual settings → control zones, corridors, lines, labels, object limits, and panel appearance.
• Show Failed / Stale Objects → controls whether old failed corridors remain visible. It is disabled by default for a cleaner publication view.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built for quick planner-style review. The chart carries the structural map, while the panel provides the decision summary.
The first panel row follows the AGPro merged blue header standard. The remaining rows focus only on the practical planning fields: state, score, defense, fill risk, and action.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally restrained so the gap, corridor, and labels are readable without turning the chart into a crowded signal map.
By default, failed or stale gap objects are hidden after they lose live planning value. Event labels remain available so the chart keeps context without carrying too many old failed boxes.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state and continuation score.
2. Check whether price is holding the gap acceptance edge.
3. Review the continuation corridor and target guide.
4. Compare fill risk against the defense line.
5. Use alerts as review markers, not execution commands.
6. Confirm the context with broader market structure, liquidity, and personal risk rules.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high continuation score means the active gap has stronger structure inside this model. It does not mean the move must continue.
Low fill risk supports continuation structure. Rising fill risk means price is starting to challenge the gap.
The defense line is a planning reference. It is not a guaranteed stop level and should not replace the user's own risk process.
Continuation corridors are visual planning areas, not promised target zones.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
This script is not financial advice.
This script is not an auto-trading system.
This script does not provide guaranteed signals.
This script does not replace independent confirmation, risk management, or execution discipline.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Gap behavior varies heavily across asset classes, sessions, and timeframes.
Adaptive launch windows can help continuous markets, but they should still be interpreted as structured gap-like planning areas rather than classic exchange-session gaps.
High volatility can make defense and target references wider.
Low liquidity can distort gap quality, label timing, and fill-risk readings.
No rule-based script can fully account for news, slippage, spread changes, or sudden liquidity shifts.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Gap continuation is often more meaningful when it aligns with trend pressure, session participation, volatility structure, and clean forward room.
A gap is not important simply because it exists. It becomes more useful when price accepts one side of it and maintains a measurable defense structure.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price gaps up, holds above the gap edge, and the continuation score improves, the script can help review whether the gap is being defended.
When price gaps down and repeatedly rejects back below the gap edge, the panel can help evaluate bearish continuation structure.
When fill risk rises quickly, the script highlights that the gap may be losing acceptance rather than continuing cleanly.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGProLabs tools are built around structured interpretation. The goal is not to add more signals to the chart. The goal is to turn market behavior into a cleaner review process.
Gap Continuation Planner follows that approach by converting a raw gap into a measurable planning object.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can remove uncertainty.
No score can guarantee continuation.
No planner can replace the trader's responsibility to manage risk.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
This script is provided for educational and analytical use only.
It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or guaranteed outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions, risk management, position sizing, and execution.
📚 Educational Note
The strongest use of this tool is to study whether a gap is being accepted or rejected as structure develops. It is designed to support review, patience, and disciplined interpretation.
Gap Continuation Planner [AGPro Series]
🧠 Core Idea
Is the active gap being accepted for continuation, or is it losing the structure needed for a clean plan?
📌 Overview / What it does
Gap Continuation Planner [AGPro Series] is a chart-first gap planning tool built to evaluate what happens after a gap appears. Instead of treating every gap as an automatic fill candidate, it asks whether price is accepting the gap edge, following through away from the gap, and preserving a measurable defense line.
The script produces a gap defense zone, a continuation corridor, an acceptance edge, a defense line, a target guide, compact labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro decision panel. The panel converts the live context into a 0-100 continuation score, fill-risk reading, and next-action state.
It does not predict future price, automate trades, or tell the user to buy or sell. It organizes observable gap behavior into a more disciplined continuation-planning framework.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who do not want to reduce every gap to a simple fill-or-fade idea.
Many gaps initially look strong, but the important question is whether the market continues to accept the gap after the first reaction. Gap Continuation Planner focuses on that middle layer: gap acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, defense quality, fill pressure, and forward room.
The design supports a planner mindset. The goal is to slow the decision process down and review whether the structure is valid enough to deserve attention.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most gap tools focus on gap detection, gap fill percentage, or historical gap zones.
This script does NOT work as a generic gap-fill reaction tool, support/resistance map, imbalance catalog, or automatic signal generator.
Instead, it treats the latest gap as a continuation planning object. The model studies whether price is accepting the continuation side of the gap, whether follow-through is developing, whether the defense line remains intact, whether fill risk is rising, and whether there is enough forward room for the plan to remain clean.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script detects classic opening gaps, wick gaps, body-separation gaps, and controlled continuation launch windows when adaptive mode is enabled.
