Get started

Contains image

EURUSD On The Rise! BUY! My dear friends, EURUSD looks like it will make a good move, and here are the details: The market is trading on 1.1704 pivot level Bias - Bullish Technical Indicators: Supper Trend generates a clear long signal while Pivot Point HL is currently determining the overall Bullish trend of the market. Goal - 1.1730 Recommended Stop Loss - 1.1690 About Used Indicators: Pivot points are a great way to identify areas of support and resistance, but they work best when combined with other kinds of technical analysis Disclosure: I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis. ——————————— WISH YOU ALL LUCK
Long
by AnabelSignals
1
GBP/AUD - Triangle Breakout (08.09.2025)The GBP/AUD Pair on the M30 timeframe presents a Potential Selling Opportunity due to a recent Formation of a Triangle Breakout Pattern. This suggests a shift in momentum towards the downside in the coming hours. Possible Short Trade: Entry: Consider Entering A Short Position around Trendline Of The Pattern. Target Levels: 1st Support – 2.0493 2nd Support – 2.0457 🎁 Please hit the like button and 🎁 Leave a comment to support for My Post ! Your likes and comments are incredibly motivating and will encourage me to share more analysis with you. Best Regards, KABHI_TA_TRADING Thank you. Disclosure: I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis.
Short
by KABHI_TA_TRADING
31
THE KOG REPORT - UpdateEnd of day update from us here at KOG: With gold continuing it's mission to all time highs again we did manage to get a 200pip rejection from the red box only to the support, get a trade upside and the RIP the from near enough the final target given this morning for the move. Worked out pretty well in our opinion! Now, interesting move here on gold and many will think the retracement has started however, there are a few hurdles here to then confirm the move. First stage is the 3655 resistance which needs to hold us down, while the 3630 support level needs to break. Due to news tomorrow, we would expect this to start a range now between the two levels. For us, we'll stick with the plan in place as that level above 3668 gave us a nice RIP downside. As always, trade safe. KOG
FX:XAUUSD
by KnightsofGold
8
Gold testing highs, possible pullback below $3,675📊 Market Overview: Gold surged to an all-time high at $3,673.95/oz on September 9, 2025, driven by Fed rate-cut expectations, USD weakness, and strong central bank demand. On September 10, gold is consolidating around $3,635/oz, with markets awaiting key US inflation data. 📉 Technical Analysis: • Key Resistance: $3,675 – $3,700 • Nearest Support: $3,600 – $3,620 • EMA: Price remains above EMA 09 → bullish momentum intact. • Candlestick / Volume / Momentum: Technicals still show Strong Buy signals, but overbought conditions suggest short-term pullback risk. 📌 Outlook: Gold may pull back in the short term if sellers defend the $3,675–$3,700 zone, but a breakout above this level could trigger another rally toward $3,720–$3,750. 💡 Trading Strategy Suggestion: 🔻 SELL XAU/USD: 3697 – 3700 🎯 TP: 40 / 80 / 200 pips 🛑 SL: 3703 🔺 BUY XAU/USD: 3617 – 3620 🎯 TP: 40 / 80 / 200 pips 🛑 SL: 3614
OANDA:XAUUSDLong
by Mian-FXSignals
1
FEAM — 5E ADVANCED MATERIALS. August 27, 2025.NASDAQ:FEAM #FEAM — 5E ADVANCED MATERIALS (NASDAQ:FEAM) Insider Purchase Analysis | Basic Materials | Specialty Chemicals | USA | NASDAQ | August 27, 2025. Overview: This report examines the recent insider purchases of FEAM shares on August 25, 2025, in the context of the company's operational focus on boron and lithium production. FEAM, a critical minerals developer with assets in California, has faced significant share price depreciation amid market challenges in the lithium sector. The insider activity, coupled with a concurrent public offering, signals potential confidence in near-term catalysts. We provide a comprehensive analysis for institutional consideration. 1. Insider Trading Context Buyers and Transaction Details: On August 25, 2025, BEP Special Situations IV LLC (a director-affiliated entity) purchased 100,000 shares at $3.50 per share, increasing its holdings to 7,597,349 shares. Similarly, Ascend Global Investment Fund SPC - Strategic Segregated Portfolio (potentially related) acquired 100,000 shares at the same price, bringing combined indirect beneficial ownership to 7,830,646 shares. Additionally, CEO Paul Weibel III bought 1,628 shares, and CFO Joshua Malm purchased 1,425 shares, both at $3.50. These transactions coincide with the closing of an $8.31 million public offering of common stock at $3.50 per share, raising capital for operational advancements. Size and Significance: The director/fund purchases represent the bulk of the activity, totaling ~$350,000 per entity, while executive buys are smaller (~$5,000–$6,000 each). Insider ownership stands at 79.00%, with recent transactions boosting it by 1.16%. Top holders include Bluescape Energy Partners LLC (37.45% of outstanding shares). Bullish Signal Interpretation: Insider buys at depressed prices, especially amid a capital raise, often indicate confidence in undervaluation or upcoming catalysts. This aligns with FEAM's focus on boron (stable pricing at ~$757/MT in the U.S.) and lithium (recovering demand from EVs). The stock rose 7.82% on August 26, 2025, post-announcement, suggesting market recognition of this vote of confidence. High insider ownership (79%) reduces agency risks and aligns interests with shareholders. Charts: • (1D) • (5D) • (1H) Insider Trades: FEAM Ownership: SEC From 4: www.sec.gov www.sec.gov 2. Technical Analysis Chart Overview (1-Year View): FEAM has been in a prolonged downtrend since September 2024, declining from ~$24 to $4.20 by August 2025, reflecting sector pressures. A sharp drop in December 2024 (from $20 to $10) marked a breakdown below key support, followed by consolidation around $4–$6. The descending trendline (purple) connects highs from October 2024 onward, acting as resistance. Moving averages show bearish alignment: SMA20 ($3.57), SMA50 ($3.92), SMA200 ($6.34). Volume trends indicate spikes during sell-offs (e.g., December 2024, March 2025), with recent August 2025 volume elevated on the offering news. Chart Overview (1-Month View): Short-term volatility is evident, with a bounce from $3.50 lows in late June to $5.00 highs in mid-August, followed by a pullback to $3.42. Candlestick patterns include a bullish engulfing on August 7–11 (green candles with volume spike), but recent red candles suggest profit-taking. RSI (14) at 38.40 indicates approaching oversold territory, potentially signaling a reversal if buying momentum builds. Key