Get started
Microsoft Corp.Microsoft Corp.Microsoft Corp.

Microsoft Corp.

No trades
OverviewFinancialsNewsIdeasMindsTechnicalsSeasonalsBonds

Trade ideas

Microsoft May Be TurningMicrosoft struggled in November, but some traders may think it’s turning this month. Consider the slide after MSFT jumped in late October. MACD was falling throughout the period, giving bulls little opportunity for a rally despite strong quarterly results. However, a few things seem to the changing. First, MACD has turned higher. That may suggest that short-term momentum has grown more bullish. Second, the software giant tested and held its 200-day simple moving average. That may confirm its longer-term uptrend remains intact. Third, prices made a higher low this month compared with late November. Next, the pullback may be viewed as a finished A-B-C corrective wave. Completion of that pattern could mark an end to the selling pressure. Finally, MSFT is an active underlier in the options market. (Its average daily volume of 328,000 contracts ranks 11th in the S&P 500, according to TradeStation data.) That may help traders take positions with calls and puts. TradeStation has, for decades, advanced the trading industry, providing access to stocks, options and futures. If you're born to trade, we could be for you. See our Overview for more. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is no guarantee of future performance or success. There is a possibility that you may sustain a loss equal to or greater than your entire investment regardless of which asset class you trade (equities, options or futures); therefore, you should not invest or risk money that you cannot afford to lose. Online trading is not suitable for all investors. View the document titled Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options at www.TradeStation.com . Before trading any asset class, customers must read the relevant risk disclosure statements on www.TradeStation.com . System access and trade placement and execution may be delayed or fail due to market volatility and volume, quote delays, system and software errors, Internet traffic, outages and other factors. Securities and futures trading is offered to self-directed customers by TradeStation Securities, Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and a futures commission merchant licensed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission). TradeStation Securities is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the National Futures Association, and a number of exchanges. Options trading is not suitable for all investors. Your TradeStation Securities’ account application to trade options will be considered and approved or disapproved based on all relevant factors, including your trading experience. See www.TradeStation.com . Visit www.TradeStation.com for full details on the costs and fees associated with options. Margin trading involves risks, and it is important that you fully understand those risks before trading on margin. The Margin Disclosure Statement outlines many of those risks, including that you can lose more funds than you deposit in your margin account; your brokerage firm can force the sale of securities in your account; your brokerage firm can sell your securities without contacting you; and you are not entitled to an extension of time on a margin call. Review the Margin Disclosure Statement at www.TradeStation.com . TradeStation Securities, Inc. and TradeStation Technologies, Inc. are each wholly owned subsidiaries of TradeStation Group, Inc., both operating, and providing products and services, under the TradeStation brand and trademark. When applying for, or purchasing, accounts, subscriptions, products and services, it is important that you know which company you will be dealing with. Visit www.TradeStation.com for further important information explaining what this means.
NASDAQ:MSFT
by TradeStation
MSFT Selling Pressure Activated — Time to Short!🔥 MSFT Bearish Profit Playbook — Thief-Style Layer Attack Activated! 🔥 Asset: MSFT — Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ) Style: Swing / Day-Trade Playbook 📉💼 📉 Plan: Bearish Pressure Play — Smart Sell-Side Thief Approach Microsoft is showing potential exhaustion on the upside, and this setup focuses on a structured bearish move using a layered sell-limit strategy (Thief Layer Method) 😎🕵️‍♂️. 🎯 Entry Strategy (Thief Layer Method) Using the thief-style multi-layer approach, we stack multiple sell-limit orders at different levels to catch premium liquidity: Sell Limit Layers: $500, $490, $480 (You can increase or adjust layers based on your own risk tolerance.) This method aims to fade upward pushes, catching price exhaustion during liquidity grabs. 🛑 Stop Loss (Risk Control) This is the Thief SL @ $510 🛑 Note: Dear Ladies & Gentlemen (Thief OG’s), I’m not recommending that you use only my stop-loss. It’s your money — your rules. Manage your risk like a pro. 💼⚠️ 🎯 Target (Exit Zones) We are aiming toward strong support zones + potential oversold zones where bearish momentum may slow. Main Target: $450 Trap may form — escape with profits before the market police catch us 🚓💨 Note: Dear Ladies & Gentlemen (Thief OG’s), I’m not recommending using only my target. Exit where you feel safe and profitable. 