Cyber MondayUp to 80% OFF

Beyond Technical Analysis

Gold Setup Is TOO CLEAN to Ignore — Bulls in Control!In my view, Gold currently presents one of the cleanest technical structures across the entire market. Ideally, I would like to see a downside manipulation first, followed by a continuation move toward the 4110 area to sweep internal buy-side liquidity. Only after that, a potential retracement toward the 3900 zone becomes reasonable. Any bearish movement that occurs without first taking buy-side liquidity does not align with my plan, and in that case, I will not consider opening any short positions. Like and follow if you wanna see more analysis like this!
CAPITALCOM:GOLDLong
by Almenio
BABA Winds Have Shifted - Macro EntryAs always, I try not to publish trades without having a big view of multiple factors so this one is based on a long term view over the next 1-2 years. Macro: I have outlined China's Central Bank (PBoC) liquidity injections (through reverse repo and MLF data) as very seasonal at the bottom pane on the chart. I do NOT believe history or seasonals should dictate future action but it is worth noting the seasonal nature of the PBoC liquidity injections and we are seeing an early rise in total and frequency since June. In fact, a recent print on 8/15 was the biggest spike since the height of 2023. China is also coming out of the rough no tolorence policy during the "pandemic" so some of their stocks are poised for major breakouts. That said, the U.S. M2 money supply is breaking out of a range with global liquidity on the rise heading into central bank easing around the world. No doubt we have some volatility in global liquidity ahead (US debt ceiling to name one) but the general trend is up and to the right over the next 2 years once we get through the vol. Price Action: As I mentioned, the price of this stock has been on a downward trend since Fed Funds rates started moving up in 2021 and has completed the bearish bat making 3 consecutive higher highs since the low in 2023. Looking at Fibonacci the targets are clear but for target 2 I am looking at the massive gap from end of 2021. My first exit before the stop loss would be losing any of the recent higher highs and the S/L is set to under the 2023 low. However, I would rely on the macro section more than price action for the exit. Timeline: I am a 3 month to many year investor not a day trader so this is one I will layer in and buy dips for the next few months. I did take a 5% position at the entry point noted. I do think the next 2-3 years will be net positive for liquidity and assets. Thanks
NYSE:BABALong
by Trainwreck
NZDCADHello Traders! 👋 What are your thoughts on NZDCAD? NZD/CAD has been moving in a continuous downward structure and has now reached a key support zone. In this area, we expect a positive reaction from the price. At the moment, the descending trendline is preventing further bullish movement, but we expect that at this stage the price will manage to break above it and reach the projected targets. Therefore, you can wait for the descending trendline to break, and after the breakout, enter on the pullback. Don’t forget to like and share your thoughts in the comments! ❤️
Long
by HAMED_AZ
15
GBPUSD: Double Top Breakdown Setting UpHi! Pattern Structure A clear Double Top formed between June–Oct 2025 around 1.3750–1.3850, showing strong rejection. The neckline at 1.3050–1.3070 has been tested several times, confirming it as a key support. 🔎 Trend & Momentum Price is sliding inside a descending channel since October ➡️ lower highs + lower lows = continued bearish pressure. Key Levels Neckline: 1.3050 ⚠️ Pullback zone: 1.3150–1.3200 (potential retest) Flip Area / Target Zone: 1.2820–1.2850, a major S&D level acting as the double-top target🎯 Expected Scenario If price rejects the trendline again, a continuation toward 1.2820 is likely. Only a strong recovery above 1.3250 would weaken the bearish setup. 🚫 Disclaimer: As part of ThinkMarkets’ Influencer Program, I am sponsored to share and publish their charts in my analysis.