Levels and Indicators: • Support: $3.00 (psychological floor, recent lows), $2.82 (52-week low). • Resistance: $4.00 (near-term), $5.00 (mid-August high), $6.00 (SMA200 convergence). • Trendlines: Bearish descending channel intact; a break above $4.00 could invalidate. • RSI/MACD: RSI neutral-to-oversold (38.40); MACD not shown but implied convergence on pullback suggests potential bullish crossover if volume supports. • Volume and Patterns: Average volume 35K; recent spikes (e.g., 131K on August 27) correlate with news. No clear reversal patterns yet, but insider buys at $3.50 may establish a base. ➖➖➖ 3. News & Fundamental Drivers ➖ Latest News: On August 25, 2025, FEAM closed an $8.31 million public offering to fund project development, including its Fort Cady boron-lithium project. An updated technical report was released on August 12, 2025, highlighting resource estimates. The company presented at the Sidoti Micro-Cap Conference on May 22, 2025. ➖ Earnings Reports: Fiscal Q3 2025 (ended March 31, 2025, reported May 15, 2025) showed EPS of -$1.68, missing estimates of -$1.31 by $0.37. TTM EPS stands at -$16.11, with no sales reported (pre-commercial stage). ROA -44.56%, ROE -82.77%, reflecting development-phase losses. Next earnings expected September 8, 2025. ➖ Sector Outlook: The boron market is projected to grow from $3.63B in 2025 at >4% CAGR, driven by glass, ceramics, and agriculture demand. Lithium supply currently outpaces demand, stabilizing prices in 2025, but EV battery growth forecasts >400 GWh demand by year-end, with potential shortages ahead. Catalysts include U.S. tariffs on imports, FEAM's domestic production advantages, and project milestones (e.g., commercial boron output). ➖➖➖ 4. Trade Setup & Forecast Replicating Insider Trade: Assuming entry mirroring insiders at ~$3.50 (current price $3.42 offers a slight discount). Entry Price: $3.42–$3.50. Price Targets: ➡️ Short-term (1–3 months): $4.50 (break above resistance, +31.6%). ➡️ Mid-term (3–6 months): $6.00 (SMA200 test, +75.4%). ➡️ Long-term (6–12 months): $10.00 (channel breakout, +192.4%). We recommend a Strong Buy with 25–35% potential upside over the next 6 months, targeting $4.50–$4.75 on project milestones. Disclaimer: This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
NASDAQ:FEAMLong
by SergioRichi
Gold makes a correctional move Gold makes a correctional move while aligning with its broader bullish trend, creating fresh highs at the 3670’s. The daily candle formation shows demand around 3620, which lures price action to liquidate the 3660’s before the next directional move. <<<<<>>>>> key insight: New High: 3670’s Daily Demand: 3620 Liquidity Zone: 3660’s Bias: Bullish continuation with corrective pullbacks. follow for more insights , comment and boost idea
OANDA:XAUUSDLong
by Ak_capitalist
1
How to Find Order Block on Any Forex Pair & Gold (SMC Basics) Order block is easier to find than you think. I am going to reveal 2 simple price models that will help you find strong bullish and bearish order block zones on any Forex pair. Discover how to identify OB and how to draw it properly in Smart Money Concepts SMC trading. To effectively spot Order Block, you will need to learn basic Structure Mapping. To find a bullish order block, you will need to learn by heart a classic bullish trend model. According to the rules, that market is trading in a bullish trend if the price consistently updates Higher High HH and Higher Lows HL. Such a price action confirms an uptrend . The last higher low in that will be your Bullish Order Block. Let me share with you a definition of a bullish order block so you could better understand its deep meaning. Bullish order block is a significant price zone or a level where large market players (banks, institutions, hedge funds) have previously placed a high volume of buy orders, creating a strong imbalance in demand. And what is a proof of this strong demand? A consequent break of structure and a formation of a new higher high demonstrate a clear strength of a bullish wave that was initiated because of the activity of Smart Money. As the market continues updating Higher Highs , remember to update Order Block. It will strictly be based on the LAST Higher Low. Examine a price action on NZDUSD forex pair on a daily time frame. The trend is bullish and our Order Block will be based on the last Higher Low. To properly draw Order Block zone, its low should be based on the lowest low of a Higher Low. Its high should be based on the lowest daily candle close above a low of a Higher Low. We will assume that huge volumes of buying orders will accumulate within that zone. That area will provide a safe zone for us to buy the market from. Alternatively, its violation will signify an important shift in a market sentiment. To find a bearish order block, you will need to understand a classic bearish trend model. According to the rules, that market is trading in a bearish trend if the price consistently updates Lower Lows LL and Lower Highs LH. Such a price action confirms a downtrend . The last lower high in that will be your Bearish Order Block. And here is what exactly is a bearish order block. Bearish order block is a significant price zone or a level where large market players - Smart Money have previously placed a high volume of sell orders, creating a strong imbalance in supply. And what is a proof of this strong supply? A consequent break of structure and a formation of a new lower low demonstrate a clear strength of a bearish wave that was initiated because of the activity of Smart Money. As the market continues updating Lower Lows, remember to update Order Block. It will strictly be based on the LAST Lower High. Please, check a price action on NZDCHF forex pair. The market is trading in a downtrend. Our bearish order block will be based on the last lower high . The high of this zone will be the highest high of the last lower high. Its low will be the highest daily candle close below the last lower high. That zone will be a critical resistance. Large selling volumes will be distributed within. Once that area is tested, we can sell the market from that. Alternatively, its bullish violation will signify a significant shift in the market sentiment. Of course, these 2 models will not reveal all the order block on a price chart, BUT it will show you one of the most significant ones that you can rely on for safe entries for your trades. Just learn a structure mapping in smart money concepts and use that you find powerful order block zones on any forex pair. ❤️Please, support my work with like, thank you!❤️ I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis.
