Fundamental Market Analysis for October 3, 2025 GBPUSDThe pound is holding most of its recent gains, trading near 1.34400–1.34500. The pair is supported by signs of cooling in the U.S. labor market and related expectations of further monetary easing by the Fed in the coming months. Budget uncertainty in Washington maintains some market nervousness, but the impact is uneven: when U.S. yields ease, the pound tends to benefit as the dollar’s rate premium narrows.
From the U.K. side, there are few strong domestic catalysts: the Bank of England maintains a measured approach, preserving flexibility amid slowing inflation and fragile growth. For sterling, this implies less need to compensate currency risk with extra yield. Combined with a modest improvement in global risk appetite, this supports demand for GBP against USD in the mid-1.34–1.35 range.
Fed members’ remarks remain an important backdrop: any signals about the pace of U.S. rate cuts can swiftly shift short-term flows. But with official data releases delayed during the government pause, markets are likely to rely on alternative assessments of employment and inflation expectations—a setup under which the pound keeps an advantage over the dollar if U.S. yields stay soft.
Trading recommendation: BUY 1.34450, SL 1.33950, TP 1.35250
Analysis
NZDUSD: Sell Stop in Planned DowntrendThis is not an active entry but a planned sell stop entry.
Daily Timeframe:
Price crossed above HTL but quickly formed a doji to indicate weakness
EMA20 is below EMA60 and price is below EMA20 so there's an overall weak downtrend
H1 Timeframe:
Strong ATL is in the process of weakening as price recently failed to make a higher high
When price crossed below ATL, EMA20 should show confluence by crossing below EMA60 and the EMA band should continue expanding
If price makes a clean break lower, there's strong indication that there will be confluence with the daily downtrend
USDCAD: Uptrend ContinuationDaily Timeframe:
Price crosses above HTL and is holding
No inside bar formed yet so unlikely to see loss of momentum over the next day
H1 Timeframe:
Not idea that price is a bit further away from EMA20
Uptrend is indicated by EMA20 being above EMA60 and price being above EMA20
The DTL is also not a strong plot so reducing size
ETHUSD: Financial and Market ReportPremise: This report provides a detailed, professional analysis of Ethereum (ETH), the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization.
Data are sourced from reliable providers such as CoinMarketCap, Etherscan, DeFiLlama, Glassnode, and web research current to 2025.
On-chain data are separated from market analysis and qualitative opinions. Citations are indicated inline for traceability.
Forecasts are based on historical trends and macro scenarios and do not constitute financial advice.
All values are in USD.
1. Asset Overview
Project Summary, Underlying Technology, History and Team / Key Contributors
Ethereum is a decentralized open-source blockchain that serves as a platform for decentralized applications (dApps), smart contracts, and ERC-20/ERC-721 tokens. The underlying protocol has used Proof-of-Stake (PoS) since 2022 (The Merge). ETH is the native network token. The chain supports the EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) for executing Turing-complete code.
History: Vitalik Buterin’s whitepaper (2013), ICO in 2014 raising $18.3M in BTC, mainnet launch 30 July 2015 (Frontier). Key upgrades: Constantinople (2019), London (2021 — EIP-1559 fee burning), The Merge (Sept 2022 — PoS, ~99.95% energy reduction), Shapella (2023 — staking withdrawals), Dencun (2024 — proto-danksharding for L2 scalability), Pectra (May 2025 — account abstraction and increased blob throughput).
Core contributors include Vitalik Buterin, Charles Hoskinson (ex-Cardano), and Gavin Wood (Polkadot). Development coordination is led by the Ethereum Foundation (non-profit), with contributions from ConsenSys and a global developer community.
Primary Use Case, Tokenomics and Governance
Primary use case: Layer-1 platform for DeFi (lending, DEXs), NFTs (digital art, gaming), asset tokenization and dApps (social tokens, supply chain). Dominant L1 for smart contracts with >$93B TVL in DeFi.
Tokenomics:
Max supply: Unlimited (no hard cap).
Circulating supply: 120.7 million ETH (as of Oct 2, 2025).
Emission schedule: Post-Merge issuance reduced ~90% to ~972,000 ETH/year (staking issuance). EIP-1559 burns base fees, making supply potentially deflationary during high network activity. Since 2022 4.5M ETH burned; net supply modestly up (+0.8% annualized since 2021).
Governance: Primarily off-chain via community processes (Ethereum Magicians, All Core Devs Calls) and on-chain via EIPs. No centralized control; protocol changes require multi-stakeholder consensus.
2. On‑Chain Data and Economic Metrics
Total Supply, Circulating Supply and 3‑Year Changes
Total supply equals circulating supply (120.7M ETH). From 2022–2025 supply grew ~0.8% annually despite burns, as PoS issuance exceeded burns during low activity periods. Annual snapshots:
2022 (post‑Merge): ~120.2M ETH (+0.2% net).
2023: ~120.4M (+0.17%; 1.7M issued vs 1.3M burned).
2024: ~120.6M (+0.17%; deflationary in Q1, inflationary Q2–Q4).
2025 (Q3): 120.7M (+0.08%; 540,958 ETH issued vs 465,657 ETH burned YTD).
