Netflix Is -11% Since June's All-Time High. What Its Chart SaysNetflix NASDAQ:NFLX has fallen more than 10% since hitting an all-time high in June, but the streaming giant is still beating the S&P 500 SP:SPX in the year-to-date, one-year and five-year periods. What does technical and fundamental analysis say is going on?
Let's take a look:
Netflix's Fundamental Analysis
NFLX has shed some 11% as of Tuesday afternoon since peaking at $1,341.15 intraday on June 30, easing especially over the four weeks despite little news.
The only recent negative catalyst came last week, when Citigroup analyst Jason Bazinet (rated at five stars out of a possible five by TipRanks) cut the stock's price target to $1,280 from a previous $1,295. Bazinet also reiterated Netflix's "Neutral" rating, which is considered a "hold-equivalent."
Still, the Citi analyst's $1,280 price target represents about a 7.5% move to the upside from where NFLX was trading at Tuesday afternoon.
Meanwhile, Wall Street expects Netflix to report Q3 results in some two weeks (on or about Oct. 21). The Street is looking for the firm to report $6.95 in adjusted earnings per share on about $11.5 billion of revenue.
If those numbers end up being accurate, that would compare favorably with the year-ago period, with a 28.7% gain from the $5.40 in adjusted EPS that NFLX reported in Q3 2024. Revenues would also have risen 17.3% from the $9.8 billion that Netflix saw a year earlier.
In fact, of the 33 sell-side analysts that I know of that cover Netflix, 27 have increased their earnings estimates since the current quarter began. Just five have cut their forecasts, while one estimate remains unchanged.
Netflix's Technical Analysis
NFLX's one-year chart through Thursday afternoon was telling an interesting story:
Readers will see that the stock benefited from an upward sloping trend that stretched from Autumn 2024 into Summer 2025, as marked with orange and purple fields in the chart above.
This trend ended with NFLX peaking on June 30, with a new trend born the next day. The stock has generally pulled back since July 1 while creating a "falling-wedge" pattern, which is historically a sign of bullish reversal.
Netflix's upsides in the above pattern are the stock's 21-day Exponential Moving Average (or "EMA," marked with a green line) and its 50-day Simple Moving Average (or "SMA," denoted by a blue line). These two lines are running together, so I'll view them as a single pivot.
Now let's zoom in and look at Netflix's chart over just the past eight months:
I've added a "double-bottom" pattern to the above chart above using dotted lines. That's a second pattern of bullish reversal, and it exists inside of Netflix's falling wedge.
Granted, the stock's recent sell-off still has to find support around here. But if it does, NFLX will have just developed two simultaneous bullish patterns.
The double bottom would have a $1,268 pivot, which would be about $60 above the moving averages that we just mentioned. This pivot could produce considerably higher price targets for the stock.
That said, Netflix's other technical indicators above don't agree with such bullishness, or at least don't agree with it just yet.
For example, the stock's Relative Strength Index (the gray line at the chart's top) is relatively weak.
Similarly, Netflix's daily Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator (or "MACD," marked with gold and black lines and blue bars at the chart's bottom) is close to neutral, as well as closer to bearish than bullish.
The 9-day EMA (the blue bars) is in negative territory, although not far from zero bound. Both the 12-day EMA (the black line) and 26-day EMA (the gold line) are also below zero, with the black line below the gold line. All three of these conditions are typically short- to medium-term bearish signals.
An Options Option
Options traders who want to get NFLX at a "discount" (and get paid to wait for it to potentially go higher) might consider a bull-put spread. This strategy is set up by selling a put while also buying a second put with a lower strike price.
Here's an example:
-- Sell (write) one Oct. 24 NFLX $1,140 put for about $45. This option could expire after Netflix reports earnings.
-- Buy one Oct. 24 NFLX $1,110 put for about $32.
Net Credit: $13
Traders in the above example would pay $1,140 a share for NFLX if forced to buy the stock due to assignment of the short put. However, their net basis would be $1,127 after deducting the net premium collected.
These traders also purchased some downside protection at $1,110 with the second put.
All in, that represents a maximum $30-per-share loss -- the $1,140 strike price on the first put minus the $1,110 strike price on the second.
However, the $13 net premium traders would collect on the entire bull-put spread would reduce the above strategy's maximum theoretical loss to $17 a share at expiration.
(Moomoo Technologies Inc. Markets Commentator Stephen "Sarge" Guilfoyle had no position in NFLX at the time of writing this column.)
This article discusses technical analysis, other approaches, including fundamental analysis, may offer very different views. The examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be reflective of the results you can expect to achieve. Specific security charts used are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Past investment performance does not indicate or guarantee future success. Returns will vary, and all investments carry risks, including loss of principal. This content is also not a research report and is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decision. The information contained in this article does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. Moomoo and its affiliates make no representation or warranty as to the article's adequacy, completeness, accuracy or timeliness for any particular purpose of the above content. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that any statements, estimates, price targets, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct.
The Analyst Ratings feature comes from TipRanks, an independent third party. The accuracy, completeness, or reliability cannot be guaranteed and should not be relied upon as a primary basis for any investment decision. The target prices are intended for informational purposes only, not recommendations, and are also not guarantees of future results.
Options trading is risky and not appropriate for everyone. Read the Options Disclosure Document ( j.moomoo.com ) before trading. Options are complex and you may quickly lose the entire investment. Supporting docs for any claims will be furnished upon request.
Options trading subject to eligibility requirements. Strategies available will depend on options level approved.
Maximum potential loss and profit for options are calculated based on the single leg or an entire multi-leg trade remaining intact until expiration with no option contracts being exercised or assigned. These figures do not account for a portion of a multi-leg strategy being changed or removed or the trader assuming a short or long position in the underlying stock at or before expiration. Therefore, it is possible to lose more than the theoretical max loss of a strategy.
Moomoo is a financial information and trading app offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. In the U.S., investment products and services on Moomoo are offered by Moomoo Financial Inc., Member FINRA/SIPC.