🏦✨ 📊 Market Summary (Clean, TV-Safe Explanation) Bearish attempt based on overextended zones Layered entries help clip premium during upside wicks Targeting liquidity pockets near support SL above structural invalidation Setup respects TradingView House Rules: No financial advice, no promises, no signals, educational thief-style humor only ✔️ 🔗 Related Pairs to Watch (Correlation Insights) Because MSFT is a heavyweight in tech + NASDAQ index weighting: 1️⃣ NASDAQ:QQQ (NASDAQ 100 ETF) Strongly correlated If QQQ rejects from local resistance → MSFT bearish play strengthened QQQ weakness = tech sector weakness 2️⃣ AMEX:SPY (S&P500 ETF) Broader market risk sentiment SPY pullback often pressures mega-caps like MSFT 3️⃣ NASDAQ:AAPL (Apple Inc.) Moves similarly during liquidity rotations Apple weakness = added pressure to mega-cap tech basket 4️⃣ NASDAQ:NVDA (Nvidia Corp.) High-beta tech name When NVDA loses momentum, MSFT downside probability increases through sector rotation 5️⃣ NASDAQ:GOOGL (Alphabet Inc.) If large-cap tech corrects collectively, MSFT rarely moves opposite Perfect correlation watch ⚡ Watching these pairs helps confirm bearish bias through sector-wide confirmation, not isolated signals. ✨ “If you find value in my analysis, a 👍 and 🚀 boost is much appreciated — it helps me share more setups with the community!” ⚠️ Disclaimer: This is a thief-style trading strategy just for fun. Educational only — not financial advice. Trade at your own risk. 😄🕵️‍♂️
NASDAQ:MSFTShort
by The-Thief
MSFT Potential Upside Squeeze SetupMSFT is currently forming a constructive structure with clearly defined levels. On the downside, the 475 put support has been defended three separate times, signaling strong positioning interest and consistent absorption of selling pressure. Price continues to hold above the HVL , with an extremely narrow transition zone and a broadening upward-tilted positive GEX profile — all reinforcing structural stability. If price breaks upward from the first call wall at 480 , this typically favors continuation rather than any sustained move lower. Upside levels : The next major call resistance sits at 500 — which also aligns with the 8/8 level on the MM grid system . This creates a very strong confluence, making 500 a significant resistance zone. If price cleanly accepts and pushes through 500, dealer hedging flows can accelerate, potentially triggering an upside squeeze — with an initial upside extension capped near 520 . If momentum continues to build above 500, the next substantial call resistance sits at 520 , currently the second-largest call wall on the chain. As long as price remains above HVL and the 475 support zone holds, the risk-reward skew favors continuation to the upside, with 480 as the trigger level and 500 as the speculative call-positioning target . However — critical risk scenario: If 475 breaks and we do not see a fast rebound from the 470/460 negative squeeze zone , this could initiate a sharp downward move and a trend shift. Currently, the largest protective put concentration sits at 475 — and the put side only begins to melt if price can reclaim 480 . At least based on the aggregated options chain, MSFT is now under immense compression with clear trigger points . MSFT tightening under GEX squeeze pressure
NASDAQ:MSFTEducation
by TanukiTrade
MSFT Swing Buy Setup — Multi-Factor Bullish Confirmation📈 MSFT QuantSignals V3 Swing Analysis | 2025-12-08 MSFT Swing Signal — 2025-12-08 • Direction: BUY CALLS • Confidence: 65% • Horizon: 18 days → 2025-12-26 expiry • Strike Focus: $460.00 • Entry Range: $33.70 • Target 1: $49.80 • Stop Loss: $23.50 • 1W Move: +1.49% • 2W Move: +2.15% • Volume: 1.0× vs prior swing • Swing Range: $480.08 – $492.30 ⚠️ Moderate Risk: Consider reducing position size due to moderate confidence. 🎯 TRADE RECOMMENDATION Direction: BUY CALLS Confidence Level: 65% (MEDIUM) Conviction: Medium ⚠️ KATY–LLM CONFLICT DETECTED Conflict: Direction LLM Recommendation: BUY CALLS Katy AI Chart Prediction: BUY PUTS (-1.40% predicted move) Katy Confidence: 50% Proceed with caution — signals do not fully align. 🧠 ANALYSIS SUMMARY Katy AI Outlook Predicts STRONG_BULLISH trajectory targeting $520+ within 3 weeks Driven by earnings momentum + AI leadership catalysts Technical Analysis Resistance: $493.50 (today’s high) Support: $482.87 (VWAP) Trading near 90% of swing range → potential breakout Bullish divergence across momentum indicators No major candlestick reversal patterns detected Market Context Overall Market: STRONG BULLISH SPY: Bullish QQQ: Bullish Strong alignment with tech-sector momentum. News Sentiment Bullish — MSFT featured in favorable TA articles Instacart x ChatGPT partnership strengthens MSFT AI dominance Options Flow PCR 1.31 → bearish-leaning flow Heavy volume at $420 puts suggests hedging rather than bearish direction Low theta decay ideal for swings Risk Level: MODERATE Watch for clean breakout above $493.50. 💰 TRADE SETUP Expiry: 2025-12-26 (18 days) Recommended Strike: $460.00 (0.881 delta — balanced) Entry Range: $33.10–$34.30 (use exact real-time bid/ask) Target 1: $49.80 (+50%) Target 2: $66.40 (+100%) Stop Loss: $23.50 (-30%) Position Size: 3% of portfolio
NASDAQ:MSFTLong
by quantsignals
$MSFT double top into resistance is a loud sell signalGM traders — just re-entered a NASDAQ:MSFT short. The double top into resistance was a loud “sell” signal for me. Fundamental backdrop is lining up too: several outlets citing Reuters/enterprise checks say Microsoft cut AI sales growth targets after reps missed quotas and customers were slower to adopt “AI agents.” That reads as near-term demand friction for parts of Copilot/agent monetization. Even if Azure remains strong, this kind of headline is a sentiment hit — it suggests the AI revenue ramp may be bumpier than bulls were pricing in.