2. Reference Mapping
Each accepted gap creates a gap defense zone, an acceptance edge, a defense line, and a target guide.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The engine scores gap size, open acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, fill risk, and forward room.
4. Visual Output
The chart displays a centered gap-zone label, a centered continuation-corridor label, event labels, planner lines, and a compact AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the detected gap defense area.
Continuation corridor = the forward planning area between the accepted gap edge and target guide.
Acceptance edge = the side of the gap that price should hold for continuation structure to remain stronger.
Defense line = an ATR-buffered invalidation reference beyond the far side of the gap.
Labels = state changes such as new gap, acceptance watch, continuation ready, defense review, or failed acceptance.
Colors = bullish continuation context uses teal, bearish continuation context uses pink, watch states use indigo, and caution states use amber.
Panel = summarizes gap state, continuation score, defense line, fill risk, and next action.
🚦 Signals & States
• New Gap → a fresh gap continuation window has been detected.
• Acceptance Watch → price is holding the continuation side of the gap, but follow-through still needs confirmation.
• Continuation Ready → the gap has stronger acceptance, follow-through, room, and risk structure.
• Defense Test → price is retesting the gap edge or defense area.
• Fill Risk → the gap is being penetrated enough to reduce continuation quality.
• Gap Failed → the active gap has lost continuation acceptance.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a new gap continuation window appears, when the gap reaches READY state, when acceptance watch begins, when defense review becomes relevant, or when gap acceptance is lost.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions and do not guarantee that continuation will occur.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest continuation context appears when gap size, gap-edge acceptance, follow-through distance, stable volatility, low fill pressure, and enough forward room align.
When these elements align, the continuation score improves. When fill pressure rises or volatility becomes too hot, the score weakens.
📊 When to Use
• After opening gaps in stocks, indices, futures, or session-based markets
• During continuation attempts after a strong gap
• When reviewing whether a gap is holding acceptance or losing structure
• Around breakout continuation sessions where risk and target references need to be visible
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity markets
• Very noisy or overlapping session opens
• News-driven gaps with unstable spreads
• Markets where volume and session structure behave unusually
• Environments where price is already far beyond a reasonable risk reference
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Sensitivity → adjusts how strict the gap and score requirements are.
• Gap Mode → controls whether the script reads classic gaps only or adaptive continuation windows.
• Acceptance Bars → changes how many bars must hold the continuation side of the gap.
• Follow-Through ATR → controls the preferred travel away from the gap edge.
• Defense Buffer → sets the ATR spacing for the defense line.
• Forward Room Lookback → helps estimate whether nearby structure limits continuation room.
• Minimum Continuation Score → sets the READY threshold.
• Visual settings → control zones, corridors, lines, labels, object limits, and panel appearance.
• Show Failed / Stale Objects → controls whether old failed corridors remain visible. It is disabled by default for a cleaner publication view.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built for quick planner-style review. The chart carries the structural map, while the panel provides the decision summary.
The first panel row follows the AGPro merged blue header standard. The remaining rows focus only on the practical planning fields: state, score, defense, fill risk, and action.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally restrained so the gap, corridor, and labels are readable without turning the chart into a crowded signal map.
By default, failed or stale gap objects are hidden after they lose live planning value. Event labels remain available so the chart keeps context without carrying too many old failed boxes.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state and continuation score.
2. Check whether price is holding the gap acceptance edge.
3. Review the continuation corridor and target guide.
4. Compare fill risk against the defense line.
5. Use alerts as review markers, not execution commands.
6. Confirm the context with broader market structure, liquidity, and personal risk rules.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high continuation score means the active gap has stronger structure inside this model. It does not mean the move must continue.
Low fill risk supports continuation structure. Rising fill risk means price is starting to challenge the gap.
The defense line is a planning reference. It is not a guaranteed stop level and should not replace the user's own risk process.
Continuation corridors are visual planning areas, not promised target zones.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
This script is not financial advice.
This script is not an auto-trading system.
This script does not provide guaranteed signals.
This script does not replace independent confirmation, risk management, or execution discipline.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Gap behavior varies heavily across asset classes, sessions, and timeframes.
Adaptive launch windows can help continuous markets, but they should still be interpreted as structured gap-like planning areas rather than classic exchange-session gaps.
High volatility can make defense and target references wider.
Low liquidity can distort gap quality, label timing, and fill-risk readings.
No rule-based script can fully account for news, slippage, spread changes, or sudden liquidity shifts.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Gap continuation is often more meaningful when it aligns with trend pressure, session participation, volatility structure, and clean forward room.
