Products
Community
Markets
Brokers
More

Markets
United Kingdom
Stocks
Technology Services
Internet Software/Services
NFLXN
Ideas

Netflix, Inc.

No trades

See on Supercharts

Overview Financials News Ideas Minds Forecasts Seasonals Bonds ETFs

Trade ideas

Netflix Down After Earning, But Its Hunting Support Netflix is coming down after earnings and is currently trading more than 10% lower. Whenever we see such a sharp reversal, it’s important to zoom out and look at the broader trend. From the 2023 lows, there is still a very strong and impulsive recovery, so this could be just a temporary deeper corrective pause before the uptrend resumes. In Elliott Wave terms, it looks like a potential fourth wave retracement that could start to stabilize somewhere around the previous wave three high near the 1060 area, or possibly a bit lower, closer to the 1K level. This whole zone could be quite attractive for a rebound, especially since some of the gaps above the current price may still be filled — something that often happens when a stock remains in an uptrend. In my view, there’s still a good chance for a nice recovery and continuation higher in the weeks to come. Grega Highlights: Trend: Bullish (consolidation in wave four approaching support) Support: 1060, 1000 Resistance: 1260 Note: Stock can stabilize after wave 4 and try to fill the earnings gap at some point in the future.

Long

NFLX Earnings Today - Levels to Watch Netflix (NFLX) releases its Q3 earnings today, and sentiment is leaning bullish. Analysts expect revenue around $11.5 billion (+17% YoY) and EPS near $6.96, supported by optimism around its ad-tier and paid-sharing model. 🌿 This signals growth. For Q2 2025, Netflix posted revenue of about $11.08 billion, up roughly 15.9% YoY. For Q3 2025, analysts are projecting around $11.51 billion in revenue, up ~17% YoY. However, expectations are already high, meaning even a solid report might not trigger a strong rally unless guidance impresses . Watch these levels: $1,265 - Strong alignment of 61.8 Fib Resistance + Value Area High of April Rally $1,196 - $1,207 - Cluster of Daily 50-EMA + Anchored vWAP of its recent mini rally Overall bias: bullish but cautious — momentum favours the upside, but guidance and ad-tier results will decide if this breakout has real legs.

by AlchemyMarkets

NETFLIX has topped and can pull back to $875.Netflix (NFLX) has formed one of its strongest Sell Signals in the last 15 years. That's the 1M MACD Bearish Cross. The stock has been trading on a very consistent pattern ever since the 2008 U.S. Housing Crisis and during this multi-year span, the best indicator for a Top has been the 1M MACD forming a Bearish Cross. As you can see, this month marks the 7th such occurrence since June 2011. All previous formations resulted in the price pulling-back to touch at least its 1W MA100 (red trend-line). Only two times the correction has been bigger that was that first Bearish Cross in June 2011 and the most recent December 2021, which almost hit the 1M MA200 (orange trend-line), the market's ultimate multi-decade Support. These Top signals match fairly well the Sine Waves, which as you see form somewhat reliable Cycles. Those confirm that Netflix currently stands on a long-term Top. Even the 1M RSI is similar to the Top patterns suggested by the Sine Waves. As a result, we expect the stock to start a multi-month technical pull-back, with a fair projection of making contact with its 1W MA100 being $875.00. That's our Target. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Please LIKE 👍, FOLLOW ✅, SHARE 🙌 and COMMENT ✍ if you enjoy this idea! Also share your ideas and charts in the comments section below! This is best way to keep it relevant, support us, keep the content here free and allow the idea to reach as many people as possible. ** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 💸💸💸💸💸💸 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇

Short

Netflix: Key Support Zone in sight Netflix shares have continued to decline since our last update. We have now provided additional detail on the ongoing turquoise wave 4, which is subdivided into a magenta three-part structure. Within this structure, wave is expected to push price further down into the turquoise Target Zone, between $962.77 and $845.22. The low point of the larger wave 4 is anticipated within this range. Only after reaching this level should wave 5 drive price back above the $1,341 mark. As such, the turquoise Target Zone presents long entry opportunities, which can be protected with a stop set 1% below the lower boundary of the zone. However, if price rises directly above the aforementioned resistance at $1,341, our alternative scenario would be triggered, and we would initially need to prepare for a higher wave alt.3 top (probability: 30%).

Short

01:11

Netflix building support for $2000 Netflix is currently sitting on support getting ready for a move to $2000. Good luck!

Long

Updated

Netflix Ready to Fall ??Technical Analysis Summary Chart Type: Daily (1D) Ticker: NFLX (Netflix Inc.) Current Price: $1,194.00 (as of October 16, 2025) Recent Movement: Down by -0.77% 📈 Elliott Wave Labels (in red) The stock shows a 7-wave impulse move labeled from (A) to (G), forming an upward channel. The latest top is marked as (G) near $1,450. A corrective structure appears to be forming post-(G), labeled as (A), (B), (C) in black. 📉 Bearish Outlook The chart suggests a potential further decline: From the current level ($1,194) to near $1,107 (short-term support). Then possibly down to around $1,017 (marked as wave (C)). 📊 Trend Channels Two parallel ascending channels: The inner channel guided the move from early 2023 until mid-2025. The outer channel includes the recent peak at (G), showing possible overextension. The price has broken below the upper boundary, hinting at a trend change.

Short

by GKTrademanthan

Netflix (NFLX) - Elliott Wave Map to $25K 📘 Netflix (NFLX) – The Final Act of Supercycle Wave III, Setting the Stage for Wave V to $25,000+ Symbol: NASDAQ:NFLX Timeframe: Monthly Published: October 2025 Current Price: ~$1,120 Framework: Elliott Wave | Fibonacci Extensions | Price Action | Smart Money Concepts (SMC) | Fundamentals 🔍 Structural Overview – Supercycle Journey Netflix has been moving through a multi-decade Elliott Wave supercycle that began in the early 2000s. This structural roadmap is now approaching the final phase of Wave III, before setting up for a corrective Wave IV and ultimately a euphoric Wave V. Supercycle Wave I completed in January 2004 — a powerful impulse that marked Netflix’s transition into a mainstream tech-growth story. Supercycle Wave II followed, completing in 2008 with a healthy 50% retracement. This wave set the long-term demand foundation and concluded right as the global financial crisis unfolded. We are now in Supercycle Wave III, which began in 2008 and is currently in its final macro wave — the most dynamic phase of the entire structure. ⚙️ Breakdown of Supercycle Wave III (2008–2026 est.) Wave III itself subdivides into five clear macro waves, each respecting Fibonacci and structural principles: Macro Wave 1 ran from the 2008 bottom into mid-2011, kickstarting the secular bull trend. Macro Wave 2 ended in 2012 with a textbook 0.618 Fibonacci retracement , a classic sign of wave-based correction. Macro Wave 3 , the most explosive move of the cycle, lasted until 2018 and terminated near a 2.618 Fibonacci extension — a key confluence area and institutional distribution point. Macro Wave 4 then corrected from 2018 to 2022. However, this retracement was shallow, bouncing from the 0.236 level — preserving long-term bullish market structure and confirming continued institutional control. We are currently in Macro Wave 5 of Supercycle III . This leg is itself subdividing into five micro waves. Micro waves 1, 2, and 3 have already completed. Micro Wave 4 is now unfolding and is expected to bottom inside the Golden Pocket — the critical Fibonacci zone between approximately $771 and $548 . Once Micro Wave 4 completes, Micro Wave 5 will initiate. This final thrust is expected to target the region near $7,447 — the 2.618 extension from prior waves. This level aligns with structural channel tops and institutional profit zones. It would also mark the formal completion of Supercycle Wave III . 🧭 What Comes Next: Supercycle Wave IV and V After Wave III completes at the ~$7,44 7 area, a significant correction is expected. Supercycle Wave IV will be the most complex corrective structure since 2008 — possibly multi-year, combining flat, zig-zag, or triangle formations. This wave will likely retrace a large portion of Wave III and reset sentiment across the broader market. But this correction is not the end — it’s the setup. Supercycle Wave V will emerge from the Wave IV base and drive Netflix into its ultimate secular top . Based on the Fibonacci 4.618 extension from the base of the cycle, Wave V is projected to reach the $24,774 to $25,332 range. This would be the euphoric blow-off move where fundamentals, monetary policy, and sentiment combine to form a parabolic top — consistent with historical market cycle conclusions. 📐 Fibonacci Confluence Zones Each major wave has respected key Fibonacci ratios . Wave II retraced to 0.50, Wave III extended to 2.618, and Wave IV retraced to 0.236. Current projections place Wave V near the 4.618 extension level — a historically significant threshold for secular tops. The current Micro Wave 4 pullback is unfolding into the Golden Pocket zone — the 0.618–0.65 retracement range — which has repeatedly served as the institutional reaccumulation zone across prior waves. 🧠 Smart Money Behavior Smart Money Concepts further validate this wave count: In 2018 , we saw classic signs of institutional distribution at the top of Macro Wave 3 — including high-volume price exhaustion, deviation from trend, and liquidity sweeps. Between 2018 and 2022, accumulation returned during Wave 4, as institutional players re-entered at discounted levels and retested key demand blocks . The 2022 breakout into Macro Wave 5 has been efficient, clean, and impulsive — with minimal resistance and wide-range bullish candles, signaling continued institutional participation. The current Wave 4 micro correction may again serve as a liquidity grab — offering another accumulation window before the final markup toward the $7,447 zone. 🔍 Netflix Fundamentals – Fueling the Cycle Netflix's fundamentals are now structurally aligned with the technical setup: Diversified Monetization: The shift from pure subscription to a multi-layered model (ad-supported tiers, gaming, IP licensing, live events) is broadening both revenues and engagement. Ad-Supported Growth: Netflix’s advertising business is scaling rapidly, offering higher ARPU and access to price-sensitive users — a major tailwind for Wave V. Global Expansion: With strong localization strategies, Netflix continues to dominate key international markets, boosting user stickiness and content ROI. Strong Financials: Consistent free cash flow, improving margins, and disciplined content spend are creating a sustainable growth engine. These dynamics are not just supporting price — they are helping to drive the type of institutional confidence needed for Wave V to materialize. 🎯 Strategic Levels and Outlook Watch the Golden Pocket between $771–$548 — this is the high-probability completion zone for Micro Wave 4. Once Micro Wave 5 begins, price is expected to rally toward $7,447 — the projected top of Supercycle Wave III. After a broad correction during Wave IV, the final Wave V is projected to target $24,774 to $25,332 — where the entire super-cycle would culminate. 🔚 Final Word Netflix is moving through the final stages of a 20-year Supercycle Wave III — one of the strongest impulsive phases in equity history. The micro pullback underway now is not a sign of weakness, but a preparation for the final push. Wave IV will offer the last major reset before a euphoric Wave V redefines valuations. If the fundamental narrative continues to align, the $25K target is not speculative — it’s structural. 📘 Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes and is not financial advice. Always do your own due diligence and risk management. #NFLX #Netflix #NASDAQ #ElliottWave #TechnicalAnalysis #WaveTheory #Fibonacci #Supercycle #PriceAction #LongTermInvestment 💬 Respected traders and analysts! Your insights matter. Share your views, confirmations, or constructive criticism in the comments below. Let’s build a high-quality discussion around Netflix’s structural evolution and long-term investment context. — Team FIBCOS