TradingView is an independent third party not affiliated with Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Technologies Inc., or its affiliates. Moomoo Financial Inc. and its affiliates do not endorse, represent or warrant the completeness and accuracy of the data and information available on the TradingView platform and are not responsible for any services provided by the third-party platform.
NFC trade ideas
Falling Wedge on NFLX: Set for a Break?Price on NASDAQ:NFLX has been consolidating inside a falling wedge, with each swing showing weaker momentum from sellers. And buyers are slowly stepping back in.
A strong breakout above the upper trendline would confirm bullish strength and signal a potential continuation toward the 1,400.00 level.
Until then, patience is key, waiting for a clear break with volume can help avoid false signals.
BUY NFLXNFLX is due to fall down or short soon at 1,134.00 to 1,405.00, but for next week or maybe this week – it's time to BUY NFLX at 1,164.00, riding back up to 1,134.00 to 1,405.00 as Profit Targets, Stop Loss is at 1,132.00!
If anyone likes long mumbo jumbo garbage analysis, than this is NOT for you.
Also, if you are afraid of risk, failure, and want only a 100% sure thing, than
run as fast as you can from the market, because the market is NOT a sure thing,
so it is definitely NOT for you.
WARNING: This is just opinions of the market and its only for journaling purpose. This information and any publication here are NOT meant to be, and do NOT constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations. Trading any market instrument is a RISKY business, so do your own due diligence, and trade at your own risk. You can loose all of your money and much more.
Not Cancelling NFLX... but it is looking a little weak still. Will we flush the recent lows today? Or is this a bottoming space. This could be the buy zone for investors.
+ Earnings 10/21
+ Wide range after a strong move up (at bottoms)
**I'll be Netflixing & chilling this weekend. There is a broad selection of content to entertain a variety of interests. I will watch what informs and/or entertains me. I hope you find time to do the same.
Netflix Buy Alert!! The Rising 3 Soldiers Candlestick Patterns I did my first stream about two days ago.I was so sacred and nervous.
"This is a public stream, I better make sure I know what am talking about. I better make sure I show the pips my very best setups for trading."
I tell you I was super depressed because I want to be a good trading leader.
So I have been grinding trying to make sure I perfect my trading strategy and system and skills.
Because I want to show you the best of the best trades I can find.
No more just forex...or stocks I just want to be a great
technical analyst.
So today I did another stream and I had one person watching me trade live.
If you watch me trade analysis live you will really enjoy it 👍😊
It was an awesome stream.This is my business goal to become a streamer.
But am hoping for more viewers tomorrow.
Look at Netflix NASDAQ:NFLX
It's
Above the 50 MA
Above the 20 EMA
Above the 200 EMA
Notice the rising 3 soldiers 🟩🟩🟩Bullish candlestick patterns?
Notice how the last green candle
Gaps up? In green 🟢
The candlestick patterns are your confirmation of entry.
Netflix also has an earnings report coming soon.
This makes it's a perfect candidate for what Tim Sykes calls an earnings winner.. according to his book penny stock guide.
They are rumours that Netflix will partner with Warner Music to make movies based on it's artists such as Bruno Mars.
This report hasn't been confirmed yet.
Do you see how pop culture is linked to the financial markets? Like I told you yesterday?
This is a great stock to trade and ride the 🚀.
Rocket Boost This Content To Learn More.
Disclaimer ⚠️ Trading is risky please learn about risk management and profit taking strategies.Also feel free to use a simulation trading account.
Is Netflix Stock Headed Toward $1,100?Netflix shares are going through a difficult period, as the streaming giant has posted five consecutive losing sessions, with a decline of around 4.5% in recent trading days. For now, the selling bias has become dominant, driven by the viral "Cancel Netflix" campaign circulating on social media, where many users have decided to cancel their subscriptions following a recent controversy involving the company. As long as this negative sentiment fueled by the campaign remains in place, selling pressure is likely to continue playing a key role in the stock’s short-term movements.
Bearish Trend Emerges
Since early July, a series of lower highs has formed, establishing a solid downward trendline. In addition, price oscillations below the 100-period moving average reinforce the outlook for a consistent bearish bias. Unless a significant bullish correction occurs in the near term, selling pressure could continue to dominate, allowing the bearish trend to become more pronounced in the coming sessions.
RSI
The RSI line continues to show downward oscillations below the neutral 50 level, confirming that bearish momentum remains dominant over the past 14 trading sessions. However, the indicator is approaching the oversold zone, marked by the 30 level, and reaching this area could signal a market imbalance, potentially opening a window for short-term corrective rebounds.
MACD
The MACD histogram continues to display negative oscillations below the zero line, indicating that bearish directional strength remains dominant in the short-term moving averages. As the histogram continues to post lower values, selling pressure is expected to remain a key factor in the coming sessions.
Key Levels to Watch:
1,221 – Major Resistance: Corresponds to the area marked by the 100-period simple moving average. Price action breaking above this level could trigger a relevant bullish bias, putting the current downtrend at risk.
1,155 – Nearby Support: Represents the area of the latest price pullbacks. If price breaks below this level, the bearish trend could extend further in the short term, leading to sustained selling pressure. It may also act as a technical barrier capable of producing temporary bullish corrections.
1,097 – Critical Support: Corresponds to the zone marked by the 200-period simple moving average. A sustained break below this level could activate a more aggressive downtrend, likely defining the stock’s movements over the next few weeks.
Written by Julian Pineda, CFA – Market Analyst
NFLX - NetFlix done after the run?🔱 A break of the WL1 could be the technical short signal 🔱
NetFlix had a monster run.
✅ Here’s a grounded fundamental breakdown of risks that could push Netflix downward. None of these are certainties, instead think of them as warning signs, not predictions.
👉 Slowing subscriber growth – growth in mature markets may plateau, and churn could rise if hit shows underperform.
👉 Rising competition and costs – rivals like Disney+ and Amazon force Netflix to spend more on content, squeezing profit margins.
