Black FridayUp to 80% OFF

Ethereum / Prospective

No trades
See on Supercharts
OverviewNewsIdeasMindsTechnicalsMarkets

Trade ideas

ETHEREUM Free Signal! Sell! Hello,Traders! ETHEREUM Price has reacted sharply from the horizontal supply area, confirming the presence of institutional selling pressure. A clean rejection signals continuation toward the lower liquidity pool near $3,740 as Smart Money hunts sell-side targets. ------------------- Stop Loss: $3,888 Take Profit: $3,741 Entry: $3,829 Time Frame: 3H Setup Risk: High ------------------- Sell! Comment and subscribe to help us grow! Check out other forecasts below too! Disclosure: I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis.
TRADENATION:ETHUSDShort
by TopTradingSignals
1
$ETH (WEEKLY): still BULLISH, lost the main SUPPORT ($4k)CRYPTOCAP:ETH the WEEKLY chart is crucial for the #altcoins in Q4, so we better have a solid grasp here. This one is very problematic, as in, it doesn't give us many clues. No proper chart pattern, at all, for years on this WEEKLY. That is rare, and I don't like it, tough to analyse. No clear ELLIOT'S WAVE pattern, the last WAVE 5 completed in December 2024, followed by a huge correction and even greater rebound ending in the current ATH zone. I will just stick to tested horizontal SUPPORT/RESISTANCE ZONES, these are always high %. So, the main RESISTANCE to beat before any BULLISH bias: $3988 - $4092. Close below and things are getting really serious immediately. As far as the SUPPORT zone, between $3306 and $3571. The support zone is where I would be looking for those sweet wicks down in case of an earthquake. Market STRUCTURE is still BULLISH and in an UPTREND. I will publish the DAILY, this one is fundamental to process first👽💙
BINANCE:ETHUSD
by ColdBloodedCharter
MeghaHorn or BowTie Pattern !!!Key Observations: Pattern Formation: A broadening wedge or megaphone pattern (also likened to a bow tie) is forming. Price is oscillating between expanding trend lines. Labeled waves: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 within the pattern. Critical Zones: Buy Above: $2,815.98 (upper boundary of the wedge). Sell Below: $2,258.03 (lower boundary of the wedge). No Trading Zone: Between $2,258 – $2,815 (uncertainty/consolidation area). Price Target: If price breaks below, Target 1 is indicated around $1,800 or below (implied from structure). Current Price: Trading at $2,748.56, up +5.05%, within the “No Trading Zone”. Summary: The chart suggests waiting for a breakout or breakdown from the wedge pattern to determine the next move. A breakout above $2,815 could signal a buy opportunity, while a breakdown below $2,258 could trigger a sell with a potential target near $1,800. Ask ChatGPT
COINBASE:ETHUSD
by GKTrademanthan
Eth New Targets - Triangle Breadown📉 Technical Patterns & Indicators 1. Head and Shoulders Pattern Left Shoulder, Head, and Right Shoulder are clearly marked. Breakdown from the neckline suggests a bearish reversal, with a drop of ~6.49% (-295.99) post-breakdown. 2. Triangle Formation A symmetrical triangle labeled with a, b, c, d, e waves. The recent price movement has broken below this triangle, indicating a bearish breakout. 3. Elliott Wave Labels Waves labeled A, B, C, D, E, F, G. The chart is currently in the E-wave to F-wave transition. Projection points: F Wave target: ~$4,218 E Wave target: ~$4,084.51 G Wave target: ~$3,897.08 4. Trendlines Blue and black descending trendlines suggest downward pressure. Ethereum remains below these resistance lines, reinforcing a bearish outlook.