A gap is not important simply because it exists. It becomes more useful when price accepts one side of it and maintains a measurable defense structure.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price gaps up, holds above the gap edge, and the continuation score improves, the script can help review whether the gap is being defended.
When price gaps down and repeatedly rejects back below the gap edge, the panel can help evaluate bearish continuation structure.
When fill risk rises quickly, the script highlights that the gap may be losing acceptance rather than continuing cleanly.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGProLabs tools are built around structured interpretation. The goal is not to add more signals to the chart. The goal is to turn market behavior into a cleaner review process.
Gap Continuation Planner follows that approach by converting a raw gap into a measurable planning object.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can remove uncertainty.
No score can guarantee continuation.
No planner can replace the trader's responsibility to manage risk.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
This script is provided for educational and analytical use only.
It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or guaranteed outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions, risk management, position sizing, and execution.
📚 Educational Note
The strongest use of this tool is to study whether a gap is being accepted or rejected as structure develops. It is designed to support review, patience, and disciplined interpretation.
Release Notes
UPDATE NOTES - V1.1This update focuses on cleaner gap visualization, calmer label density, stronger continuation-corridor readability, panel conformity, and publication-ready chart presentation.
The core purpose of the script remains unchanged.
This release improves how the existing gap-continuation logic is presented, organized, and interpreted on the chart.
This script continues to function as an analytical and visualization tool.
It does not attempt to predict price direction or provide guaranteed outcomes.
------------------------
What Changed
------------------------
* Reduced default label density
Sparse context labels are now disabled by default, label cooldown is calmer, and the maximum visible label count is reduced for cleaner public screenshots.
* Refined gap object retention
The default maximum visible object count is reduced so old gap zones and corridors do not overwhelm the active planning story.
* Improved continuation corridor readability
The continuation corridor keeps centered text while using a lighter visual footprint, allowing candles and structure to remain readable.
* Strengthened the AG Pro panel
The panel now separates Forward Room from Fill Risk and adds clearer action guidance for faster first-glance interpretation.
* Added alert control
Gap-state alerts can now be enabled or disabled from one grouped input while keeping all core alert types available.
* Cleaner public-release defaults
Gap cooldown, projection length, label offset, context spacing, zone opacity, and label limits were adjusted for a more balanced chart.
------------------------
Visual Improvements
------------------------
* Improved chart readability by reducing repeated context labels
* Reduced visual clutter around new gap, watch, ready, defense, fill-risk, failed, and stale states
* Refined visual hierarchy so the gap zone and continuation corridor carry the main message
* Kept gap-zone and corridor labels centered vertically and horizontally inside their boxes
* Adjusted label spacing and offsets to keep labels away from candles
------------------------
Interface & Usability
------------------------
* Optimized panel layout for clearer information flow
* Preserved user control over panel visibility, panel location, panel theme, label font size, and panel font size
* Added a dedicated Forward Room panel row for cleaner continuation review
* Improved label readability with calmer defaults and stronger spacing control
* Added one alert toggle for gap-state alerts without changing the analytical model
------------------------
Behavior Notes
------------------------
This update does not change the core analytical purpose of the script.
The goal is to improve clarity and usability, not to introduce predictive behavior.
READY, WATCH, DEFENSE TEST, FILL RISK, FAILED, and STALE states remain attention markers.
They are not trade instructions.
Users should interpret outputs the same way as before, but with improved visual structure and cleaner label rhythm.
------------------------
Limitations Reminder
------------------------
The script remains a rule-based analytical tool.
Market conditions such as volatility, liquidity, session structure, gap type, spread behavior, and timeframe differences may affect how gap continuation states appear.
Continuation corridors are planning references and should not be treated as promised target zones.
Outputs should always be interpreted within broader market context.
------------------------
Risk Reminder
------------------------
This script is for educational and analytical purposes only.
It does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions.
Release Notes
UPDATE NOTES - V1.2This update focuses on workflow clarity, visual storytelling, panel structure, and public-chart usability.
The core purpose of the script remains unchanged.
This release improves how the existing gap-continuation logic is presented, organized, and interpreted on the chart.
This script continues to function as an analytical and visualization tool.
It does not attempt to predict price direction or provide guaranteed outcomes.
------------------------
What Changed
------------------------
* Simplified workflow state language.
Chart and panel wording now uses clearer action-oriented states such as PLAN READY, BUILD WATCH, DEFENSE CHECK, FILL PRESSURE, ACCEPTANCE LOST, and WINDOW STALE.
* Improved active gap storytelling.
The active gap zone and continuation corridor now use clearer centered text and stronger state context.
* Added right-edge live plan tags.
The refreshed chart now shows compact right-edge tags for active side, workflow state, continuation score, and fill-risk context.