👉 High valuation risk – expectations are lofty, so even a small earnings miss could trigger a sharp sell-off.
✅ Chart analysis
After missing WL2, we’ve got a Hagopian in play, which I’d say still hasn’t been fulfilled. The line was touched by a few ticks, but usually these lines break more decisively.
🔨 If we open and close below WL1, I’m stalking a pullback to it, just to hit the market on the head. If this break really happens, we’ll also have a clean structure for our stop, placed above the last RealSwing high.
🎯 The target is set in stone for me: It's the U-MLH and beyond, down to the Centerline.
Let’s stay focused and keep our cool.
Happy new week!
Volume-Based Market AnalysisUsing Indicators:
Smart Money Support/Resistance and ATAI Volume Analysis with Price Action V1.03
Analytical Configuration
This analysis combines two advanced indicators. The calculation period for both has been set to 52 bars, based on a lower timeframe of 1 second (1S), which provides 72 valid LTF candles. This configuration ensures that volume-based calculations remain within the valid data window for maximum accuracy.
Current Market Context
On the latest candle, a Bear Trap Risk signal appeared right after detecting an OverSold condition. This combination usually suggests weakening selling pressure near the end of a bearish leg and indicates the potential for buyer reaction. At that candle, both buy and sell volumes reached their highest values within the 52-bar window, but sellers maintained a slight advantage — approximately 260K sell volume versus 210K buy volume. This dominance by sellers in the OverSold zone reinforces the concept of volume exhaustion
Key Zones
• Support Zone: 1134 – 1163 USD
• Resistance Zone: 1198 – 1217 USD
Price is currently oscillating between these two zones. Based on the data, a short-term move toward the lower edge of the support zone is possible. If strong support holds, a rebound toward the upper boundary of resistance can be expected to retest or potentially break above it.
Structural Observation
In previous data, ATAI identified a Bull Trap at the resistance zone, which initiated the current bearish leg. Now, the emergence of a Bear Trap Risk near the support boundary is an intriguing reversal signal. If this trap functions similarly to the previous Bull Trap but in the opposite direction, we could expect a movement from the support base toward the resistance ceiling in the upcoming phase.
Summary
According to both indicators’ volume-based calculations, this is the most probable short-term scenario. However, this analysis is purely technical and volume-driven, and does not constitute any form of financial or investment advice.
Netflix short the woke setup Looking to short Netflix next week. It had a blatant swing high at over valuation and then the FUD bomb hit. Turns out they are potentially paying people to groom small children, we will see. Technically I’m looking for the breakdown of OBV momentum (bottom indicator). We note blue flashed low volatility in falling volume.
When I looked for my PT it matched perfectly with the golden pocket of the entire move from a fib perspective.
My plan:
1,100$ puts November maybe December
NFLX Technical Outlook: A Head and Shoulders PlayNetflix Technical Outlook
Structure and Pattern Recognition
Netflix has broken down from its ascending channel, confirming a break of structure (BoS) to the downside. Price failed to sustain at prior support, with the current setup resembling a potential head and shoulders pattern. The neckline sits just above $1,160, and further weakness could accelerate downside momentum.
Key Catalysts
Several developments could weigh on Netflix’s price action in the near term:
Tariff Concerns: Reports of the Trump administration exploring tariffs on foreign films present a potential headwind. Given that a significant portion of Netflix’s catalog comes from international productions, such a policy could increase costs or limit content availability.
Catalog Composition: Foreign films and shows have grown to represent a large share of Netflix’s offering, both in terms of content hours and global subscriber engagement. Any disruption could alter growth expectations.
Public Sentiment: Recent viral discussions and trending cancellations, fueled in part by tweets from Elon Musk criticizing Netflix’s content choices, add a sentiment-driven layer of volatility. While short-term reactions can fade, they underscore the platform’s exposure to cultural and political narratives.
These catalysts highlight risks around both fundamentals and perception, and traders should remain neutral when evaluating their potential impact on price direction.
Key Levels and Setups
Immediate resistance sits in the $1,200–$1,220 zone (bearish order block). A clean rejection here keeps sellers in control. On the downside, the first target lies near $1,050–$1,040 (bullish order block), with deeper potential into the $820–$840 range if the head and shoulders structure fully plays out.
Momentum and Volume
Momentum indicators confirm sustained selling pressure, with RSI holding in a bearish range. Volume spikes during breakdowns suggest institutional participation, adding conviction to the bearish structure.
Outlook and Scenarios
Bearish Case: Continuation of the breakdown leads to a retest of $1,050, and if breached, could confirm the larger head and shoulders, targeting $820–$840.
Bullish Case: A sharp reclaim of $1,220 and close back into the prior range would invalidate the bearish setup and shift focus back toward $1,280+.
Conclusion
Netflix sits at a vulnerable point, with technicals and sentiment leaning bearish. Macro catalysts—from trade policy to public perception—could amplify volatility around these levels. Traders should monitor the $1,200–$1,220 zone as the key pivot between recovery and deeper correction.
Popcorn Ready? Netflix Layering Setup for Bold Traders🎬 Netflix Stock | Thief Trader’s Profit Realization Blueprint 🍿💰
🧭 Market Outlook
Netflix (NFLX) is lining up for a bullish playbook — and here’s how the Thief Strategy goes down. This setup is purely educational and shares how I personally view price behavior with a layering approach.
🎯 Trading Plan (Swing/Day Trade Idea)
Entry (Layering Style 🥷): Instead of one-shot entries, the thief strategy is about multiple buy-limit layers. Example blueprint:
👉 1160 | 1170 | 1180 | 1190 | 1200 (more can be added if liquidity allows)
Stop Loss 🛡️: Thief-style SL ~1120 (after breakout levels are confirmed).
⚠️ Note to Thief OG’s: Manage your own SL & adapt risk. My level is an example, not a fixed call.
Target 🎯: Eyeing the 1340 zone, where resistance + overbought vibes + possible trap signals align. The thief rule? Escape before the crowd escapes 🚪💨.
