Smart Market Dashboard PRO Gap Trader EditionA comprehensive intraday dashboard designed specifically for Borsa Istanbul (BIST) equity traders. This indicator focuses on opening gap analysis, combining volume, delta, and price action to help traders make informed decisions at market open.
Key Features:
Gap Detection & Classification – Automatically identifies and labels opening gaps (Full Gap Up/Down, Partial Gap Up/Down) with configurable minimum gap % threshold
Volume & Delta Analysis – Displays real-time cumulative delta, buy/sell volume ratio, and VWAP deviation
Multi-Timeframe Data – Fetches previous day’s OHLCV data to calculate gap reference levels accurately
Visual Dashboard – A clean on-chart table showing key metrics: gap size, volume trend, delta direction, and gap fill probability
Smart Alerts – Configurable alerts for gap setups, gap fill events, and volume anomalies
How It Works:
Gap levels are calculated using End-of-Day (previous session close) as the reference price
All calculations are based on confirmed bar data (barmerge.lookahead_off) to prevent repainting on historical bars
Recommended Usage:
Timeframe: 1–15 minute charts
Market: BIST stocks (optimized for Turkish market open at 10:00 AM)
Works best during the first 30–60 minutes of the trading session
Disclaimer: This indicator is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Always manage your risk accordingly.
Note: As with all intraday indicators, values may update within the current live bar until it closes Indicator

Gap Continuation Planner [AGPro Series]TITLE
Gap Continuation Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is the active gap being accepted for continuation, or is it losing the structure needed for a clean plan?
📌 Overview / What it does
Gap Continuation Planner is a chart-first gap planning tool built to evaluate what happens after a gap appears. Instead of treating every gap as an automatic fill candidate, it asks whether price is accepting the gap edge, following through away from the gap, and preserving a measurable defense line.
The script produces a gap defense zone, a continuation corridor, an acceptance edge, a defense line, a target guide, compact labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro decision panel. The panel converts the live context into a 0-100 continuation score, fill-risk reading, and next-action state.
It does not predict future price, automate trades, or tell the user to buy or sell. It organizes observable gap behavior into a more disciplined continuation-planning framework.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built for traders who do not want to reduce every gap to a simple fill-or-fade idea.
Many gaps initially look strong, but the important question is whether the market continues to accept the gap after the first reaction. Gap Continuation Planner focuses on that middle layer: gap acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, defense quality, fill pressure, and forward room.
The design supports a planner mindset. The goal is to slow the decision process down and review whether the structure is valid enough to deserve attention.
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most gap tools focus on gap detection, gap fill percentage, or historical gap zones.
This script does NOT work as a generic gap-fill reaction tool, support/resistance map, imbalance catalog, or automatic signal generator.
Instead, it treats the latest gap as a continuation planning object. The model studies whether price is accepting the continuation side of the gap, whether follow-through is developing, whether the defense line remains intact, whether fill risk is rising, and whether there is enough forward room for the plan to remain clean.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script detects classic opening gaps, wick gaps, body-separation gaps, and controlled continuation launch windows when adaptive mode is enabled.
2. Reference Mapping
Each accepted gap creates a gap defense zone, an acceptance edge, a defense line, and a target guide.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The engine scores gap size, open acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, fill risk, and forward room.
4. Visual Output
The chart displays a centered gap-zone label, a centered continuation-corridor label, event labels, planner lines, and a compact AGPro panel.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones = the detected gap defense area.
Continuation corridor = the forward planning area between the accepted gap edge and target guide.
Acceptance edge = the side of the gap that price should hold for continuation structure to remain stronger.
Defense line = an ATR-buffered invalidation reference beyond the far side of the gap.
Labels = state changes such as new gap, acceptance watch, continuation ready, defense review, or failed acceptance.
Colors = bullish continuation context uses teal, bearish continuation context uses pink, watch states use indigo, and caution states use amber.
Panel = summarizes gap state, continuation score, defense line, fill risk, and next action.
🚦 Signals & States
• New Gap → a fresh gap continuation window has been detected.
• Acceptance Watch → price is holding the continuation side of the gap, but follow-through still needs confirmation.
• Continuation Ready → the gap has stronger acceptance, follow-through, room, and risk structure.
• Defense Test → price is retesting the gap edge or defense area.
• Fill Risk → the gap is being penetrated enough to reduce continuation quality.
• Gap Failed → the active gap has lost continuation acceptance.
🔔 Alerts Logic
Alerts trigger when a new gap continuation window appears, when the gap reaches READY state, when acceptance watch begins, when defense review becomes relevant, or when gap acceptance is lost.
Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions and do not guarantee that continuation will occur.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The strongest continuation context appears when gap size, gap-edge acceptance, follow-through distance, stable volatility, low fill pressure, and enough forward room align.
When these elements align, the continuation score improves. When fill pressure rises or volatility becomes too hot, the score weakens.
📊 When to Use
• After opening gaps in stocks, indices, futures, or session-based markets
• During continuation attempts after a strong gap
• When reviewing whether a gap is holding acceptance or losing structure
• Around breakout continuation sessions where risk and target references need to be visible
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity markets
• Very noisy or overlapping session opens
• News-driven gaps with unstable spreads
• Markets where volume and session structure behave unusually
• Environments where price is already far beyond a reasonable risk reference
🎛️ Key Inputs
• Sensitivity → adjusts how strict the gap and score requirements are.
• Gap Mode → controls whether the script reads classic gaps only or adaptive continuation windows.
• Acceptance Bars → changes how many bars must hold the continuation side of the gap.
• Follow-Through ATR → controls the preferred travel away from the gap edge.
• Defense Buffer → sets the ATR spacing for the defense line.
• Forward Room Lookback → helps estimate whether nearby structure limits continuation room.
• Minimum Continuation Score → sets the READY threshold.
• Visual settings → control zones, corridors, lines, labels, object limits, and panel appearance.
• Show Failed / Stale Objects → controls whether old failed corridors remain visible. It is disabled by default for a cleaner publication view.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built for quick planner-style review. The chart carries the structural map, while the panel provides the decision summary.
The first panel row follows the AGPro merged blue header standard. The remaining rows focus only on the practical planning fields: state, score, defense, fill risk, and action.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally restrained so the gap, corridor, and labels are readable without turning the chart into a crowded signal map.
By default, failed or stale gap objects are hidden after they lose live planning value. Event labels remain available so the chart keeps context without carrying too many old failed boxes.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel state and continuation score.
2. Check whether price is holding the gap acceptance edge.
3. Review the continuation corridor and target guide.
4. Compare fill risk against the defense line.
5. Use alerts as review markers, not execution commands.
6. Confirm the context with broader market structure, liquidity, and personal risk rules.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high continuation score means the active gap has stronger structure inside this model. It does not mean the move must continue.
Low fill risk supports continuation structure. Rising fill risk means price is starting to challenge the gap.
The defense line is a planning reference. It is not a guaranteed stop level and should not replace the user's own risk process.
Continuation corridors are visual planning areas, not promised target zones.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
This script is not financial advice.
This script is not an auto-trading system.
This script does not provide guaranteed signals.
This script does not replace independent confirmation, risk management, or execution discipline.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Gap behavior varies heavily across asset classes, sessions, and timeframes.
Adaptive launch windows can help continuous markets, but they should still be interpreted as structured gap-like planning areas rather than classic exchange-session gaps.
High volatility can make defense and target references wider.
Low liquidity can distort gap quality, label timing, and fill-risk readings.
No rule-based script can fully account for news, slippage, spread changes, or sudden liquidity shifts.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Gap continuation is often more meaningful when it aligns with trend pressure, session participation, volatility structure, and clean forward room.
A gap is not important simply because it exists. It becomes more useful when price accepts one side of it and maintains a measurable defense structure.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price gaps up, holds above the gap edge, and the continuation score improves, the script can help review whether the gap is being defended.
When price gaps down and repeatedly rejects back below the gap edge, the panel can help evaluate bearish continuation structure.
When fill risk rises quickly, the script highlights that the gap may be losing acceptance rather than continuing cleanly.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGProLabs tools are built around structured interpretation. The goal is not to add more signals to the chart. The goal is to turn market behavior into a cleaner review process.
Gap Continuation Planner follows that approach by converting a raw gap into a measurable planning object.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can remove uncertainty.
No score can guarantee continuation.
No planner can replace the trader's responsibility to manage risk.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk.
This script is provided for educational and analytical use only.
It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or guaranteed outcomes.
Users remain responsible for their own decisions, risk management, position sizing, and execution.
📚 Educational Note
The strongest use of this tool is to study whether a gap is being accepted or rejected as structure develops. It is designed to support review, patience, and disciplined interpretation.
Indicator

Gap Fill Reaction Planner [AGPro Series]Gap Fill Reaction Planner
🧠 Core Idea
Is this gap reaction actually ready for planning, or is it just another rectangle on the chart?
