The Risks of Over-Optimizing a Trading Algorithm

As a trader, you know how difficult it can be to manage your discretionary trading. Most traders do not know that managing a profitable trading algorithm is a challenging but rewarding task as well. Trading algorithms require rigorous testing and optimization. However, it can be easy to fall into the trap of over-optimizing your selected algorithms settings, which can lead to disastrous results. In this post, we willll discuss the risks of over-optimizing a trading algorithm and how to avoid them.

What is over-optimization?
Over-optimization, also known as curve-fitting or data dredging, is the process of tweaking an algorithm’s parameters to fit historical data as closely as possible. While this may seem like a good idea, it can lead to a trading system that is too complex and too closely tailored to historical data. This can result in poor performance on new data, which is known as overfitting.

The risks of over-optimization
Over-optimization can result in a trading system that is highly sensitive to noise and short-term market fluctuations. This can lead to false signals and trades that are not profitable in the long run.

How to avoid over-optimization
To avoid over-optimization, it is crucial to strike a balance between the complexity of the trading system and its ability to generalize to new data. Here are some tips to help you avoid over-optimization:

1. Use a robust optimization framework: Use a framework that includes a large set of data, multiple test sets, and a range of parameter values to avoid overfitting. On TradingView, utilizing both bar magnifier and Deep Backtesting are critical to getting the most accurate data when back-testing.

2.Use out-of-sample testing: Use a portion of the overall data for out-of-sample testing to validate the algorithm’s performance on new data. It is wise to split your back-testing optimization into a 70/30 split of the data you will use to back-test. For the first portion of the testing, you would test on roughly the first 8.5 months of the data set without including the last 3.5 months. Once you have completed your initial test, you would then check those settings against the remaining 3.5 months to see if those settings still performed well in the new data.

3.Be skeptical: Be wary of algorithms that seem too good to be true, especially if they promise insane profits or a suspiciously high win percentage. These algorithms may be over-optimized and may not perform well on new data. It is quite easy for bad actors to misconstrue their data to make their algorithms appear better than they really are. One way they can do this is to bump their stop loss far out with a lower take profit. This can dramatically increase the winning trades percentage displayed.
It is easy to calculate the required hit rate needed for an algorithm to be profitable, which can also let you know when the profits promised are too good to be true. That formula is:

Required hit % = (1/ (1+(TP%/SL%))*100
Example using 1:1 TP/SL
Example Required hit % = (1/(1+(1/1))*100= 50%

In conclusion, over-optimization is a common pitfall in algorithmic trading that can lead to poor performance and difficulties when it comes to adjusting to changing market conditions. To avoid over-optimization, it is crucial to use a robust optimization framework, out-of-sample testing, and keep the results realistic. By following these tips, you can manage an algorithm that is robust, profitable, and adaptable to changing market conditions.

If you like our content and want more, drop a boost and follow!!