Long

NETFLIX PERFECT LONG NASDAQ:NFLX On the daily TF has committed a large sweep of liquidity, then has broken the previous swing high and is now consolidating bullishly towards the daily 50ema, where I am looking for a reaction to the upside. At the lowest there could be a spike down to the 50fib on a fast retracement, so SL below. But rejection of 4hr 50ema and 100ema is telling that the move is ready to happen and likely not to retrace back down much further. I am targeting the previous long term highs as a tp. I feel confident in this entry, the price action is clean. Bollinger band volatility confluence is missing which is my only hesitation, however with the price action being as strong as it is, I am more than willing to make the entry.

Long

by Euan7rTrader

Netflix Buying Opportunity Netflix shares have dropped sharply — losing around 10% of their value in just one day, wiping billions from its market cap. The decline followed disappointing earnings results and a one-off $619 million tax charge in Brazil, overshadowing strong revenue growth. On the chart, price has tapped into a fair value gap created earlier — the gap between the first and third candle, where price hadn’t yet rebalanced liquidity. This area often acts as a strong demand zone, suggesting a potential short-term bottom. If price holds above this level, the next possible targets could be: 🎯 $1,267 — about +13% from current levels 🎯 $1,341 — about +20% from current levels Despite the sharp correction, Q4 guidance remains strong — Netflix expects revenue around $11.96B, a 17% YoY increase, and operating income near $2.86B. ⚠️ While volatility remains high, this drop may offer a strategic buying opportunity for those watching Netflix’s long-term growth story.

Long

Falling Wedge on NFLX: Set for a Break?Price on NASDAQ:NFLX has been consolidating inside a falling wedge, with each swing showing weaker momentum from sellers. And buyers are slowly stepping back in. A strong breakout above the upper trendline would confirm bullish strength and signal a potential continuation toward the 1,400.00 level. Until then, patience is key, waiting for a clear break with volume can help avoid false signals.

Long

Netflix (NFLX) - Descriptive Analysis by FIBCOS 📘 NFLX 2009–2029 Descriptive Analysis This is a detailed Elliott Wave Theory -based outlook for Netflix (NFLX) stock from around 2009 to the projected future of 2029, and it incorporates Fibonacci retracement & extensions, Smart Money Concepts (SMC) , and Price Action structure within a channel. Let’s break this down chronologically and structurally: 🌀 Wave Theory Confluence (Elliott Wave Structure) The long-term structure of Netflix (NFLX) from 2009 to the projected 2029 period follows a classic Elliott Wave cycle, now realigned with the cycle top in mid-2018 and the macro correction ending in mid-2022. 1. Cycle Wave i (2009–2018): NFLX entered a powerful multi-year rally, forming five sub-waves within this first major impulse. This long rally ended in mid-2018 , marking the top of Cycle Wave i . 2. Cycle Wave ii – ABC Correction (2018–2022): From the 2018 top, the price entered a prolonged and complex 4-year correction, unfolding as a classic A-B-C corrective structure. Wave A began the decline with a sharp markdown. Wave B was a fake recovery, leading to Wave C, a deeper liquidation into mid-2022 , completing the correction. This phase aligns with a major redistribution cycle where smart money exited positions, and retail investors were caught in hope rallies. 3. Cycle Wave iii (2022–2025): After finding a bottom in mid-2022, the stock launched a new impulsive rally , forming five sub-waves (1–5) of a powerful Wave iii Momentum accelerated in wave 3 of iii (typical in Elliott Wave), and the structure is now peaking as of late 2025, around $1,576.42. This marks the expected completion of Wave iii, with signals pointing toward a correction. 4. Cycle Wave iv (Expected 2025–2027): A corrective wave iv is expected to unfold, possibly returning toward the lower bound of the long-term ascending channel. According to the principle of alternation , since wave ii was deep and complex, wave iv may be shallower or more sideways. 5. Cycle Wave v (Expected 2027–2029): After the wave iv correction, a final impulsive leg — Wave v — is expected to push the price higher, targeting around $2,280.37 , with a potential extended move to $3,008.41 . This will complete the macro 5-wave cycle that began in 2009. 📐 Fibonacci Confluence The Fibonacci structure supports these wave formations: The 2.618 extension of the previous impulse wave (measured from the 2022 bottom) projects a price target near $2,280.37 , aligning with historical extension zones. The extended target at $3,008.41 aligns with the upper boundary of the long-term channel — often reached during euphoric final waves. Prior retracements during wave ii and the anticipated retracement in wave iv fall into common Fibonacci pullback zones (0.382–0.618). Fibonacci tools confirm that price has behaved symmetrically within the wave cycles, and provide high-probability zones for both correction and expansion. 🧠 Smart Money Concept (SMC) From a Smart Money perspective, the chart reflects a complete institutional cycle: Distribution Zone (2017–2018): Smart money exited during the late stages of Cycle Wave i. This aligns with the cycle top in mid-2018 , often accompanied by overvaluation and high optimism. Re-Accumulation Phase (2018–2022): The 4-year correction allowed institutional players to accumulate at discounted prices during wave C. Retail was largely shaken out, and liquidity was swept multiple times. Expansion Phase (2022–2025): From the 2022 bottom, price moved sharply upward in a clean impulse (Wave iii), confirming institutional interest. Gaps, strong breakouts, and efficient trends reflected low-resistance expansion driven by smart money. Future Distribution (2029?): Around the projected $2,280–$3,008 range (Wave v), expect distribution signs —including deviation from trend, order block mitigation, and liquidity grabs. These are typical before a larger market reset. Smart Money Concepts help explain the why behind each wave: fear and euphoria don’t happen randomly — they are often orchestrated phases of value transfer. 📊 Price Action Structure The long-term price action of NFLX reinforces the wave count and market psychology: 2009–2018 (Wave i): Price action showed a steady trend of higher highs and higher lows , with smooth breakouts and momentum-driven runs. 2018–2022 (Wave ii correction): A breakdown in structure occurred. Lower highs and a wide, overlapping correction defined this multi-year distribution. Key support levels were breached and retested as resistance — a classic bearish shift in structure. 2022–2025 (Wave iii): Clean, impulsive movement resumed. Breakouts, bullish flags, and retests marked key continuation zones. Market structure flipped back bullish with efficient rallies. 2025–2027 (Wave iv expected): A retracement is likely toward previous demand zones , possibly aligning with wave 4 of the lower-degree impulse, respecting Elliott’s guideline of wave 4 often retracing to the territory of wave 4 of the previous degree. 2027–2029 (Wave v projection): Anticipate price pushing into new highs, with potential overextension . However, bearish divergence and slowing momentum could foreshadow the macro top. This structure shows how technical behavior mirrors emotional and fundamental phases — from greed to fear, and back again. 📆 Timeline Summary (2009–2029) 2009–2018: Powerful multi-year impulse forms Cycle Wave i , ending in mid-2018. 2018–2022: A deep, multi-legged ABC correction forms Cycle Wave ii , ending in mid-2022. 2022–2025: Explosive impulsive rally forms Cycle Wave iii , currently completing around $1,576.42. 2025–2027 (Expected): A corrective pullback forms Cycle Wave iv , likely more sideways or shallow in structure. 2027–2029 (Expected): Final rally completes Cycle Wave v , with price targets between $2,280.37 and $3,008.41 , ending the macro Elliott structure. 🔚 Conclusion With the cycle top revised to mid-2018 and the correction ending mid-2022 , the chart structure becomes even more aligned with classic Elliott Wave theory and Smart Money behavior. Netflix’s long-term chart is a perfect confluence of: Elliott Wave structure (impulse → correction → impulse), Fibonacci precision, Institutional manipulation (SMC), and Clear price action behavior. The roadmap to 2029 shows exciting bullish potential, but also highlights the need for caution near projected macro top zones — where institutional distribution may quietly unfold again. 📘 DISCLAIMER: This is a structural, educational market outlook. Not financial advice. Please do your own due diligence and risk management. #Netflix, #NFLX, #Nasdaq #WaveTheory, #Fibonacci, #SmartMoney, #PriceAction