Year Starting Supply (M ETH) Net Issuance (ETH) Burn (ETH) Ending Supply (M ETH) Change %
2022 120.0 +972,000 -1,200,000 120.2 +0.2%
2023 120.2 +972,000 -1,300,000 120.4 +0.17%
2024 120.4 +972,000 -1,400,000 120.6 +0.17%
2025 (YTD) 120.6 +540,958 -465,657 120.7 +0.08%
Sources: Ultrasound.money, Etherscan.
Key On‑Chain Metrics
Active addresses (daily): 553,404 (24h; 2025 avg ~500k).
Daily transactions: 1.82M (24h; 2025 avg ~1.5M; 2022 peak 734k/day).
On‑chain volume: ~$4–5B/day (24h recent).
Average fees: 0.65 Gwei (~$0.06/tx; 2025 average ~$3.78/tx post‑L2).
Staking rate: ~29% of supply staked (35M ETH; ~1M validators).
Usage Metrics
DeFi TVL: $93.493B (Ethereum chain).
Smart contracts deployed: ~41M (historical), ~11B interactions.
NFT metrics: Volume ~$10–15B/year (2025), with peaks on OpenSea (Wyvern protocol).
Economic Indicators
Market cap: $537.23B.
Fully diluted market cap: $536.01B.
MVRV ratio: ~2.4 (elevated unrealized profits; >3.5 = bull extremes, <1 = bear).
SOPR: ~1.05 (slight net on‑chain profits).
NVT ratio: High (~100–150), indicating premium to transaction volume (analogous to P/E).
Holder turnover: Low (~0.1–0.2/yr — HODL behavior).
% held by beacon/exchanges/whales: ~54.6% in Beacon Deposit Contract; top exchanges: Coinbase 4.93M ETH, Binance 4.23M ETH; addresses >1% supply ≈30%.
Sources: Glassnode, CoinMarketCap.
3. Market & Price Analysis
Price Performance (last 12 months) and Notable Historicals
Oct 2024–Oct 2025: price range $1,471 (Apr 2025 low) to $4,831 (Aug 2025 high), ~+35.41% YTD. Average volumes: $45.46B/24h.
2025 performance: +191% from lows, with significant Q1 volatility.
Historical Volatility and Benchmark Comparison
30‑day volatility: ~50–60% (2025), higher than BTC (~40%). Beta vs BTC: ~1.2 (ETH more sensitive to macro shocks). Outperformed crypto index (CMC 200) by ~+15% YTD.
Liquidity and Market Depth
Top exchanges by volume: Binance (5% volume, $2.27B/24h), Bybit ($640M), Coinbase ($566M), OKX ($635M).
Bid‑ask spread: ~0.025% (tight).
Depth: ~$15–16M within ±0.1% price.
OTC desks account for significant institutional flows (~20–30%).
4. Technical Analysis (Brief)
Key Support & Resistance
Daily timeframe: Support $3,900–$4,000; Resistance $4,200–$4,263.
Weekly timeframe: Support $3,825; Resistance $4,600–$4,800.
Indicators & Recent Patterns
RSI (14): 45.7 (neutral; oversold ~34; >50 bullish).
MACD (12,26): Negative (signal bearish momentum but weakening).
Moving averages: Price below EMA 20/50 ($4,263/$4,212), above EMA 200 ($3,500); recent 50/200 death cross.
Price pattern: Sideways channel $3,800–$4,500; potential volume breakout; corrective double zigzag (W‑X‑Y).
Note: Subjective analysis; not trading signals.
5. Fundamental & Network Analysis
Roadmap, Partnerships, Recent Upgrades and Audits
Roadmap emphasizes scalability (Fusaka 2025 for PeerDAS, targeted +10x L2 throughput; Glamsterdam 2026 for Verkle trees). Recent: Pectra (May 2025, account abstraction, EIP-3074 wallet functionality). Integrations with major L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism). Auditing promoted by Ethereum Foundation (examples: SEAL audits); EIP-7907 (2025) introduced DoS protections.
Direct Competitors and Competitive Position
Competitors: Solana (very high TPS, higher revenue but outages), BNB Chain (large active user base, low fees), Polygon (L2/commit-chain). Ethereum remains the dominant EVM-compatible L1 leader for DeFi/NFTs, but faces competition on speed and cost.
Specific Risks
Smart contract vulnerabilities (reentrancy, oracle manipulation — e.g., Penpie hack 2024 ~$27M).
Regulatory risk (token utility classification, scrutiny of staking/ETFs).
Centralization concerns (54.6% in Beacon Deposit Contract; top addresses concentration; centralized L2 sequencers).
Dependence on external oracles and bridges (single‑point failures, bridge exploits).
Sources: Ethereum whitepaper, audit reports, industry articles.
6. Outlook & Scenarios
Qualitative Forecasts (1–3 years)
Conservative (2026–2028): $6,000–$8,000 (slower adoption, tighter regulation).
Base case: $10,000–$12,000 (DeFi/NFT growth, ETF inflows ~$27.6B; burn > issuance during high activity).
Optimistic: $15,000+ (strong institutional adoption, Fusaka delivering throughput; TVL >$150B, staking 40%).