PEPPERSTONE:XAUUSDEducation
by VasilyTrader
11
ARAM (Aram Group) — ADX 15Min BuyARAM pulled off a monster 106% move, breaking out of a large basing structure near 0.95 and rocketing up to 3.18. After this euphoric move, price formed a rising wedge, followed by a sharp correction and now a bull flag breakout — textbook bull continuation pattern. The current candle just broke out from the falling wedge to the upside, signaling a fresh impulsive leg may be underway. 🔀 Trend & Breakout Structure: Primary trend: Bullish AF Consolidation: Falling wedge after rising wedge → bullish continuation Breakout Trigger: Break of wedge resistance at ~2.65 🎯 Trade Setup: Entry: 2.78 (Breakout Confirmation) Stop Loss: 2.30 (Below wedge low) Take Profit: 3.98 Risk/Reward: ~3 R Max $ Risk: 1–3% of capital "Let your winners run, cut your losers short." – Jesse Livermore ⚠️ Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. ARAM appears to be a high-risk, small-cap momentum play. Use strict risk management and ensure your position size reflects your capital tolerance.
ADX:ARAMLong
by DubaiTradersHub
CALC CBO Eric Roberts added 3,508 shares at $2.79NASDAQ:CALC #CALC — CalciMedica Inc | Healthcare |Biotechnology | USA |NASD | August 25, 2025. Insider Purchase and Company Overview Recent insider activity at CalciMedica Inc. (NASDAQ: CALC), a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing novel therapies for acute and chronic inflammatory diseases, indicates growing executive confidence. On August 21, 2025, Eric W. Roberts, the Chief Business Officer, purchased 3,508 shares at an average price of $2.79 per share, for a total value of $9,797. This transaction, disclosed via SEC Form 4 on August 25, 2025, at 09:30 AM EDT, increased his total holdings to 60,907 shares. This buy is part of a broader pattern of insider accumulation, as CalciMedica's Chief Medical Officer, Sudarshan Hebbar, also acquired shares in mid-August 2025 (9,563 shares on August 19 at ~$2.82 and 4,392 shares on August 15 at ~$2.79), signaling potential optimism amid the stock's recent volatility. www.stocktitan.net www.investing.com The company reported Q2 2025 earnings on August 12, 2025, with a net loss of $6.0 million ($0.40 per share), in line with analyst estimates, and a cash position of $18.0 million as of June 30, 2025—sufficient to fund operations into mid-2026. Key catalysts include ongoing Phase 2 trials (e.g., KOURAGE for acute kidney injury, with data expected in 2025), which could drive upside if positive. ir.calcimedica.com www.prnewswire.com www.stocktitan.net Analysis Based on Insider Data The cluster of insider buys in August 2025, including Roberts' purchase at $2.79, aligns with the chart's bottoming signals and post-earnings stability. Insiders often buy during perceived undervaluation, especially in biotech where clinical data can catalyze rapid moves. With cash runway to mid-2026 and upcoming trial readouts, this activity implies executives see asymmetric upside potential, potentially discounting positive Phase 2 results. The buys occurred near support levels, reinforcing the $2.50-$2.80 zone as a accumulation area. Charts: • (1D) • (1D) • (3D) SEC From 4: www.sec.gov Forecast: Replicating Roberts' buy at ~$2.79, the setup offers moderate-to-high reward potential in a biotech rebound play, assuming positive catalysts materialize. Based on the insider confidence, technical bottoming, and upcoming data, I project a 40-80% upside potential over 3-6 months if the reversal holds. Entry Price: $2.79 (current/insider level). Recommended Exit Targets: — Conservative Target 1: $3.50 (25% profit, +$0.71/share) – Near-term resistance; exit on first signs of weakness or post-trial news. — Moderate Target 2: $4.00 (43% profit, +$1.21/share) — Aggressive Target 3: $5.00 (79% profit, +$2.21/share) – full exit if RSI hits overbought (>70) or on positive trial data release. Overall Potential: 40-80% growth. This forecast is speculative and not financial advice; always conduct due diligence.
NASDAQ:CALCLong
by SergioRichi
EURJPY: Test of Critical Demand Zone 🇪🇺🇯🇵 EURJPY is stuck on a major daily horizontal demand zone. A recent breakout of a resistance line of a falling parallel channel on an hourly time frame indicates an intraday strength of the buyers. I will expect a pullback at least to 173.0 level. ❤️Please, support my work with like, thank you!❤️ I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis.
