RCAT - STILL LONG AFTER FUZZY PANDAFuzzy Panda’s recent report makes several serious allegations about Red Cat Holdings, its contracts, and its products. However, much of the report is based on unverified or incomplete information, and several claims are contradicted or unsupported by public records and official statements.
1. U.S. Army Contract Size and Status
Fuzzy Panda claims that Red Cat’s U.S. Army Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) contract is worth only $12.9 million, far less than the company indicated.
No FOIA documentation has been publicly released to confirm this figure.
The U.S. Army’s official SRR (Short Range Reconnaissance) program announcements describe the effort as a multi-phase, multi-year initiative involving multiple tranches of funding.
Red Cat’s Teal Drones division was explicitly identified as an SRR program awardee by reputable defense publications, including Defense News and The Wall Street Journal.
It’s therefore inaccurate to suggest that Red Cat “misrepresented” the program size — the initial tranche may represent just the first phase of a much larger, ongoing procurement.
2. SRR Competition Mischaracterization
While it is true that multiple vendors are competing within the SRR program, Red Cat remains an approved SRR supplier.
Winning SRR approval is a significant technical milestone and positions Teal Drones within the Army’s trusted vendor ecosystem.
Fuzzy Panda’s framing that Red Cat has “no guaranteed work” ignores the reality that SRR vendors continue to receive orders as the program scales.
3. “FANG” Drone Allegations
The report claims that Red Cat’s FANG FPV drone is merely a rebranded consumer drone using Chinese parts.
On October 8, 2025, Red Cat officially launched FANG as an NDAA-compliant, U.S.-made tactical FPV system.
The company’s marketing materials and government-focused distribution channels support that it is a purpose-built defense drone, not a hobbyist product.
The use of certain commercial-grade components does not make a system “noncompliant” or “fake”; most U.S. defense manufacturers integrate off-the-shelf hardware where allowed under NDAA rules.
4. NATO Catalogue Listing
Fuzzy Panda downplays Red Cat’s NATO listing as “meaningless” and outdated.
It is true that Teal Drones was initially added to the NATO Support and Procurement Agency catalogue in 2023, but Red Cat renewed and expanded this listing in 2025, broadening access for member nations.
Catalogue inclusion does not guarantee sales, but it represents pre-qualification and compliance clearance, which is an important barrier for international defense vendors.
5. Accusations of Misleading Guidance
Fuzzy Panda alleges that Red Cat “misled” investors about its revenue outlook.
Red Cat’s financial projections have been clearly presented as forward-looking estimates, accompanied by appropriate risk disclosures.
There is no evidence that the company fabricated contract values or intentionally deceived investors.
As a growth-stage defense technology firm, optimistic guidance is not uncommon and should be interpreted in context.
Conclusion
Fuzzy Panda’s report raises questions but also relies heavily on speculative interpretations, unpublished data, and subjective characterizations.
The verified facts remain:
Red Cat’s Teal Drones is an approved SRR program contractor.
The FANG drone has been officially launched and marketed as NDAA-compliant.
Red Cat maintains a valid NATO procurement listing.
While the company has been ambitious in its public statements, there is no substantiated evidence of fraud or deliberate misrepresentation. Investors should weigh short-seller opinions alongside verifiable public information and the company’s direct disclosures.
IN SHORT:
---
1. Fuzzy Panda claims the Army contract is only **$12.9M** — they never publicly share the full FOIA document, so that number is unverified. While this number is real, it doesn’t automatically prove Red Cat misled investors, because guidance could include expected future tranches, options, or follow-on production — but it does confirm that the currently awarded LRIP tranche is much smaller than the $55M+ figure sometimes cited.
2. Red Cat / Teal **were publicly announced** as SRR program winners by major outlets — it’s not pure hype.
3. The fact that multiple vendors compete isn’t proof Red Cat’s role is meaningless.
4. Red Cat **officially launched FANG** as a product — so it’s not purely “marketing concept.”
5. Using some off-the-shelf components (even ones made in China) is common in aerospace; it doesn’t automatically mean fraud.
6. The NATO catalogue listing may be older (2023), but catalogue inclusion is a real procurement step, not just a press stunt.
7. Fuzzy Panda is short RCAT — their report has an obvious bias.
8. Bottom line: Fuzzy Panda raises questions, but many of their strongest claims depend on interpretations, not solid public proof.
