Ethereum (ETH) Bulls Drive Towards 4500 Flip ZoneEthereum (ETH) Bulls Drive Towards 4500 Flip Zone
Ethereum (ETH) has shown a strong bullish recovery on the 4-hour chart, bouncing robustly from the "3850 key level" and the "4000" support zone, now trading at 4,392 within an ascending channel.
The price is currently challenging the immediate resistance around the "4500 Flip Zone," which represents a crucial hurdle for the continued upward momentum.
In case of a retracement from current levels, the "4200" mark serves as immediate support, aligning with the lower boundary of the current ascending channel.
Maintaining price action above the "4000" support level is essential for the bullish structure, with the "4800 to 4900 Sell Order Block" looming as the next significant resistance above the "4500 Flip Zone."
Disclaimer:
The information provided in this chart is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice. Trading and investing involve substantial risk and are not suitable for every investor. You should carefully consider your financial situation and consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The creator of this chart does not guarantee any specific outcome or profit and is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of using this information. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Use this information at your own risk. This chart has been created for my own improvement in Trading and Investment Analysis. Please do your own analysis before any investments.
ETHUSD.P trade ideas
Eth/Usd - Bearish Reversal After Resistance Rejection This chart shows the recent price movement of Ethereum (ETH) against the U.S. Dollar on the 15-minute timeframe. The market initially found strong support in the green zone at the bottom, where price reversed and started moving upwards. This area marked the beginning of a bullish trend, confirmed by breaks of structure (BOS) and a change of character (CHoCH)—indicating a shift from bearish to bullish momentum.
Following this, ETH made a strong bullish move, breaking past previous highs and entering a resistance zone marked in blue. However, once price entered this resistance area, it began to slow down and form what is labeled a “Weak High”, meaning buyers were losing strength and struggling to push price higher.
The chart highlights a potential short trade setup: If a candle closes below the marked support level just under the resistance zone, it would suggest the start of a bearish move. In that case, the suggested trade is to enter a short position and aim for the lower support area (target zone) where the price may again find demand.
This setup reflects a possible trend reversal from bullish to bearish in the short term, especially if price fails to maintain above the resistance and breaks the nearby support.
ETH/USD: The Levels Nobody’s Talking AboutETH looks quiet… but the chart is coiling around decision zones.
A) A break of $4,606 clears the path to $5,500.
B) A slip below $3,800 opens the door to $3,669, with a deeper risk toward $2,200.
What most traders miss: it’s not about predicting which level hits first… it’s about understanding what those breaks mean for positioning.
I won’t post a full strategy here, but I’ll say this: the difference between smart money and retail is that smart money prepares before these levels break.
Curious to hear; how are you positioning if ETH chooses either path?
ETH Bull?Seeing the possibility that the correction terminated earlier this year and not in 2022 - which would make more sense fractally (yes it's a higher low) but not all trending moves start from the lowest low - I'm of the belief ETH has started an impulsive move from our C and we're in the process of a much larger move (wave 3 for now) until proven otherwise.
$ETH market update 5-10-2025📊 Ethereum Market Update (on request)
Right now, there’s nothing major happening for Ethereum. It continues to consolidate in a range between the ATH at $4800 and the $3800 level, because of this massive bearish divergeance.
On the daily chart, the MACD is bullish and the Stochastic RSI is supportive, but momentum looks exhausted. There isn’t much conviction in this move. Bitcoin is the real superstar, while Ethereum is fading in its shadow.
From my analysis, we might still have about one more week of growth, potentially pushing to a new ATH — but don’t expect a parabolic rally. This looks more like a technical follow of BTC rather than genuine investor interest.
⚠️ That means the probability is high that we see a dump back below $4000, likely testing $3800 as support.
If bulls regain control and Bitcoin rotation restarts, ETH could resume its rally. Otherwise, we may see deeper consolidation, possibly down to $3400, before finding the energy to push again toward a new ATH.
#Ethereum #ETH #EthereumPrice #Crypto #CryptoNews #CryptoMarket #Bitcoin #BTC #Altcoins #Trading #TechnicalAnalysis #CryptoUpdate #MACD #StochasticRSI #ATH #CryptoTrading #Investing
ETH to $6000 by end of October or early November Don't listen to me, but according to my advanced charting techniques (just kidding), it's going to $6000 after touching an RSI of 30. Pattern:
- Touch RSI of 30
- Make a big move.