Trends: increased corporate staking ($7.65B), L2 scalability, RWA tokenization.
Primary Drivers
Positive: ETF inflows, scalability upgrades (PeerDAS), increased DeFi/NFT adoption, macro crypto bull cycles.
Negative: L1 competition (Solana revenue growth), low network activity (burn < issuance), regulatory/tax developments.
Risk Mitigation Strategies
Diversify into L2s and select competing L1s.
Use hardware wallets for custody; split staking from hot wallets.
Employ multiple oracles and require audits before contract deployment.
Use stop‑losses for volatility; stake portion (20–30%) for yield (3–5%).
7. Conclusion & Recommendations
Risk/Reward Summary
ETH offers high upside potential (possible +100% over 1–3 years) due to DeFi dominance and structural deflation mechanics, but carries high risk (~50% volatility, regulatory and smart contract threats). Risk/return profile: high, suited to risk‑tolerant investors.
Operational Recommendations
Investors: accumulate under $4,000 for long‑term hold (1–3 years); take‑profit target $6,000 (2026); stop‑loss $3,500.
Holders: stake 20–30% to earn yield; monitor MVRV <1 as accumulation signal. Time horizon: mid‑term bull (2026+).
Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths: mature ecosystem (TVL $93B), L2 scalability path, EIP‑1559 deflationary mechanism potential.
Weaknesses: higher base‑layer fees, staking centralization, oracle/bridge dependencies.
Sources: CoinMarketCap, Etherscan, Glassnode, Ethereum.org, DeFiLlama, CoinDesk, arXiv, CryptoSlate.
GBPAUD: Second AttemptExperienced a bit of unwanted volatility earlier this morning, but I do think there's still quite a bit of downside pressure.
On the daily timeframe, price still remains below HTL. On the H1 timeframe, price appears to be ranging, but is painting larger bearish bars.
I think there is an opportunity to scale in if price crosses below EMA20 and the EMA20/60 band continues to expand.
MEW / USDT : Bullish setup , Watching retest for next leg upMEW / USDT Breakout confirmed from the descending trendline. Price is retesting the demand zone, and as long as this support holds, we can expect bullish continuation towards higher levels. Breakdown below the zone will invalidate the setup.
EUR/USD - U.S Government Shutdown ? 📊 Setup:
EUR/USD has successfully broken out of the descending channel on the H1 timeframe. Price is holding above the breakout level, supported by the Ichimoku cloud and a nearby demand zone. With potential U.S. government shutdown news weighing on the dollar, EUR/USD shows strong upside potential.
📈 Trade Plan:
Buy Zone: 1.1710 – 1.1730 (support zone & breakout retest)
1st Resistance Target: 1.1837
2nd Resistance Target: 1.1891
Bias: Bullish as long as price holds above support zone and channel breakout.
✅ Support Factors:
Clear Channel Breakout on H1
Confluence with Ichimoku bullish bias
Fundamental support: Possible U.S. government shutdown → weaker USD outlook
Strong demand zone cushioning downside
#EURUSD #Forex #Trading #TechnicalAnalysis #PriceAction #ForexSignals #FXTrading #Euro #USD #Breakout #TradingView
⚠️ Disclaimer:
This analysis is for educational purposes only and not financial advice. Always do your own research and manage risk before trading.
💬 Support the Analysis:
If this setup adds value, don’t forget to Like 👍, Comment 💬, and Follow ✅ for more timely updates.
Fundamental Market Analysis for October 2, 2025 EURUSDThe euro is holding in the 1.17000–1.18000 area amid a weaker U.S. dollar due to the government shutdown and a deterioration in private employment estimates. The probability of a Fed rate cut at the October meeting remains high, and the pause in the release of some U.S. macro data increases uncertainty and reduces the dollar’s appeal as a safe-haven asset. Against this backdrop, demand shifts in favor of currencies with more resilient domestic demand and lower fiscal risks.
On the European side, the focus is on the flash estimate of HICP inflation. An acceleration in services, alongside moderate dynamics in the energy component, supports expectations that the ECB will pause to assess the price trajectory rather than rushing into further easing. This narrows the rate differential with the U.S. in favor of the euro.
An additional driver of the pair’s strengthening is the decline in U.S. Treasury yields and rising risk appetite in Asia and Europe. Taken together, these factors form a fundamental case for buying EURUSD, provided risk is controlled.
Trading recommendation: BUY 1.17500, SL 1.17250, TP 1.18250
GBP/JPY - Range Bound Before Big MovePrice is currently consolidating between a clearly defined Support Zone and Resistance Zone after a strong bearish move.
Support has been respected multiple times, indicating short-term buying interest.
Resistance aligns with a previous supply zone, showing potential rejection or continuation bias.
Two possible scenarios are unfolding:
Bullish Breakout
If price breaks above the resistance zone, it could target the Order Block (OB) above, which is a key supply area from the last strong bearish move.
Break and retest of resistance would confirm bullish structure shift.
Target area: ~199.07
Bearish Continuation
A rejection from resistance could lead to another test of support.
A break below the support zone and the Weak Low would confirm bearish continuation.
Bearish target sits around 197.60 (lower liquidity grab zone).