Long

Updated

ESG Investing and Sustainable Finance 1. Defining ESG Investing ESG investing refers to the practice of incorporating Environmental, Social, and Governance factors into investment analysis and decision-making processes. Unlike traditional investing, which primarily evaluates financial metrics, ESG investing considers the broader impact of business activities on society and the environment. 1.1 Environmental Factors Environmental criteria assess a company’s stewardship of natural resources and its impact on the planet. Key areas include: Climate Change and Carbon Emissions: Evaluating a company’s carbon footprint and strategies for transitioning to a low-carbon economy. Resource Management: Efficient use of energy, water, and raw materials. Pollution and Waste: Efforts to minimize environmental contamination. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Protection: Initiatives to protect natural habitats and biodiversity. 1.2 Social Factors Social criteria examine how companies manage relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and communities. Key considerations include: Labor Practices: Fair wages, worker safety, and freedom of association. Diversity and Inclusion: Representation of minority groups in leadership and workforce. Human Rights: Ensuring operations do not contribute to violations of human rights. Community Engagement: Positive contributions to local communities through philanthropy or development programs. 1.3 Governance Factors Governance evaluates how companies are directed and controlled, ensuring accountability and transparency. This includes: Board Structure and Independence: Diverse and independent boards to oversee management. Executive Compensation: Aligning incentives with long-term performance. Ethical Business Practices: Anti-corruption policies, transparency, and compliance with regulations. Shareholder Rights: Ensuring stakeholders have a voice in major corporate decisions. 2. Sustainable Finance Sustainable finance is a broader concept that encompasses ESG investing but also includes financing activities aimed at promoting sustainability across the economy. It involves directing capital toward projects and initiatives that support long-term environmental and social goals while managing financial risks. Sustainable finance integrates ESG considerations into lending, investing, insurance, and risk management practices. 2.1 Key Objectives The primary objectives of sustainable finance are: Risk Mitigation: Identifying ESG-related risks that could impact financial returns. Capital Allocation: Directing funds to projects that promote sustainability, such as renewable energy or social infrastructure. Market Transformation: Encouraging companies to adopt sustainable practices through financial incentives. Long-term Value Creation: Balancing financial returns with positive societal impact. 2.2 Instruments in Sustainable Finance Several financial instruments are used to advance sustainable objectives: Green Bonds: Debt securities earmarked for environmental projects, such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, or pollution control. Social Bonds: Bonds that fund initiatives addressing social challenges, such as education, healthcare, and affordable housing. Sustainability-linked Loans (SLLs): Loans where the interest rate is tied to achieving ESG targets. Impact Investing: Investments explicitly intended to generate measurable social or environmental benefits alongside financial returns. ESG Funds and ETFs: Mutual funds or exchange-traded funds that prioritize companies with strong ESG performance. 3. Evolution of ESG Investing ESG investing has evolved from niche socially responsible investing (SRI) to a mainstream approach. The evolution can be traced through several phases: 3.1 Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) In the 1960s and 1970s, SRI gained popularity as investors sought to avoid companies involved in tobacco, alcohol, or apartheid-related activities. The primary motivation was ethical or religious rather than financial. 3.2 ESG Integration By the early 2000s, investors began integrating ESG factors into financial analysis. This marked a shift from exclusionary approaches to proactive risk and opportunity assessment. 3.3 Impact Investing Emerging in the 2010s, impact investing focuses on generating measurable social or environmental outcomes alongside financial returns. It emphasizes accountability and transparency in reporting impact. 3.4 Global Adoption Today, ESG investing is a global phenomenon, with trillions of dollars in assets under management guided by ESG criteria. Regulatory frameworks, corporate disclosure standards, and investor demand have accelerated adoption. 4. ESG Integration Approaches Investors employ several methodologies to integrate ESG factors into decision-making: 4.1 Negative Screening Excludes companies involved in controversial activities (e.g., tobacco, fossil fuels, weapons manufacturing). 4.2 Positive Screening Selects companies with strong ESG performance relative to peers. This approach rewards leaders in sustainability. 4.3 ESG Integration Incorporates ESG factors into traditional financial analysis to assess risk-adjusted returns. For example, evaluating a company’s exposure to climate risks can influence its valuation. 4.4 Thematic Investing Focuses on specific ESG themes, such as renewable energy, gender equality, or sustainable agriculture. 4.5 Shareholder Engagement Investors actively engage with companies to encourage better ESG practices, including proxy voting, dialogue with management, and filing resolutions. 5. Measuring ESG Performance Measuring ESG performance is challenging due to the lack of standardized metrics. Several frameworks and rating systems help investors assess ESG risks and opportunities: 5.1 ESG Ratings Agencies Companies like MSCI, Sustainalytics, and FTSE Russell provide ESG ratings based on multiple criteria, including environmental impact, labor practices, and governance structures. 5.2 Reporting Standards Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Provides comprehensive sustainability reporting guidelines. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): Focuses on financially material ESG factors for investors. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): Encourages reporting on climate-related risks and opportunities. 5.3 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Companies track quantitative and qualitative ESG metrics, such as carbon emissions, employee diversity ratios, or board independence. 6. Drivers of ESG Investing Several factors have contributed to the rapid growth of ESG investing: 6.1 Regulatory Pressure Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are increasingly mandating ESG disclosure and sustainability reporting, making ESG integration a compliance necessity. 6.2 Investor Demand Institutional investors, such as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, are prioritizing ESG investments due to risk mitigation, reputational considerations, and long-term value creation. 6.3 Risk Management ESG issues, such as climate change, social unrest, or corporate governance scandals, pose financial risks. Integrating ESG factors helps mitigate these risks. 6.4 Societal Awareness Consumers and stakeholders increasingly favor businesses with responsible and ethical practices, influencing corporate behavior and investment decisions. 6.5 Technological Advancements Data analytics, artificial intelligence, and blockchain enhance ESG data collection, measurement, and verification. 7. ESG Investing and Financial Performance A key debate revolves around the relationship between ESG investing and financial returns. Empirical studies suggest: Companies with strong ESG performance often demonstrate lower operational risks, higher efficiency, and better reputation. ESG portfolios may experience lower volatility and improved risk-adjusted returns over the long term. However, short-term financial trade-offs can exist, particularly in industries requiring high capital expenditure for sustainability transitions. Overall, evidence increasingly supports the notion that ESG integration can enhance long-term financial performance while promoting sustainability. 8. Challenges in ESG Investing Despite its growth, ESG investing faces several challenges: 8.1 Lack of Standardization Different rating agencies and frameworks produce inconsistent ESG scores, complicating investment decisions. 8.2 Greenwashing Companies may exaggerate or misrepresent ESG initiatives to attract investment, undermining credibility. 8.3 Data Gaps Limited or unreliable ESG data, particularly in emerging markets, poses analytical challenges. 8.4 Balancing Financial and Social Returns Investors must navigate the trade-offs between financial performance and societal impact. 8.5 Regulatory Fragmentation Differing ESG regulations across regions create complexity for multinational investors. 9. Global Trends in ESG Investing ESG investing has gained global momentum, with several notable trends: 9.1 Growth in Assets Under Management (AUM) ESG-focused funds and sustainable investment vehicles have seen exponential growth. As of 2025, global ESG AUM exceeds $50 trillion. 9.2 Climate-Focused Investing Climate risk has emerged as a primary driver, leading to increased investment in renewable energy, electric vehicles, and carbon mitigation technologies. 9.3 Integration in Emerging Markets Emerging economies are increasingly adopting ESG principles, with opportunities in clean energy, social infrastructure, and sustainable agriculture. 9.4 Policy and Regulatory Developments The European Union’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the U.S. SEC’s climate disclosure requirements, and similar initiatives worldwide are shaping investment behavior. 9.5 Technological Innovation Fintech solutions, AI-powered ESG analytics, and blockchain-based impact verification enhance transparency and reporting. 10. Case Studies 10.1 Renewable Energy Funds Funds investing in solar, wind, and hydroelectric projects demonstrate how ESG investing can align financial returns with environmental impact. 10.2 Gender Lens Investing Investment funds focusing on companies promoting gender equality in leadership roles have shown positive social outcomes without sacrificing returns. 10.3 Green Bonds Green bond issuance has financed infrastructure projects that reduce carbon emissions, demonstrating how capital markets can support sustainability. 11. Future of ESG Investing and Sustainable Finance The future of ESG investing and sustainable finance appears promising, driven by: Enhanced Standardization: Efforts to harmonize ESG reporting standards will improve comparability and trust. Integration with AI and Big Data: Advanced analytics will enable more precise ESG risk assessment. Focus on Net-Zero Transitions: Investors will increasingly finance decarbonization projects to meet global climate goals. Increased Regulatory Convergence: Global alignment of ESG rules will facilitate cross-border sustainable investment. Emergence of New Asset Classes: Instruments such as carbon credits, biodiversity credits, and sustainability-linked derivatives will grow. Sustainable finance is likely to become central to global capital allocation, making ESG principles a core aspect of investment strategy rather than an optional add-on. Conclusion ESG investing and sustainable finance represent a fundamental shift in the global financial ecosystem. By integrating environmental, social, and governance considerations, investors can mitigate risks, seize opportunities, and contribute to a more sustainable future. The evolution from socially responsible investing to sophisticated ESG strategies reflects the growing recognition that long-term financial performance is intrinsically linked to sustainability. Despite challenges like greenwashing, data gaps, and regulatory fragmentation, ESG investing continues to gain momentum globally. Technological advancements, policy support, and rising societal expectations are driving adoption across industries and regions. As sustainable finance becomes mainstream, it promises to reshape capital markets, align economic activity with global sustainability goals, and create value for both investors and society at large. In essence, ESG investing is not just an ethical choice; it is a strategic imperative that blends profit with purpose, demonstrating that responsible finance can drive both economic and social progress.