- Coil
- Retest 100 EMA
- RSI hits 30
- Make a big move!
Prediction: it goes to $6000 by the end of October or early November.
Let me know what you guys think. Let's get some confirmation bias going and fill our veins with hopium!!!
Ethereum Outlook – Key Levels in Play Amid Market JittersAfter a turbulent week across the crypto space—with volatility even bleeding into traditional equities—it's clear just how fragile sentiment remains. We’re seeing the usual overreactions: every minor selloff triggers calls that the bull market is over, despite the broader structure holding up... for now.
🔍 ETH Technical Outlook
Ethereum is retesting a major support zone between 4000–4200. This area has acted as a springboard before, but if it breaks decisively, it could flip to resistance, introducing more headwinds for bullish momentum.
Still, this may be shaping up as another dip-buying opportunity—if macro conditions remain stable and Bitcoin doesn't lead a broader breakdown.
🧱 Next Support Zone
If 4000–4200 doesn’t hold, the next major support zone is 3200–3300. This aligns with previous accumulation levels and would likely draw interest from larger buyers if price gravitates down there.
🔺 Chart Pattern Watch: Triangle Shift
We’ve been tracking a triangle formation, which now appears to be shifting from a symmetrical triangle to a descending triangle—a change in tone, but not yet a deal-breaker for the bulls.
The longer-term target remains intact: we’re still eyeing the 5700–5800 range, assuming structural support zones continue to hold and volume confirms any breakout.
ETHUSD ANALYLTICAL IDEA, FOR 30 SEP, 2025.After the quick fall below $4000, in value, the second in command on the coin market sharply went back to its original position and currently trades around $4100, but the overall direction is bullish as considered the altcoin season. But the question is, will it hold? Or continue pushing above or below well, for now, we can only sit tight on our hands, as my Bias remains bearish for the short term, and I look forward to taking sell trade positions as the price continues to push further in that direction.
As usual, my calls or analysis are based on what we see, the current Bias, and from a probability standpoint, meaning that this projection may be or may not be validated, so tread carefully, and as usual, this is not financial advice, trade responsibly.
ETH TA 29.09On Thursday, we bounced well from the important zone with HTF divers and are already back above 4k. Now Ether desperately needs to break through the R1 zone of 4215-4250, and then there won't be any important resistances until 4600+. Currently, locally, we're trading sideways at 3980-4200+. Losing the lower boundary of the sideways range is undesirable and very dangerous for further growth, plus there's a good low there, albeit a Voskresensk one. And the nearest decent support is at 3500.
ETH/USD - BUILDING MOMENTUM FOR NEXT BULLISH LEGOn the 15-minute ETH/USD chart, we can clearly observe that price action has shifted into a bullish structure after forming a strong impulse move from the lower demand zone. The market respected the higher timeframe liquidity area around 4,140 – 4,150, where buyers stepped in aggressively, creating a solid base for the upward push. From there, a clean series of higher highs and higher lows started to establish, indicating strong bullish momentum in play.
Currently, ETH is respecting the ascending trendline that has been guiding the price upward. Each retest of this trendline has been met with bullish rejections, confirming that buyers remain in control. The price is now consolidating just above the minor supply-turned-demand zone near 4,170, which shows that the previous resistance has flipped into support — a positive sign for continuation.
If the price manages to sustain above this intraday support and trendline, we can expect a potential continuation toward the upside target. Any minor pullback into the demand zone would likely attract buyers again, keeping the bullish structure intact. As long as price stays above the 4,160 zone and does not break below the trendline with strong bearish candles, the bias remains bullish.
Overall, the structure suggests that ETH is preparing for another leg higher, with the projected target in sight. Traders should monitor the price behavior around the support and trendline for confirmation before entering, as clean candle closures above these levels will add confidence to the bullish scenario.
$eth updateAs anticipated
CRYPTOCAP:ETH finally rolling out…
Last minute there and looks to be en route.
Targets remain, $4330 - $4400 crucial.
Really gonna be on closures here because we could see a potential high @$5600 OR a full blown roll over sending us back into the realms of $3200.