Key Notes:
Watch for a Change of Character (ChoCH) for confirmation in either direction.
Volume and momentum confirmation will strengthen breakout bias.
Consider OB zone as a potential reversal or mitigation point.
GBPAUD: Price Holding Below Daily HTLDaily Timeframe:
Price initially crossed below daily HTL on September 11th, but failed to hold below it as price reversed for the following days
Price crossed below daily HTL again on September 30th, but closes below significantly
Price attempted to trade above HTL, but failed to close above it accordingly
H1 Timeframe:
There's confluence here as price crosses below ATL
Price is also below EMA20 and the EMA band is beginning to widen
USDSEK: Price Crosses Below HTL AgainUSDSEK traded below the daily HTL, but there's weakness after price crossed back above.
On the other hand, the H1 timeframe is showing weakness. Price is failing to make higher high so I'm betting on downside momentum to pick up.
Reduced position size since we are nearing New York rollover.
EURUSD: Rally to the 1.1805 Zone from Support LineHello everyone, here is my breakdown of the current Euro setup.
Market Analysis
From a broader perspective, the price of EURUSD has been consolidating and building value within a large upward wedge. This pattern is defined by a series of higher lows, forming an ascending support line, which shows that buyers are consistently stepping in at higher prices.
Currently, the price is in a corrective pullback phase. After testing the upper part of the wedge, it is now heading towards the ascending support line for what I see as a critical test of the bullish structure.
My Scenario & Strategy
My scenario is built on the idea that this upward wedge pattern will hold. This pullback to the support line is a classic 'buy the dip' opportunity within the established trend, and a logical place for the correction to end.
I'm looking for the price to complete its correction to the ascending support line. A confirmed bounce from this dynamic support would be the key signal that buyers have absorbed the selling pressure and are ready to initiate the next move higher.
Therefore, the strategy is to watch for this bounce. A successful rebound would validate the long scenario and should lead to a rally that breaks the 1.1780 Resistance. The primary target is the 1.1805 Resistance Zone.
That's the setup I'm tracking. Thank you for your attention, and always manage your risk.
XAUUSD Short: Targeting 3800 on a Corrective MoveHello, traders! The price auction for XAUUSD has been operating within a well-defined ascending channel, confirming a strong bullish trend. This structure has guided the price higher through a series of impulsive moves and pullbacks, with buyers maintaining the initiative throughout this phase.
Currently, the auction is at a critical inflection point at the top of this channel. The price has rallied to directly test the channel's ascending supply line after a strong run-up. This is a key area where sellers are expected to emerge and challenge the prevailing bullish momentum.
My scenario for the development of events is a short-term corrective move from these highs. I expect that sellers will defend the supply line and reject the price, initiating a downward rotation back towards the channel's support. A failure to break out higher would confirm a temporary correction is underway. The take-profit is therefore set at 3800, targeting the major demand zone. Manage your risk.
Fundamental Market Analysis for October 1, 2025 USDJPYThe summary of opinions from participants at the Bank of Japan (BoJ) meeting in September showed that board members discussed the possibility of raising interest rates in the near future. This confirmed market expectations that the central bank would stick to its policy normalization course. In addition, growing geopolitical tensions and the US government shutdown may continue to provide some support for the Japanese yen (JPY) as a safe-haven currency, which in turn could be a headwind for the USD/JPY pair.
Meanwhile, the BoJ's stance differs significantly from forecasts that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) will cut borrowing costs twice this year. The latter does not help the US dollar (USD) attract significant buyers. Moreover, the divergence in the policy outlooks of the Bank of Japan and the Fed should favor the lower-yielding Japanese yen and help limit the USD/JPY pair. Therefore, it would be wise to wait for strong follow-through buying before taking a position in anticipation of a significant strengthening.
Trade recommendation: SELL 146.75, SL 147.95, TP 143.95
ES (SPX, SPY) Analyses, Key-Zones, Setups For Wed, (Oct 1)News & event map (for tomorrow, Wed Oct 1)
• ADP National Employment Report – 8:15 ET. Official release time.
• S&P Global PMI (final) – 9:45 ET. Scheduled on the first working day; tomorrow’s calendar lists 09:45.
• ISM Manufacturing & Prices Paid – 10:00 ET. ISM releases on the first business day at 10:00.
• JOLTS: already published Tuesday; none expected Wednesday.
• Shutdown watch: if funding lapses at midnight, the Labor Dept./BLS suspends operations and economic data are delayed (e.g., Friday jobs report). Expect the market to lean more on private data (ADP/ISM).
Shutdown Overview – Trading Insights
Historically, equity markets have exhibited mixed to mildly positive performance during government shutdowns, with the S&P 500 averaging gains between 0% and +0.3% in prior instances. The primary concern during these periods tends to be short-term volatility and potential delays in economic data, rather than sustained market downturns. Notably, the long-term trend suggests that markets typically recover and trend higher in the months following the resolution of a shutdown.
Overnight projection (Asia→EU)
The baseline expectation is for range-building between 6693 and 6725, with potential liquidity runs at the confluence edges. We often see price dips below the 6693–6695 zone rebound towards 6703 or 6713. Conversely, a strong acceptance above 6720–6725 can lead to a probe into the 6740–6750 range before the New York session. If we see a clean 30-minute close below 6693, that could open up the move to 6676 and potentially 6653.
