Community discussions
If one assumes BTC is going to have a 30% ARR over the next 5 years, a holder of IBIT would see a cumulative return of 269.4% (after fund expenses) in 5 years vs. a cumulative return of 271.3% for BTC direct, only a 2% difference.
Meanwhile MSTR now has $1 billion annual dividend commitments between all the STRx products. That will require 1.5% annual shareholder dilution just to pay the dividends, the effects of which compound over time. If an investor buys MSTR when the mNAV is 1.25 (25% premium above BTC spot), and assuming BTC has the same 30% ARR, and assuming MSTR maintains a 1.25 mNAV, they would have a cumulative return of only 176% over the same 5 year period due to dividend dilution and the upfront mNAV premium drag. That's a difference of almost 100% less owning MSTR vs. IBIT or BTC direct. It doesn't matter how many more coins MSTR buys and adds to their stack, the math remains the same if the mNAV stays the same. That is an annual drag of 7.4% vs 0.35% for IBIT. That does not even account for the losses in the software division nor the huge option bonuses that management is awarded every year. Add those in and you have well over 10% annual drag vs. 0.35% for IBIT. Or 0% for Bitcoin direct.
Tell me again why people should buy this stock as a BTC proxy???
Look at the VIX... It should have been up 40% this week if this was the beginning of a deep, market-wide correction. But it's not up even half that amount. That's a good sign that the froth is coming out of the risk-on space and the overall market will probably be ok. In a couple of weeks this will all be a faint memory and the risk-on plays will have their day in the sun again like newfound toys. MSTR might even get a little stray fairy dust sprinkled on it.


Stay away from the meteorit