Month coming to a close, next 2weeks will play crucial to q4 pricing.
Let’s go Traders!!!! ✊🏾
ETH/USD: The Perfect Time to Buy?! (PART II)Over the last four and a half years, the price range around $4000 has played an important role in ETH movements.
It first acted as support for a short period after ETH made its all-time high back in 2021. More importantly, this level has worked multiple times as strong support. Each touch has only reinforced its importance.
At the beginning of August 2025, COINBASE:ETHUSD made a strong breakthrough — a confirmed breakout. Heavy buying power smashed through the zone.
And now comes the best part: price is currently retesting that breakout zone, a classical Break & Retest setup.
So, this strong price level is now starting to act as support, and technically, this is a very solid setup.
I don’t post crypto that often, but the last time I shared an ETH/USD chart was just before the current rally started. Let’s call this Part II. 😉
Keep an eye on the current price levels — technically, it’s a very clean setup.
Good luck,
Vaido
Ethereum at a Historical Crossroads: Breakout or Major Rejection
Based on the ETH/USD daily chart you shared, here’s a professional breakdown:
🔎 Technical Overview
Key Level: $4,000 – $4,100
This zone is a multi-year resistance (price was rejected here twice before → double top).
Currently, price is sitting just below this line — a true decision point.
Pattern Outlook
A confirmed breakout above $4,100 could open the way for a strong bullish rally.
A rejection here could trigger a deep correction, similar to the past two times.
100-Day Moving Average
Acting as dynamic mid-term support. A clean break below it would be a strong bearish signal.
📈 Short-Term Outlook (1–3 weeks)
Bullish Scenario:
Break and daily close above $4,100–$4,200 → Target 1: $4,500, Target 2: $4,850.
Stop-loss: Daily close below $3,900.
Bearish Scenario:
Rejection and breakdown below $3,850 → Target 1: $3,400, Target 2: $3,000.
Stop-loss: Daily close above $4,150.
📊 Long-Term Outlook (3–9 months)
Bullish (if resistance breaks):
Mid-term targets: $5,250 (next historical peak) → then potentially $6,000–$6,500 if momentum continues.
Stop-loss: Sustained close below $3,400.
Bearish (if resistance holds):
Likely correction towards $2,750–$3,000.
In a broader market downturn, a retest of $2,200–$2,400 is also possible.
⚠️ Key Takeaway: Price is sitting at a critical resistance zone. Risk management is crucial — trading without a stop-loss here could be dangerous.
From 4800 Highs to 3850 Lows – ETH Eyes RecoveryAfter a fresh test of the 4800 zone in mid-September, ETH started to decline, with the selloff accelerating after September 22nd, in line with the broader crypto market weakness.
The drop broke below the 4100 technical support and even under the psychological 4K mark, sending price as low as 3850.
Yesterday, however, ETH managed to recover part of the losses and climbed back above 4K, a positive sign for the bulls.
From a structural point of view, the overall trend remains strongly bullish, and I see this move as nothing more than a correction and a hunt for liquidity at lower levels.
Trading Outlook:
• In the coming days, I expect ETH to reclaim the 4100 zone, turning the breakdown into a false break.
• If that happens, the door opens for upside continuation, with potential to retest 4500 and even challenge the 4800 resistance again.
• For now, I remain on the sidelines, waiting for confirmation before taking a new position.
$ETH in a DOWNTREND after hitting a LOWER LOWCRYPTOCAP:ETH has confirmed BEAR market structure after a LOWER LOW was put in.
So a full-on DOWNTREND on the daily chart, and this is most likely WAVE C, so usually the last one out 3 in a corrective move.
After WAVE C completes (could crash as low as Fib 1.618 at $3563), we will likely continue with another 5 WAVE uptrend.
For now, the support above $4000 has been retested at $4078 but no immediate high volume recovery, at all. So we might be heading lower especially after another ETF outflow day.
More liquidity below down to $3500 too.
Not looking good on this chart👽💙
$ETH trading near $4,180, sitting close to the $4,000 support CRYPTOCAP:ETH trading near $4,180, sitting close to the $4,000 support zone. A short-term bounce from here is possible, with pullback targets toward $4,500. However, I’m still holding my short position, watching for a clean break below $4,000 that could open the way toward $3,500 and lower levels.