Short
by melikatrader94
14
Very useful techniques to learnI have recently posted several posts around mechanical and simple charts. This is another insight into some professional techniques that are not often shown. Gann talked about High and low candles and opposing ticks. Lowest Tick of the Highest Bar: This refers to the lowest price point (or low tick) of the highest price bar (or highest price period) on the chart. It indicates a crucial support level. If the price falls below this point, it may signal a downward trend or a breakdown. Highest Tick of the Lowest Bar: Conversely, this refers to the highest price point (or high tick) of the lowest price bar (or lowest price period). This represents a key resistance level. If the price rises above this level, it may indicate an upward trend or a breakout. Here's an image showing this in an uptrend. And another for a downtrend. Then what you would expect from this, would be a move similar to this and of course you can't expect it every time. But to appreciate it, you need to understand the logic as to why this is important in the first instance. The simple explanation of that is in an uptrend that lowest tick of the highest bar was in fact the exact area buyers failed and sellers took control. Obviously, the inverse is true of a downtrend. The highest point of the lowest candle, means buyers are back pushing prices higher. Into the future you MIGHT but not always see these levels as support or resistance. When you overlap this with the mechanical techniques, you can use this for range entries. Here's a post on mechanical techniques. ========================================== Second tip is to do with volume. Many people seem to have volume on their chart, but don't really know how to utilise it. Now, imagine the areas I mentioned in the first tip. As price nears these zones (other other zones) order blocks, supply or demand, fib levels. If you could quickly identify what story volume is trying to tell you. Then there is a huge benefit to know how you need to react to the price action. In this image; Look at the spikes in volume until the orange arrow point. What you can see from this next image, is the orange arrow is the turning point. For it's next stop after breaking through the PoC of the range from the prior low to its high. You can draw a line, extended from the highest tick of the lowest candle. Price comes back, and as explained in the example above. Buyers step back in and drive the price directly away from this level. Now; let's go one step further. In this image I have the volume profile on the left representing the swing low to high and then the profile on the right from that high to the fresh swing low. You can see from the sell side pressure where price has interest to both parties. Next you have both lines drawn on the chart of the opposing candles, like this. Here. we can look at if the market is seeking outside or inside liquidity. However, if you look back at the volume on the bottom of the chart. Are we seeing green candles and volume increasing? or red candles with volume increasing? This is where the second tip becomes very, very useful. If you can identify the phase of internal or external, areas of interest. You can confirm this with volume clues on the chart and you will find yourself on the right side of the trade more often than not. Have a great week all! Disclaimer This idea does not constitute as financial advice. It is for educational purposes only, our principal trader has over 25 years' experience in stocks, ETF's, and Forex. Hence each trade setup might have different hold times, entry or exit conditions, and will vary from the post/idea shared here. You can use the information from this post to make your own trading plan for the instrument discussed. Trading carries a risk; a high percentage of retail traders lose money. Please keep this in mind when entering any trade. Stay safe.
FX:XAUUSDEducation
by Mayfair_Ventures
"God forbid let peace breakout." Look at US Defence Stocks $ITALeo Tolstoy included that line in his novel "War & Peace". It might be said that many holders of defence stocks will be uttering the same should this weeks negotiations over the conflict of Ukraine make progress. It might be said that the price action already denotes the trajectory of the peace talks. As peace talks have become more tangible, so has the decline in defence stocks. If there is an announcement this week in time for Thanksgiving then expect a further decline. Is Zelensky/Europe/Putin decides to rug-pull Trump in an effort to keep the charabanc going then I'd expect a rise. I hope for the former, but the cynical old differ in me expects the latter. C'est la vie.
CBOE:ITAShort
by FXTraderPaul
A big week for the UK, and $EWUIts a big week for the UK, due to the long awaited Autumn Statement on Wednesday. Chancellor Reeves decided to put back the date as long as feasibly possible. I presume that she hoped she'd have better numbers out of the economy to help her position? That her great plan for renewed growth would bare fruit? If so, then that plan has backfired quite badly. Furthermore it has allowed more time for everyone to pass commentary on a) the economy, b) the budget, and c) Reeves's performance. None of which has been complimentary. (By all means feel free to show me evidence to the contrary). Despite all the shenanigans the FTSE has until recently) continued to march North, based on the back of a) anti-Trump rotation and b) the weakening of GBP helping those companies global profits look ore impressive. However when we take a look at the daily chart of EWU - the ishares ETF for the UK we can see that the strong move above the Daily 50MA has reversed. Whereas it acted as strong dynamic support these last 6 months or so now leads us to consider: will it now flip to become dynamic resistance? Is that an indication of a move lower for EWU, the FTSE, and the UK in general? All will be revealed this week I believe.