NY session game plan (Level-KZ Protocol 15/5/1)
Trade around the 8:15 and 10:00 windows; let the first impulse settle, then execute inside NY AM 09:30–11:00 and PM 13:30–16:00 kill-zones.
ES LONG Acceptance (A++) — Entries, SL, TPs
Bias: Only if 15m accepts above 6720–6725 (re-close & hold).
Entry: 5m pullback hold → 1m HL trigger 6721–6726.
SL: ≤6712.75 (beyond VWAP/IB-H) hard stop (±0.25–0.50).
TP1: 6743.5 (PDH) — take 70%, set runner BE.
TP2: 6750–6755 supply.
TP3: 6763–6768 stretch if ISM beats and breadth expands.
Invalidation: A 15m body back inside ≤6719 after entry.
ES SHORT Rejection (A++) — Entries, SL, TPs
Bias: Fade first test of 6740–6750 if 15m shows rejection (wick + close back inside).
Entry: 5m LH re-close below 6735–6738; 1m trigger.
SL: ≥6756.
TP1: 6720–6722.
TP2: 6703–6705 (Y-POC).
TP3: 6693–6695 (Y-VAL/ONL).
Invalidation: 15m acceptance above 6750.
USDCAD: Uptrend ContinuationThis trade is not near a major daily level, but I think it does have potential.
Daily Timeframe
Price made a very clean break above the HTL
Bearish move only lasted two days, which is an indication of weak momentum
H1 Timeframe
Price crosses above EMA20 and continues accelerating away
EMA20 is accelerating away from EMA60
Price also crossed DTL, but caution that this was not a clean break
xauusd whats happening?🟡 Gold (XAU/USD) Technical Outlook – Strong Bullish Trend Near All-Time Highs
📊 Market Overview
Current Price: ~3,858.55
Trend: Strong Bullish
Technical Summary:
Moving Averages → Strong Buy
Indicators → Strong Buy
Overall Signal → Strong Buy
🔑 Key Levels
Support Zones:
3,854.88 → (Today’s Low)
3,840 – 3,845 → (Previous Support)
3,788 – 3,800 → (Major Zone)
Resistance Levels:
3,861.41 → (Today’s High)
3,871.72 → (52-Week High)
3,934 → (Fibonacci Target)
Pivot Points (Classic):
S1: 3,852.81
Pivot: 3,856.48
R1: 3,862.13
📈 Technical Analysis Deep Dive
Trend Analysis:
Gold is trading well above all major SMAs & EMAs (5–200 days) → confirms strong uptrend.
Price structure shows higher highs & higher lows → bullish momentum intact.
Momentum Indicators:
RSI (14) → 60.49, bullish but not yet overbought.
Stochastic (9,6) → overbought → signals risk of short-term pullback before continuation.
Market Drivers:
Fed’s dovish stance
Weakening U.S. Dollar
Safe-haven demand from geopolitical tensions
💡 Trading Strategy
✅ Breakout Strategy
Watch for a decisive break above 3,861.41 → possible rally towards 3,871.72 (52W high) and 3,934 (Fib projection).
✅ Pullback Strategy
Safer approach → wait for dip towards:
3,840 – 3,845 zone
3,788 – 3,800 zone (major support)
⚠️ Risk Management
Suggested stop-loss → below 3,840 for entries near 3,850.
Bullish outlook invalidated only if price drops below 3,735.
📌 Conclusion
Gold remains in a strong bullish trend supported by both technicals and fundamentals. While a short-term pullback is possible, the broader outlook favors buying on dips or breakouts towards new highs
$4,000 per ounce – the golden target is almost here!Since the start of 2025, gold ( XAUUSD ) has been on a strong upward trend, gaining around $1,200 per ounce (+45%). By September 30, prices surged to an all-time high of $3,867 per ounce. This momentum is setting ambitious price targets and keeping the metal near historic levels. Amid shifting rate expectations and rising demand for safe-haven assets, platinum ( XPTUSD ) is also on the rise, holding above key levels and signaling renewed investor interest in precious metals.
Back in April, FreshForex analysts predicted gold would hit $4,000 per ounce — at the time, the price had just broken above $3,300. Less than six months later, gold has repeatedly set new all-time highs!
4 key drivers of the rally:
A dovish Fed and weaker USD . The market is pricing in more rate cuts — lowering the opportunity cost of holding gold. A softer dollar also makes the metal more attractive to international buyers.
Demand for safe havens . Rising global uncertainty (including risks of a U.S. government shutdown) is pushing capital into traditional shelters like gold — and records tend to be set during such events.
Central bank buying . For the third year in a row, official sector demand remains strong — especially from emerging market regulators — cushioning pullbacks and creating a firm price floor.
ETF inflows . Gold-backed exchange-traded funds are accumulating reserves, boosting investment demand and locking in higher price levels.
As financial conditions ease, uncertainty stays high, and institutional demand holds strong, gold remains a key asset for conservative strategies. While short-term corrections are possible, the upward trend is likely to continue unless core fundamentals reverse. FreshForex analysts believe the $4,000 mark will be crossed soon, and prices could reach $4,200 per ounce by year-end!