COINBASE:ETHUSDShort
by GKTrademanthan
4
Ethereum Daily Chart (Sell on Rise)Wave Count (Green Labels 1–5): A 5-wave impulsive move appears to have completed, marking a bullish cycle peak. Complex Correction (W-X-Y-X-Z pattern): The correction after the 5th wave is labeled as a Complex Correction, composed of: Wave W – Zigzag Wave X Wave Y – Flat (3-3-5) Wave X – Smaller bounce Wave Z – Currently unfolding with a Diametric Pattern (7-wave structure) 📉 Current Market Structure Ethereum is in a corrective phase, currently moving through the Z wave of the complex correction. The correction appears to be forming another Diametric Pattern, potentially indicating one final drop before resuming upward. 🛒 Key Buying Zones Highlighted Upper Buying Zone (~$4,400 to $4,600) If ETH breaks bullish earlier than expected. Lower Buying Zone (~$3,600 to $3,800) More likely based on the projection shown. Where the final leg (Z) is expected to complete. 📈 Projected Path Price is expected to dip into the lower buying zone as the Diametric pattern completes. Following that, a strong bullish reversal is anticipated, likely leading to a new impulsive wave up. 📝 Patterns Used Zigzag Flat (3-3-5) Diametric Pattern – A 7-legged corrective structure, less common, indicating prolonged correction.
COINBASE:ETHUSDShort
by GKTrademanthan
2
Eth Ready for All time High :-)🔍 Analysis Summary: Current Price: ~$3,824 Pattern: Complex Elliott Wave correction (W-X-Y-X-Z) has likely completed. Key Observation: A potential bear trap just occurred (false breakdown), signaling a reversal. Wave Count: The chart suggests that Wave 2 has completed, and Wave 3 up is starting. ✅ Trading Plan: Buy Above: $3,925 Stop Loss: $3,378 Target 1: $5,230 Target 2: $6,306 🧠 Insights: Buying Zone was identified in the earlier phase near April. Bear Traps are used to suggest failed breakdowns, which trap sellers and fuel upside moves. Expected Move: Strong impulsive rally if price breaks above the resistance zone.
COINBASE:ETHUSDLong
by GKTrademanthan
3
#Ethereum - Aug 2025: $ 1300 Points Move?Date: 17-08-2025 #Ethereum - Current Price: $ 4,478 Pivot Point: $4,579.06 Support: $ 4,348.59 Resistance: $4,811.61 Upside Targets: -------------------------------- | Target | Price | --------------------------------- | 🎯 Target 1 | $5,112.56 | | 🎯 Target 2 | $5,413.52 | | 🎯 Target 3 | $5,726.44 | | 🎯 Target 4 | $6,039.36 | Downside Targets: | 🎯 Target 1 | $4,046.59 | | 🎯 Target 2 | $3,744.60 | | 🎯 Target 3 | $3,431.67 | | 🎯 Target 4 | $3,118.75 | #Crypto #Bitcoin #BTC #CryptoTA #TradingView #PivotPoints #SupportResistance #SOLANA #ETHEREUM #BTCUSD #MATICUSDT #XRPUSDT
E
by Micro_trades123
Ethereum Key Buy Zones 💠 Ethereum (ETH/USD) – Key Buy Zones Ahead ETH is showing a major rejection from the same price zone that has only been tested twice in history — near the $4,000–$4,100 resistance area (highlighted in circles). Both previous visits led to sharp corrections, making this a historically strong resistance zone. ⸻ 🔹 Current View • ETH rejected the $4,000–$4,100 zone — same level as the 2021 top. • Price is now trading around $3,770, below the 50 & 100 SMAs, signaling short-term weakness. • The RSI is trending down from mid-levels, suggesting more room for a correction before a potential bounce. ⸻ 🔹 Buy Targets • First Buy Target: $2,590 • Second Buy Target: $2,160 • Third Buy Target: $1,715 These levels line up with strong historical support zones and key moving averages, ideal areas to start accumulating if ETH continues to pull back. ⸻ 🔹 Outlook The long-term structure for Ethereum remains bullish, but a deeper correction could provide much better risk-reward entries for the next cycle. My plan: accumulate gradually at the marked levels, focusing on patience and strong technical confirmation. ⸻ 🧠 “Smart investors don’t chase green candles — they buy when fear returns.” 📜 Disclaimer : This is general information only and not financial advice. Always do your own research before investing.