AMEX:EWUShort
by FXTraderPaul
Gold May See a Minor Pullback Before Gaining Bullish Momentum📊 Market Update Gold is currently trading around ≈ 4,050 USD/oz. A firm US Dollar is keeping gold from breaking higher, while markets await clearer signals from the Federal Reserve and upcoming US economic data. Cautious sentiment is keeping gold in a tight consolidation range. 📉 Technical Analysis Resistance Levels: • R1: ~ 4,100 • R2: ~ 4,135 (new resistance – recent swing high, strong selling pressure likely) Support Levels: • S1: ~ 4,020 • S2: ~ 3,995 – 4,000 (strong support, aligned with recent lows and trend validation) EMA & Trend: • Price is below the EMA 09, indicating slowing bullish momentum and short-term consolidation. • If price moves back above EMA 09 on H1 → bullish momentum may resume. Candles – Volume – Momentum: • Narrow-range movement on H1/H4 → sideways market. • Volume slightly lower → traders are waiting for a catalyst. • Momentum is soft but no strong reversal signals yet. ________________________________________ 📌 Market View Gold may pull back to the 4,020 or 4,000 support regions before regaining upward momentum. A weaker USD or negative US economic data could push gold upward again toward 4,100 – 4,135. ________________________________________ 💡 Trading Strategy 🔻 SELL XAU/USD at: 4,090 – 4,093 🎯 TP: 40 / 80 / 200 pips ❌ SL: 4,096 🔺 BUY XAU/USD at: 4,023 – 4,020 🎯 TP: 40 / 80 / 200 pips ❌ SL: 4,017
OANDA:XAUUSDShort
by Mian-FXSignals
Gold (XAU/USD) – Market Structure Analysis | November 24, 2025Bias: Neutral → Slight Bullish Key Level to Watch: 4,075.24 USD Gold is stabilizing inside a tightening consolidation zone, holding structure above the 4,040–4,000 support region while struggling to secure acceptance above the 4,100 psychological level. This compression indicates reduced volatility and signals an upcoming breakout as liquidity builds on both sides of the range. Intraday order-flow shows buyers stepping in with higher lows and a steady recovery back into resistance. However, the broader structure remains neutral until a decisive break confirms directional dominance. ⸻ Technical Breakdown Market Structure • Market is range-bound between 4,000–4,100, forming a compression pattern • Higher intraday lows indicate emerging bullish presence • No confirmed breakout yet — market remains balanced Key Resistance Zones • 4,075.24 – Initial reaction level • 4,087.69 – 4,090.45 – Critical breakout band • 4,099.86 – 4,104 – Upper resistance cluster • 4,150 – Higher-timeframe structural resistance Key Support Zones • 4,044.09 – Immediate intraday support • 4,036.62 – Secondary support • 4,032 → 4,000 – Structural support and bearish validation floor ⸻ Outlook & Interpretation Gold remains in a neutral structure with slightly improving bullish sentiment. For buyers to take full control, price must break and hold above the 4,087–4,090 region. Until then, the market sits in equilibrium, with both sides defending key liquidity zones. ⸻ Trading Plan Bullish Scenario Break and hold above 4,087–4,090 → upside targets: • 4,099 → 4,104 → 4,150 Neutral Scenario Price remains between 4,044 – 4,087 → expect continued consolidation and liquidity build-up. Bearish Scenario Break below 4,044 → downside targets: • 4,036 → 4,031, with 4,000 as the broader structural support.
PEPPERSTONE:XAUUSD
by Trellz_
GBP/JPY LONGShtf = bulish price has come down and swept 1d highs while on a uptrend & bounced out of a 4h fvg . im now looking for price to continue upwards to follow htf i would like to see a strong move up and create a ifvg on the 4h after this occurs i will scale down to a ltf and wait for a ltf liq sweep to the downside and enter of the ltf ifvg to target previous weekley highs price could respect this fvg & continue to draw lower, untill we get a closure above this 4h fvg we sit on our hands.