NASDAQ:MSFTShort
by Swing_Trader_Saan
Emerging Market vs Developed Market1. Definitions Developed Markets Developed markets are countries with high economic maturity, advanced financial systems, strong institutions, and stable political environments. Their characteristics include high GDP per capita, industrial sophistication, deep capital markets, and steady (though slower) economic growth. Examples include USA, UK, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, Australia, and Singapore. Emerging Markets Emerging markets are economies transitioning from developing to developed status. They show rapid industrialization, expanding middle-class populations, improving institutions, and increasing integration with global markets. Examples include India, China, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, Mexico, Turkey, and Vietnam. 2. Key Characteristics 2.1 Economic Growth Emerging Markets: Faster GDP growth, driven by urbanization, industrial expansion, rising consumption, digital adoption, and favorable demographics. Annual growth often ranges from 4–7%. Developed Markets: Slower but stable growth, typically 1–3%, due to market maturity, ageing demographics, and saturated industries. Implication: EMs offer growth potential; DMs offer stability. 2.2 Income Levels and Living Standards Developed Markets: High income, advanced infrastructure, strong social welfare systems, high productivity. Emerging Markets: Lower but rapidly rising incomes, infrastructure still developing, large segments transitioning to formal economy. 2.3 Financial Markets and Institutions Developed Markets: Deep, liquid, and highly regulated financial markets. Stock exchanges (e.g., NYSE, NASDAQ, LSE) exhibit high transparency and strong corporate governance. Emerging Markets: Growing markets but with lower liquidity, higher volatility, and varying investor protections. Institutional reforms are ongoing. 2.4 Currency Stability Developed Markets: Stable currencies, low inflation, credible central banks. Emerging Markets: More prone to currency fluctuations, inflation spikes, and external shocks due to reliance on imported commodities and foreign capital. 2.5 Political and Regulatory Environment Developed Markets: Predictable policies, rule of law, strong regulatory systems. Emerging Markets: More political uncertainty, policy shifts, regulatory inconsistencies. However, some EMs like India are rapidly improving regulatory transparency. 2.6 Demographics Emerging Markets: Young, expanding populations — a positive for long-term consumption and labor supply. Developed Markets: Ageing populations — leading to higher healthcare spending, slower consumption growth, and labor shortages. 3. Opportunities in Emerging vs Developed Markets 3.1 Investment Opportunities Emerging Markets Higher returns due to rapid growth. Sectors like technology, fintech, manufacturing, renewable energy, and infrastructure show exceptional potential. Underpenetrated markets allow companies to grow at scale. Developed Markets Stable and predictable returns. Strong corporate governance and reduced risk of fraud or systemic failures. Advanced industries like AI, biotechnology, cloud computing, clean tech, and high-end manufacturing. 3.2 Consumer Market Potential EMs have massive, growing middle classes. Consumption is expected to double in many EMs in the next two decades. DMs have saturated markets, with growth reliant on innovation rather than new customers. 3.3 Capital Flows Investors often chase high growth in EM equities, debt, and startups. DMs attract long-term, stable institutional capital due to reliability of returns. 4. Risks in Emerging vs Developed Markets 4.1 Market Volatility Higher in EMs, due to currency risks, political events, commodity dependence, and lower liquidity. DMs show lower volatility thanks to robust financial systems. 4.2 Geopolitical and Policy Risks EMs often face elections, reforms, or geopolitical pressures that can shift markets abruptly. DMs are more predictable, although events like Brexit or US political gridlocks still create uncertainty. 4.3 Currency and Inflation Risks EM currencies can depreciate sharply in global stress periods. DMs maintain low inflation and strong central bank credibility. 4.4 Structural Challenges EMs face challenges like corruption, weak judiciary, infrastructure gaps, and bureaucratic hurdles. DMs deal with challenges like high public debt, low productivity growth, and ageing populations. 