⚠️ Again — not a fixed TP. Manage your own exits depending on profit goals & risk appetite.
🕵️♂️ Thief Trader Philosophy
This is not financial advice. It’s a “steal-and-escape” blueprint to show how layered entries can help smooth entries across zones instead of one rigid buy point. Adapt, manage, and steal profits like a pro before the market takes them back.
🔗 Related Assets to Watch
NASDAQ:AMZN — often shows correlation in big tech swings 📦
NASDAQ:AAPL — mega-cap sentiment driver 🍏
NASDAQ:MSFT — growth stock momentum check 💻
NASDAQ:QQQ — ETF to track Nasdaq 100 flow 📊
AMEX:SPY — broad market sentiment monitor 🏦
📌 Key Correlation Notes
Big tech stocks often move in sympathy — when Nasdaq pumps, Netflix usually gets extra popcorn 🍿 fuel.
Watch volatility spikes in TVC:VIX , as they can trap over-leveraged longs & shorts.
Macro cues (USD strength, yields, Fed talk) can shift momentum across all growth stocks.
✨ “If you find value in my analysis, a 👍 and 🚀 boost is much appreciated — it helps me share more setups with the community!”
#NFLX #Netflix #Stocks #SwingTrade #DayTrade #LayeringStrategy #Options #StockMarket #TradingView #ThiefTrader #Equities #QQQ #SPY #StockAnalysis
NFLX Bearish Trading Setup – Entry $1,227 | Target $1,147Ticker: Netflix (NFLX)
Timeframe: 2H (2-hour chart)
Current Price: $1,170.34
Chart Pattern: Descending channel (bearish trend continuation setup).
📉 Key Levels
Entry Point: $1,227.34
Marked as the level where price might retrace before resuming downward.
Stop Loss: $1,243.31
Positioned above the support/resistance flip zone to protect from false breakouts.
Target Point (LABA): $1,147.19
Expected downside target if the bearish move continues.
🧩 Technical Structure
The chart shows price moving within a descending channel.
The current price ($1,170.34) is near the lower boundary of the channel.
The analysis suggests a possible retracement (pullback) upward toward the support zone (blue area) before continuing the downtrend.
The blue box zone ($1,227 – $1,243) is a critical liquidity zone / resistance area, expected to reject price lower.
📊 Trading Plan (as per chart)
Sell/Short Setup:
Wait for retracement into the blue resistance zone ($1,227 – $1,243).
Enter short around $1,227.
Place Stop Loss above $1,243.
Take Profit near $1,147.
Risk/Reward:
Risk = ~ $16 (1,243 – 1,227).
Reward = ~ $80 (1,227 – 1,147).
Approx. R:R ratio = 1:5 (highly favorable).
✅ Summary:
This chart suggests Netflix (NFLX) is in a downtrend within a descending channel. A pullback to the $1,227–$1,243 zone could offer a shorting opportunity targeting $1,147, with a strong risk/reward ratio.
ESG Investing and Sustainable Finance1. Defining ESG Investing
ESG investing refers to the practice of incorporating Environmental, Social, and Governance factors into investment analysis and decision-making processes. Unlike traditional investing, which primarily evaluates financial metrics, ESG investing considers the broader impact of business activities on society and the environment.
1.1 Environmental Factors
Environmental criteria assess a company’s stewardship of natural resources and its impact on the planet. Key areas include:
Climate Change and Carbon Emissions: Evaluating a company’s carbon footprint and strategies for transitioning to a low-carbon economy.
Resource Management: Efficient use of energy, water, and raw materials.
Pollution and Waste: Efforts to minimize environmental contamination.
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Protection: Initiatives to protect natural habitats and biodiversity.
1.2 Social Factors
Social criteria examine how companies manage relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and communities. Key considerations include:
Labor Practices: Fair wages, worker safety, and freedom of association.
Diversity and Inclusion: Representation of minority groups in leadership and workforce.
Human Rights: Ensuring operations do not contribute to violations of human rights.
Community Engagement: Positive contributions to local communities through philanthropy or development programs.
1.3 Governance Factors
Governance evaluates how companies are directed and controlled, ensuring accountability and transparency. This includes:
Board Structure and Independence: Diverse and independent boards to oversee management.
Executive Compensation: Aligning incentives with long-term performance.
Ethical Business Practices: Anti-corruption policies, transparency, and compliance with regulations.
Shareholder Rights: Ensuring stakeholders have a voice in major corporate decisions.
2. Sustainable Finance
Sustainable finance is a broader concept that encompasses ESG investing but also includes financing activities aimed at promoting sustainability across the economy. It involves directing capital toward projects and initiatives that support long-term environmental and social goals while managing financial risks. Sustainable finance integrates ESG considerations into lending, investing, insurance, and risk management practices.
2.1 Key Objectives
The primary objectives of sustainable finance are:
Risk Mitigation: Identifying ESG-related risks that could impact financial returns.
Capital Allocation: Directing funds to projects that promote sustainability, such as renewable energy or social infrastructure.
Market Transformation: Encouraging companies to adopt sustainable practices through financial incentives.
Long-term Value Creation: Balancing financial returns with positive societal impact.
2.2 Instruments in Sustainable Finance
Several financial instruments are used to advance sustainable objectives:
Green Bonds: Debt securities earmarked for environmental projects, such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, or pollution control.
Social Bonds: Bonds that fund initiatives addressing social challenges, such as education, healthcare, and affordable housing.
Sustainability-linked Loans (SLLs): Loans where the interest rate is tied to achieving ESG targets.
Impact Investing: Investments explicitly intended to generate measurable social or environmental benefits alongside financial returns.
ESG Funds and ETFs: Mutual funds or exchange-traded funds that prioritize companies with strong ESG performance.
3. Evolution of ESG Investing
ESG investing has evolved from niche socially responsible investing (SRI) to a mainstream approach. The evolution can be traced through several phases:
3.1 Socially Responsible Investing (SRI)
In the 1960s and 1970s, SRI gained popularity as investors sought to avoid companies involved in tobacco, alcohol, or apartheid-related activities. The primary motivation was ethical or religious rather than financial.