Long
by connorpgregory
NIFTY Analysis 24th Nov '25: IntraSwing (Spot)levels (New Look)The Bullish Bat pattern is a Harmonic price formation used in technical analysis to identify potential reversal zones where a downtrend may end and a new uptrend could begin. It is defined by precise Fibonacci retracement and extension levels for each leg of the XABCD structure. Bullish Bat Pattern Conditions XA: The initial surge upward, forming the basis of the pattern.​ AB: A retracement downward from XA, reaching 38.2% to 50% of the XA leg.​ BC: A corrective move upwards, spanning 38.2% to 88.6% of the AB leg.​ CD: The final decline, typically an extension of 161.8% to 261.8% of BC, but most importantly, ends at 88.6% retracement of XA. This D point is known as the Potential Reversal Zone (PRZ). Probable reversal Point as oer HARMONIC Bullish BAT Pattern: 👉🏽 @ 25979.8 1.618 of BC Leg 👉🏽 @ 25932.7 2 of BC Leg 👉🏽 PRZ => @ 25900.7 i.e 0.886 of XA Leg 👉🏽 @ 25856.55 2.618 of BC Leg Additional Criteria and Trade Setup The D point forms after a significant downtrend and should ideally show signs of reversal, such as bullish candlestick patterns or divergence on oscillators like RSI/MACD.​ 🌈Traders typically wait for a reversal signal at the PRZ (near the 88.6% retracement of XA) before entering a long position.​ 🌈Stop-loss is usually placed a bit below the X point, with profit targets at various Fibonacci retracement levels of the CD leg or the C/A points for more conservative exits.​ 🪸At a GLANCE: Fibonacci Levels for Bullish Bat Leg Requirement (Bullish Bat) XA Initial upward move AB Retrace 38.2% to 50% of XA BC Retrace 38.2% to 88.6% of AB CD Extend 161.8%–261.8% of BC, Complete at 88.6% of XA [ Level Interpretation / description: L#1: If the candle crossed & stays above the “Buy Gen”, it is treated / considered as Bullish bias. L#2: Possibility / Probability of REVERSAL near RLB#1 & UBTgt L#3: If the candle stays above “Sell Gen” but below “Buy Gen”, it is treated / considered as Sidewise. Aggressive Traders can take Long position near “Sell Gen” either retesting or crossed from Below & vice-versa i.e. can take Short position near “Buy Gen” either retesting or crossed downward from Above. L#4: If the candle crossed & stays below the “Sell Gen”, it is treated / considered a Bearish bias. L#5: Possibility / Probability of REVERSAL near RLS#1 & USTgt HZB (Buy side) & HZS (Sell side) => Hurdle Zone, *** Specialty of “HZB#1, HZB#2 HZS#1 & HZS#2” is Sidewise (behaviour in Nature) Rest Plotted and Mentioned on Chart Color code Used: Green =. Positive bias. Red =. Negative bias. RED in Between Green means Trend Finder / Momentum Change / CYCLE Change and Vice Versa. Notice One thing: HOW LEVELS are Working. Use any Momentum Indicator / Oscillator or as you "USED to" to Take entry. ⚠️ DISCLAIMER: The information, views, and ideas shared here are purely for educational and informational purposes only. They are not intended as investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instruments. I am not a SEBI-registered financial adviser. Trading and investing in the stock market involves risk, and you should do your own research and analysis. You are solely responsible for any decisions made based on this research. "As HARD EARNED MONEY IS YOUR's, So DECISION SHOULD HAVE TO BE YOUR's". Do comment if Helpful . In depth Analysis will be added later (If time Permits)
NSE:NIFTY
by DSKF16
Report 24/11/25Report summary: Europe’s policy debate has pivoted from cyclical noise to structural urgency. Christine Lagarde warned that the euro area’s export-led “old growth model” is out of date and that years of inaction risk a slow grind lower in productivity and per-capita income. Her prescription is to deepen the single market and remove internal trade barriers so domestic demand can carry more of the load, a message sharpened by Germany’s protracted manufacturing slump. This is a meaningful shift in elite signaling: it frames EU stagnation as a design problem rather than a business cycle dip, and it implies a multi-year policy program that favors services, capital-market integration, and defense/tech over heavy industry status quo. At the same time, Brussels is pressing ahead with a “reparations-style” loan that would use the income from frozen Russian assets to collateralize roughly €140 billion for Ukraine, despite competing ideas out of Washington to redeploy the funds for U.S.-led vehicles. The plan’s viability rests on EU political consensus and legal comfort with the primacy of sanctions law over sovereign asset protections; if it holds, it creates a medium-term floor under Kyiv’s financing and a fresh precedent for sanctions leverage in geopolitical bargaining. Japan is moving the other way on the cycle: a new ¥21.3 trillion (~$135 billion) package mixes energy subsidies, cash handouts, and tax cuts to cushion real incomes and counter tariff-related shocks. Markets faded the “Truss moment” angst, but the bigger macro tell is in rates: Japan’s 10-year JGB yield is pressing multi-decade highs near ~1.78%–1.80%, reflecting both fiscal supply and a slow-moving regime shift at the BOJ. The policy mix, more fiscal, less BOJ repression, keeps USDJPY volatile, raises MoF intervention risk if disorderly FX develops, and re-prices term premia globally via portfolio rebalancing. Over in the U.S., a different kind of regime change is underway in capital markets: the “AI capex” financing machine. Investment-grade titans and speculative-grade data-center developers have flooded debt markets; Oracle’s credit-default-swap costs jumped as issuance and leverage climbed, and analysts now talk about another ~$20–$60 billion from data-center issuers next year if financing conditions allow. The broader template is stark: Wall Street expects big-tech borrowing of roughly $1.2 trillion from 2025–2028 to fund an AI build-out that could approach $3 trillion in total spend, leaving equity, private credit, ABS, and vendor financing to fill the gap. That’s powering near-term growth but also tightening financial conditions for the marginal borrower and increasing draw-down risk if adoption proves S-shaped rather than exponential.    