5. Comparative Overview 5.1 Growth vs Stability Emerging markets = growth, opportunity, volatility Developed markets = stability, safety, lower returns 5.2 Innovation and Technology Adoption DMs lead in innovation due to research ecosystems. EMs leapfrog technology — e.g., India’s digital payments boom, China’s e-commerce leadership. 5.3 Trade and Globalization EMs are increasingly integrated into global supply chains. DMs dominate global trade policies, IMF, World Bank, and monetary influence (USD, Euro, Yen). 5.4 Corporate Structures DMs have multinationals with global footprints. EMs are producing new giants (e.g., Reliance, Tata, Alibaba, BYD, Samsung). 6. Examples Emerging Markets India: Fastest-growing major economy, tech innovation, digital transformation. China: Manufacturing hub, consumption growth. Brazil: Natural resources, agriculture economy. Indonesia & Vietnam: Manufacturing and consumption boom. Developed Markets USA: World’s largest and most innovative economy. Japan: High-tech industries, strong institutions. Germany: Industrial powerhouse. UK & Canada: Stable financial systems. 7. Which Is Better for Investors? Emerging Markets Are Ideal If You Want: High long-term growth potential Exposure to rising consumption High-return equity opportunities Portfolio diversification Developed Markets Are Ideal If You Want: Safety and predictability Lower volatility Strong governance Blue-chip stability Best Strategy: A balanced portfolio that mixes both — e.g., EM for growth + DM for stability — provides optimal long-term results. 8. Conclusion Emerging and developed markets represent two ends of the global economic spectrum. Emerging markets offer high growth, rising consumer demand, innovation, and long-term opportunities, but with higher risks and volatility. Developed markets deliver stability, security, and robust institutions, though with slower growth. Understanding the differences helps investors, businesses, and policymakers choose the right strategies. In today’s interconnected world, both market types are essential components of global economic progress. A combination of the dynamism of emerging markets and the reliability of developed markets provides a balanced and powerful approach to global investment and economic engagement.
NASDAQ:MSFTEducation
by GlobalWolfStreet
MSFT: Next Long Term Buy ZoneMicrosoft has staged a strong rally since the April tariff-related selloff, rebounding significantly but ultimately failing to set a new meaningful high in October. While the company’s earnings have remained relatively strong, it is still a publicly traded stock and therefore susceptible to broader market conditions that could trigger a pullback. After my analysis on META identified a strong trade/buy zone around $600 and below, I’ve noticed a very similar setup forming on Microsoft, one that could present an excellent buying opportunity if a deeper drop materializes. From a purely technical standpoint, using volume-based tools, I see several reasons to be prepared for a potentially larger pullback in this stock. To start, I’ve marked two major zones to outline the volume-price action: the first is the consolidation range before the tariff driven decline, and the second is the volume profile of the subsequent uptrend. You’ll notice that price broke out of the previous consolidation range without any meaningful retracement back into that fair value zone, essentially melting up. This creates thin structural support that can easily give way if meaningful sell-side pressure emerges. Secondly, price has failed twice above the Value Area High of the uptrend’s fair value range near $538. These failures resulted in a failed auction that drove price to the opposite end of the range at $472. What concerns me most is the rejection at the Point of Control (the most heavily traded zone), highlighted in blue. Price reacted sharply from that level, forming a resistance zone that has not been reclaimed, an indication of potential weakness. Third, price is now losing the uptrend anchored VWAP from the previous swing low. In my view, this is a major support level that typically signals trend continuation, where buyers should be stepping in to defend price. That is not occurring. If price breaks below the Value Area Low where the most recent swing low sits I would be concerned about a possible waterfall move that could bring price back into previous support zones. If such a drop does occur, I will not panic. Instead, I will recognize it as a potential major buying opportunity in a fundamentally strong and profitable company one that could represent nearly a 25% decline from the highs. Only time will tell..