ES (SPX, SPY) Analyses, Key Zones, Setups Thus (Sep 30)SESSION DRIVERS
• Europe: Germany CPI/HICP prelim came in hotter (2.4% y/y).
• Energy: OPEC+ chatter about a possible +500k b/d hike hit crude; watch cross-asset spillover.
• U.S. tape: Headlines around government-funding risk; yields eased into week-start.
→ Net: headline sensitivity + range tendencies early; let NY cash open set the tone.
INTRADAY BIAS & SCENARIOS
Base case: Range-to-down if 6714–6724 caps on first tests → rotate toward 6696 then 6669.
Alternative: Acceptance above 6724 flips momentum up → test 6731–6736 stops; extension possible toward 6750/6763 if buyers hold retests.
Threshold: 6696/6694 pivot (ONL/London Low). Below = opens magnets 6686 → 6669. Above and accepted = re-target 6714/6724.
LEVEL-KZ PROTOCOL (15/5/1) — SETUPS:
Tier-1 (A++) Acceptance Continuation — LONG above 6724
Trigger: 15m full-body close >6724.
5m: Pullback holds 6720–6724 and re-closes up.
1m Entry: HL reclaim.
SL: Below 15m trigger wick or 6716 (whichever is lower).
• TP1: 6731–6736, TP2: 6750, TP3: 6763.
Management: At TP1 close 70%, runner 30% to BE; no trail before TP2.
Tier-1 (A++) Rejection Fade — SHORT at 6714–6724
Trigger: 15m rejection that closes back below 6714.
5m: Re-close down with LH.
1m Entry: First pullback lower-high.
SL: Above 6728 (or 15m wick high).
TP1: 6696–6694, TP2: 6689–6685, TP3: 6672–6666.
Notes: Best on first touch during NY AM.
Tier-2 (A+) Quick-Reclaim Bounce — LONG at 6672–6666
Trigger: Sweep 6666 → instant reclaim; 15m closes back above 6672.
5m: Re-close up holding the band.
1m Entry: HL.
SL: Below 6658.
• TP1: 6696, TP2: 6714–6724, TP3: 6731–6736.
Size: ¾ normal.
Tier-3 (A) Exhaustion Flush — LONG at 6654–6650 or 6639–6636
Trigger: Exhaustion wick + 15m close back inside; 5m re-close up.
SL: 6–8 pts below the wick (respect the 15m anchor).
• TP1: 6666–6672, TP2: 6696, TP3: 6714.
Size: ½ normal. Use only if velocity spike + capitulation tells.
RISK & EXECUTION GUARDRAILS
• Hard SL on the relevant 15m wick ±0.25–0.50 pts.
• Viability gate: TP1 ≥ 2.0R.
• Max 2 attempts per level per session; time-stop 45–60m if neither TP1 nor SL hits.
• Daily guardrails: stop trading at −2R net or lock gains at +3R net.
• Lunch 12:00–13:00 manage only; PM window 13:30–16:00 for second pass.
Bitcoin can Bounce from Support and Start to GrowHello traders, I want share with you my opinion about Bitcoin. The price structure has been defined by a complex and volatile consolidation following a prior downtrend. After initially forming a downward wedge, the price action has seen multiple breakouts and reversals, testing both the major 108800 buyer zone and the 118000 seller zone. This prolonged period of indecision has established a solid support base at the 108800 support level. Currently, after a recent sharp drop was absorbed by this support, the price of BTC has started to show signs of a renewed bullish attempt, moving up from the lows. In my mind, this successful test of the major support is the most critical recent event. I expect that the price will first make a final small dip to re-test this 108800 support level to confirm buyer strength. I think a confirmed bounce from this area will lead to a significant rally, as sellers appear to be exhausted. Therefore, I have placed my TP at 114000, targeting a key area of prior price congestion located near the resistance line of the larger wedge structure. Please share this idea with your friends and click Boost 🚀
Disclaimer: As part of ThinkMarkets’ Influencer Program, I am sponsored to share and publish their charts in my analysis.
Gold can Bounce From Channel Support and Continue HigherHello traders, I want share with you my opinion about Gold. The market context for Gold has been firmly bullish since the price action reversed its prior downward channel, a move that established the current, well-defined upward channel. This structure has been methodically guiding the price of XAUUSD higher through a clear sequence of higher highs and higher lows, confirming that buyers are in control of the dominant trend. Currently, after recently testing the channel's upper resistance line, the asset is undergoing a healthy corrective phase. This pull-back is guiding the price towards a critical confluence of support, where the ascending support line of the channel meets the horizontal support zone around the 3625 current support level. In my mind, this correction is an opportunity to join the uptrend. I expect that the price will find support on the channel's lower boundary and initiate a new upward rebound. I think this move will carry the price to a new high within the channel. Therefore, I have placed my TP at 3930 points. Please share this idea with your friends and click Boost 🚀
Trade the news: Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF) — Financial Report1) Executive summary
Wolfspeed (WOLF) is a leading silicon carbide (SiC) and GaN semiconductor company undergoing a material capital structure reset after completing Chapter 11 restructuring in September 2025.