📌 Overview / What it does
Gap Fill Reaction Planner is a planner-style price action tool built around gap fill behavior, reaction quality, and execution readiness. Instead of simply drawing gap zones, it evaluates whether the active gap reaction has enough structure to become a measurable plan.
The script detects gap support and gap resistance zones, tracks fill progress, classifies reaction state, and converts the active setup into a 0-100 readiness score. It also maps a live entry reference, invalidation level, target projection, and estimated R multiple so the user can review the structure as a plan rather than as an isolated signal.
It does not automate trades, predict future price, or replace independent analysis. Its purpose is to organize gap reaction context into a cleaner decision framework.
🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy
This script was built to move beyond passive gap marking. A normal gap indicator can show where a gap exists, but it does not answer the questions that matter before a trade idea is considered:
Is the reaction valid?
How strong is the setup?
Where is the invalidation?
Where is the target?
What should the trader watch next?
Gap Fill Reaction Planner was designed for traders who want a structured workflow around opening gaps, continuous-market reaction bands, partial fills, full fills, rejection behavior, and acceptance risk. The mindset is not "take every gap." The mindset is "measure the reaction first."
⚡ Why This Script Is Different
Most gap tools focus on detection. They draw every gap, imbalance, or separation zone and leave the decision process to the user.
This script does NOT act as a generic gap highlighter, generic support/resistance map, or broad imbalance catalog.
Instead, it treats each gap as a planning object. Every active zone is evaluated through fill depth, reaction state, volatility context, participation, age, and structural validity. The panel then translates that context into readiness, next action, invalidation, target, and risk/reward information.
That planner layer is the difference. The script helps the user decide whether a gap reaction deserves attention, not merely whether a gap exists.
⚙️ Methodology
1. Context Detection
The script first searches for gap reaction zones. It prioritizes classic open-to-previous-close gaps, then supports adaptive reaction bands for continuous markets where clean opening gaps may be rare.
2. Reference Mapping
Each detected zone receives a fixed-length rectangular band. The zone is not dragged forward forever; it remains anchored to its origin so old structures do not distort the current chart. Thin zones are displayed with a minimum visual height so the chart keeps a cleaner, more professional planning layer.
3. Reaction Evaluation
The engine tracks fill percentage, partial fill, full fill, rejection, and acceptance. Rejection behavior is treated differently from simple fill behavior because a filled gap and a rejected gap communicate different planning context.
4. Planner Scoring
The readiness score combines gap size, fill quality, reaction behavior, volatility participation, and recency. The score is normalized from 0 to 100.
5. Risk / Target Projection
For the active planner zone, the script calculates an invalidation reference beyond the far side of the gap and projects a target using the selected R multiple.
6. Visual Output
The chart shows gap zones, centered zone labels, optional fill progress, planner labels, and active plan levels. The panel summarizes the decision state.
🗺️ How to Read the Chart
Zones
Gap Support zones represent upward gap reactions that may act as support-style planning areas.
Gap Resistance zones represent downward gap reactions that may act as resistance-style planning areas.
Zone Labels
Focused zones can display a centered label showing the zone role, state, and readiness score. This keeps the chart readable without turning every historical zone into a text cluster.
Colors
Bullish planner context uses the AGPro green state color.
Bearish planner context uses the AGPro pink state color.
Neutral or unfinished context uses restrained secondary colors.
Panel
The panel shows readiness, next action, plan side, gap size, fill/state, invalidation, target/R, and bias.
Plan Levels
When an active planner zone exists, the script can display entry reference, invalidation, and target lines.
🚦 Signals & States
• Fresh → A new gap zone exists but has not reached meaningful fill depth.
• Partial Fill → Price has returned into the gap enough to begin reaction monitoring.
• Rejected → Price filled part of the gap and then closed back away from the zone.
• Full Fill → The gap has reached the full-fill threshold and becomes more neutral.
• Accepted → Price closed beyond the far boundary of the gap, meaning the zone has lost its original reaction role.
• Planner Ready → A rejection setup reached the configured readiness threshold.
🔔 Alerts Logic
New Gap Support Zone
Triggers when a bullish gap support planning zone is created.
New Gap Resistance Zone
Triggers when a bearish gap resistance planning zone is created.
Gap Partial Fill
Triggers when a tracked zone reaches the partial-fill threshold.
Gap Full Fill
Triggers when a tracked zone reaches the full-fill threshold.
Gap Planner Ready
Triggers when a rejection setup reaches the readiness score threshold.
Gap Acceptance
Triggers when price accepts beyond the far side of the gap.