Education

by GlobalWolfStreet

NFLX I did some analysis as per harmonic pattern school and with fibo time to check and it seems time to change direction down. also, i add RSI and volume profile to support. this is not recommendation to buy its just sharing information for learning purpose.

by Adeep_123456

NFLX: The Wyckoff mark-down phase is confirmed!The pre-earnings rally to $1,238 was a classic Wyckoff bull trap, an Upthrust After Distribution (UTAD). The earnings miss was the catalyst, and today's chart shows the devastating "effect" of the "cause" built during that distribution. The volume-momentum indicators are in a "Red-to-Red" state, indicating a "strong continuation of a bearish trend". Short into a rally near $1,150 - $1,165. (e.g., Buy Nov $1150 Put, Sell Nov $1100 Put)

by KhanhC.Hoang

Globalization and Deglobalization Introduction Globalization has been one of the most defining forces of the modern era. It refers to the process by which businesses, cultures, technologies, and governments across the world become interconnected and interdependent. From the late 20th century onwards, globalization accelerated rapidly due to advances in communication, transportation, and digital technologies. This process transformed the global economy into an integrated system, allowing for free trade, capital flows, and cultural exchange on an unprecedented scale. However, the 21st century has also witnessed the emergence of an opposite trend — deglobalization. This refers to the gradual slowing down, reversal, or reconfiguration of globalization. Rising nationalism, trade wars, pandemics like COVID-19, and geopolitical tensions have encouraged countries to reconsider global interdependence. Understanding both globalization and deglobalization is crucial to comprehend how today’s world economy and politics are evolving. Concept of Globalization Globalization can be defined as the increasing integration and interdependence of national economies and societies through the cross-border flow of goods, services, technology, capital, and information. It breaks down barriers between countries, fostering economic cooperation and cultural exchange. The phenomenon of globalization is not new — it began centuries ago with trade routes such as the Silk Road, connecting Asia and Europe. However, the modern wave of globalization began in the late 20th century, following the end of World War II, the creation of international institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and WTO, and the liberalization of markets worldwide. Drivers of Globalization Technological Advancements Innovations in communication (like the internet, smartphones, and social media) and transportation (such as air travel and container shipping) have dramatically reduced costs and time barriers, making the world more connected. Trade Liberalization Free trade agreements (FTAs), the reduction of tariffs, and the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) have encouraged global trade, allowing goods and services to move freely across borders. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Multinational corporations (MNCs) have expanded operations across countries, investing in developing nations and creating global production chains. Outsourcing and Offshoring Companies increasingly locate production in countries with cheaper labor or better resources. For example, manufacturing moved to China and India became a hub for IT services. Financial Integration Capital markets have become interconnected, enabling investments and capital to move globally with ease. Cultural Exchange The spread of media, tourism, and migration has led to a blending of cultures, making the world more cosmopolitan. Dimensions of Globalization Globalization has multiple dimensions: Economic Globalization – Integration of national economies through trade, investment, and capital flow. Political Globalization – Growing influence of international organizations and global governance structures such as the UN, WTO, IMF, and World Bank. Cultural Globalization – The spread of ideas, languages, and lifestyles, often leading to cultural homogenization. Technological Globalization – Rapid global diffusion of technologies, especially in communication and automation. Environmental Globalization – Global cooperation in addressing issues like climate change and sustainability. Positive Impacts of Globalization Economic Growth Globalization has led to rapid growth in many developing countries. By opening markets, nations like China, India, and Vietnam have lifted millions out of poverty. Access to Technology and Knowledge It allows developing nations to access advanced technologies and global expertise. Employment Opportunities New industries and global supply chains create millions of jobs, especially in emerging markets. Cultural Exchange and Diversity Globalization promotes multiculturalism, allowing people to experience different cuisines, fashions, and entertainment. Global Cooperation It enhances international cooperation in tackling global issues like pandemics, climate change, and terrorism. Negative Impacts of Globalization Economic Inequality While globalization increases wealth, it often benefits the rich more than the poor, widening the gap between developed and developing nations. Exploitation of Labor and Resources Multinational companies may exploit cheap labor in developing countries, leading to poor working conditions and environmental degradation. Cultural Homogenization Local cultures and traditions are overshadowed by Western consumer culture. Job Losses in Developed Nations Outsourcing and relocation of industries to low-cost regions lead to unemployment in advanced economies. Environmental Challenges Increased industrial activity and global transportation contribute to pollution and climate change. The Emergence of Deglobalization After decades of rapid integration, the world is now witnessing a phase of deglobalization. Deglobalization refers to the process of reducing interdependence and integration between nations. It does not mean the end of globalization but rather a reconfiguration or slowdown of global integration. The early 21st century saw signs of this shift, with trade tensions, supply chain disruptions, and rising nationalism. Events like the 2008 global financial crisis, Brexit, the U.S.-China trade war, and the COVID-19 pandemic intensified the trend. Causes of Deglobalization Geopolitical Tensions Rivalries between major powers like the United States and China have disrupted global trade and technology partnerships. Economic Protectionism Many countries are adopting protectionist measures to safeguard domestic industries, reversing decades of trade liberalization. Pandemic Disruptions COVID-19 exposed vulnerabilities in global supply chains, prompting companies to adopt “localization” or “nearshoring” strategies. Technological Nationalism Nations are increasingly prioritizing self-sufficiency in critical technologies like semiconductors, defense, and energy. Environmental Concerns Global supply chains are criticized for their carbon footprint, leading to policies encouraging local production. Populist and Nationalist Movements Political leaders in several countries emphasize nationalism, sovereignty, and “self-reliance,” often at the expense of global cooperation. Characteristics of Deglobalization Shift from global to regional supply chains. Rising tariffs and trade barriers. Greater emphasis on domestic manufacturing (e.g., “Make in India,” “America First,” “China’s Dual Circulation”). Increased scrutiny of foreign investments for national security reasons. Slower global trade growth compared to GDP growth. Reassessment of global dependencies, especially in energy, food, and pharmaceuticals. Impact of Deglobalization Economic Impact Deglobalization may slow global growth and reduce trade efficiency. However, it can strengthen domestic industries and reduce external vulnerabilities. Supply Chain Restructuring Companies are diversifying or relocating supply chains to minimize risks — a shift from “just-in-time” to “just-in-case” production models. Shift in Investment Patterns FDI flows are becoming more regional, and investment in strategic sectors is prioritized over global expansion. Technological Decoupling The U.S. and China are developing separate ecosystems in technology, telecommunications, and AI, creating a fragmented digital world. Social and Political Impact Rising nationalism can lead to social polarization, xenophobia, and less international cooperation. Environmental Outcomes While local production reduces transport emissions, duplication of industries globally may increase overall resource consumption. Globalization vs. Deglobalization Aspect Globalization Deglobalization Economic Focus Free trade, open markets Protectionism, self-reliance Supply Chain Global, interconnected Regional, localized Cultural Impact Cultural exchange, hybridization Preservation of local culture Political Approach Global cooperation National sovereignty Growth Model Efficiency-driven Resilience-driven Technology Flow Shared innovations Restricted technology access Examples from Around the World United States The U.S. has shifted toward protectionism with policies like “America First” and reshoring manufacturing from China. China China’s “Dual Circulation Strategy” emphasizes domestic consumption while reducing reliance on exports. European Union The EU promotes “strategic autonomy,” aiming to be less dependent on external suppliers for energy and defense. India India’s “Atmanirbhar Bharat” (self-reliant India) initiative encourages local manufacturing and innovation while maintaining global engagement. Global South Many developing nations are balancing between globalization’s benefits and the need for self-sufficiency in food, energy, and technology. Future of Globalization and Deglobalization The world is unlikely to witness a complete end to globalization. Instead, the future will likely involve “selective globalization” — a hybrid model that balances global efficiency with local resilience. Digital globalization will continue to grow through online services, data flows, and virtual collaboration. Regional trade blocs (like RCEP, ASEAN, and EU) may replace full-scale global integration. Nations will cooperate in areas like climate change, health, and technology, while competing in strategic sectors. This evolving structure may lead to a multipolar world — with multiple centers of power and influence instead of a single dominant global order. Conclusion Globalization has been a transformative force shaping the modern world, driving economic growth, technological innovation, and cultural exchange. Yet, it has also produced inequalities, environmental stress, and geopolitical vulnerabilities. Deglobalization, in contrast, represents a corrective phase — a rethinking of excessive interdependence and a move toward resilience and regionalism. The challenge for the future is to strike a balance between the efficiency of globalization and the security of deglobalization. The goal should not be to isolate nations but to build a sustainable, inclusive, and resilient global order that benefits all. In the decades to come, the world’s prosperity will depend not on retreating from globalization but on redefining it to serve humanity in a fairer, more balanced way.