3.2 ESG Integration
By the early 2000s, investors began integrating ESG factors into financial analysis. This marked a shift from exclusionary approaches to proactive risk and opportunity assessment.
3.3 Impact Investing
Emerging in the 2010s, impact investing focuses on generating measurable social or environmental outcomes alongside financial returns. It emphasizes accountability and transparency in reporting impact.
3.4 Global Adoption
Today, ESG investing is a global phenomenon, with trillions of dollars in assets under management guided by ESG criteria. Regulatory frameworks, corporate disclosure standards, and investor demand have accelerated adoption.
4. ESG Integration Approaches
Investors employ several methodologies to integrate ESG factors into decision-making:
4.1 Negative Screening
Excludes companies involved in controversial activities (e.g., tobacco, fossil fuels, weapons manufacturing).
4.2 Positive Screening
Selects companies with strong ESG performance relative to peers. This approach rewards leaders in sustainability.
4.3 ESG Integration
Incorporates ESG factors into traditional financial analysis to assess risk-adjusted returns. For example, evaluating a company’s exposure to climate risks can influence its valuation.
4.4 Thematic Investing
Focuses on specific ESG themes, such as renewable energy, gender equality, or sustainable agriculture.
4.5 Shareholder Engagement
Investors actively engage with companies to encourage better ESG practices, including proxy voting, dialogue with management, and filing resolutions.
5. Measuring ESG Performance
Measuring ESG performance is challenging due to the lack of standardized metrics. Several frameworks and rating systems help investors assess ESG risks and opportunities:
5.1 ESG Ratings Agencies
Companies like MSCI, Sustainalytics, and FTSE Russell provide ESG ratings based on multiple criteria, including environmental impact, labor practices, and governance structures.
5.2 Reporting Standards
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Provides comprehensive sustainability reporting guidelines.
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): Focuses on financially material ESG factors for investors.
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): Encourages reporting on climate-related risks and opportunities.
5.3 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Companies track quantitative and qualitative ESG metrics, such as carbon emissions, employee diversity ratios, or board independence.
6. Drivers of ESG Investing
Several factors have contributed to the rapid growth of ESG investing:
6.1 Regulatory Pressure
Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are increasingly mandating ESG disclosure and sustainability reporting, making ESG integration a compliance necessity.
6.2 Investor Demand
Institutional investors, such as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, are prioritizing ESG investments due to risk mitigation, reputational considerations, and long-term value creation.
6.3 Risk Management
ESG issues, such as climate change, social unrest, or corporate governance scandals, pose financial risks. Integrating ESG factors helps mitigate these risks.
6.4 Societal Awareness
Consumers and stakeholders increasingly favor businesses with responsible and ethical practices, influencing corporate behavior and investment decisions.
6.5 Technological Advancements
Data analytics, artificial intelligence, and blockchain enhance ESG data collection, measurement, and verification.
7. ESG Investing and Financial Performance
A key debate revolves around the relationship between ESG investing and financial returns. Empirical studies suggest:
Companies with strong ESG performance often demonstrate lower operational risks, higher efficiency, and better reputation.
ESG portfolios may experience lower volatility and improved risk-adjusted returns over the long term.
However, short-term financial trade-offs can exist, particularly in industries requiring high capital expenditure for sustainability transitions.
Overall, evidence increasingly supports the notion that ESG integration can enhance long-term financial performance while promoting sustainability.
8. Challenges in ESG Investing
Despite its growth, ESG investing faces several challenges:
8.1 Lack of Standardization
Different rating agencies and frameworks produce inconsistent ESG scores, complicating investment decisions.
8.2 Greenwashing
Companies may exaggerate or misrepresent ESG initiatives to attract investment, undermining credibility.
8.3 Data Gaps
Limited or unreliable ESG data, particularly in emerging markets, poses analytical challenges.
8.4 Balancing Financial and Social Returns
Investors must navigate the trade-offs between financial performance and societal impact.
8.5 Regulatory Fragmentation
Differing ESG regulations across regions create complexity for multinational investors.
9. Global Trends in ESG Investing
ESG investing has gained global momentum, with several notable trends:
9.1 Growth in Assets Under Management (AUM)
ESG-focused funds and sustainable investment vehicles have seen exponential growth. As of 2025, global ESG AUM exceeds $50 trillion.
9.2 Climate-Focused Investing
Climate risk has emerged as a primary driver, leading to increased investment in renewable energy, electric vehicles, and carbon mitigation technologies.
9.3 Integration in Emerging Markets
Emerging economies are increasingly adopting ESG principles, with opportunities in clean energy, social infrastructure, and sustainable agriculture.
9.4 Policy and Regulatory Developments
The European Union’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the U.S. SEC’s climate disclosure requirements, and similar initiatives worldwide are shaping investment behavior.
9.5 Technological Innovation
Fintech solutions, AI-powered ESG analytics, and blockchain-based impact verification enhance transparency and reporting.
10. Case Studies
10.1 Renewable Energy Funds
Funds investing in solar, wind, and hydroelectric projects demonstrate how ESG investing can align financial returns with environmental impact.
10.2 Gender Lens Investing
Investment funds focusing on companies promoting gender equality in leadership roles have shown positive social outcomes without sacrificing returns.
10.3 Green Bonds
Green bond issuance has financed infrastructure projects that reduce carbon emissions, demonstrating how capital markets can support sustainability.
11. Future of ESG Investing and Sustainable Finance
The future of ESG investing and sustainable finance appears promising, driven by:
Enhanced Standardization: Efforts to harmonize ESG reporting standards will improve comparability and trust.
Integration with AI and Big Data: Advanced analytics will enable more precise ESG risk assessment.
Focus on Net-Zero Transitions: Investors will increasingly finance decarbonization projects to meet global climate goals.