Long
by VasilyTrader
2
EURGBP The Target Is UP! BUY! My dear followers, This is my opinion on the EURGBP next move: The asset is approaching an important pivot point 0.8649 Bias - Bullish Technical Indicators: Supper Trend generates a clear long signal while Pivot Point HL is currently determining the overall Bullish trend of the market. Goal - 0.8666 About Used Indicators: For more efficient signals, super-trend is used in combination with other indicators like Pivot Points. Disclosure: I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis. ——————————— WISH YOU ALL LUCK
Long
by AnabelSignals
1
GBPJPY What Next? SELL! My dear subscribers, This is my opinion on the GBPJPY next move: The instrument tests an important psychological level 199.56 Bias - Bearish Technical Indicators: Supper Trend gives a precise Bearish signal, while Pivot Point HL predicts price changes and potential reversals in the market. Target - 199.28 My Stop Loss - 199.71 About Used Indicators: On the subsequent day, trading above the pivot point is thought to indicate ongoing bullish sentiment, while trading below the pivot point indicates bearish sentiment. Disclosure: I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis. ——————————— WISH YOU ALL LUCK
Short
by AnabelSignals
1
Nvidia (NVDA) 2025+ Catalysts Updated: Analyst Views September🚀 Nvidia (NVDA) 2025+ Catalysts & Risks: Analyst Views — Updated September 2025 ________________________________________ 📝 Summary Outlook (September 2025) Nvidia remains at the center of the global AI boom, with dominant GPU share, a strengthening networking/software moat, and multi-year sovereign and enterprise buildouts driving demand. Q2 FY26 confirmed strong momentum, while Q3 guidance points to continued growth. The main risks lie in tariff policy, China licensing, supply chain tightness, and valuation sensitivity. Street consensus remains bullish, with targets in the $207–$211 range and a Strong Buy bias. 🔑 Key Catalysts Driving Nvidia’s Stock Growth (2025+) 1. 🏆 AI Chip Dominance — Score: 10/10 Nvidia still commands ~90%+ of data-center AI accelerators, with CUDA/NVLink lock-in keeping switching costs high. 2. 🏗️ Surging Data Center Demand — Score: 10/10 Hyperscalers remain in an AI “build” cycle. 2025 data-center CapEx is approaching ~$300B, with Nvidia reporting record $41.1B Data Center revenue in its latest quarter. 3. 🌐 Enterprise & “AI Everywhere” Adoption — Score: 8.7/10 Companies across industries are rolling out AI assistants, copilots, and retrieval-augmented applications; Nvidia benefits via GB200 NVL72 racks and RTX-based inference at the edge. 4. 🤝 Strategic/Channel Partnerships — Score: 8.9/10 Cisco is integrating Spectrum-X into networking solutions, while HPE has expanded its Nvidia “AI factory” offerings—broadening reach into enterprise and hybrid AI buildouts. 5. 🚗 Automotive & Robotics — Score: 8.4/10 Auto revenue grew ~70% Y/Y; DRIVE Thor shipments have begun, and Nvidia’s Jetson/AGX Thor and robotics platforms are expanding into industrial automation. 6. 🧑‍💻 Software & Subscriptions — Score: 8.6/10 Nvidia’s AI Enterprise, DGX Cloud, CUDA-Q, and TensorRT deepen recurring, high-margin revenue and increase developer lock-in. 7. 🌎 Omniverse, Digital Twins & Industrial AI — Score: 8.2/10 Ansys, Siemens, and other industrial software vendors are embedding Omniverse into simulation suites, accelerating adoption of “digital twins” and simulation AI workflows. 8. 🛜 Networking & Photonics — Score: 8.8/10 Spectrum-X Photonics enables co-packaged optics for exascale “AI factories,” improving bandwidth and efficiency while giving Nvidia more end-to-end control. 9. 🧪 Relentless Roadmap (Blackwell → Rubin) — Score: 9.0/10 Blackwell Ultra is ramping into 2025, with the Rubin architecture slated for 2026—sustaining Nvidia’s upgrade cycles. 10. 🌍 Sovereign & Global AI Buildouts — Score: 8.5/10 Europe, the Middle East, and India are launching sovereign AI projects. Saudi-backed Humain alone has committed to tens of thousands of Blackwell chips for 2026 buildouts. ________________________________________ 📈 Latest Analyst Recommendations (September 2025) • Street Stance: Strong Buy/Overweight remains dominant. ~85% of analysts rate NVDA a Buy; avg 12-mo PT ~$207–$211. • Recent Calls: Multiple firms reiterated Overweight/Buy, with price targets up to $230. • Common Bull Case: Nvidia’s accelerator lead, software moat, sovereign/enterprise AI pipeline, and expanding networking portfolio. • Common Cautions: Premium valuation, competition from custom silicon, and export/tariff risk. ________________________________________ 🗞️ Latest Events & News (Aug–Sep 2025) • Q2 FY26 results (reported Aug 27, 2025): Revenue $46.7B (+56% Y/Y); Data Center $41.1B; Blackwell shipments +17% Q/Q; buyback program boosted by $60B. • Q3 FY26 guidance: ~$54B (±2%) revenue. • Networking push: Spectrum-X Photonics unveiled; Cisco partnership expanding enterprise deployments. • Omniverse OEM deal: Ansys to embed Omniverse tech within its simulation platforms. • Sovereign AI momentum: Saudi Humain centers to deploy 18k+ Blackwell chips starting 2026; UAE and India also ramping large-scale AI initiatives. • Ecosystem investing: Nvidia continues selective investments in AI startups, strengthening CUDA adoption. ________________________________________ 🇺🇸🇨🇳 US–China Tariffs & Export Controls — September 2025 Update • Tariff truce extended (Aug 2025): Current tariffs remain at ~30% U.S. on Chinese imports and ~10% reciprocal from China. Next decision point: Nov 10, 2025. • Supreme Court review: The Court will hear a case challenging U.S. executive authority on tariffs this fall. • China export licensing: U.S. has begun granting licenses for Nvidia’s H20 China-compliant GPUs. Advanced Blackwell exports remain restricted without further approvals. Impact on Nvidia: Truce reduces near-term disruption, but future tariff or licensing changes remain key risks. China sales are limited to compliant GPUs with lower margins. ________________________________________ ⚠️ Key Negative Drivers & Risks (Updated) 1. 