Types of Sanctions: Economic, Trade, and Diplomatic1. Introduction to Sanctions
Sanctions are restrictive measures imposed by one entity—such as a country, group of countries, or international body—on another. Their purpose is to restrict or alter the actions of the target, which may be a nation-state, corporation, or even individuals. The rationale behind sanctions is that applying pressure can compel behavioral change without resorting to direct military conflict.
Sanctions often arise in response to:
Violations of international law (e.g., territorial aggression).
Human rights abuses (e.g., apartheid in South Africa).
Threats to global peace (e.g., nuclear proliferation).
Terrorism or organized crime (e.g., freezing terrorist assets).
Sanctions can be unilateral (imposed by a single state), multilateral (involving multiple states), or global (authorized by organizations like the United Nations).
Among the many forms of sanctions, three stand out due to their widespread application: economic, trade, and diplomatic sanctions.
2. Economic Sanctions
2.1 Definition
Economic sanctions are financial penalties or restrictions imposed to influence the policies or actions of another state or entity. They usually target banking, investment, currency, or financial transactions to undermine the economic stability of the sanctioned party.
2.2 Mechanisms of Economic Sanctions
Economic sanctions typically involve:
Asset Freezes: Blocking access to bank accounts, properties, and other financial holdings.
Restrictions on Financial Transactions: Prohibiting banks from processing payments linked to sanctioned entities.
Investment Bans: Preventing new investments in specific industries or regions.
Debt Restrictions: Limiting borrowing or access to international credit markets.
Currency Controls: Restricting access to foreign reserves.
2.3 Objectives of Economic Sanctions
Deterring aggression: Make the cost of war or hostile acts prohibitively high.
Limiting capacity: Restrict a nation’s ability to fund military or illicit programs.
Promoting policy change: Push governments to alter domestic or foreign policies.
Punishing violations: Penalize actions that contravene international law or norms.
2.4 Case Studies
Iran: Economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. and EU targeted Iran’s banking and oil industries, aiming to prevent nuclear weapon development. These sanctions severely curtailed Iran’s economy and pressured it into negotiations, resulting in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Russia (2014 and 2022): Following Russia’s annexation of Crimea and later the invasion of Ukraine, sweeping sanctions targeted its financial institutions, reserves, and access to global markets. The aim was to weaken its economy and reduce its ability to sustain military operations.
North Korea: Sanctions restrict Pyongyang’s access to global finance and luxury goods, designed to limit its nuclear program’s funding.
2.5 Effectiveness and Criticisms
While economic sanctions can exert enormous pressure, their effectiveness varies. Sometimes, they succeed in bringing parties to the negotiating table; other times, they push states toward alternative alliances or informal economies. Criticisms include:
Humanitarian impacts: Ordinary citizens often suffer more than ruling elites.
Circumvention: Nations may evade sanctions via smuggling or alternative partners.
Political resistance: Instead of weakening regimes, sanctions may strengthen nationalist sentiments.
3. Trade Sanctions
3.1 Definition
Trade sanctions are restrictions on imports, exports, or access to markets. Unlike broad economic sanctions, trade sanctions specifically target goods, services, or technologies.
3.2 Mechanisms of Trade Sanctions
Export Bans: Prohibiting certain goods or technologies from being exported.
Import Restrictions: Blocking the purchase of goods from the target state.
Tariffs and Quotas: Raising barriers to trade to reduce economic interaction.
Sectoral Restrictions: Targeting industries such as energy, technology, or defense.
Embargoes: Comprehensive bans on all trade with a country.
3.3 Objectives of Trade Sanctions
Reduce economic growth: By cutting off access to international trade.
Limit access to technology: Prevent development of weapons or advanced systems.
Send political messages: Isolate regimes diplomatically through trade exclusion.
Promote human rights: Restrict the export of goods that could enable repression.
3.4 Case Studies
Cuba Embargo: The U.S. imposed a trade embargo on Cuba in 1960 to weaken Fidel Castro’s communist regime. While the embargo isolated Cuba for decades, it did not topple the government, sparking debate about its long-term utility.