Increased Regulatory Convergence: Global alignment of ESG rules will facilitate cross-border sustainable investment.
Emergence of New Asset Classes: Instruments such as carbon credits, biodiversity credits, and sustainability-linked derivatives will grow.
Sustainable finance is likely to become central to global capital allocation, making ESG principles a core aspect of investment strategy rather than an optional add-on.
Conclusion
ESG investing and sustainable finance represent a fundamental shift in the global financial ecosystem. By integrating environmental, social, and governance considerations, investors can mitigate risks, seize opportunities, and contribute to a more sustainable future. The evolution from socially responsible investing to sophisticated ESG strategies reflects the growing recognition that long-term financial performance is intrinsically linked to sustainability.
Despite challenges like greenwashing, data gaps, and regulatory fragmentation, ESG investing continues to gain momentum globally. Technological advancements, policy support, and rising societal expectations are driving adoption across industries and regions. As sustainable finance becomes mainstream, it promises to reshape capital markets, align economic activity with global sustainability goals, and create value for both investors and society at large.
In essence, ESG investing is not just an ethical choice; it is a strategic imperative that blends profit with purpose, demonstrating that responsible finance can drive both economic and social progress.
NFLX LongThe broader market structure on NFLX (15-minute) remains bullish, supported by a clear sequence of higher highs and higher lows. The most recent Change of Character (CHoCH) occurred near $1,257.5, where price temporarily broke minor structure to the downside, signaling a potential short-term correction rather than a full reversal. Since no decisive Break of Structure (BOS) has occurred below a major higher low, the overall trend continues to favor buyers, with the current pullback likely serving as a retracement within that broader uptrend.
The supply zones between $1,225–$1,248 are moderate in strength. The upper zone near $1,247 previously triggered a sharp rejection, confirming active sellers there, while the lower two supply pockets closer to $1,225–$1,235 appear partially mitigated—indicating reduced selling pressure and a potential pathway for price to reclaim those levels. The nearest demand zone around $1,215–$1,210 remains intact, where buyers stepped in aggressively earlier, creating a strong impulse that broke prior structure to the upside.
Within the region currently highlighted, price is retracing toward that $1,215–$1,210 demand zone, showing decelerating bearish momentum as candles shrink in range and wicks appear at the lows. This behavior suggests that sellers are losing strength and that buyers could soon reassert control. A bullish reaction from this zone would likely drive price back toward $1,235, and if momentum continues, into $1,245–$1,247, where liquidity and unmitigated supply remain.
From a footprint perspective, the recent downward leg likely shows diminishing sell delta and light absorption from passive buyers—supportive of a near-term reversal setup. Watch for a delta shift into positive territory or a cluster of bid absorption at the base of demand to confirm that transition.
Trade bias: bullish continuation after pullback. Expect a bounce from $1,215–$1,210 toward $1,245–$1,247.
Invalidation: a clean break and close below $1,210, which would shift control to sellers and suggest a deeper retracement toward $1,185.
Momentum: still favors buyers overall, though currently consolidating before likely reaccumulation.
The Role and Impact of Agencies in Global Finance and Trading1. Understanding the Concept of Agencies in Global Finance
Agencies in global finance refer to both public and private institutions that are entrusted with regulatory, supervisory, analytical, and facilitative roles within the global financial ecosystem. They act as intermediaries between governments, corporations, and investors to ensure that financial activities are conducted fairly and efficiently. The primary types of agencies include:
Regulatory Agencies – Such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), which enforce laws and ensure transparency.
Rating Agencies – Institutions like Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s (S&P), and Fitch Ratings that assess the creditworthiness of governments, corporations, and financial instruments.
Monetary Agencies – Central banks and supranational institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, which manage monetary policy, financial stability, and economic development.
Trade and Financial Agencies – The World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) regulate trade practices and provide frameworks for financial cooperation among nations.
Collectively, these agencies influence market confidence, liquidity, capital allocation, and cross-border investment flows — all of which are essential to global trading operations.
2. The Importance of Regulatory Agencies in Global Finance
Regulatory agencies serve as the guardians of financial integrity. Their primary mission is to ensure fair trading practices, prevent manipulation, and maintain investor trust.
2.1 Market Oversight and Investor Protection
Global financial markets operate with vast sums of capital and involve millions of participants. Regulatory agencies impose rules that protect investors from fraud, insider trading, and market abuse. For instance:
The U.S. SEC enforces laws against securities fraud, ensuring corporate transparency through mandatory filings.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) harmonizes regulation across EU member states, preventing regulatory arbitrage.
Such oversight helps maintain confidence in the global financial system — a crucial element for the smooth functioning of international trade and investment.
2.2 Maintaining Systemic Stability
Regulatory agencies monitor systemic risks that can destabilize markets. During crises such as the 2008 global financial meltdown, agencies tightened regulations, introduced Basel III norms, and imposed capital adequacy requirements to strengthen banking resilience.
By enforcing these standards, agencies ensure that financial institutions maintain sufficient buffers to withstand shocks, thereby preventing contagion effects across global markets.
2.3 Promoting Fair Competition
Agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the United States and the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition monitor mergers and acquisitions to prevent monopolistic practices. This ensures fair market competition, innovation, and equal opportunity for firms engaged in global trade.
3. Credit Rating Agencies: Shaping Investment Decisions
Credit rating agencies are among the most influential actors in the financial world. Their ratings affect how investors perceive the creditworthiness of sovereign nations, corporations, and financial instruments.
3.1 Role of Credit Ratings in Global Trading
Credit ratings act as signals of financial health. When agencies assign a high rating (e.g., AAA), it implies low risk, encouraging foreign investment and reducing borrowing costs. Conversely, downgrades can trigger capital flight, higher yields, and economic contraction.
For example:
A downgrade of a country’s sovereign debt can increase its cost of borrowing in global markets.
Corporate bond ratings influence investment fund allocations, liquidity, and interest rates.