Education

by GlobalWolfStreet

NFLX Long Reasoning: Strong volume day before earnings, stock may gap up on earnings!!! Remember: Every long-term investment alert can also be played as a swing trade. Long-Term Investors (3-12 Month Holds) Entry: Full position on breakout Profit Taking: Sell 1/4 to 1/5 at Goal 1 Exit Signal: Close below 20-day EMA (your trend guide) or 50EMA Why: Strong moves are hard to time at the top, but the 20EMA acts as a reliable trend filter Swing Traders (2-6 Week Holds) Entry: Full position on breakout Profit Taking: Sell 1/3 at Goal 1 Final Exit: Remainder at Goal 2

Long

G7 and G20 in the World Market: A Comprehensive Overview Introduction In the ever-evolving landscape of the global economy, two powerful international groups — the Group of Seven (G7) and the Group of Twenty (G20) — play a pivotal role in shaping global financial policies, trade frameworks, and market stability. These organizations consist of the world’s most influential economies, both advanced and emerging, that come together to coordinate policy responses to global challenges. Their influence extends across economic growth, climate action, trade regulations, technology, and geopolitical stability — all of which have profound effects on the world market. This essay explores the formation, structure, objectives, and economic impact of the G7 and G20, while also examining their comparative roles in global governance and market coordination. 1. The G7: Origins and Evolution 1.1 Historical Background The Group of Seven (G7) was formed in 1975 amid the oil crisis and global financial instability of the 1970s. The initial members were the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan, with Canada joining in 1976, making it seven nations. The European Union (EU) later became a participant in G7 meetings but not a full member. Initially, the G7 served as an informal forum for leaders of advanced economies to discuss economic coordination and policy responses to inflation, exchange rates, and oil shocks. Over time, the agenda expanded to include trade liberalization, development aid, climate change, digital innovation, and global security. 1.2 Composition and Characteristics The G7 countries collectively represent: Around 45% of global GDP (as of 2025), Approximately 10% of the global population, and A major share of global trade, technology, and financial capital. These nations are highly industrialized, democratic, and share values of free-market capitalism, human rights, and rule-based governance. The G7 does not have a formal secretariat or permanent institution. Instead, it operates through annual summits hosted by member nations on a rotating basis. Decisions are not legally binding but carry immense political and economic weight due to the influence of its members. 1.3 Core Objectives The main objectives of the G7 are to: Promote global economic stability and sustainable growth. Coordinate monetary and fiscal policies among advanced economies. Support developing nations through aid and debt relief. Strengthen free trade and oppose protectionism. Address climate change and energy transitions. Manage global crises such as pandemics, conflicts, and financial shocks. 1.4 G7’s Role in the Global Market The G7 shapes the global market primarily through policy influence rather than direct control. Its discussions often set the tone for international financial institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and WTO. For instance: Monetary coordination: Central banks of G7 nations often align on interest rate policies and inflation control. Trade frameworks: The G7 promotes rules-based trade and opposes protectionist barriers. Climate finance: Members pledge billions to help developing countries transition to clean energy. Crisis management: The G7 coordinated the global financial response to the 2008 crisis and the 2020 pandemic. Because these economies dominate global financial systems — with the U.S. dollar, euro, pound, and yen as key reserve currencies — their decisions have direct impacts on currency markets, investment flows, and commodity prices. 2. The G20: Formation and Global Reach 2.1 Background and Formation While the G7 represents advanced industrial economies, the G20 (Group of Twenty) was created in 1999 to bring emerging and developing economies into global decision-making. The Asian financial crisis of 1997–1998 exposed the need for a broader, more inclusive framework that could address interconnected global risks. The G20 includes 19 countries plus the European Union, representing both advanced and emerging economies such as China, India, Brazil, South Africa, Mexico, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and others. Together, G20 members account for: Over 85% of global GDP, Around 75% of global trade, and About two-thirds of the world’s population. 2.2 Structure and Operation Like the G7, the G20 has no permanent secretariat. It functions through: Annual Leaders’ Summits, Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors’ Meetings, and Working groups on topics like climate, digital economy, health, and labor. The presidency rotates annually, with the host nation setting the year’s agenda. For example: India (2023) focused on “One Earth, One Family, One Future.” Brazil (2024) emphasized sustainable growth and inclusive development. 2.3 Objectives of the G20 The G20’s mission is broader and more inclusive than the G7’s. Its key objectives include: Promoting global economic stability and growth. Ensuring financial market regulation to prevent crises. Encouraging international trade and investment. Addressing climate change and sustainable development. Reducing global inequality and supporting low-income nations. Enhancing digitalization and innovation in the global economy. The G20’s broader membership allows it to address issues that affect both developed and developing nations, making it more representative of global interests. 3. The G7 and G20’s Influence on the World Market 3.1 Monetary and Fiscal Coordination Both the G7 and G20 play a crucial role in coordinating monetary and fiscal policies. During crises like the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, the G20 facilitated coordinated stimulus packages that prevented a deeper recession. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, both groups supported liquidity programs and vaccine funding initiatives. Such coordination stabilizes global capital markets, reduces exchange rate volatility, and boosts investor confidence. 3.2 Trade and Investment The G20 has become the key platform for promoting open and fair trade. It supports WTO reforms, encourages global value chains, and resists protectionism. Emerging economies like India, China, and Brazil have gained greater influence in shaping international trade rules. The G7, while smaller, continues to influence trade through strategic alliances, sanctions, and technological cooperation. Their joint efforts shape policies on digital trade, semiconductor supply chains, and energy transition — all of which significantly affect global stock and commodity markets. 3.3 Global Financial Regulation After the 2008 crisis, the G20 spearheaded reforms in global financial regulation through institutions like the Financial Stability Board (FSB). This helped improve transparency, banking supervision, and systemic risk management. The G7, meanwhile, remains influential in setting standards for banking supervision, anti-money laundering (AML), and cross-border taxation, affecting multinational corporations and global investors. 3.4 Sustainable Development and Climate Change Both groups have prioritized sustainable growth. The G7 commits to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 and financing climate initiatives in developing nations. The G20 promotes green finance, renewable energy investment, and the phasing out of fossil fuel subsidies. As climate-related risks increasingly affect agriculture, manufacturing, and infrastructure, these commitments influence global commodity prices, investment trends, and corporate valuations. 3.5 Technology and Digital Economy In the digital era, both G7 and G20 discussions address issues like artificial intelligence (AI), cybersecurity, data privacy, and digital taxation. Their cooperation helps create common standards that shape global tech markets and innovation ecosystems. For example, the G7’s Digital Trade Principles and the G20’s AI frameworks guide how countries regulate cross-border data and digital platforms — crucial in a world where tech firms dominate market capitalization. 3.6 Geopolitical Stability and Market Confidence Geopolitical tensions — such as the Russia-Ukraine war or U.S.-China rivalry — have significant global market consequences. The G7 often coordinates sanctions, defense support, and diplomatic pressure, while the G20 acts as a broader dialogue platform to prevent fragmentation. Their coordinated responses help maintain market predictability, protect energy supply chains, and influence investor sentiment. 4. Criticisms and Challenges Despite their global importance, both G7 and G20 face criticisms: 4.1 Representation Gap The G7 is criticized for being elitist, representing only advanced nations. The G20, while more inclusive, still excludes many smaller developing countries. 4.2 Implementation Challenges Decisions made in summits are not legally binding, making implementation dependent on national will. 4.3 Geopolitical Divisions Internal divisions — such as tensions between the U.S. and China or Russia’s participation in G20 — can reduce policy effectiveness. 4.4 Climate and Inequality Gaps Although both groups pledge climate and development aid, actual disbursement often falls short of commitments, leading to credibility issues. 5. The Future of G7 and G20 in Global Governance As globalization evolves, the G7 and G20 are expected to adapt to new challenges: Managing the AI-driven economy and digital finance. Addressing supply chain resilience post-pandemic. Coordinating on debt restructuring for developing nations. Ensuring energy security amid green transitions. Promoting inclusive and equitable growth to reduce inequality. Their relevance lies in their ability to bridge the gap between advanced and developing economies and create a stable, rule-based global market that fosters sustainable progress. Conclusion The G7 and G20 are twin pillars of international economic governance, each with distinct strengths. The G7 provides leadership and stability through the advanced economies’ policy coordination, while the G20 ensures inclusivity and representation of emerging markets in global decision-making. Together, they form the foundation of global cooperation — influencing trade policies, financial systems, environmental sustainability, and technological standards that shape the world market. As global interdependence deepens, their ability to collaborate and implement forward-looking policies will determine the resilience and prosperity of the international economy in the decades ahead.