* Added a thin connector line from the active gap edge to the live workflow tag.
This makes the right-side context feel tied to the actual planning structure instead of floating separately.
* Standardized panel behavior.
The panel now uses a safer merged-header pattern and responds cleanly to location, theme, and font-size changes.
------------------------
Visual Improvements
------------------------
* Improved chart readability by keeping the gap zone, continuation corridor, defense line, target guide, and live tags as the main visual hierarchy.
* Increased default label offset so event labels are less likely to sit inside candle bodies.
* Replaced multi-line event labels with compact uppercase labels where practical.
* Kept recent failed or stale objects visible by default with softer opacity so the chart still tells a complete planning story.
* Improved right-edge tag readability for score and fill-risk context.
* Reduced failed/stale corridor text clutter.
When a gap has already lost acceptance or become stale, the corridor keeps its visual context but avoids printing redundant center text.
* Improved panel action wording.
The Action row now avoids repeated wording and uses shorter workflow instructions.
------------------------
Interface & Usability
------------------------
* Kept Show Panel enabled by default.
* Preserved Panel Location, Panel Theme, and Panel Font Size controls.
* Preserved Label Font Size control for chart labels, zone text, corridor text, and live plan tags.
* Preserved the single merged blue AG Pro panel header.
* Updated panel state and action wording to match the refreshed workflow language.
------------------------
Behavior Notes
------------------------
This update does not change the core analytical logic of the script.
Gap detection, continuation scoring, defense reference, fill-risk pressure, target guide, and forward-room logic remain aligned with the previous version.
The goal is to improve clarity and usability, not to introduce new predictive behavior.
Users should interpret outputs the same way as before, but with improved visual structure and faster workflow recognition.
------------------------
Alerts Logic
------------------------
Alerts remain attention markers only.
They describe new gap windows, plan-ready context, build-watch context, defense-check context, and acceptance-lost context.
They do not represent trade instructions, prediction, automation, or guaranteed outcomes.
------------------------
Limitations Reminder
------------------------
The script remains a rule-based analytical tool.
Market conditions such as volatility, liquidity, session structure, and timeframe differences may affect how gap continuation structures appear.
Outputs should always be interpreted within broader market context.
------------------------
Risk Reminder
------------------------
This script is for educational and analytical purposes only.
It does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions.
Release Notes
🔧 UPDATE NOTES - V1.3This update focuses on publication polish, chart readability, object hygiene, and premium first-glance presentation.
The core purpose of the script remains unchanged.
Gap Continuation Planner continues to evaluate whether an active gap is gaining continuation acceptance or losing structural control.
This script continues to function as an analytical and visualization tool.
It does not attempt to predict price direction or provide guaranteed outcomes.
------------------------
What Changed
------------------------
• Reworked gap and corridor text presentation
Zone and corridor wording now uses separate centered badges instead of text embedded inside transparent boxes.
• Cleaner default failed-object behavior
Failed and stale objects are now hidden by default to reduce old corridor clutter while preserving the setting for users who want historical failed objects visible.
• Added right-side tag offset control
Live plan, score, and fill-risk tags can now be shifted horizontally to reduce overlap with price scale and forward objects.
• Expanded panel location choices
The panel now includes Middle Center in addition to the existing top, middle, and bottom placement options.
• Preserved the full continuation engine
Gap detection, adaptive launch windows, scoring, fill-risk logic, defense line, target guide, alerts, labels, data-window plots, and panel workflow remain intact.
------------------------
Visual Improvements
------------------------
• Improved chart readability by moving zone and corridor text into solid premium badges.
• Reduced visual clutter by making failed and stale objects optional by default.
• Refined visual hierarchy so active gap, continuation score, fill risk, and next-action context stand out more clearly.
• Adjusted right-edge workflow tags to support cleaner spacing on publication screenshots.
------------------------
Interface & Usability
------------------------
• Added Right Tag Offset Bars for better control of live plan tag placement.
• Preserved panel show/hide, theme, location, and font-size controls.
• Preserved label font-size control and event label density settings.
• Kept the AG Pro blue merged panel header standard.
------------------------
Behavior Notes
------------------------
This update does not change the core analytical logic of the script.
The goal is to improve clarity and usability, not to introduce new predictive behavior.
Users should interpret outputs the same way as before, but with cleaner visual structure and stronger publication defaults.
------------------------
Limitations Reminder
------------------------
The script remains a rule-based analytical tool.
Market conditions such as volatility, liquidity, session behavior, and timeframe differences may affect how gap continuation states appear.
Outputs should always be interpreted within broader market context.