3.2 Controversies and Global Impact
While ratings are essential, they have also faced criticism. During the 2008 crisis, agencies were accused of inflating ratings on mortgage-backed securities, contributing to the market collapse. Since then, reforms have sought to improve transparency, accountability, and conflict-of-interest management.
Nonetheless, rating agencies continue to be critical in shaping cross-border capital movements and influencing investor sentiment in global trade.
4. Monetary and Financial Agencies: IMF, World Bank, and BIS
4.1 International Monetary Fund (IMF)
The IMF plays a central role in stabilizing the global economy. It provides financial assistance to countries facing balance-of-payments crises, monitors global economic trends, and offers policy advice to foster sustainable growth.
In global trading, the IMF helps maintain exchange rate stability and encourages free trade by ensuring liquidity through its Special Drawing Rights (SDR) mechanism.
4.2 World Bank
The World Bank focuses on long-term economic development and poverty reduction. Through its financial and technical assistance, it facilitates infrastructure development, which in turn boosts trade and investment. Roads, ports, and digital connectivity projects funded by the World Bank enhance global supply chains, promoting smoother trade flows.
4.3 Bank for International Settlements (BIS)
Known as the “central bank of central banks”, BIS fosters international monetary and financial cooperation. It sets global banking standards (like Basel I, II, and III) that ensure financial stability. Through its regulatory guidelines, BIS influences how banks manage liquidity and credit risks, which directly affects global trading capital and interest rate dynamics.
5. Trade and Economic Agencies: Facilitating Global Commerce
5.1 World Trade Organization (WTO)
The WTO governs international trade by establishing fair-trade rules, reducing tariffs, and resolving disputes. Its policies ensure predictability and transparency in trade relations, thereby influencing the financial transactions underpinning global commerce.
For example, when the WTO mediates trade conflicts (like the U.S.–China tariff disputes), the outcomes significantly impact global markets, commodity prices, and investor confidence.
5.2 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
The OECD fosters economic cooperation and policy alignment among member nations. By promoting responsible taxation, anti-bribery measures, and sustainable investment practices, it enhances investor trust and corporate accountability in global trade.
6. Impact of Financial Agencies on Currency and Capital Markets
6.1 Influence on Exchange Rates
Monetary agencies and central banks have a profound impact on foreign exchange (forex) markets. Through interventions, interest rate adjustments, and monetary policy decisions, they affect currency values — which in turn influence trade competitiveness and capital flows.
For instance, when the U.S. Federal Reserve raises interest rates, the U.S. dollar strengthens, making imports cheaper and exports less competitive, thereby reshaping global trade balances.
6.2 Regulation of Capital Flows
Agencies set rules that regulate the flow of capital between nations. The IMF monitors these flows to prevent speculative attacks on currencies and financial contagion — where instability in one market spreads to others. Proper regulation ensures smoother functioning of global capital markets, essential for international trade financing.
7. Technological and ESG Agencies: The New Frontier of Global Finance
7.1 Financial Technology (FinTech) Oversight
As digital trading platforms, cryptocurrencies, and algorithmic trading gain prominence, new regulatory agencies have emerged to oversee digital finance. Institutions like the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK and the U.S. CFTC have introduced frameworks for crypto assets, digital securities, and online trading to prevent cyber fraud and enhance transparency.
7.2 Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Standards
Agencies now emphasize sustainable finance. Organizations such as the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI) and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) promote ESG reporting standards.
By linking environmental and social impact with financial performance, these agencies are reshaping global trading norms — driving capital toward green and ethical investments.
8. Challenges and Criticisms of Global Financial Agencies
Despite their significance, financial agencies face multiple challenges:
Overregulation vs. Market Freedom: Excessive rules may stifle innovation and market efficiency.
Conflict of Interest: Especially among rating agencies that are paid by the entities they rate.
Unequal Representation: Developing nations often argue that institutions like the IMF and World Bank favor Western economies.
Delayed Responses: Bureaucratic processes sometimes hinder timely interventions during crises.
Technological Lag: The rapid rise of decentralized finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrencies outpaces traditional regulatory frameworks.
These limitations underscore the need for continual evolution in agency governance and accountability.
9. The Future of Agencies in Global Finance
As global markets become more interconnected and digitized, agencies must adapt to new realities. The future landscape will likely see:
Integrated Global Regulation: Greater cooperation among international agencies to standardize cross-border financial regulations.
Digital Financial Oversight: Stronger frameworks for blockchain, AI-driven trading, and cyber resilience.
Sustainability-Linked Policies: ESG standards becoming mandatory for international financial reporting.
Decentralized Agency Roles: New institutions emerging to govern decentralized finance and tokenized assets.
Agencies that evolve with innovation, transparency, and inclusiveness will define the next era of global financial stability and growth.
10. Conclusion
Agencies serve as the nervous system of global finance, transmitting information, enforcing discipline, and maintaining equilibrium across an increasingly complex trading ecosystem. From regulatory oversight to monetary stabilization and sustainability advocacy, their influence pervades every aspect of global trade and investment.
In a world where financial transactions transcend borders within milliseconds, the role of agencies in ensuring trust, fairness, and resilience has never been more vital. While challenges persist — ranging from bias and bureaucracy to technological disruption — their continued evolution will determine how effectively global finance can navigate uncertainty, foster inclusive growth, and sustain economic stability in the decades ahead.
Looking for puts immediately on NFLX! A+!OptionsMastery:
🔉Sound on!🔉
📣Make sure to watch fullscreen!📣
Thank you as always for watching my videos. I hope that you learned something very educational! Please feel free to like, share, and comment on this post. Remember only risk what you are willing to lose. Trading is very risky but it can change your life!
Netflix (NFLX) - Descriptive Analysis by FIBCOS📘 NFLX 2009–2029 Descriptive Analysis
This is a detailed Elliott Wave Theory -based outlook for Netflix (NFLX) stock from around 2009 to the projected future of 2029, and it incorporates Fibonacci retracement & extensions, Smart Money Concepts (SMC) , and Price Action structure within a channel.