NASDAQ:MSFTLong
by afurs1
MSFT LongBroader Market Structure MSFT on the 15-minute chart is in a short-term uptrend following a sequence of higher lows and higher highs from the $464 area. The key structural shift occurred when price printed a CHoCH at $492.44, breaking above the previous swing high and confirming bullish intent. Before that, the market had transitioned from lower lows into a clear higher-low structure, signaling accumulation before expansion. The recent drop from the $492–$494 supply is corrective, not impulsive, which suggests we’re seeing a pullback rather than a reversal unless demand fails. Supply & Demand Zones The upper supply around $492–$494 has shown clear weakness for buyers; price rejected immediately with strong momentum and multiple wicks showing absorption and aggressive selling. Higher up, the major supply at $504–$507 remains a strong distribution zone where price previously dropped sharply, indicating institutional control. On the demand side, the closest zone at $478–$475 is fresh and unmitigated; buyers stepped in with strength from that area earlier, producing a decisive rally and ultimately the CHoCH. A deeper demand below $470–$466 is even more important because it initiated the entire trend shift and contains protected lows. Price Action in the Marked Region Price is currently declining from supply and pushing toward the green demand region. The move down is controlled rather than impulsive, indicating sell-side momentum is fading as it approaches prior buyer interest. The marked projection makes sense: a dip into $478–$475 would allow liquidity collection before a bounce toward the $488–$492 supply above. If demand holds, expect responsive buying with a clean bullish engulfing candle or long-wick rejection. Trade Bias, Direction & Invalidation The bias for now is bullish, looking for a pullback to demand and continuation upward. The expected direction is a retest of $478–$475 followed by a rally toward $488–$492. A key invalidation level is a clean 15-minute close below $475—if that level breaks, sellers likely target the deeper $470–$466 demand, and the bullish thesis weakens significantly. Momentum & Candle Behavior Momentum currently favors sellers in the short term, but the drop is stepping rather than impulsive, suggesting exhaustion into demand. Look for a shift in candle behavior—such as a bullish engulfing bar, absorption wick, or displacement candle—to confirm buyer strength returning.
NASDAQ:MSFTLong
by ProSignalai
MSFT PullbackPattern Identified: Bearish Double Top pattern confirmed on Microsoft ( NASDAQ:MSFT ) with neckline break and clear measured move objectives. Neckline Break Triggers Measured Move to Gap Fill. Key Confluence: First Top: Initial rejection Second Top: Failed breakout, lower high Neckline: Support connecting swing lows between tops Confirmation: Neckline break & retest completed Measured Move Calculation: TP1: Distance from highest top to neckline, projected onto the breakout zone = $430 TP2: Gap fill zone from May 1st, 2025 = $400 SL: Above Neckline at previous confirmation
NASDAQ:MSFTShort
by diegochuw
QS V3 Weekly Call Opportunity – MSFT Bullish TrendMSFT Weekly Signal | 2025-12-05 MSFT Weekly Call Option Direction: Buy Calls (Long / Bullish) Strike: $482.50 Entry Price: $5.62 – $5.70 Profit Target 1: $8.90 (≈60% gain) Profit Target 2: $11.20 (≈100% gain) Stop Loss: $3.90 (≈30% loss) Expiry: Dec 12, 2025 (7 days) Position Size: 2% of portfolio Confidence: 58% Rationale: Katy AI predicts upward trajectory to ~$497 by Friday; MACD bullish divergence suggests potential multi-day reversal. Risk Notes: High – Friday expiration with gamma effects; low VIX may reduce premium capture. Monitor actively.
NASDAQ:MSFTLong
by quantsignals
Quant signals MSFT Weekly PUT: Institutional Bearish MomentumDirection: BUY PUTS (SHORT) Confidence: 65% (Medium) Strike: $475.00 Entry Price: $4.10 Target 1: $6.15 (50% gain) Target 2: $8.20 (100% gain) Stop Loss: $2.87 (30% loss) Expiry: 2025-12-05 (2 days) Position Size: 2% of portfolio Weekly Momentum: BEARISH (-2.82%) Options Flow: Bearish (PCR 18.23) – heavy institutional put buying Technical: Oversold RSI 5.2, session low $475.28, resistance $493.50 News: Microsoft lowers AI software sales quotas – negative catalyst Risk: Medium – Katy AI conflicts (neutral-to-bullish), high gamma risk MSFT Weekly PUT Signal #2 Direction: BUY PUTS (SHORT) Confidence: 65% (Medium) Strike: $482.50 Entry Price: $3.30 Target 1: $4.95 (50% gain) Target 2: $6.60 (100% gain) Stop Loss: $2.31 (30% loss) Expiry: 2025-12-05 (2 days) Position Size: 3% of portfolio Weekly Momentum: NEUTRAL (+0.08%) Options Flow: Bearish (PCR 14.10) – heavy institutional put buying Technical: Overbought RSI 85.2, weekly high $493.50, support $475.20 News: Negative AI sales catalyst Risk: Medium – Katy AI conflicts (bullish prediction), requires active management
NASDAQ:MSFTShort
by quantsignals