Education

by GlobalWolfStreet

NFLX Weekly Outlook (Oct 21–25): Bulls Regain Control Eyes on $1,267 Breakout 🚀 📆 Daily Chart — Macro Trend and Structure Overview Market Structure: Netflix (NFLX) printed a powerful rebound candle off the $1,134–$1,160 demand zone, signaling renewed buying interest. This level has acted as a structural support in multiple swing cycles. The daily chart shows a recent BOS (Break of Structure) after a series of CHoCH formations, suggesting that smart money may be repositioning long after liquidity was swept below October lows. The move from $1,134 to $1,238 marks the first aggressive bullish displacement in weeks, shifting momentum back toward the mid-trend channel. Supply & Demand / Order Blocks: * Demand Zone: $1,134–$1,160 (major re-accumulation zone). * Intermediate Supply Zone: $1,238–$1,267 (previous CHoCH and liquidity pocket). * Macro Supply Zone: $1,310–$1,330 (upper liquidity target). Indicator Confluence: * 9 EMA > 21 EMA: Cross underway — bullish realignment possible by Tuesday. * MACD: Momentum reversal confirmed with a fresh histogram cross above zero. * Stoch RSI: Rising from 20 → 67 — strong mid-cycle momentum. * Volume: Bullish expansion day, matching the most recent BOS in September. The daily chart suggests that the $1,134 base is secure, and price may now aim to retest $1,267 before consolidating again. ⏱️ 1-Hour Chart — Short-Term Swing Setup Market Structure: The 1-hour chart shows clear transition from bearish to bullish structure with a CHoCH → BOS sequence near $1,200 and $1,240. Price broke out of the descending channel and is consolidating right below resistance at $1,245–$1,247, the zone of the most recent BOS. Momentum remains strong, and any pullback toward $1,217–$1,225 should offer dip-buying opportunities if volume holds. Supply & Demand / OB Zones: * Demand Zone: $1,217–$1,225 (recent breakout OB). * Supply Zone: $1,244–$1,267 (major liquidity resistance). Indicator Confluence: * 9 EMA > 21 EMA: Bullish continuation structure. * MACD: Rising histogram — bullish volume expansion. * Stoch RSI: Above 70, showing continuation with mild overbought stretch. Trade Scenarios: * Bullish Setup: Buy dips near $1,217 → Target $1,267 → Stop below $1,199. * Bearish Setup: Rejection from $1,267 → Short to $1,217 → Stop above $1,280. Bias favors upside while price holds above $1,217 — breaking $1,267 could trigger momentum extension toward $1,300. 🕒 15-Minute Chart — Intraday Scalping View Market Structure: The 15-min timeframe shows a clean ascending channel, with multiple BOS confirming short-term trend strength. The most recent CHoCH near $1,237 was defended quickly, proving that intraday buyers are actively holding higher lows. The pattern shows minor compression under resistance, suggesting either a small consolidation before a push to $1,260+ or a quick retest of $1,230 support. Supply & Demand / OB Levels: * Demand Zone: $1,235–$1,238 (minor OB base). * Supply Zone: $1,247–$1,255 (scalp resistance range). Indicator Confluence: * 9 EMA & 21 EMA: Strong uptrend alignment. * MACD: Momentum fading slightly — potential micro pullback. * Stoch RSI: Overbought (80+) — short-term pause likely. Scalp Plan: * Bullish Case: Buy retest at $1,235–$1,238 → Target $1,247 → Stop $1,230. * Bearish Case: Fade $1,247–$1,250 → Target $1,235 → Stop $1,255. Intraday trend remains bullish — buyers in control while above $1,230. Expect a range break toward $1,255–$1,267 if volume persists. 📊 GEX (Gamma Exposure) & Options Sentiment NFLX’s GEX structure indicates a bullish gamma expansion zone between $1,220–$1,260. Dealer exposure favors stability near $1,240, creating a “magnet” effect that can accelerate upward once $1,247 breaks. Key GEX Levels: * Highest Positive GEX: $1,260 (major call resistance). * 2nd Call Wall: $1,280 (extension target). * Put Support: $1,160 (floor of dealer hedging zone). * IVR: 37 — moderate, rising ahead of next catalyst. * Call Flow: 29.1% — improving, consistent with accumulation behavior. Dealers are currently neutral-to-positive gamma, supporting controlled bullish drift. Above $1,260, expect increased dealer hedging pressure to lift price further. 🎯 Closing Outlook Netflix is showing strong signs of accumulation and breakout potential following a clean structure shift on both the daily and hourly timeframes. Volume confirmation and positive gamma support add confidence to the bullish scenario. A sustained close above $1,247–$1,267 could trigger a measured move toward $1,300–$1,310. If rejected, a controlled pullback to $1,217–$1,225 remains a healthy buy zone for continuation. Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always perform your own due diligence before trading.

by BullBearInsights

Broker Platform Selection in the World Market Introduction In the ever-evolving world of financial markets, broker platforms play a pivotal role as the primary gateway between investors and global trading opportunities. Whether an individual investor, institutional trader, or algorithmic system, the selection of a reliable broker platform determines not only the ease of trading but also the safety, cost-efficiency, and overall success of investment strategies. As financial globalization deepens and digital technology revolutionizes access to assets, understanding how to select the right brokerage platform in the world market has become a critical skill. The broker selection process involves evaluating several dimensions—such as regulation, cost structure, asset variety, technology infrastructure, customer service, and market reputation. This essay explores the key considerations for broker platform selection, analyzes leading global brokers, and highlights future trends shaping the brokerage industry worldwide. 1. The Role of Broker Platforms in the Global Market A broker platform acts as an intermediary that allows clients to access financial markets such as equities, commodities, currencies, and derivatives. In the pre-digital era, brokers were physical intermediaries operating through phone orders and manual execution. However, today’s brokerages provide seamless, technology-driven platforms offering real-time price feeds, advanced charting tools, and automated trade execution. The global brokerage ecosystem is divided broadly into retail brokers (serving individual investors) and institutional brokers (serving hedge funds, banks, and large-scale investors). Retail platforms such as Interactive Brokers, eToro, TD Ameritrade, Saxo Bank, and IG Markets have made global investing accessible to millions of individuals. Institutional platforms like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and JP Morgan serve large portfolios through direct market access and specialized trading infrastructure. 2. Key Factors to Consider When Choosing a Broker Platform Selecting a broker platform requires a careful balance between regulatory security, technological efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Below are the major factors influencing this choice: a. Regulation and Security Regulation is the cornerstone of trust in brokerage services. Regulated brokers are supervised by recognized financial authorities that enforce rules for client protection, fair trading, and fund segregation. Some of the world’s leading regulatory bodies include: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) – United States Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) – United Kingdom Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) – Australia Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) – Europe (EU Passporting) Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) – Asia Choosing a broker regulated by these authorities ensures investor protection against fraud, misuse of funds, or unfair market practices. Regulation also affects the level of leverage and investor compensation schemes in case of insolvency. b. Trading Instruments and Market Access Different brokers specialize in specific asset classes. A good platform provides access to multiple markets such as: Equities (stocks) – Global exchanges like NYSE, NASDAQ, LSE, BSE Forex (currencies) – Major, minor, and exotic currency pairs Commodities – Precious metals, energy, and agricultural products Derivatives – Options, futures, and CFDs Cryptocurrencies – Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other digital assets Global traders often prefer multi-asset platforms (e.g., Interactive Brokers, Saxo Bank) that allow portfolio diversification under one account. c. Trading Costs and Fees Costs directly affect profitability. Traders must analyze the following cost structures: Commissions – Fee per trade or per lot Spreads – Difference between bid and ask price Swap/Overnight Charges – For leveraged positions held overnight Account Maintenance and Withdrawal Fees – Administrative costs Discount brokers have disrupted traditional brokerage models by offering zero-commission trading on equities and ETFs. However, hidden costs such as wide spreads or payment-for-order-flow practices should also be considered. d. Trading Technology and Platform Usability The effectiveness of a broker often depends on its trading technology. Platforms must offer: Real-time market data and low latency execution Advanced charting tools and technical indicators Algorithmic trading and API integration Mobile and web trading accessibility User-friendly interface with customizability Platforms like MetaTrader 4/5, cTrader, and TradingView dominate global forex and CFD trading, while stock investors use Thinkorswim, TWS (Interactive Brokers), and SaxoTraderGO for professional-grade analysis. e. Customer Support and Educational Resources Efficient customer support builds trust, especially in fast-moving markets. Leading brokers provide 24/5 or 24/7 multilingual support via live chat, email, and phone. Additionally, brokers that offer educational resources, webinars, and market analysis attract both beginners and professionals aiming to refine their skills. f. Deposit and Withdrawal Flexibility Global investors seek seamless fund management. Platforms supporting multiple payment gateways—like bank transfers, credit/debit cards, PayPal, and digital wallets—offer convenience. Moreover, brokers with transparent and quick withdrawal processes stand out in terms of reliability. 3. Types of Broker Platforms in the Global Market Different types of brokers cater to different trader profiles. Understanding these categories helps align one’s needs with the right platform. a. Full-Service Brokers Full-service brokers offer personalized investment advice, portfolio management, research insights, and dedicated support. They charge higher commissions but are suitable for long-term investors. Examples include Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. b. Discount Brokers Discount brokers provide basic trading services with low or no commissions. They focus on technology-driven self-directed trading rather than advisory services. Examples: Robinhood, Zerodha (India), and Interactive Brokers. c. ECN/STP Brokers Electronic Communication Network (ECN) or Straight-Through Processing (STP) brokers connect traders directly with liquidity providers, ensuring transparent and fast execution with tighter spreads. Popular ECN brokers include IC Markets, Pepperstone, and FXTM. d. Proprietary Trading Platforms Some brokers develop their own proprietary systems offering unique interfaces and tools—for example, TD Ameritrade’s Thinkorswim, SaxoTraderGO, and IG’s platform. These platforms often provide integrated research, charting, and order management tools. 4. Leading Global Broker Platforms The world’s top broker platforms are known for their innovation, reliability, and regulatory compliance. Below are some prominent examples: Interactive Brokers (IBKR) – Offers global access to 150+ markets, low fees, and advanced research tools; ideal for professionals. Saxo Bank – Denmark-based multi-asset broker with a strong European presence and excellent user interface. TD Ameritrade – Known for Thinkorswim platform and strong U.S. market research. eToro – Leader in social and copy trading, allowing users to replicate trades of top investors. IG Group – Pioneer in CFD and forex trading with strong regulation and mobile apps. CMC Markets – Highly regulated UK broker with excellent execution and analytical tools. Plus500 – User-friendly CFD platform targeting retail traders. Each platform differs in trading philosophy—some focus on active day traders, while others cater to long-term investors seeking global diversification. 5. The Impact of Technology on Broker Platform Selection Technological innovation has reshaped brokerage operations across the world. The rise of AI-driven analytics, automated trading bots, mobile apps, and cloud-based execution systems have made trading faster and more efficient. Artificial Intelligence (AI): Platforms use AI to offer predictive market insights, personalized recommendations, and sentiment analysis. Robo-Advisors: Automated portfolio managers like Wealthfront and Betterment are revolutionizing passive investing. Blockchain Integration: Decentralized trading platforms (DEXs) like Uniswap and dYdX enable direct asset ownership without intermediaries. APIs for Algo-Trading: Institutional-grade brokers allow users to build algorithms that execute trades based on custom strategies in milliseconds. Cloud Computing: Enables scalable and high-speed trading environments with reduced latency. Traders increasingly prefer brokers that stay technologically updated and compatible with global financial innovations. 6. Global Regulatory Environments and Compliance Every region follows unique regulatory frameworks to maintain investor safety and financial stability. United States: The SEC and FINRA impose strict reporting and capital adequacy requirements. Brokers like Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade are benchmarked for compliance. United Kingdom: The FCA mandates transparency and negative balance protection. European Union: MiFID II ensures uniform investor protection and reporting standards. Asia-Pacific: ASIC, MAS, and SEBI (India) regulate brokers with growing global recognition. A broker operating in multiple regions must comply with cross-border laws, money laundering (AML) protocols, and data protection acts (like GDPR). 7. Risk Management and Investor Protection Reliable broker platforms provide risk management tools like stop-loss orders, margin calculators, volatility alerts, and negative balance protection to safeguard traders from extreme market movements. Additionally, segregated client funds ensure that user deposits remain separate from the broker’s operational funds, providing a safety net in case of financial distress. Investor compensation schemes, such as SIPC (U.S.) and FSCS (UK), further protect client capital if the broker defaults. 8. The Future of Global Brokerage Platforms The future of brokerage platforms will be defined by digital transformation, AI, and sustainability-driven finance. Key trends include: Fractional Ownership: Allows small investors to buy portions of expensive assets like Amazon or Tesla shares. Social Trading Networks: Copy trading and community-driven analysis continue to grow globally. Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Blockchain-based platforms will challenge traditional broker models. AI and Big Data: Predictive analytics will make decision-making more intelligent. Sustainability Investing (ESG): Brokers are adding environmental, social, and governance filters to support responsible investing. As boundaries between technology and finance blur, broker platforms are evolving into holistic financial ecosystems integrating trading, analytics, learning, and social collaboration. Conclusion Selecting the right broker platform in the world market is one of the most important decisions for any trader or investor. A well-chosen platform ensures not only access to global markets but also enhances profitability through transparency, speed, and security. The ideal broker must combine regulatory compliance, advanced technology, diversified market access, low costs, and responsive customer service. In today’s interconnected financial ecosystem, the competition among global brokers is fierce. With technological disruptions like AI, blockchain, and decentralized finance reshaping the industry, the broker platforms of the future will not merely execute trades—they will empower users with data-driven intelligence, global connectivity, and complete control over their investment journey. Ultimately, successful trading begins not just with knowledge or capital, but with the right broker platform—a partner that bridges global opportunities with local expertise, ensuring that investors can navigate the dynamic world markets with confidence and precision.