Energy geopolitics adds another shock-absorber/accelerant. Fresh U.S. sanctions on Russian oil have widened Urals’ discount to Brent, stranded sanctioned barrels at sea, and driven crude afloat to ~1.4 billion barrels while tanker day-rates jump. This raises freight-adjusted delivered prices for some buyers and lengthens supply chains as India and China probe alternatives in the Americas. If sustained, higher shipping costs tighten effective supply even if headline output is stable, a bullish skew for time-spreads and for crack margins if logistics bottlenecks persist.  U.S. monetary policy is the wild card short-term. The Fed is openly split after two cuts, with some officials citing firmer labor and sticky services inflation to argue against a December move; the shutdown-delayed data flow has complicated consensus-building. Markets that had priced a near-certain cut marked odds back to a coin-flip and the dollar firmed. This tug-of-war keeps rate-sensitive equities choppy and supports DXY on dips while curve steepening remains the path of least resistance if growth doesn’t crack.  Western trade policy is hardening. Allies are coordinating to contain subsidized Asian steel overcapacity, a step that would entrench defensive measures beyond the U.S. and EU and nudge input costs higher for downstream users. In the Americas, the White House removed 40% tariffs on slices of Brazilian food imports to temper U.S. food inflation, signaling tactical dial-a-tariff flexibility rather than a clean de-escalation of protectionism. The common theme is industrial policy with a CPI lens. Market reactions and near-term setup U.S. equities are oscillating between hopes of a gentle disinflationary glide and the reality of capital-intensive AI economics. November saw the Nasdaq slump as investors punished cash-burn-adjacent AI stories and questioned returns on the next $500 billion of big-tech capex, yet breadth improved late in the week as non-AI cyclicals rallied. Expect “violently flat” tape: big ranges, muted trend until a catalyst resets the earnings/discount-rate mix. Positioning is rotating toward cash-returners and old-economy beneficiaries of the AI build (power gear, engines, grid).  European risk assets are bifurcating. Banks and defense/aerospace remain relative winners on regulatory flexibility and fiscal rearmament talk, while exporters tethered to capex goods lag amid weak global manufacturing. Lagarde’s push for single-market deepening is equity-positive in the long run but slow-acting; near-term, EU assets key off the dollar and the U.S. rate path. JGBs are under persistent pressure as supply and term premia reprice. Foreign inflows into long JGBs have picked up given improved hedged yields and life-insurer asset-liability shifts, but the market will still demand higher coupons if fiscal packages multiply. The BOJ’s slower purchase pace adds another marginal bear impulse. Expect global spillovers via reallocation out of U.S. duration, particularly on hedged bases. Oil’s micro is dominated by logistics and refined-product dynamics more than OPEC headlines in the very near term. U.S. product demand is running a touch above 20 mb/d into late November, with gasoline normalizing and distillates steady; a prolonged tanker squeeze would tighten physical benchmarks even if OECD inventories look comfortable, a setup that can push Brent time-spreads into backwardation on shipping-led tightness.  Strategic forecasts (3–12 months) For the euro area, the base case is low-trend growth with positive dispersion. Countries that execute on services liberalization and defense/dual-use tech will outgrow heavy-industry incumbents. A successful Russian-asset loan would stabilize Ukraine support and reduce tail-risk premia in European credit and FX by anchoring war financing, though Kremlin countermeasures are an overhang. The upside risk is a faster-than-expected single-market push that narrows the EU-U.S. productivity gap; the downside is political fragmentation that delays reforms and keeps potential growth sub-1%. For Japan, modest real growth with rising nominal anchors is plausible if fiscal offsets persist and the BOJ gradually normalizes. The yen’s fair value shifts stronger over the horizon as real yields creep up and the current account benefits from capex-related reshoring and tourism, but path dependence is messy: any USDJPY slide below “lines in the sand” could trigger MoF action that sparks risk-off waves across Asia. For the U.S., AI-led investment remains a growth prop, yet the financing mix raises credit-cycle sensitivity. If bond buyers demand wider spreads and private credit tightens structures, 2026 capex could slip to the low end of Street estimates for data-center developers. The soft-landing case still holds if labor eases without a profits recession, but the equity factor mix tilts from “duration + narrative” toward “cash + capacity to fund.” Fiscal and political implications Lagarde’s critique implies Brussels-level initiatives: capital-markets union, cross-border banking waivers, and defense R&D funding, all of which raise EU banks’ ROE and M&A option value if they materialize. Japan’s fiscal stance, tax cuts and subsidies, keeps households whole but lifts JGB supply needs and medium-term debt-sustainability questions. In the U.S., a divided Fed and a Congress that toggles between deregulatory pushes (e.g., accounting conflicts reconsidered) and tactical industrial policy keeps policy risk high for megacap tech, auditors, and regulated utilities powering data centers. Key asset implications Gold (XAUUSD) is a geopolitical hedge caught between elevated real yields and fresh conflict/energy frictions. With the Fed divided and the dollar bid on growth-and-carry, rallies can stall in the absence of a shock; sustained oil shipping tightness or an escalation in Ukraine would argue for renewed upside via risk premia and central-bank diversification. Think choppy with upward spikes on event risk. S&P 500 and Dow Jones are likely to remain range-bound into year-end as earnings revisions flatten and the market digests the true cost of AI. Favor cash-flow-rich defensives, power-grid/engine suppliers riding off-grid data-center builds, and U.S. industrials with pricing power; fade thematic spikes in highly levered AI-infrastructure plays if spreads re-widen and CDS headlines recur. USDJPY should stay positively correlated with global yields. Japan’s stimulus and BOJ gradualism keep dips shallow, but any acceleration toward 160 would invite verbal or actual MoF intervention; rallies back toward 150 would likely require either softer U.S. data or a BOJ policy surprise. Expect realized vol to stay high as life-insurers and foreign reserve managers rebalance. DXY retains a carry and growth premium as long as the Fed resists rapid easing and European/Japanese yields lag on a hedged basis. Event-risk spikes tend to be bought, especially if EU reform is slow and Japan telegraphs only incremental normalization. A clear pivot from the Fed or a synchronized non-U.S. growth surprise would be needed to knock the dollar into a new down-trend.  Crude oil is fundamentally range-bound but tactically skewed higher on logistics. Elevated “oil on water,” rising freight, and U.S. product resilience offset soft spots in OECD macro. Watch how quickly India/China re-route to non-sanctioned grades and whether winter diesel tightens; a fast normalization of shipping would cap rallies, but another sanctions turn could put $5–$10 on Brent via spreads. Playbook (30–90 days): The market is rotating from “rates-only” narratives to a three-engine regime, policy mix, financing cost of AI infrastructure, and logistics-driven energy micro. In that mix the base case for the next one to three months is range-bound risk with violent factor swings: the dollar stays resilient on carry, global curves keep a mild steepening bias as Japan and Europe inch toward fiscal-led reflation, and oil trades the logistics tape rather than headline supply. Under that backdrop the most robust portfolio stance is barbelled: own quality cash generators and “picks-and-shovels” to the data-center build on one side, and convex hedges to financing or FX shocks on the other. Below are concrete trade expressions, triggers, and risk controls for your named assets, written to be executable without relying on a single macro outcome. For gold (XAUUSD), treat the metal as event-volatility insurance funded by carry elsewhere. The near-term headwind is real yields when the Fed sounds cautious on further cuts, but the tail winds, sanctions volatility in energy markets, sovereign asset seizures crossing new legal lines, and central-bank diversification, keep upside convexity alive. Express longs through a call-spread ladder dated beyond the next Fed meeting to avoid theta bleed around speeches; a typical construction buys a call roughly 3% to 5% out of the money and sells one 8% to 10% out, sized so that the maximum loss is under one week of average P&L. If you prefer linear, add on dips that coincide with dollar up-days and U.S. 10-year breakevens steady to higher; cut if the dollar breaks out with real yields rising in tandem, because that mix historically compresses gold’s risk premium rather than reprices it higher. The hedge to a core long is a tight tenor risk-reversal (sell a small put to part-fund the call), but keep the short put notional capped so assignment would be a one-day VaR event, not a portfolio reset. For U.S. equities via the S&P 500, run a “cash-plus-protection” frame rather than a pure beta bet. Earnings revisions are good but flattening as the street digests the true cost of the next leg of AI capex and the debt it rides in on. Overwrite strength in the index level with 30–45-day covered calls against quality positions that already yield high free cash flow; recycle the premium into 2%–3% out-of-the-money index put spreads, which finance cheaply when implied correlation is low. If you prefer outright index structures, a collar that sells a call roughly 4% out and buys a put 3% down, then sells a second put 7% down in smaller size, creates downside funding without over-insuring grindy tapes. Upgrade the factor mix inside the sleeve: overweight grid equipment, power electronics, engines and backup power tied to data-center build-outs, plus U.S. industrials with pricing power; underweight highly levered AI-infrastructure stories that