Microsoft (NASDAQ: $MSFT) Drops as AI Sales Miss Targets Microsoft (NASDAQ: NASDAQ:MSFT ) slid more than 2% after a report from The Information claimed that the company had reduced growth targets for its AI products because sales teams failed to meet expectations. The report highlighted that several Azure sales units missed ambitious quotas tied to Foundry—Microsoft’s enterprise AI platform used to build and manage autonomous AI agents. According to the report, less than 20% of salespeople in one U.S. Azure division hit the 50% Foundry growth target, while another team initially faced a quota requiring them to double sales. Microsoft quickly refuted the claims, stating that The Information conflated growth projections with internal quotas. The company emphasized that “aggregate sales quotas for AI products have not been lowered,” reaffirming the strength and ambition of its broader AI roadmap. Despite the clarification, the stock reacted sharply, reflecting heightened sensitivity around AI monetization as enterprise adoption continues to lag expectations. Although AI is transforming workflows and offering automation opportunities, the adoption curve for enterprise-scale AI agents remains slower compared to consumer AI breakthroughs. Competitors including Google, Amazon, Anthropic, Salesforce, and OpenAI all face similar challenges as traditional organizations navigate data integration, reliability issues, and operational risk. Technical Outlook From the chart, MSFT has pulled back sharply from its $555 resistance zone and is now retesting a key support level around $465. This area aligns with previous structure and may act as short-term demand. A breakdown below $465 opens room for a deeper decline toward the $450 level. However, holding this support could trigger a rebound back toward the $555 region. Momentum remains neutral-bearish, with price sitting below the recent swing highs.
NASDAQ:MSFTLong
by DEXWireNews
MSFT - 4 months DOUBLE TOP══════════════════════════════ Since 2014, my markets approach is to spot trading opportunities based solely on the development of CLASSICAL CHART PATTERNS 🤝Let’s learn and grow together 🤝 ══════════════════════════════ Hello Traders ✌ After a careful consideration I came to the conclusion that: - it is crucial to be quick in alerting you with all the opportunities I spot and often I don't post a good pattern because I don't have the opportunity to write down a proper didactical comment; - since my parameters to identify a Classical Pattern and its scenario are very well defined, many of my comments were and would be redundant; - the information that I think is important is very simple and can easily be understood just by looking at charts; For these reasons and hoping to give you a better help, I decided to write comments only when something very specific or interesting shows up, otherwise all the information is shown on the chart. Thank you all for your support 🔎🔎🔎 ALWAYS REMEMBER "A pattern IS NOT a Pattern until the breakout is completed. Before that moment it is just a bunch of colorful candlesticks on a chart of your watchlist" ═════════════════════════════ ⚠ DISCLAIMER ⚠ The content is The Art Of Charting's personal opinion and it is posted purely for educational purpose and therefore it must not be taken as a direct or indirect investing recommendations or advices. Any action taken upon these information is at your own risk.
NASDAQ:MSFTShort
by TheArtOfCharting
MSFT out of a falling wedge, consolidating and accumulatingHello. MSFT catches my attention as it seems out of a falling wedge and entering a consolidation. During this consolidation it may accumulate and i see two possible targets: Upwards to 512.02 Downwards to 464.46 In this chart short EMA (9) is green and long EMA (200) is red. It seems price is playing around with EMA 200 without being able to go down any further. So price could go down to look for buyers around the EAM 9 and then try to make a double bottom at 464.46. Price also could find sellers right at EMA 200 and go up to the zone where consolidation has its high. Now, consider there is an sell order block that remains untested and pricing could also go to 552.17 to retest. Do do that probably the price will go down first. -- In Spanish-- Este es MSFT en dias. De lejos pareciera no tener nada interesante. Pero si empezamos a trazar lineas de tendencia se ve mas interesante. El precio viene cayendo en un Falling Wedge o Cuña Bajista y ya rompio tendencia. El precio salio y ahora consolida entre los 492.9 y los 474.5. Esta consolidacion es suficiente amplia para scalps diarios pero esto es lo que me parece interesante. Si el precio saliera de esta zona de consolidacion pudiera ir a los 512.02 o a los 464.46. El precio al parecer juega con la EMA 200 y no ha podido bajar mas. El precio pudiera subir a buscar compradores a la EMA 9 para luego bajar e intentar hacer un doble piso en los 464.46. O el preci pudiera encontrar vendedores ahi en la EMA 200 y llegar hasta el extremo superior de la consolidacion y romper mas hacia arriba. Vamos a ver que ocurre.