Alerts are attention markers and workflow prompts. They are not trade instructions.
🧩 Confluence Logic
The planner score becomes stronger when multiple conditions align:
• The gap has enough ATR-normalized size
• Fill depth is meaningful but not exhausted
• Reaction behavior confirms away from the zone
• Current volatility and participation support the reaction
• The zone is recent enough to remain relevant
When these pieces align, the gap becomes a stronger planning candidate.
📊 When to Use
• After large opening gaps
• During pullbacks into gap support or gap resistance
• Around partial fill and rejection behavior
• In trending markets where gaps create reaction shelves
• In volatile markets where gap fill behavior matters
• On crypto and FX charts where adaptive reaction bands may help continuous-market analysis
⚠️ When NOT to Use
• Extremely low-liquidity symbols
• Very noisy micro timeframes
• Market conditions where spread, slippage, or data quality is poor
• When the chart is moving too fast for structured planning
• When a trader has not defined broader market context
🎛️ Key Inputs
Detection Mode
Controls whether the script uses only classic open gaps or adaptive reaction bands.
Minimum Gap Size
Filters out small gaps using ATR normalization.
Readiness Threshold
Defines the minimum score required for a planner-ready label.
Target Multiple (R)
Projects the target from the current reference price using the invalidation distance.
Invalidation Buffer
Adds ATR-based spacing beyond the far side of the gap zone.
Zone Right Extension
Controls how far each zone projects from its origin.
Panel / Label Settings
Control panel visibility, panel theme, panel location, and font sizes.
🖥️ Interface & Visual Design
The interface is built for quick decision review. The panel provides the planner summary, while the chart emphasizes the most important structural elements: premium-height zones, focused centered labels, action labels, and active plan levels.
The visual hierarchy is intentionally clean. Zones explain context, labels explain state, and the panel explains what to do next from an analytical standpoint.
🧪 Practical Usage Workflow
1. Read the panel readiness score.
2. Check whether the next action is monitor, wait, plan, or stand aside.
3. Review the active gap zone and its centered label.
4. Compare fill percentage with the reaction state.
5. Review invalidation and target levels.
6. Confirm the idea with broader market context before acting.
🔍 Interpretation Guidelines
A high score does not mean certainty. It means the gap reaction has stronger planning structure.
A partial fill means price has started interacting with the gap, but reaction quality still matters.
A rejection state is more meaningful when it occurs with strong score, clean invalidation, and acceptable target distance.
An accepted zone should usually be treated as a failed reaction context rather than an active planning area.
🚫 What This Script Is NOT
This script is not a prediction engine.
This script is not an automated trading system.
This script is not a financial advice tool.
This script does not provide guaranteed outcomes.
This script does not replace risk management, trade review, or independent confirmation.
⚠️ Limitations & Transparency
Gap behavior can change significantly across symbols and timeframes.
Continuous markets may produce fewer classic opening gaps, which is why the script includes adaptive detection modes.
Volatility expansion can make targets and invalidation levels wider.
Low-liquidity environments may reduce the reliability of reaction labels and score readings.
No rule-based tool can fully account for news events, sudden liquidity shifts, or execution quality.
🧠 Market Context Notes
Gap reactions are often more useful when they are read together with trend structure, volatility, session behavior, and liquidity context. A gap zone is not automatically important because it exists. It becomes more useful when price returns to it, reacts clearly, and produces a measurable planning structure.
🧾 Use Case Examples
When price returns into a Gap Support zone and rejects upward with a high readiness score, the panel can help review whether invalidation and target structure are measurable.
When price fills a Gap Resistance zone and accepts above it, the script marks the context as acceptance rather than treating the zone as a still-valid resistance area.
When the panel shows low readiness, the script is communicating that the structure may exist visually but is not yet a strong planner candidate.
🧱 System Philosophy
AGProLabs tools are built around structured interpretation. The goal is not to add more noise to the chart. The goal is to convert raw market behavior into a cleaner decision framework that traders can review with discipline.
🔐 Non-Promise Statement
No indicator can remove uncertainty.
No score can guarantee a result.
No planner can replace the trader's responsibility to manage risk.
📉 Risk Disclosure
Trading involves risk. This script is provided for educational and analytical use only. It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes. Users remain responsible for their own research, risk management, position sizing, and execution decisions.
📚 Educational Note
The best use of this script is not to chase every gap. The best use is to slow the decision process down, measure the reaction, and decide whether the setup is structured enough to deserve attention.
Indicator

Indicator