require continuous market access. The invalidation for a constructive stance is a sharp, credit-led widening in IG spreads alongside a stronger dollar; that combo says “financing is the problem,” in which case switch from collars to outright long puts for a few weeks. For the Dow Jones, lean into the value tilt as your relative hedge against a stumble in long-duration tech. A simple spread, long Dow futures versus short Nasdaq futures, keeps you market-neutral on U.S. growth while monetizing any further de-rating of capex-heavy stories. If you don’t run futures, you can synthesize with large-cap value ETF versus a mega-cap growth ETF, but keep the pair dollar-neutral and rebalance weekly because factor drift is high in this tape. The stop is not a level but a condition: close the spread if the 3-month change in 10-year real yields rolls over while IG spreads tighten; that mix usually re-accelerates duration leadership and hurts the pair. For USDJPY, keep a two-handed plan: long-USD tactical swings on dips toward well-telegraphed “lines in the sand,” paired with cheap optionality for a policy or intervention surprise that strengthens the yen. The driver into year-end is still rate-differentials and issuance: Japan’s supplementary budget lifts JGB supply and nudges term premia up, while BOJ normalization remains incremental. Buy USDJPY on retracements that coincide with U.S. yields firming and oil bid, but carry a protective 1-by-2 put spread (long one nearer-dated USDJPY put, short two further-dated deeper-strike puts in much smaller notional) to monetize any Ministry of Finance shock move. Size the options so that, in an intervention gap-down, your delta flips long JPY rather than leaving you naked. If you own Japanese equities, consider funding partial FX hedges via rolling forwards when the basis softens; the carry drag is smaller than the earnings volatility from a fast yen rally. For the broad dollar via DXY, the path of least resistance is still a buy-the-dip stance as long as non-U.S. growth is patchy and the Fed resists a rapid easing path. The way to trade it without basis noise is a basket: long USD versus EUR and GBP in larger weight and versus a liquid Asian cross in smaller weight to capture policy divergence. Use futures or forward points rather than options unless you specifically want tail cover; if you do, own USD calls struck just beyond recent highs with maturities that hop over the next central-bank meetings. The risk to this stance is a synchronized upside surprise in European services activity together with a BOJ signal that accelerates normalization; should that occur, flip to selling DXY rallies and close any EURUSD shorts first, because the euro will do the heavy lifting of any non-U.S. growth surprise. For crude oil, trade the structure rather than the headline. Freight tightness, sanction routing and “oil on water” dynamics are as important to prompt pricing as OPEC chatter, and they predominantly express through time-spreads and cracks. If you have access to futures curves, a small long prompt-minus-next calendar (long the nearer month, short the next) benefits from shipping bottlenecks and inventory draw-downs without taking full flat-price beta; pair that with a modest crack-spread long if U.S. product demand firms into winter. If your toolkit is listed options on WTI or Brent, a diagonal call spread—long a nearer-dated at-the-money call and short a further-dated call a few dollars higher, lets you monetize a transient tightness while selling more expensive longer-dated vol. The invalidation is a rapid normalization in tanker availability or a clear downdraft in U.S. product supplied; if either occurs, close structure longs and keep only residual upside via cheap calls. Risk management across the sleeve should emphasize condition-based exits and position sizing that assumes gap risk. For gold and crude options, cap premium outlay on each structure to no more than your average daily P&L to avoid “insurance becoming the risk.” For equity collars and put spreads, avoid clustering maturities: stagger them so you’re not forced to roll the entire hedge book on the same week. For USDJPY and DXY, treat policy meetings and unscheduled official comments as jump risk; keep some of the FX exposure in options so your first response to a gap is to adjust delta, not liquidate at the worst print. For the Dow-versus-Nasdaq pair, monitor credit spreads and real yields daily; those two variables explain most of the pair’s variance right now, and a regime flip there is your earliest warning to step aside. Scenario mapping is straightforward. In a benign glide, U.S. growth okay, Europe improving at the margin, Japan steady, shipping constraints lingering, the dollar stays firm but not disorderly, gold grinds with episodic spikes, oil’s structure outperforms flat price, the S&P 500 chops but rewards cash-returning cyclicals, and the Dow-over-Nasdaq pair works. In a financing shock, AI-capex issuers pay up, IG spreads widen, and the dollar rallies, beta underperforms protection, the S&P 500 put spreads pay, Nasdaq lags the Dow, USDJPY pops higher unless MoF steps in, and gold initially stalls before catching a late safe-haven bid. In an intervention or policy upside shock, BOJ hints at faster normalization or MoF acts decisively, the yen strengthens abruptly, DXY softens, gold rallies alongside duration, oil dips on stronger yen and softer global growth expectations, and you monetize the USDJPY downside optionality while covering some equity hedges.
