Ozon Holdings PLC OZON

Trader_Ivankov

In the last post on OZON, I wrote about the short from the current levels (₽3190) to ₽3000 (support), since the level with this round number is unlikely to be ignored by the market and it should be expected at least a local rebound from it. After reaching the level of ₽3130, the price bounced, failing to cross the local maximum of ₽3230. The price returned to the...

loco_mango

OZON HLDGS PLC Disclaimer/ On average, 90% of all stocks move down with the market, and 75% - up. The wave principle applies to some extent to individual stocks, but counting waves for them is often confusing and has little practical significance. But since the company has a large capitalization, we assume that the state of the shares depends on the...

loco_mango

OZON HLDGS PLC Disclaimer/ On average, 90% of all stocks move down with the market, and 75% - up. The wave principle applies to some extent to individual stocks, but counting waves for them is often confusing and has little practical significance. But since the company has a large capitalization, we assume that the state of the shares depends on the...

TonyStonk Premium

holding above 0.5FIB inside relatively tight consolidation zone. LONG with commons

TonyStonk Premium

Back in the trading zone. Expecting the bounce off the trendline or trading zone edge.. (lookout for shakeout) needs volume, has been trading almost off the radar ...

Hiddenharmonicstrading Pro+

First Cypher we caught tp 1, 2. lets see if we can catch a bounce here on this one. last play=

rbswingtrader Premium

Low Risk High Reward

atopcomputers

put options

iCantw84it Pro+

This is good for a $10 run twice. by iCant84it 05.25.2021

SimpleBoyy Pro

Most corona beneficiaries (ZM, TDOC, DKNG, TSLA, etc) look pretty inflated and will follow boom bust cycle.

Hiddenharmonicstrading Pro+

It is a valid cypher, I would like to see more of a reaction off 786 trigger. Aim 382, 618 for tp's, due to market climate might be best to hold off here, hope this helps

Henry_Ross

Long and short OZON Activation of the transaction only when the blue zone is fixed/broken. The author recommends the use of anchoring fixed the blue zone, this variation is less risky. If there is increased volatility in the market and the price is held for more than 2-3 minutes behind the activation zone after the breakdown, then the activation of the idea...

Chartoholic Pro

NASDAQ:OZON formed a double bottom pattern. Long the break out at 58.8$, target 67.7$, stop loss at 55$. Hit the like button please if you find this useful :) This is only my own view and not a financial advice, do your own analysis before buying or selling Happy Trading!

Legalizedhustler

Not financial advice. Don't take it from me. Do your due diligence and own research. I see 100-125 before any significant pullback. Yes it will test levels and go up and down. But I see doubling from here. OZON can have the potential for some phenomenal gains going forward. This stock just getting started. Russia is behind the curve on adoption of E Commerce...

Henry_Ross

Long and short OZON Activation of the transaction only when the blue zone is fixed/broken. The author recommends the use of anchoring fixed the blue zone, this variation is less risky. If there is increased volatility in the market and the price is held for more than 2-3 minutes behind the activation zone after the breakdown, then the activation of the idea...

AidanMDang

$OZON broke out of a bull flag. Watch for continuation to the upside. Let me know what you think in the comments and leave a like if you agree with my analysis! 👍🏽

yyctrady Premium

Ozon Could test $80 before the end of the month, if breakout is confirmed. Personally going to buy June Calls ( Q4 Earning March 30 ) Strong Growth in Russia eCommerce and holiday season earning could make Ozon go Parabolic. (Not Advice) , do your own DD, I am a novice investor.

shkspr

NASDAQ:OZON Possible Scenario: SHORT Evidence: Price Action TP ~55$ , 13% Decline I'll buy PUTS for 18 June, Strike 55$, This is my idea and could be wrong 100%