BITSTAMP:ETHUSD
by Amer_Shouaeb
Everyone's Panicking, Market is TANKING!The Crypto Market Is TANKING! Right now, the market’s crashing, everyone’s confused, and fear is everywhere. In this video, I break down exactly what’s happening with TOTAL, BTC, and ETH, and why I’m not surprised by this move at all. I’ll explain: Why people are panicking (and why they shouldn’t) Why I don’t think the wick will get filled — and what it means if it does The key levels I’m watching for BTC and ETH What this crash could mean for the next major move Stay calm, stay focused — this is where real traders are made. #Bitcoin #CryptoCrash #BTC #ETH #CryptoMarket #Altcoins #CryptoTrading #ICTStrategy
COINBASE:ETHUSDLong
by Trader-Alchemist
Sharing of recent ETH trading ideasETH rebounded to 4290 this morning before encountering resistance and falling back. Support lies between 3700 and 3800. If it holds, there's a good chance of another rebound. If not, it may continue to test the 3300-3500 range. Trading wise, you can go long around 3700-3800 to catch a rebound. If it falls below 3650, set a stop-loss and wait for the next support level. Upward resistance lies between 4250 and 4400. If it rebounds here and then shows signs of weakness, you can go short, as the current daily trend is already bearish. Trading involves risk. The above views do not constitute financial advice and are for educational purposes only.
BINANCE:ETHUSD
by AlchemyMr_
Historical Background of Competitive DevaluationIntroduction Competitive devaluation refers to a deliberate downward adjustment in the value of a nation’s currency, aimed at gaining a trade advantage over other countries. By making exports cheaper and imports more expensive, a country can boost domestic production and employment. However, when several nations engage in such policies simultaneously, it often leads to a “currency war,” where no country gains significantly, and global trade stability is threatened. The phenomenon of competitive devaluation has deep historical roots, closely tied to changes in the global monetary system, major economic crises, and evolving international trade relations. Understanding its historical background provides insight into the motives behind currency manipulation and its far-reaching economic consequences. 1. Early Origins of Currency Devaluation 1.1 The Pre–Gold Standard Era Before the establishment of formal monetary systems, many countries operated on bimetallic standards using gold and silver. Devaluation during this period often took the form of reducing the metal content in coins, known as debasement. Monarchs and governments used this strategy to finance wars or debts without raising taxes. For example, during the 16th and 17th centuries, European powers like Spain and France frequently debased their coinage, resulting in inflation and loss of public trust in money. While these early instances were not “competitive” in the modern sense, they set a precedent for government intervention in currency values to achieve economic or fiscal goals. 1.2 The Classical Gold Standard (1870–1914) Under the Classical Gold Standard, major economies fixed their currencies to a specific quantity of gold. This system promoted exchange rate stability and facilitated international trade. However, maintaining a fixed gold parity required discipline: countries with trade deficits had to tighten monetary policy, while those with surpluses expanded theirs. As a result, devaluation was rare and often viewed as a sign of economic weakness. Nevertheless, towards the end of this era, some countries began manipulating their gold parity to improve trade balances, foreshadowing the competitive devaluations that would emerge in the 20th century. 2. Competitive Devaluation During the Interwar Period (1919–1939) 2.1 The Collapse of the Gold Standard After World War I World War I disrupted the international gold standard. Countries abandoned gold convertibility to finance military expenditures, leading to inflation and fiscal imbalances. After the war, many nations attempted to restore the gold standard, but exchange rates were misaligned, and economies were struggling with debt and unemployment. The United Kingdom, for instance, returned to the gold standard in 1925 at its pre-war parity, overvaluing the pound and causing deflationary pressure. The rigid adherence to gold parity prevented countries from adjusting to post-war economic realities, setting the stage for competitive devaluation during the 1930s. 2.2 The Great Depression and the Currency Wars of the 1930s The Great Depression (1929–1939) marked the most intense period of competitive devaluation in modern history. When the U.S. stock market crashed in 1929, global trade contracted sharply. In response, countries sought to protect their economies by devaluing their currencies to make exports cheaper and stimulate growth. The United Kingdom led the way by abandoning the gold standard in 1931, allowing the pound to depreciate by around 30%. This improved Britain’s export competitiveness but harmed trading partners still tied to gold. Following Britain, Japan, the Scandinavian countries, and many members of the British Commonwealth also left gold and devalued their currencies. The United States followed suit in 1933, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt devalued the dollar by raising the gold price from $20.67 to $35 per ounce, effectively reducing the dollar’s value by 40%. The countries that remained on gold, such as France and Switzerland, faced worsening trade deficits and economic stagnation. By 1936, even France was forced to devalue, effectively ending the interwar gold standard. 2.3 Consequences of 1930s Competitive Devaluation The wave of devaluations in the 1930s led to a “beggar-thy-neighbor” spiral. Each country sought to gain at others’ expense, but the net effect was destructive. Instead of reviving global demand, competitive devaluation disrupted trade and led to retaliation through tariffs and import quotas — notably the U.S. Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which worsened the depression. The interwar experience demonstrated that uncoordinated exchange rate policies could deepen global economic instability. This lesson would strongly influence post–World War II monetary arrangements. 3. Post–World War II and the Bretton Woods Era (1944–1971) 3.1 Establishment of the Bretton Woods System In 1944, as World War II drew to a close, representatives from 44 Allied nations met in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to design a new international monetary order. The resulting Bretton Woods System established the U.S. dollar as the anchor currency, convertible to gold at $35 per ounce, while other currencies were pegged to the dollar within a narrow band of ±1%. The aim was to ensure exchange rate stability while allowing limited flexibility to adjust parities in case of “fundamental disequilibrium.” To oversee the system, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was created to provide financial assistance and policy coordination. 3.2 Early Devaluations and Adjustments (1949–1967) Although Bretton Woods reduced currency volatility, some countries still resorted to devaluation. In 1949, the United Kingdom devalued the pound from $4.03 to $2.80 due to persistent trade deficits. Over 20 other countries followed with similar moves, marking one of the first coordinated postwar devaluation waves. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, European and Asian economies gradually recovered, and competitive pressures eased. However, France (1958) and the U.K. (1967) again devalued when their external positions deteriorated. The United States, on the other hand, began facing balance-of-payments deficits as it financed global military commitments and foreign aid. This trend eventually eroded confidence in the dollar’s gold convertibility. 3.3 The Collapse of Bretton Woods and the Return of Floating Rates By the late 1960s, growing U.S. inflation and foreign dollar holdings made the gold peg unsustainable. In 1971, President Richard Nixon suspended dollar convertibility into gold — the famous “Nixon Shock” — effectively ending Bretton Woods. Following this, most major currencies adopted floating exchange rates by 1973. Under the new regime, devaluations occurred through market forces rather than government decree, but the temptation for competitive depreciation persisted, especially during recessions and oil crises. 4. Competitive Devaluation in the Late 20th Century 4.1 The 1980s: Dollar Appreciation and the Plaza Accord During the early 1980s, U.S. monetary tightening to combat inflation caused the dollar to appreciate sharply. The strong dollar hurt American exports and led to growing trade deficits, particularly with Japan and West Germany. In 1985, the Plaza Accord was signed by the G5 nations (U.S., Japan, West Germany, France, and the U.K.) to coordinate a controlled depreciation of the U.S. dollar. The agreement marked a rare instance of multilateral cooperation to prevent a potential currency war. The Plaza Accord succeeded in lowering the dollar’s value but led to side effects, including asset bubbles in Japan, which eventually contributed to its 1990s stagnation. 