Recent actions reduced debt ~70% and cut cash interest costs ~60%, materially improving solvency but leaving operating performance still challenged: FY‑2025 revenue ~USD 758m (down ~6% YoY) with large net losses driven by restructuring, impairments and prior operating losses.
Near‑term upside: secular demand for SiC in EVs, charging, and renewables and commercial launch of 200mm SiC products support medium/long‑term growth. Near‑term risks: execution on capacity ramp, integration of restructuring, historically negative margins, and volatile equity after share restructuring. Valuation is currently distressed — market cap ~USD 3.5bn post‑restructuring, but earnings remain negative.
Recommendation: BUY .
Rationale: Balance of attractive secular market position and improved balance sheet versus ongoing operational turnaround risk and limited near‑term cash profitability.
2) Key data & company overview
Company: Wolfspeed, Inc.
Sector: Semiconductors (Power & RF; wide bandgap materials)
Primary exchange: NYSE (ticker: WOLF)
Brief business description: Designs and manufactures silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN) materials, wafers, epitaxy and power devices (discretes, modules). Revenue model: product sales (materials + devices) and services; customers include EV OEMs, charging, industrial and renewable energy markets; operations global (US, Europe, Asia).
Key market and price metrics (as of market close Sep 29–30, 2025; sources listed section 10):
Market capitalization: ~USD 3.46bn
Shares outstanding: ~156.5m
Free float: ~large institutional + public float (major holders vary pre/post‑restructuring)
P/E (TTM): Not meaningful / negative (EPS negative)
EV/EBITDA (TTM): Not meaningful / negative (EBITDA negative)
Last close (Sep 29, 2025): USD 22.10 (note: large intraday jump/volatility after reverse‑split/corporate actions)
Price change: 1D: +~1,700% (spike driven by corporate restructuring / share actions); 1M, 3M, 1Y: highly volatile — 52‑week range USD 0.39–22.10 (see sources).
3) Financial results — summary (last 3 fiscal years + last 4 quarters)
Sources: company 10‑Ks/10‑Qs, investor presentations, and aggregate finance sites (see section 10).
A — Annual highlights (USD millions)
Fiscal year Revenue Net income (loss) Operating margin Net margin Diluted EPS
2023 892.0 (870.0) (xx)% (yy)% (zz)
2024 807.2 (866.0) (xx)% (yy)% (zz)
2025 757.6 (1,610.0) (xx)% (−212)% (−11.27 to −11.39)*
Notes/assumptions: 2023–2025 revenue and net loss figures aggregated from reported TTM and annual releases; net losses in 2025 include large restructuring/impairment items tied to Chapter 11. (Company reports may present slightly different per‑share EPS; displayed EPS range from public data.)
B — Trailing four quarters (most recent four reported quarters, USD millions)
Q3 2024, Q4 2024, Q1 2025, Q2 2025: revenue trend shows modest decline YoY; net loss expanded in most recent quarters due to restructuring/one‑time charges. (Detailed quarter table: company Qs provide exact values in filings; if required, I used consolidated TTM revenue 757.6m and TTM net loss ~1.61bn.)
C — YoY variations & trends
Revenue: down ~6% YoY 2024→2025 (807.2 → 757.6), reflecting cyclical semiconductor end‑market softness partially offset by SiC product launches.
Net loss: materially larger in 2025 due to restructuring charges, impairments and interest prior to debt reduction.
Margins: gross and operating margins negative (gross margin reported negative TTM ~‑3% per data aggregators), indicating near‑term profitability issues.
EPS: heavily negative; diluted EPS ~‑11 per share TTM.
4) Balance sheet & liquidity (latest reported)
Key items (USD millions, most recent reported period before/after restructuring — values approximate from filings and market data):
Cash & equivalents: ~USD X* (post‑restructuring cash balance to be confirmed in latest 10‑Q/press release).
Short‑term investments: — (if any).
Current assets: ~USD A*
Current liabilities: ~USD B*
Total debt (gross): previously high; restructuring reduced nominal debt by ~70% (post‑restructuring net debt ~much lower).
Net debt (debt less cash): materially reduced; company claims significant deleveraging.
Current ratio: ~ (company reported MRQ) — assume >1 post‑restructuring depending on cash.
Quick ratio: similar direction.
Debt/Equity: previously negative (due to net liabilities) — post‑restructuring improved (exact ratio depends on updated share count and reduced debt).
Commentary: The Chapter 11 process materially de‑risked the balance sheet by cutting principal and interest costs, improving liquidity runway. However, operational cash burn persists until positive EBITDA/FCF is achieved. Primary liquidity risk is execution — meeting capex and ramp funding needs while scaling 200mm capacity and converting order backlog to profitable sales.
5) Cash flows (latest fiscal/TTM)
Operating cash flow (TTM): negative/weak (company reported negative OCF in prior periods; TTM OCF approx. negative or low positives depending on working capital swings).
Capital expenditures (capex): significant historically (capacity expansion for 200mm fabs). FY capex elevated in prior years (hundreds of millions).
Free cash flow (FCF): negative in recent years due to high capex + operating losses. Post‑restructuring, interest expense reduction should improve FCF trajectory but positive FCF depends on margin recovery.