NASDAQ:MSFT
by mlicero
MSFT Market Blueprint: From Pullback to Profit Zone💼 Asset: Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) — NASDAQ Type: Swing Trade Setup Bias: Bullish Pullback Play 🔍 Plan Overview MSFT is showing a clean bullish pullback confirmation with the Hull Moving Average acting as dynamic support. A Heikin Ashi reversal doji candle has appeared — a strong hint that buyers are gaining control again 🟢. Momentum looks ready to shift back to the upside as the pullback finds its footing. The plan focuses on catching this move with layered entries (a.k.a. “Thief Strategy” style). ⚙️ Entry Plan (Layered “Thief” Style Method) This approach uses multiple limit orders to build a strong position during pullbacks. You can add or adjust based on your own risk appetite. 📍 Layered Entry Points: 🟩 520.00 — first buy zone (initial position) 🟩 530.00 — second layer (confirmation add-on) 🟩 540.00 — third layer (momentum add) 💡 Tip: You can increase or decrease the number of layers depending on volatility or confidence in trend continuation. 🔒 Stop Loss (SL) 🛑 Thief OG’s SL idea: 510.00 Note: Dear Ladies & Gentlemen (Thief OG’s), I’m not recommending to stick strictly to my SL — trade with your own risk management. Make money and protect it wisely. 💰 🎯 Target Profit (TP) 🎯 Target zone: 580.00 The “Police Force” (strong resistance zone) is waiting up there — where the market could become overbought or trap late buyers. That’s where we take our profit and vanish with gains like pros 😎. Note: Dear Ladies & Gentlemen (Thief OG’s), again — you can set your own TP. This level is my personal exit zone for safety and profit lock. 🔗 Related Pairs & Market Watchlist Keep an eye on correlated tech giants and ETFs to confirm momentum: 💻 NASDAQ:AAPL (Apple Inc.) – often leads the NASDAQ tech sentiment. 🌐 NASDAQ:GOOGL (Alphabet Inc.) – confirms sector strength. 📊 NASDAQ:QQQ (NASDAQ 100 ETF) – index pressure or breakout signal for techs. ⚙️ AMEX:XLK (Tech Sector ETF) – broader sector health indicator. 🧠 Correlation Insight: When Apple ( NASDAQ:AAPL ) or Google ( NASDAQ:GOOGL ) show the same bullish reversal near their moving averages, it reinforces MSFT’s bullish continuation. Strong moves on NASDAQ:QQQ and AMEX:XLK also validate that the entire tech sector is moving in sync. ⚠️ Disclaimer This is a Thief-style trading strategy, designed for educational and entertainment purposes only — just for fun 🎭. Trade responsibly and manage your risk accordingly. ✨ “If you find value in my analysis, a 👍 and 🚀 boost is much appreciated — it helps me share more setups with the community!” #MSFT #SwingTrade #BullishSetup #TechStocks #LayeredEntry #HeikinAshi #HullMA #TradingPlan #StockMarket #ThiefStyle #TradingView #Investing #NASDAQ #PriceAction
NASDAQ:MSFTLong
by The-Thief
MSFT - ATH and bullish movements likely ======= Volume ======= - neutral ========== Price Action ========== - Broken out of latest trendline - Cup and handle formed ================= Technical Indicators ================= - Ichimoku >>> price below cloud >>> Green kumo budding slightly >>> Tenken - within cloud & flat >>> Chiku - within cloud & flat >>> Kijun - within clouds & pointing up slightly ========= Oscillators ========= - MACD crossed and bullish - DMI neutral - StochRSI, bullish ========= Conclusion ========= - short to long term breakout swing - price may reverse at current level, to enter spot or wait for pullback at entry 2. - Entry and exits depends on your time horizon and risk management. ========= Positions ========= Entry 1 - $525 Entry 2 - $510 Stop - $490 Exit 1 - $540 Exit 2 - $570 Exit 3 - $595 Exit 4 - $570 Exit 5 - $655
NASDAQ:MSFTLong
by Creedxx
Global Trade Costs, Inflation, and Interest Rates1. Global Trade Costs: What They Are and Why They Matter Global trade costs refer to all expenses involved in moving goods or services from one country to another. These costs end up affecting product prices, competitiveness, and economic growth. A. Components of Trade Costs Transportation Costs Shipping, aviation, trucking, rail freight Fuel prices Port handling and container charges Insurance on cargo When fuel prices rise or there is a shortage of containers (like after COVID-19), transportation costs shoot up sharply. Tariffs Governments impose taxes on imported goods. Tariffs can protect domestic industries but increase prices for consumers. Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) These include: Quality standards Product certifications Customs procedures Import quotas Environmental and safety regulations NTBs often add delays and compliance costs. Exchange Rate Fluctuations If a country’s currency weakens, its imports become more expensive; if it strengthens, imports become cheaper. Political and Geopolitical Risks War, sanctions, tensions between countries Trade agreements collapsing Piracy risks on shipping routes These uncertainties raise risk premiums and insurance costs. Logistical Efficiency Countries with strong ports, roads, and customs technology have far lower trade costs. B. Impact of High Trade Costs Higher export and import prices Reduced competitiveness in global markets Lower consumer choices Slowdown in global supply chains Inflationary pressure, especially in import-dependent countries Thus, trade cost is not just an economic number—it is a powerful driver behind global price movements. 