🇨🇳 US–China Tech Policy Tariff truce is temporary; licensing decisions and court rulings keep China exposure uncertain. 2. 🏛️ Regulatory/Legislative Overhang Proposals like the GAIN AI Act could impose stricter controls on exports and prioritize domestic deployments. 3. 🏭 Supply Chain Bottlenecks Advanced packaging and HBM memory remain tight despite expansions—potential bottlenecks for shipments. 4. 🧮 Competitive Threats & Custom Silicon AMD, Intel, and hyperscaler-designed accelerators continue to advance, potentially eroding Nvidia’s hyperscale share. 5. 🏷️ Valuation & Expectations Nvidia trades at high multiples; any slowdown or guidance miss could trigger volatility. 6. 💵 Customer Concentration Top cloud giants still account for a large share of revenue; CapEx pauses or custom chip adoption would materially impact results. ________________________________________
NASDAQ:NVDALong
by ProjectSyndicate
62
Gold Extends Rally After Hitting Record High📊 Market Overview: Gold is holding at record highs, trading around $3,652/oz, supported by a weaker dollar, lower yields, and growing Fed rate cut expectations. 📉 Technical Analysis: • Key resistance (near-term): 3650 – 3665 • Extended resistance (H1): 3690 – 3700 • Nearest support: 3640 – 3635 • Extended support (H1): 3615 – 3608 • EMA: Price is trading above multiple EMAs, confirming a bullish bias. • Candles / Volume / Momentum: Momentum remains bullish; RSI on H1 is slightly overbought, suggesting potential for short pullbacks before continuation. 📌 Outlook: Gold is likely to continue higher short-term if it holds above 3640. A breakout above 3665 could open the door to 3690 – 3700, with potential extension to 3725 – 3735. Conversely, a drop below 3635 may trigger downside pressure toward 3615 – 3585. 💡 Suggested Trading Strategy: 🔺 BUY XAU/USD: 3640 – 3643 🎯 TP: 40/80/200 pips ❌ SL: 3637 🔻 SELL XAU/USD : 3663 – 3666 🎯 TP: 40/80/200 pips ❌ SL: 3669
OANDA:XAUUSDLong
by Mian-FXSignals
2
Lingrid | AUDUSD Major Resistance Short - Monthly LevelThe price perfectly fulfilled my previous idea . FX:AUDUSD has rallied strongly from the double-bottom formation near 0.6460 and is now testing the resistance zone around 0.6627. The market structure shows bullish momentum fueled by a breakout from the triangle pattern, lifting price toward prior highs. Price action is stalling at the upper boundary, where sellers may look to fade the move, opening potential retracement back toward 0.6550. If buyers defend that zone, another attempt at resistance could follow, but failure there may shift momentum in favor of sellers. The broader setup suggests a battle between trend continuation and near-term exhaustion. 💡 Risks: A stronger-than-expected US PPI could boost the dollar and push AUDUSD lower. A dovish RBA stance or weak Australian economic data may undercut recent bullish momentum. Global risk sentiment shifts, particularly weakness in equities or commodities, could weigh on AUD demand. If this idea resonates with you or you have your own opinion, traders, hit the comments. I’m excited to read your thoughts!
Short
by Lingrid
10
Lingrid | AVAXUSDT Upside Momentum Building. Potential SurgeBINANCE:AVAXUSDT is trending inside a well-defined upward channel, supported by higher lows and a clean breakout above the 25.50 level. The market structure shows consolidation breaks and triangle formations resolving higher, signaling continuation of bullish pressure. Current momentum suggests buyers could drive price toward the 28.30 resistance zone if the upward trendline continues to hold. Any retest of 25.60 is likely to act as a springboard for further gains within the channel. The overall setup reflects sustained bullish sentiment aiming for higher levels. 💡 Risks: A breakdown below 25.00 could trap buyers and send price back toward 22.00 support. Regulatory headlines targeting crypto markets may trigger sudden volatility and selling pressure. Sharp declines in Bitcoin or Ethereum could weigh on broader altcoin sentiment and stall AVAX’s uptrend. If this idea resonates with you or you have your own opinion, traders, hit the comments. I’m excited to read your thoughts!
Long
by Lingrid
7
Lingrid | USDCHF Reached Demand Zone: Potential Rebound The price perfectly fulfilled my previous idea . FX:USDCHF has tested the demand zone around 0.7913 and is showing signs of holding above this key support. The structure suggests a potential rebound as price deceleration aligns with the higher probability of a corrective move toward the 0.7984 resistance. A break above the downward trendline would confirm strength and open the way toward the 0.8050 region. As long as the 0.7900 level remains defended, buyers retain the advantage with room for continuation higher. 💡 Risks: A decisive close below 0.7900 would invalidate the demand-zone setup and trigger deeper losses. Upcoming US data releases such as CPI or NFP may spark volatility and disrupt the bullish scenario. Unexpected hawkish commentary from the SNB could strengthen CHF and cap upside momentum. If this idea resonates with you or you have your own opinion, traders, hit the comments. I’m excited to read your thoughts!