OANDA:XAUUSD
by Buranku
BTC temporary recovery - short term this week📌 BTC Weekly Outlook Update — Plan Remains on Track Bitcoin continues to follow the expected roadmap with precision. The recent price action confirms a corrective move to the upside before resuming the larger bearish structure. 📍 Current Structure & Price Behavior BTC has shown a short-term bullish retracement after forming a temporary low. However, the overall outlook remains bearish as price continues to trade below key moving averages and under the major downtrend line. Price is now heading toward the resistance area between 94,300 and 100,780 USD, where the following confluence exists: Previous support turned resistance Fibonacci retracement zone Trendline rejection zone Liquidity pool This area remains the most important zone to watch early this week. 📈 Expected Move — Still Valid The original plan remains unchanged: Short-term move upward into the supply zone at 94K → 100K. Rejection and continuation of the downtrend. Price targets the Fibonacci 1.618 extension zone at ~80,000 USD. 🎯 Key Target: Fibonacci 1.618 (≈ 80,500 USD) This level is crucial as it aligns with: ✔ A major demand zone ✔ The 1.618 Fibonacci extension ✔ A deep liquidity sweep level ✔ Potential cycle correction completion This area is expected to act as the macro support level where buyers step in aggressively.
Long
by Nova-Scalper
1
Can X-Ray Technology Really Disrupt a 125-Year-Old Industry?Nano-X Imaging is attempting to fundamentally restructure the medical imaging industry through a convergence of semiconductor innovation and business model disruption. The company has commercialized a cold cathode X-ray source that replaces the century-old thermionic emission technology, which wastes 99% of energy as heat, with field emission from millions of molybdenum nano-cones operating at room temperature. This breakthrough, manufactured in their South Korean semiconductor fabrication facility near the SK Hynix cluster, enables the Nanox.ARC system: a compact, digitally-agile tomosynthesis device that eliminates the need for massive cooling systems and rotating gantries that have defined traditional CT scanners.   The commercial strategy centers on "Medical Screening as a Service" (MSaaS), converting imaging from a capital expenditure to an operational expense, which is particularly advantageous in the current high-interest-rate environment, where hospitals face capital budget constraints. Strategic partnerships provide immediate market access: the 3DR Labs agreement connects Nanox to over 1,800 US hospitals, integrating FDA-cleared AI algorithms (HealthCCSng, HealthOST, HealthFLD) directly into existing radiology workflows, while international deployments span Mexico (630 units with SPI Medical), South Korea and Vietnam (2,500 systems supported by SK Telecom), and European reference sites in France. Management has issued ambitious guidance of $35 million in revenue for 2026, representing approximately 900% growth from 2025 levels, progressing toward a projected $72.6 million by 2028.   The investment thesis rests on technological validation (FDA 510(k) clearance, operational semiconductor fab), geopolitical resilience (supply chain decoupled from Middle East instability), and macroeconomic alignment (OpEx-based model favored during capital constraints). However, execution risks remain significant: the company maintains a substantial cash burn rate ($30.4 million in negative operating cash flow), requires continued capital raises (most recently, a $15 million offering), and faces adoption uncertainty as hospitals evaluate this novel service model. Analyst sentiment is bullish with price targets averaging $7.75 (120%+ upside), though more aggressive projections reach $23, contingent on the successful scaled deployment of the recurring revenue model that fundamentally challenges the traditional equipment sales paradigm of incumbent manufacturers like GE, Siemens, and Philips.
NASDAQ:NNOXLong
by UDIS_View