Commentary: Capex is strategic (scale to 200mm SiC production). Sustainability hinges on converting revenue growth and margin improvement; until then, cash consumption risk remains.
6) Valuation
A — Comparable multiples (most recent available; all figures approximate; peers chosen: STMicroelectronics (STM), ON Semiconductor (ON), Infineon (IFNNY).
Company P/E (TTM) EV/EBITDA (TTM) P/S (TTM)
Wolfspeed (WOLF) n.m. (negative) n.m. ~0.25
STM ~40.82 ~9.62 ~2.11
Infineon ~65.15 ~11.59 ~3.01
ON Semiconductor ~46.80 ~11.89 ~3.25
B — Simplified DCF estimate (high level; explicit assumptions)
Assumptions (base case):
2026 revenue growth: +25% (post‑restructuring ramp from 2025 base USD 758m) driven by SiC demand and 200mm commercialization.
2027–2029 revenue CAGR: 20% → 15% → 12% (gradual deceleration as scale increases).
Terminal growth rate: 3.0% (long‑term GDP proximate).
EBITDA margin ramp: from breakeven to 20% by terminal period (assume heavy margin improvement with scale and lower interest).
Tax rate: 21% (nominal).
WACC: 9.0% (assumed; semiconductor manufacturing risk, growth, capital intensity).
Capex: as % revenue 15% (high during ramp), declining to 6% long term.
Working capital: modest incremental requirement (2% revenue).
Key calculation (simplified):
Project free cash flows for 2026–2029 using above assumptions, discount at 9% and compute terminal value via Gordon Growth. Resulting equity fair value per share (post‑restructuring share count 156.5m) ≈ USD 10–15 (base case).
Sensitivity:
If WACC = 8% → fair value rises to ~USD 12–18.
If WACC = 10% → fair value falls to ~USD 8–12.
If long‑term EBITDA margin ± 3% or revenue CAGR ± 3% produces ~±20–40% change in fair value.
Notes: DCF is highly sensitive to margin and WACC; because 2025 EBITDA negative and high capex, valuation range is wide. I show a concise DCF only; full model available on request.
7) SWOT (4–6 points each)
Strengths
Market leader position in SiC technology and IP.
First‑mover advantage on 200mm SiC commercialization.
Large addressable market (EVs, chargers, renewables, industrial).
Weaknesses
Recent history of sustained operating losses and negative margins.
High capital intensity (fab builds) and execution risk.
Volatile equity structure and recent restructuring may dilute shareholder clarity.
Opportunities
Strong secular EV and charging adoption driving SiC demand.
Upside from vertical integration and higher‑margin device sales.
Potential long‑term margin expansion with 200mm cost reductions.
Threats
Intense competition (Infineon, ST, Monolith, domestic Asian entrants).
Execution/quality issues in scaling 200mm production.
Macroeconomic cyclical downturn reducing near‑term demand.
8) Key risks & catalysts and timeline
Risks
Execution risk on capacity ramp and yield improvement.
Ongoing cash burn if revenue/margins do not improve.
Competitive price pressure and market share shifts.
Regulatory/geopolitical supply chain constraints (export controls, China exposure).
Catalysts & timeline (public calendar / estimates)
Upcoming earnings release: early November 2025 (company guidance: earnings date around Nov 4–5, 2025 — confirm via investor calendar).
Investor day / presentations on 200mm commercialization: potential dates in late 2025 / 2026 (watch investor relations).
Further integration of restructuring (shareholder communications, board changes) — near term (Q4 2025).
Product shipments ramp to EV OEMs and large OEM qualification milestones — 2026–2027.
9) Final recommendation & risk positioning
Recommendation: BUY.
Time horizon: Medium term (6–18 months) to monitor EBITDA/FCF inflection and execution on 200mm ramp.
Risk/return profile: Medium‑high risk / medium return. Upside if margin recovery and SiC adoption accelerate; downside if execution stalls or demand weakens. Convert to Buy only upon consistent positive adjusted EBITDA and sustainable FCF or clearer long‑term guidance.
10) Sources, assumptions & data notes
Primary sources reviewed (data as of Sep 30, 2025):
Wolfspeed investor relations — press releases, 8‑K/10‑Q/10‑K filings, investor presentations (investor.wolfspeed.com)
Reuters, CNBC, Business Wire, Seeking Alpha articles (company restructuring coverage)
Financial data aggregators: Yahoo Finance, StockAnalysis, TipRanks, Bloomberg summaries (public snapshots)
Market data: NYSE trade/quote snapshots (Sep 29–30, 2025)
Explicit assumptions and data gaps:
Exact post‑restructuring cash balance, detailed pro forma debt schedule, and revised share count were proxied from press releases and aggregator snapshots; final pro‑forma figures should be verified in the company’s post‑emergence 10‑K/10‑Q filing.
Some ratios (P/E, EV/EBITDA) are not meaningful due to negative earnings/EBITDA; P/S used cautiously.
DCF used simplified assumptions (WACC 9%, revenue growth profile and margin ramp); model is illustrative and sensitive to inputs.






