Long
by Lingrid
5
International Payment Systems (SWIFT, CBDCs)Part I: The Evolution of International Payment Systems 1. The Early Days of Cross-Border Payments Historically, cross-border payments were facilitated through: Gold and Silver Settlements: Merchants exchanged precious metals, which were universally recognized as stores of value. Bills of Exchange: Used in medieval trade, these paper instruments allowed merchants to settle accounts without moving physical assets. Correspondent Banking: In the 19th and 20th centuries, banks built networks of correspondent relationships to settle payments across borders. These methods were slow, costly, and prone to risks such as fraud, counterparty default, and political instability. 2. The Bretton Woods System and Beyond After World War II, the Bretton Woods Agreement (1944) created the U.S. dollar–centric system, where the dollar was convertible into gold and became the dominant reserve currency. This system enhanced cross-border payments but still relied heavily on correspondent banks. Following the collapse of Bretton Woods in 1971, fiat currencies began floating freely, further complicating international payments as exchange rate volatility increased. 3. The Rise of Electronic Payment Systems The digital era of the late 20th century transformed payments: CHIPS (Clearing House Interbank Payments System) in the U.S. TARGET2 in Europe. Fedwire for domestic U.S. transfers. SWIFT, which emerged as the global financial messaging system connecting thousands of banks. Part II: SWIFT – The Backbone of Global Financial Messaging 1. What is SWIFT? Founded in 1973 and headquartered in Belgium, SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) is not a payment system itself but a secure messaging network that enables banks and financial institutions worldwide to exchange standardized financial messages. Key functions include: Transmitting payment instructions (wire transfers, securities transactions, trade finance documents). Enabling standardization through message formats (MT/MX messages). Providing security with encrypted and authenticated communication channels. 2. How SWIFT Works Participants: Over 11,000 institutions in 200+ countries. Message Types: SWIFT MT (Message Type) and newer ISO 20022 MX formats. Process: A bank initiates a payment request via SWIFT. The message is sent securely to the counterparty bank. Actual fund settlement occurs separately through correspondent banking or clearing systems. 3. Why SWIFT Became Dominant Global Reach: No other network connected as many banks worldwide. Security: High encryption standards and authentication. Neutrality: As a cooperative owned by member institutions, SWIFT is not tied to any single nation-state (though geopolitics complicates this claim). Efficiency: Faster than telex, fax, or older systems. 4. SWIFT’s Economic and Political Significance Handles millions of messages daily, representing trillions of dollars in transactions. Acts as a gatekeeper of the international financial system. Has been used as a tool of geopolitical leverage, with nations being excluded (e.g., Iran, Russia). 5. Limitations of SWIFT Not instant: Settlement still depends on correspondent banking, which can take 2–5 days. Expensive: Multiple intermediaries add costs (correspondent bank fees, FX spreads). Opaque: Hard for individuals and small businesses to track payments in real time. Geopolitical risk: Heavy influence from the U.S. and EU raises questions of neutrality. Part III: Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and the Future of Payments 1. What are CBDCs? Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are digital forms of sovereign money issued directly by central banks. Unlike cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum) or stablecoins (USDT, USDC), CBDCs are: Legal tender, backed by the state. Centralized, controlled by the central bank. Stable in value, tied to fiat currencies. CBDCs can be classified into: Retail CBDCs: For use by the general public (e.g., digital yuan wallet). Wholesale CBDCs: For interbank and institutional settlements. 2. Motivations for CBDC Development Central banks globally are exploring CBDCs for reasons including: Faster and cheaper payments (especially cross-border). Financial inclusion for unbanked populations. Reduced reliance on private intermediaries (Visa, Mastercard, SWIFT). Geopolitical sovereignty (reducing dollar dependency). Improved monetary policy tools (programmable money, negative rates). 3. CBDCs in Cross-Border Payments CBDCs offer potential solutions to SWIFT’s limitations: Instant settlement: Peer-to-peer transfers between central banks. Lower cost: Eliminates correspondent banking layers. Transparency: Real-time tracking of payments. Programmability: Smart contracts for automated compliance. 4. Leading CBDC Projects Worldwide China: Digital Yuan (e-CNY) already in pilot across multiple cities and tested for cross-border use. Europe: The European Central Bank is developing a Digital Euro. India: The Reserve Bank of India launched pilot programs for the Digital Rupee in 2022. USA: The Federal Reserve is researching a Digital Dollar, though progress is slower. Multi-CBDC Platforms: Projects like mBridge (BIS, China, UAE, Thailand, Hong Kong) aim to build interoperable cross-border CBDC networks. Part IV: SWIFT vs. CBDCs – Collaboration or Competition? 1. Will CBDCs Replace SWIFT? Possibility: If central banks interconnect CBDCs directly, the need for SWIFT messages may decline. Reality: Transition will be slow; SWIFT’s vast network is difficult to replicate overnight. 2. SWIFT’s Response SWIFT is experimenting with CBDC interoperability solutions, connecting multiple digital currencies through its network. Focus on ISO 20022 standardization to ensure compatibility with CBDC systems. Partnerships with central banks to ensure relevance in the digital era. 3. Coexistence Scenario In the short to medium term, SWIFT and CBDCs may coexist: SWIFT remains dominant for traditional bank-to-bank messaging. CBDCs gain traction for specific corridors, especially in Asia and emerging markets.Part I: The Evolution of International Payment Systems 1. The Early Days of Cross-Border Payments Historically, cross-border payments were facilitated through: Gold and Silver Settlements: Merchants exchanged precious metals, which were universally recognized as stores of value. Bills of Exchange: Used in medieval trade, these paper instruments allowed merchants to settle accounts without moving physical assets. Correspondent Banking: In the 19th and 20th centuries, banks built networks of correspondent relationships to settle payments across borders. These methods were slow, costly, and prone to risks such as fraud, counterparty default, and political instability. 