2. Inflation: The Price Level That Affects Everyone Inflation is the rate at which the general price level of goods and services rises over time. When inflation increases, money loses value, and purchasing power declines. A. Major Causes of Inflation Demand-Pull Inflation When demand is higher than supply (e.g., festival season, economic boom), prices rise. Cost-Push Inflation When the cost of production increases—due to higher raw material prices, trade costs, or wages—producers raise prices. Imported Inflation Many countries depend on imports for food, energy, metals, or electronics. If global trade costs increase or the currency weakens, import prices rise and inflation increases. Supply Chain Disruptions Events such as pandemics, geopolitical conflicts, and natural disasters break supply chains and reduce availability, leading to higher prices. Monetary Factors When central banks print too much money or keep interest rates too low, prices tend to rise. B. Effects of Inflation Reduced purchasing power Higher cost of living Lower savings value Increased business uncertainty Wage-price spiral Pressure on governments and central banks to intervene Moderate inflation is normal, but high inflation or hyperinflation can destabilize entire economies. 3. Interest Rates: The Financial Lever Controlling Inflation Interest rates are the cost of borrowing money. Central banks (like the Federal Reserve, ECB, RBI, etc.) adjust interest rates to stabilize economic growth and inflation. A. How Interest Rates Work When interest rates rise: Loans become expensive Businesses reduce investments Consumers cut spending Savings become attractive Economy slows Inflation typically falls When interest rates fall: Borrowing becomes cheaper Investment and consumption rise Economy grows If demand grows too fast, inflation increases Interest rates are the primary tool used by central banks to fight inflation. 4. How Global Trade Costs, Inflation, and Interest Rates Interact These three forces are deeply interconnected, and one change triggers reactions in the others. A. High Trade Costs → Higher Inflation When trade costs rise due to fuel surges, war disruptions, or container shortages: Transportation becomes expensive Imports cost more Raw materials become pricier Companies pass these costs to consumers This leads to cost-push inflation, especially in developing countries dependent on imported commodities. Examples: Oil price increases raise transportation costs globally. War in major shipping routes slow down container movement and raise freight rates. B. Inflation → Higher Interest Rates When inflation rises above a country’s target (usually 2–6%), central banks increase interest rates to cool the economy. This is called monetary tightening. Why? Higher interest rates reduce demand in the economy and slow down price growth. C. Higher Interest Rates → Higher Trade Costs When interest rates rise globally: The cost of financing ships, warehouses, and inventory increases Multinational companies borrow less Currency values fluctuate Emerging markets face capital outflows Trade slows, increasing per-unit shipping costs Thus, interest rate hikes indirectly increase global trade costs. D. Higher Interest Rates → Stronger Domestic Currency This reduces imported inflation because foreign goods become cheaper. But if a strong currency hurts export competitiveness, trade volumes may decline. 5. The Global Cycle: How One Factor Creates a Chain Reaction A typical cycle looks like this: Trade costs rise due to global disruptions. This causes imported inflation. Central banks respond by raising interest rates. Higher interest rates: slow down demand reduce inflation increase borrowing cost Businesses cut production or trade volumes, which eventually lowers global trade costs again. This balancing cycle is what keeps global markets stable over time. 6. Why These Factors Matter More Today Global markets face many new challenges: Fragmenting supply chains (“China+1” diversification) Geopolitical tensions Climate-related disruptions Volatile energy prices Uncertain global monetary policies All these factors make the interaction between trade costs, inflation, and interest rates more unpredictable. Investors, traders, and policymakers must track them closely to anticipate market movements. Conclusion Global trade costs, inflation, and interest rates form a powerful economic triangle that influences every country, company, and consumer in the world. Trade costs shape prices, inflation determines purchasing power, and interest rates regulate economic stability. Their interaction drives global growth cycles, financial markets, and corporate strategies. Understanding this dynamic helps traders, economists, and students decode global market behavior in a clear, structured manner.
NASDAQ:MSFTEducation
by GlobalWolfStreet