------------------------
Risk Reminder
------------------------
This script is for educational and analytical purposes only.
It does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions.
Release Notes
🔧 UPDATE NOTES - v1.4This update focuses on decision confidence and proof.
The core purpose of the script remains unchanged.
This release adds a confirmation-anchored proof layer that measures how often detected gaps
continued from the acceptance edge toward the target guide before the defense line was breached.
This script continues to function as an analytical and visualization tool.
It does not attempt to predict price direction or provide guaranteed outcomes.
------------------------
What Changed
------------------------
• Added a Proof Layer (Follow / Hold / React / Flip)
The panel now reports how reliably detected gaps continued on the current symbol and
timeframe. Each time a gap is detected, it is tracked forward over a configurable horizon
with the acceptance edge as the entry reference, the defense line as the risk reference, and
a one risk unit (1R) target toward the target guide:
- Follow Rate : share of detected gaps that continued one risk unit from the acceptance
edge toward the target guide (or reached a nearer target) before the
defense line was breached
- Hold Rate : share whose defense line was not breached through resolution
- React Rate : share that produced an early favorable continuation reaction
- Flip Rate : share whose defense line was breached within the horizon (control was lost)
A sample size (n) is shown so the rates are read in context, and they display as "building"
only until the first detected gap resolves.
• Added hidden data outputs
The Follow / Hold / React / Flip rates are now added to the Data Window alongside the
existing continuation, fill-risk, forward-room, and gap-size outputs, so they can be
referenced by alerts, screeners, or other tools without changing the chart visuals.
------------------------
Visual Improvements
------------------------
• Grouped the proof metrics into a clean block under a dedicated "Proof @ Confirm" heading,
below the existing gap-state, score, defense, fill-risk, forward-room, and action rows.
• Preserved the existing gap defense zone, continuation corridor with centered text, acceptance
edge, defense and target guide lines, right-edge live plan tags, and event labels.
• Kept the merged blue header row and alternating-row dashboard styling across the dark and
light themes.
------------------------
Interface & Usability
------------------------
• Optimized panel layout for clearer information flow with the new proof block.
• Improved at-a-glance interpretation by reporting how often detected gaps continued from the
acceptance edge toward the target guide before the defense line.
• Adjusted default visual settings for a more balanced appearance.
• Added a Proof input group (show/hide, proof horizon bars, reaction window bars, reaction
progress threshold) so the proof layer is fully configurable without affecting the core
continuation logic.
------------------------
Behavior Notes
------------------------
This update does not change the core analytical logic of the script.
The proof rates are descriptive statistics of detected gaps on the current symbol and
timeframe. They measure how often a detected gap continued one risk unit from the acceptance
edge toward the target guide before the defense line, not trade performance, and they do not
change how the continuation score, gap state, zones, or lines are produced.
Users should interpret outputs the same way as before, now with added reliability context.
------------------------
Limitations Reminder
------------------------
The script remains a rule-based analytical tool.
Proof rates depend on the amount of available history and on how many gaps were detected on
the current symbol and timeframe; a small sample (low n) should be treated with caution.
Each detected gap is counted once, with the acceptance-edge entry, defense reference, and 1R
target frozen at detection. Lower timeframes can detect many small gaps that fill quickly,
while higher timeframes detect fewer, larger gaps, so the rates naturally differ across
timeframes. Market conditions such as volatility, liquidity, and timeframe differences may
affect how gaps and rates appear.
Outputs should always be interpreted within broader market context.
------------------------
Risk Reminder
------------------------
This script is for educational and analytical purposes only.
It does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions.
Open-source script
In true TradingView spirit, the creator of this script has made it open-source, so that traders can review and verify its functionality. Kudos to the author! While you can use it for free, remember that republishing the code is subject to our House Rules.
Public-free scripts + invite-only AGPro workflows for market analysis, liquidity context, risk planning and execution review.
Rules-based. No hype. No guesswork.
Library & access: agprolabs.com/
Telegram: t.me/agprolabs
Rules-based. No hype. No guesswork.
Library & access: agprolabs.com/
Telegram: t.me/agprolabs
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.
Open-source script
In true TradingView spirit, the creator of this script has made it open-source, so that traders can review and verify its functionality. Kudos to the author! While you can use it for free, remember that republishing the code is subject to our House Rules.
Public-free scripts + invite-only AGPro workflows for market analysis, liquidity context, risk planning and execution review.
Rules-based. No hype. No guesswork.
Library & access: agprolabs.com/
Telegram: t.me/agprolabs
Rules-based. No hype. No guesswork.
Library & access: agprolabs.com/
Telegram: t.me/agprolabs
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.