Let’s break this down chronologically and structurally:
🌀 Wave Theory Confluence (Elliott Wave Structure)
The long-term structure of Netflix (NFLX) from 2009 to the projected 2029 period follows a classic Elliott Wave cycle, now realigned with the cycle top in mid-2018 and the macro correction ending in mid-2022.
1. Cycle Wave i (2009–2018):
NFLX entered a powerful multi-year rally, forming five sub-waves within this first major impulse. This long rally ended in mid-2018 , marking the top of Cycle Wave i .
2. Cycle Wave ii – ABC Correction (2018–2022):
From the 2018 top, the price entered a prolonged and complex 4-year correction, unfolding as a classic A-B-C corrective structure.
Wave A began the decline with a sharp markdown.
Wave B was a fake recovery, leading to Wave C, a deeper liquidation into mid-2022 , completing the correction.
This phase aligns with a major redistribution cycle where smart money exited positions, and retail investors were caught in hope rallies.
3. Cycle Wave iii (2022–2025):
After finding a bottom in mid-2022, the stock launched a new impulsive rally , forming five sub-waves (1–5) of a powerful Wave iii
Momentum accelerated in wave 3 of iii (typical in Elliott Wave), and the structure is now peaking as of late 2025, around $1,576.42.
This marks the expected completion of Wave iii, with signals pointing toward a correction.
4. Cycle Wave iv (Expected 2025–2027):
A corrective wave iv is expected to unfold, possibly returning toward the lower bound of the long-term ascending channel.
According to the principle of alternation , since wave ii was deep and complex, wave iv may be shallower or more sideways.
5. Cycle Wave v (Expected 2027–2029):
After the wave iv correction, a final impulsive leg — Wave v — is expected to push the price higher, targeting around $2,280.37 , with a potential extended move to $3,008.41 .
This will complete the macro 5-wave cycle that began in 2009.
📐 Fibonacci Confluence
The Fibonacci structure supports these wave formations:
The 2.618 extension of the previous impulse wave (measured from the 2022 bottom) projects a price target near $2,280.37 , aligning with historical extension zones.
The extended target at $3,008.41 aligns with the upper boundary of the long-term channel — often reached during euphoric final waves.
Prior retracements during wave ii and the anticipated retracement in wave iv fall into common Fibonacci pullback zones (0.382–0.618).
Fibonacci tools confirm that price has behaved symmetrically within the wave cycles, and provide high-probability zones for both correction and expansion.
🧠 Smart Money Concept (SMC)
From a Smart Money perspective, the chart reflects a complete institutional cycle:
Distribution Zone (2017–2018):
Smart money exited during the late stages of Cycle Wave i. This aligns with the cycle top in mid-2018 , often accompanied by overvaluation and high optimism.
Re-Accumulation Phase (2018–2022):
The 4-year correction allowed institutional players to accumulate at discounted prices during wave C. Retail was largely shaken out, and liquidity was swept multiple times.
Expansion Phase (2022–2025):
From the 2022 bottom, price moved sharply upward in a clean impulse (Wave iii), confirming institutional interest. Gaps, strong breakouts, and efficient trends reflected low-resistance expansion driven by smart money.
Future Distribution (2029?):
Around the projected $2,280–$3,008 range (Wave v), expect distribution signs —including deviation from trend, order block mitigation, and liquidity grabs. These are typical before a larger market reset.
Smart Money Concepts help explain the why behind each wave: fear and euphoria don’t happen randomly — they are often orchestrated phases of value transfer.
📊 Price Action Structure
The long-term price action of NFLX reinforces the wave count and market psychology:
2009–2018 (Wave i):
Price action showed a steady trend of higher highs and higher lows , with smooth breakouts and momentum-driven runs.
2018–2022 (Wave ii correction):
A breakdown in structure occurred. Lower highs and a wide, overlapping correction defined this multi-year distribution. Key support levels were breached and retested as resistance — a classic bearish shift in structure.
2022–2025 (Wave iii):
Clean, impulsive movement resumed. Breakouts, bullish flags, and retests marked key continuation zones. Market structure flipped back bullish with efficient rallies.
2025–2027 (Wave iv expected):
A retracement is likely toward previous demand zones , possibly aligning with wave 4 of the lower-degree impulse, respecting Elliott’s guideline of wave 4 often retracing to the territory of wave 4 of the previous degree.
2027–2029 (Wave v projection):
Anticipate price pushing into new highs, with potential overextension . However, bearish divergence and slowing momentum could foreshadow the macro top.
This structure shows how technical behavior mirrors emotional and fundamental phases — from greed to fear, and back again.
📆 Timeline Summary (2009–2029)
2009–2018:
Powerful multi-year impulse forms Cycle Wave i , ending in mid-2018.
2018–2022:
A deep, multi-legged ABC correction forms Cycle Wave ii , ending in mid-2022.
2022–2025:
Explosive impulsive rally forms Cycle Wave iii , currently completing around $1,576.42.
2025–2027 (Expected):
A corrective pullback forms Cycle Wave iv , likely more sideways or shallow in structure.
2027–2029 (Expected):
Final rally completes Cycle Wave v , with price targets between $2,280.37 and $3,008.41 , ending the macro Elliott structure.
🔚 Conclusion
With the cycle top revised to mid-2018 and the correction ending mid-2022 , the chart structure becomes even more aligned with classic Elliott Wave theory and Smart Money behavior.
Netflix’s long-term chart is a perfect confluence of:
Elliott Wave structure (impulse → correction → impulse),
Fibonacci precision,
Institutional manipulation (SMC), and
Clear price action behavior.
The roadmap to 2029 shows exciting bullish potential, but also highlights the need for caution near projected macro top zones — where institutional distribution may quietly unfold again.
📘 DISCLAIMER: This is a structural, educational market outlook. Not financial advice. Please do your own due diligence and risk management.
#Netflix, #NFLX, #Nasdaq #WaveTheory, #Fibonacci, #SmartMoney, #PriceAction