2. The Bretton Woods System and Beyond After World War II, the Bretton Woods Agreement (1944) created the U.S. dollar–centric system, where the dollar was convertible into gold and became the dominant reserve currency. This system enhanced cross-border payments but still relied heavily on correspondent banks. Following the collapse of Bretton Woods in 1971, fiat currencies began floating freely, further complicating international payments as exchange rate volatility increased. 3. The Rise of Electronic Payment Systems The digital era of the late 20th century transformed payments: CHIPS (Clearing House Interbank Payments System) in the U.S. TARGET2 in Europe. Fedwire for domestic U.S. transfers. SWIFT, which emerged as the global financial messaging system connecting thousands of banks. Part II: SWIFT – The Backbone of Global Financial Messaging 1. What is SWIFT? Founded in 1973 and headquartered in Belgium, SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) is not a payment system itself but a secure messaging network that enables banks and financial institutions worldwide to exchange standardized financial messages. Key functions include: Transmitting payment instructions (wire transfers, securities transactions, trade finance documents). Enabling standardization through message formats (MT/MX messages). Providing security with encrypted and authenticated communication channels. 2. How SWIFT Works Participants: Over 11,000 institutions in 200+ countries. Message Types: SWIFT MT (Message Type) and newer ISO 20022 MX formats. Process: A bank initiates a payment request via SWIFT. The message is sent securely to the counterparty bank. Actual fund settlement occurs separately through correspondent banking or clearing systems. 3. Why SWIFT Became Dominant Global Reach: No other network connected as many banks worldwide. Security: High encryption standards and authentication. Neutrality: As a cooperative owned by member institutions, SWIFT is not tied to any single nation-state (though geopolitics complicates this claim). Efficiency: Faster than telex, fax, or older systems. 4. SWIFT’s Economic and Political Significance Handles millions of messages daily, representing trillions of dollars in transactions. Acts as a gatekeeper of the international financial system. Has been used as a tool of geopolitical leverage, with nations being excluded (e.g., Iran, Russia). 5. Limitations of SWIFT Not instant: Settlement still depends on correspondent banking, which can take 2–5 days. Expensive: Multiple intermediaries add costs (correspondent bank fees, FX spreads). Opaque: Hard for individuals and small businesses to track payments in real time. Geopolitical risk: Heavy influence from the U.S. and EU raises questions of neutrality. Part III: Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and the Future of Payments 1. What are CBDCs? Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are digital forms of sovereign money issued directly by central banks. Unlike cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum) or stablecoins (USDT, USDC), CBDCs are: Legal tender, backed by the state. Centralized, controlled by the central bank. Stable in value, tied to fiat currencies. CBDCs can be classified into: Retail CBDCs: For use by the general public (e.g., digital yuan wallet). Wholesale CBDCs: For interbank and institutional settlements. 2. Motivations for CBDC Development Central banks globally are exploring CBDCs for reasons including: Faster and cheaper payments (especially cross-border). Financial inclusion for unbanked populations. Reduced reliance on private intermediaries (Visa, Mastercard, SWIFT). Geopolitical sovereignty (reducing dollar dependency). Improved monetary policy tools (programmable money, negative rates). 3. CBDCs in Cross-Border Payments CBDCs offer potential solutions to SWIFT’s limitations: Instant settlement: Peer-to-peer transfers between central banks. Lower cost: Eliminates correspondent banking layers. Transparency: Real-time tracking of payments. Programmability: Smart contracts for automated compliance. 4. Leading CBDC Projects Worldwide China: Digital Yuan (e-CNY) already in pilot across multiple cities and tested for cross-border use. Europe: The European Central Bank is developing a Digital Euro. India: The Reserve Bank of India launched pilot programs for the Digital Rupee in 2022. USA: The Federal Reserve is researching a Digital Dollar, though progress is slower. Multi-CBDC Platforms: Projects like mBridge (BIS, China, UAE, Thailand, Hong Kong) aim to build interoperable cross-border CBDC networks. Part IV: SWIFT vs. CBDCs – Collaboration or Competition? 1. Will CBDCs Replace SWIFT? Possibility: If central banks interconnect CBDCs directly, the need for SWIFT messages may decline. Reality: Transition will be slow; SWIFT’s vast network is difficult to replicate overnight. 2. SWIFT’s Response SWIFT is experimenting with CBDC interoperability solutions, connecting multiple digital currencies through its network. Focus on ISO 20022 standardization to ensure compatibility with CBDC systems. Partnerships with central banks to ensure relevance in the digital era. 3. Coexistence Scenario In the short to medium term, SWIFT and CBDCs may coexist: SWIFT remains dominant for traditional bank-to-bank messaging. CBDCs gain traction for specific corridors, especially in Asia and emerging markets. Part V: Risks, Challenges, and Opportunities 1. Risks of CBDCs Privacy concerns: Central banks could track every transaction. Cybersecurity threats: Centralized systems are high-value hacking targets. Financial disintermediation: Banks may lose deposits if individuals prefer CBDCs. Geopolitical fragmentation: Competing CBDC blocs (U.S.-led vs China-led) could split the financial system. 2. Risks of SWIFT Sanctions weaponization undermines neutrality. Inefficiency relative to new technologies. Exposure to cyberattacks (e.g., Bangladesh Bank heist in 2016). 3. Opportunities For SWIFT: Remain the global connector by facilitating CBDC interoperability. For CBDCs: Create a more inclusive, efficient, and sovereign financial system. For Businesses and Consumers: Faster remittances, lower costs, better transparency. Conclusion International payment systems are undergoing one of the most profound transformations since the Bretton Woods era. SWIFT, the dominant global financial messaging system for decades, remains crucial but faces challenges from new technologies and shifting geopolitics. Meanwhile, CBDCs represent both an opportunity and a threat—promising faster, cheaper, and more sovereign payment infrastructures but also raising risks of fragmentation, surveillance, and competition. The likely future is not a complete replacement of SWIFT by CBDCs, but rather a hybrid system where SWIFT evolves to act as an interoperability layer while CBDCs gain prominence in specific cross-border corridors. Ultimately, the future of international payments will depend not only on technological innovation but also on political will, global cooperation, and the balance of power among major economies. The contest between SWIFT and CBDCs is not just about efficiency—it is about who controls the financial arteries of the 21st-century global economy.