Education

by GlobalWolfStreet

Netflix – Trend Reversal and Impulsive Setup #Netflix – Trend Reversal and Impulsive Setup Current price: $1,215.6 Netflix is showing early signs of a trend reversal after completing a multi-month corrective phase. The structure suggests a shift toward a new impulsive rally within the broader bullish framework. 🧩 Technical Overview • After a prolonged pullback from the June highs, price found support near $1,130, forming a local base. • The descending channel was broken to the upside — a signal of potential momentum change. • Price is now consolidating above the breakout zone, building the foundation for an upward impulse. 📈 Scenario • The structure resembles the start of a new impulsive leg following the correction. • As long as the market holds above $1,130, bullish continuation remains the dominant view. • Stop-loss: below the recent swing low at $1,130. • Upside targets: – $1,250–$1,270 – short-term retest of breakout zone – $1,340–$1,380 – key resistance and mid-cycle confirmation zone – $1,470–$1,550 – major Fibonacci target range – $1,670+ – extended bullish objective if momentum accelerates ⚙️ Market Context • The broader trend remains constructive as long as price stays above the breakout structure. • Momentum shift coincides with improving sentiment across large-cap techs. • A sustained move above $1,340 would confirm renewed strength and open the path toward the $1,500 area. 🧭 Summary Netflix has likely completed its corrective phase and is preparing for a new upside cycle. Holding above $1,130 keeps the bullish bias intact, while a breakout above $1,340–$1,380 would confirm trend continuation toward $1,470–$1,550 and beyond.

Long

by NewOneCrypto

NFLX Long The broader market structure on NFLX (15-minute) remains bullish, supported by a clear sequence of higher highs and higher lows. The most recent Change of Character (CHoCH) occurred near $1,257.5, where price temporarily broke minor structure to the downside, signaling a potential short-term correction rather than a full reversal. Since no decisive Break of Structure (BOS) has occurred below a major higher low, the overall trend continues to favor buyers, with the current pullback likely serving as a retracement within that broader uptrend. The supply zones between $1,225–$1,248 are moderate in strength. The upper zone near $1,247 previously triggered a sharp rejection, confirming active sellers there, while the lower two supply pockets closer to $1,225–$1,235 appear partially mitigated—indicating reduced selling pressure and a potential pathway for price to reclaim those levels. The nearest demand zone around $1,215–$1,210 remains intact, where buyers stepped in aggressively earlier, creating a strong impulse that broke prior structure to the upside. Within the region currently highlighted, price is retracing toward that $1,215–$1,210 demand zone, showing decelerating bearish momentum as candles shrink in range and wicks appear at the lows. This behavior suggests that sellers are losing strength and that buyers could soon reassert control. A bullish reaction from this zone would likely drive price back toward $1,235, and if momentum continues, into $1,245–$1,247, where liquidity and unmitigated supply remain. From a footprint perspective, the recent downward leg likely shows diminishing sell delta and light absorption from passive buyers—supportive of a near-term reversal setup. Watch for a delta shift into positive territory or a cluster of bid absorption at the base of demand to confirm that transition. Trade bias: bullish continuation after pullback. Expect a bounce from $1,215–$1,210 toward $1,245–$1,247. Invalidation: a clean break and close below $1,210, which would shift control to sellers and suggest a deeper retracement toward $1,185. Momentum: still favors buyers overall, though currently consolidating before likely reaccumulation.