4.2 The 1990s: Emerging Market Crises The 1990s witnessed several exchange rate crises in emerging economies, often triggered by speculative attacks and unsustainable pegs. Notable examples include: The Mexican Peso Crisis (1994) The Asian Financial Crisis (1997) The Russian Ruble Crisis (1998) In these cases, countries were forced to devalue their currencies sharply to restore competitiveness and stabilize capital flows. While these were not deliberate “competitive” devaluations, they nonetheless affected global trade dynamics and influenced neighboring economies’ exchange rate policies. 5. Competitive Devaluation in the 21st Century 5.1 The 2008 Global Financial Crisis and “Currency Wars” The 2008 financial crisis reignited fears of competitive devaluation. As growth slowed, central banks in advanced economies adopted ultra-loose monetary policies, including near-zero interest rates and quantitative easing (QE). These measures weakened their currencies, prompting accusations of “currency manipulation.” In 2010, Brazil’s finance minister Guido Mantega famously warned of an ongoing “currency war”, as capital inflows and volatile exchange rates disrupted emerging markets. Countries like Japan and China were accused of maintaining artificially weak currencies to support exports. The U.S. Federal Reserve’s QE programs indirectly pushed the dollar lower, while the European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of Japan (BOJ) followed similar strategies to stimulate their economies, fueling global tensions. 5.2 China’s Role and the Modern Era of Currency Competition China’s exchange rate policies have been central to modern competitive devaluation debates. Since the early 2000s, China has managed its yuan (renminbi) within a controlled band, often accused of keeping it undervalued to boost exports. While China allowed gradual appreciation after 2005, it intervened again during global slowdowns, particularly in 2015–2016, when it unexpectedly devalued the yuan to support growth amid slowing demand. These moves sparked volatility in global markets and renewed concerns about competitive currency adjustments among major trading nations. 5.3 The COVID-19 Pandemic and Global Monetary Expansion The COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022) led to unprecedented monetary stimulus. Central banks worldwide cut interest rates and expanded liquidity to stabilize economies. This large-scale monetary expansion weakened many currencies simultaneously. However, since the crisis was global, no single country gained a competitive edge. Instead, the era underscored how interconnected monetary policies had become — where actions in one major economy (like the U.S.) could ripple across the world’s financial system almost instantly. 6. Lessons from History 6.1 Coordination vs. Competition History demonstrates that coordinated monetary action, as in the Plaza Accord, can mitigate harmful effects of currency volatility, whereas unilateral devaluations, as seen in the 1930s, often worsen global instability. 6.2 Short-Term Gains, Long-Term Costs While devaluation can temporarily improve trade balances, its effects fade as inflation rises and trading partners retaliate. Sustainable competitiveness depends on productivity and innovation, not exchange rate manipulation. 6.3 Role of International Institutions The IMF, World Bank, and World Trade Organization (WTO) continue to monitor and discourage currency manipulation. However, enforcement remains challenging, especially with the rise of flexible exchange rates and complex capital flows. Conclusion The history of competitive devaluation reflects the tension between national self-interest and global economic cooperation. From the 1930s currency wars to modern-day monetary easing, the temptation to use exchange rates as a policy tool has persisted. However, historical experience consistently reveals that competitive devaluation rarely produces lasting prosperity. Instead, it undermines confidence, destabilizes trade, and erodes the foundations of international monetary cooperation. In the modern era, as economies become more interconnected, the path to sustainable growth lies not in depreciating currencies but in fostering innovation, improving productivity, and strengthening multilateral coordination. The lessons of the past remain clear: in a globalized economy, currency competition benefits no one — cooperation benefits all.
BINANCE:ETHUSDEducation
by GlobalWolfStreet