NSE:BANKNIFTYEducation
by GlobalWolfStreet
Shipping, Freight, and Logistics Trading (Baltic Index)1. Foundations of Global Shipping and Freight 1.1 The Role of Shipping in Global Trade Shipping is the engine of globalization. Over 80% of international trade by volume is carried by sea. Ships transport crude oil, natural gas, coal, iron ore, grains, fertilizers, automobiles, and countless other goods. Without shipping, modern trade would collapse. It provides: Cost efficiency: Shipping is the cheapest way to transport large quantities over long distances. Accessibility: Oceans cover 70% of the earth, linking producers and consumers across continents. Flexibility: Different vessel types (tankers, bulk carriers, container ships, LNG carriers) handle specific cargo needs. 1.2 Freight: The Price of Shipping In simple terms, freight is the cost of transporting cargo from one point to another. Freight rates vary depending on: Type of cargo (dry bulk, liquid, containerized) Distance and route (short haul vs. long haul) Vessel size and availability Market conditions (supply of ships vs. demand for goods) Freight costs are crucial because they directly affect commodity prices, corporate profits, and inflation worldwide. 1.3 Logistics and Its Broader Scope While shipping focuses on transport, logistics covers the entire chain: storage, warehousing, customs clearance, last-mile delivery, and supply chain management. Logistics companies such as Maersk, DHL, FedEx, and MSC coordinate multi-modal transport systems that integrate shipping, trucking, rail, and air. 2. The Baltic Exchange and Baltic Index 2.1 History of the Baltic Exchange The Baltic Exchange is a London-based institution founded in the mid-18th century. Initially, it provided a marketplace for shipowners and merchants to negotiate contracts. Today, it is the world’s leading source of maritime market information, freight assessments, and shipping benchmarks. 2.2 What is the Baltic Dry Index (BDI)? The BDI is a composite index that tracks the cost of transporting raw materials by sea, specifically dry bulk commodities such as: Iron ore Coal Grains (wheat, corn, soybeans) Bauxite, alumina, and other minerals It is published daily by the Baltic Exchange and reflects the average of freight rates on major shipping routes worldwide. 2.3 How the BDI is Calculated The index is derived from assessments of freight brokers who provide daily estimates of charter rates for different ship sizes. It combines data from four main dry bulk carrier classes: Capesize (largest ships, mainly carrying iron ore & coal, 150,000+ DWT) Panamax (medium size, often for coal & grain, 60,000–80,000 DWT) Supramax (40,000–60,000 DWT, flexible routes & cargoes) Handysize (smaller vessels, 10,000–40,000 DWT, short routes, regional trade) The weighted average of these daily rates produces the BDI value. 2.4 Why is the BDI Important? Economic Indicator: It is considered a leading indicator of global trade activity. Rising BDI suggests strong demand for raw materials and growth, while falling BDI indicates slowing trade. Price Benchmark: Used by miners, steelmakers, traders, and shipping companies to negotiate contracts. Financial Market Tool: Hedge funds, analysts, and investors watch the BDI to forecast commodity cycles and global GDP trends. 3. The Economics of Freight Markets 3.1 Supply Side: The Shipping Fleet The supply of vessels is relatively inelastic in the short term. It takes 2–3 years to build new ships, so when demand spikes, freight rates can rise sharply. Conversely, during downturns, excess ships push rates lower. 3.2 Demand Side: Global Commodity Trade Demand for shipping depends on global consumption of raw materials: China’s steel production drives iron ore imports. Power plants drive coal shipments. Food security drives grain exports from the US, Brazil, and Ukraine. 3.3 Freight Rate Cycles The shipping industry is notoriously cyclical: Boom: High demand, limited supply → skyrocketing freight rates. Bust: Overbuilding of ships, economic slowdown → rates collapse. This volatility makes freight trading attractive but risky. 4. Trading and Investment Using the Baltic Index 4.1 Physical Shipping Contracts Shipowners lease vessels to charterers (traders, miners, commodity houses) through: Voyage Charter: Hire for a single trip. Time Charter: Hire for a specific time period. Bareboat Charter: Hire vessel without crew/equipment. Freight rates are negotiated based on BDI benchmarks. 4.2 Freight Derivatives and Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs) To manage volatility, traders use FFAs, financial contracts that lock in freight rates for future dates. Example: A steelmaker importing iron ore may buy FFAs to hedge against rising shipping costs. Speculators also trade FFAs purely for profit, betting on future freight movements. 4.3 ETFs and Shipping Stocks Investors gain exposure to freight and shipping through: Shipping company stocks (Maersk, Cosco, Hapag-Lloyd, Frontline) Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track shipping indices Commodities like iron ore, coal, and grains, which correlate with freight rates 4.4 Role of Banks and Hedge Funds Financial institutions use the BDI for forecasting, asset allocation, and even as a proxy for inflation and GDP. Hedge funds trade freight derivatives to profit from global trade cycles. 5. Logistics and Supply Chain Dynamics 5.1 Container Shipping vs. Bulk Shipping Container Shipping: Handles manufactured goods (electronics, clothing, cars). Measured in TEUs (Twenty-foot Equivalent Units). Freight benchmark = Shanghai Containerized Freight Index (SCFI). Bulk Shipping: Handles raw commodities (ore, coal, grain). Benchmark = BDI. 5.2 Supply Chain Bottlenecks Events like the COVID-19 pandemic and Suez Canal blockage (2021) highlighted vulnerabilities: Congested ports delayed shipments. Container shortages raised freight prices. Geopolitical tensions (Russia-Ukraine war) disrupted grain and oil transport. 5.3 Role of Technology Digital platforms, blockchain, and AI are transforming logistics: Real-time cargo tracking Smart contracts for freight payments Automated port operations 6. Case Studies 6.1 The 2008 Shipping Boom and Bust Pre-2008: China’s rapid industrial growth caused freight rates to skyrocket (BDI hit 11,793 points in May 2008). Post-2008: Global financial crisis slashed demand; oversupply of ships led to a crash (BDI dropped below 700 points in late 2008). 6.2 COVID-19 Pandemic Early 2020: Demand collapsed, ships idled, freight rates fell. Mid-2020 onward: Recovery + container shortages led to record high container freight prices. 6.3 Russia-Ukraine War (2022) Disrupted Black Sea grain exports. Increased insurance costs for vessels in conflict zones. Re-routed trade flows reshaped freight markets. Conclusion Shipping, freight, and logistics are the hidden arteries of global trade. The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) stands as a critical barometer of world economic health, linking shipping costs to broader market cycles. Traders, investors, and policymakers watch it closely to gauge demand for raw materials, predict inflation, and assess the global growth outlook. While the industry faces volatility, geopolitical risks, and environmental pressures, it is also entering a period of transformation driven by decarbonization, digitalization, and new trade patterns. For anyone interested in global markets—whether a trader, economist, or policy planner—the Baltic Index remains one of the most powerful yet underappreciated indicators of where the world economy is heading.
NASDAQ:METAEducation
by GlobalWolfStreet
1