Long

The Role and Impact of Agencies in Global Finance and Trading 1. Understanding the Concept of Agencies in Global Finance Agencies in global finance refer to both public and private institutions that are entrusted with regulatory, supervisory, analytical, and facilitative roles within the global financial ecosystem. They act as intermediaries between governments, corporations, and investors to ensure that financial activities are conducted fairly and efficiently. The primary types of agencies include: Regulatory Agencies – Such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), which enforce laws and ensure transparency. Rating Agencies – Institutions like Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s (S&P), and Fitch Ratings that assess the creditworthiness of governments, corporations, and financial instruments. Monetary Agencies – Central banks and supranational institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, which manage monetary policy, financial stability, and economic development. Trade and Financial Agencies – The World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) regulate trade practices and provide frameworks for financial cooperation among nations. Collectively, these agencies influence market confidence, liquidity, capital allocation, and cross-border investment flows — all of which are essential to global trading operations. 2. The Importance of Regulatory Agencies in Global Finance Regulatory agencies serve as the guardians of financial integrity. Their primary mission is to ensure fair trading practices, prevent manipulation, and maintain investor trust. 2.1 Market Oversight and Investor Protection Global financial markets operate with vast sums of capital and involve millions of participants. Regulatory agencies impose rules that protect investors from fraud, insider trading, and market abuse. For instance: The U.S. SEC enforces laws against securities fraud, ensuring corporate transparency through mandatory filings. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) harmonizes regulation across EU member states, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Such oversight helps maintain confidence in the global financial system — a crucial element for the smooth functioning of international trade and investment. 2.2 Maintaining Systemic Stability Regulatory agencies monitor systemic risks that can destabilize markets. During crises such as the 2008 global financial meltdown, agencies tightened regulations, introduced Basel III norms, and imposed capital adequacy requirements to strengthen banking resilience. By enforcing these standards, agencies ensure that financial institutions maintain sufficient buffers to withstand shocks, thereby preventing contagion effects across global markets. 2.3 Promoting Fair Competition Agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the United States and the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition monitor mergers and acquisitions to prevent monopolistic practices. This ensures fair market competition, innovation, and equal opportunity for firms engaged in global trade. 3. Credit Rating Agencies: Shaping Investment Decisions Credit rating agencies are among the most influential actors in the financial world. Their ratings affect how investors perceive the creditworthiness of sovereign nations, corporations, and financial instruments. 3.1 Role of Credit Ratings in Global Trading Credit ratings act as signals of financial health. When agencies assign a high rating (e.g., AAA), it implies low risk, encouraging foreign investment and reducing borrowing costs. Conversely, downgrades can trigger capital flight, higher yields, and economic contraction. For example: A downgrade of a country’s sovereign debt can increase its cost of borrowing in global markets. Corporate bond ratings influence investment fund allocations, liquidity, and interest rates. 3.2 Controversies and Global Impact While ratings are essential, they have also faced criticism. During the 2008 crisis, agencies were accused of inflating ratings on mortgage-backed securities, contributing to the market collapse. Since then, reforms have sought to improve transparency, accountability, and conflict-of-interest management. Nonetheless, rating agencies continue to be critical in shaping cross-border capital movements and influencing investor sentiment in global trade. 4. Monetary and Financial Agencies: IMF, World Bank, and BIS 4.1 International Monetary Fund (IMF) The IMF plays a central role in stabilizing the global economy. It provides financial assistance to countries facing balance-of-payments crises, monitors global economic trends, and offers policy advice to foster sustainable growth. In global trading, the IMF helps maintain exchange rate stability and encourages free trade by ensuring liquidity through its Special Drawing Rights (SDR) mechanism. 4.2 World Bank The World Bank focuses on long-term economic development and poverty reduction. Through its financial and technical assistance, it facilitates infrastructure development, which in turn boosts trade and investment. Roads, ports, and digital connectivity projects funded by the World Bank enhance global supply chains, promoting smoother trade flows. 4.3 Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Known as the “central bank of central banks”, BIS fosters international monetary and financial cooperation. It sets global banking standards (like Basel I, II, and III) that ensure financial stability. Through its regulatory guidelines, BIS influences how banks manage liquidity and credit risks, which directly affects global trading capital and interest rate dynamics. 5. Trade and Economic Agencies: Facilitating Global Commerce 5.1 World Trade Organization (WTO) The WTO governs international trade by establishing fair-trade rules, reducing tariffs, and resolving disputes. Its policies ensure predictability and transparency in trade relations, thereby influencing the financial transactions underpinning global commerce. For example, when the WTO mediates trade conflicts (like the U.S.–China tariff disputes), the outcomes significantly impact global markets, commodity prices, and investor confidence. 5.2 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) The OECD fosters economic cooperation and policy alignment among member nations. By promoting responsible taxation, anti-bribery measures, and sustainable investment practices, it enhances investor trust and corporate accountability in global trade. 6. Impact of Financial Agencies on Currency and Capital Markets 6.1 Influence on Exchange Rates Monetary agencies and central banks have a profound impact on foreign exchange (forex) markets. Through interventions, interest rate adjustments, and monetary policy decisions, they affect currency values — which in turn influence trade competitiveness and capital flows. For instance, when the U.S. Federal Reserve raises interest rates, the U.S. dollar strengthens, making imports cheaper and exports less competitive, thereby reshaping global trade balances. 6.2 Regulation of Capital Flows Agencies set rules that regulate the flow of capital between nations. The IMF monitors these flows to prevent speculative attacks on currencies and financial contagion — where instability in one market spreads to others. Proper regulation ensures smoother functioning of global capital markets, essential for international trade financing. 7. Technological and ESG Agencies: The New Frontier of Global Finance 7.1 Financial Technology (FinTech) Oversight As digital trading platforms, cryptocurrencies, and algorithmic trading gain prominence, new regulatory agencies have emerged to oversee digital finance. Institutions like the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK and the U.S. CFTC have introduced frameworks for crypto assets, digital securities, and online trading to prevent cyber fraud and enhance transparency. 7.2 Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Standards Agencies now emphasize sustainable finance. Organizations such as the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI) and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) promote ESG reporting standards. By linking environmental and social impact with financial performance, these agencies are reshaping global trading norms — driving capital toward green and ethical investments. 8. Challenges and Criticisms of Global Financial Agencies Despite their significance, financial agencies face multiple challenges: Overregulation vs. Market Freedom: Excessive rules may stifle innovation and market efficiency. Conflict of Interest: Especially among rating agencies that are paid by the entities they rate. Unequal Representation: Developing nations often argue that institutions like the IMF and World Bank favor Western economies. Delayed Responses: Bureaucratic processes sometimes hinder timely interventions during crises. Technological Lag: The rapid rise of decentralized finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrencies outpaces traditional regulatory frameworks. These limitations underscore the need for continual evolution in agency governance and accountability. 9. The Future of Agencies in Global Finance As global markets become more interconnected and digitized, agencies must adapt to new realities. The future landscape will likely see: Integrated Global Regulation: Greater cooperation among international agencies to standardize cross-border financial regulations. Digital Financial Oversight: Stronger frameworks for blockchain, AI-driven trading, and cyber resilience. Sustainability-Linked Policies: ESG standards becoming mandatory for international financial reporting. Decentralized Agency Roles: New institutions emerging to govern decentralized finance and tokenized assets. Agencies that evolve with innovation, transparency, and inclusiveness will define the next era of global financial stability and growth. 10. Conclusion Agencies serve as the nervous system of global finance, transmitting information, enforcing discipline, and maintaining equilibrium across an increasingly complex trading ecosystem. From regulatory oversight to monetary stabilization and sustainability advocacy, their influence pervades every aspect of global trade and investment. In a world where financial transactions transcend borders within milliseconds, the role of agencies in ensuring trust, fairness, and resilience has never been more vital. While challenges persist — ranging from bias and bureaucracy to technological disruption — their continued evolution will determine how effectively global finance can navigate uncertainty, foster inclusive growth, and sustain economic stability in the decades ahead.

Education

by GlobalWolfStreet

Popcorn Ready? Netflix Layering Setup for Bold Traders 🎬 Netflix Stock | Thief Trader’s Profit Realization Blueprint 🍿💰 🧭 Market Outlook Netflix (NFLX) is lining up for a bullish playbook — and here’s how the Thief Strategy goes down. This setup is purely educational and shares how I personally view price behavior with a layering approach. 🎯 Trading Plan (Swing/Day Trade Idea) Entry (Layering Style 🥷): Instead of one-shot entries, the thief strategy is about multiple buy-limit layers. Example blueprint: 👉 1160 | 1170 | 1180 | 1190 | 1200 (more can be added if liquidity allows) Stop Loss 🛡️: Thief-style SL ~1120 (after breakout levels are confirmed). ⚠️ Note to Thief OG’s: Manage your own SL & adapt risk. My level is an example, not a fixed call. Target 🎯: Eyeing the 1340 zone, where resistance + overbought vibes + possible trap signals align. The thief rule? Escape before the crowd escapes 🚪💨. ⚠️ Again — not a fixed TP. Manage your own exits depending on profit goals & risk appetite. 🕵️‍♂️ Thief Trader Philosophy This is not financial advice. It’s a “steal-and-escape” blueprint to show how layered entries can help smooth entries across zones instead of one rigid buy point. Adapt, manage, and steal profits like a pro before the market takes them back. 🔗 Related Assets to Watch NASDAQ:AMZN — often shows correlation in big tech swings 📦 NASDAQ:AAPL — mega-cap sentiment driver 🍏 NASDAQ:MSFT — growth stock momentum check 💻 NASDAQ:QQQ — ETF to track Nasdaq 100 flow 📊 AMEX:SPY — broad market sentiment monitor 🏦 📌 Key Correlation Notes Big tech stocks often move in sympathy — when Nasdaq pumps, Netflix usually gets extra popcorn 🍿 fuel. Watch volatility spikes in TVC:VIX , as they can trap over-leveraged longs & shorts. Macro cues (USD strength, yields, Fed talk) can shift momentum across all growth stocks. ✨ “If you find value in my analysis, a 👍 and 🚀 boost is much appreciated — it helps me share more setups with the community!” #NFLX #Netflix #Stocks #SwingTrade #DayTrade #LayeringStrategy #Options #StockMarket #TradingView #ThiefTrader #Equities #QQQ #SPY #StockAnalysis

Updated

11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 1010 1111 1212 1313 1414 1515 1616 1717 1818 1919 2020 2121 2222 2323 2424 2525 2626 2727 2828 2929 3030 3131 3232 3333 3434 3535 3636 3737 3838 3939 4040 4141 4242

Select market data provided by ICE Data Services. Select reference data provided by FactSet. Copyright © 2025 FactSet Research Systems Inc.Copyright © 2025, American Bankers Association. CUSIP Database provided by FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved. SEC fillings and other documents provided by Quartr.© 2025 TradingView, Inc.

More than a product

Supercharts

Screeners

Stocks
ETFs
Bonds
Crypto coins
CEX pairs
DEX pairs
Pine

Heatmaps

Stocks
ETFs
Crypto

Calendars

Economic
Earnings
Dividends

More products

Yield Curves
Options
News Flow
Pine Script®

Apps

Mobile
Desktop

Community

Social network
Wall of Love
Refer a friend
House Rules
Moderators

Ideas

Trading
Education
Editors' picks

Pine Script

Indicators & strategies
Wizards
Freelancers

Tools & subscriptions

Features
Pricing
Market data

Trading

Overview
Brokers

Special offers

CME Group futures
Eurex futures
US stocks bundle

About company

Who we are
Space mission
Blog
Careers
Media kit

Merch

TradingView store
Tarot cards for traders
The C63 TradeTime

Policies & security

Terms of Use
Disclaimer
Privacy Policy
Cookies Policy
Accessibility Statement
Security tips
Bug Bounty program
Status page

Business solutions

Widgets
Charting libraries
Lightweight Charts™
Advanced Charts
Trading Platform

Growth opportunities

Advertising
Brokerage integration
Partner program
Education program

Community

Social network
Wall of Love
Refer a friend
House Rules
Moderators

Ideas

Trading
Education
Editors' picks

Pine Script

Indicators & strategies
Wizards
Freelancers

Business solutions

Widgets
Charting libraries
Lightweight Charts™
Advanced Charts
Trading Platform

Growth opportunities

Advertising
Brokerage integration
Partner program
Education program