South Africa (Apartheid Era): Trade sanctions and boycotts against South Africa in the 1980s targeted its exports, particularly minerals, to pressure the government into ending apartheid. These measures, combined with internal resistance, helped bring reform.
Technology Sanctions on China: Recent sanctions have restricted China’s access to advanced semiconductor technologies, aiming to slow its military and technological advancements.
3.5 Effectiveness and Criticisms
Trade sanctions can be powerful but have mixed results:
Effective when applied multilaterally (e.g., South Africa).
Ineffective when targets find new markets (e.g., Cuba trading with Europe and Asia).
Criticism: Often harm economic growth broadly, with limited influence on ruling elites.
4. Diplomatic Sanctions
4.1 Definition
Diplomatic sanctions involve reducing or severing official diplomatic relations. Unlike economic or trade sanctions, they focus on political isolation rather than financial or commercial restrictions.
4.2 Mechanisms of Diplomatic Sanctions
Expulsion of Diplomats: Declaring diplomats persona non grata.
Suspension of Diplomatic Relations: Downgrading or cutting ties entirely.
Exclusion from International Forums: Preventing participation in organizations (e.g., G8 suspension of Russia in 2014).
Visa Bans: Restricting leaders and officials from traveling abroad.
Symbolic Actions: Boycotting state events or summits.
4.3 Objectives of Diplomatic Sanctions
Signal disapproval: Express international condemnation of actions.
Isolate politically: Reduce legitimacy and influence of governments.
Pressure regimes: Encourage policy changes through political isolation.
Prevent escalation: Use symbolic actions instead of military confrontation.
4.4 Case Studies
Russia’s G8 Suspension (2014): Following the annexation of Crimea, Russia was expelled from the G8, signaling diplomatic condemnation.
Myanmar (Post-2021 Coup): Many countries downgraded diplomatic engagement and excluded Myanmar from ASEAN summits.
Iran (Post-1979 Revolution): The U.S. severed diplomatic ties after the hostage crisis, limiting formal engagement for decades.
4.5 Effectiveness and Criticisms
Diplomatic sanctions are often symbolic but can still have impact:
Effective when combined with economic/trade sanctions.
Symbolic in cases where states already embrace isolation.
Criticism: They limit dialogue, reducing opportunities for peaceful negotiation.
5. The Interconnected Nature of Sanctions
In practice, these sanctions rarely exist in isolation. Governments and international bodies often use them together as part of a broader strategy. For instance, against Russia in 2022, the West imposed:
Economic sanctions (asset freezes, exclusion from SWIFT).
Trade sanctions (bans on oil and technology exports).
Diplomatic sanctions (diplomatic expulsions, exclusion from forums).
Together, these measures amplify impact and present a united front, but they also carry risks such as retaliatory actions, global market disruptions, or long-term geopolitical divides.
6. Global Consequences of Sanctions
Sanctions reshape global politics and economics in multiple ways:
Geopolitical Realignments: Countries under sanctions may seek new alliances (e.g., Russia and China deepening ties).
Impact on Global Trade: Sanctions disrupt supply chains, especially in energy and commodities.
Humanitarian Implications: Civilians often face shortages, inflation, and unemployment.
Technological Fragmentation: Trade restrictions on high-tech goods may create separate technological ecosystems.
Erosion of Multilateralism: Unilateral sanctions sometimes undermine collective international decision-making.
7. Critiques and Ethical Considerations
Sanctions, though non-military, raise important ethical debates:
Do they harm the guilty or the innocent? In many cases, ordinary citizens bear the brunt, while elites remain insulated.
Are sanctions coercion or legitimate pressure? Critics argue sanctions can be instruments of coercion and neo-imperialism.
Do sanctions work long-term? Some argue they harden regimes instead of weakening them.
8. Future of Sanctions
The global landscape suggests sanctions will remain central to international diplomacy. Trends include:
Targeted Sanctions: Focusing on elites and sectors instead of entire populations.
Technological Sanctions: Increasing emphasis on restricting access to AI, semiconductors, and advanced technologies.
Financial Innovation: Cryptocurrencies may help evade sanctions, requiring new regulatory approaches.
Greater Multilateralism: Sanctions are more effective when applied collectively.
Hybrid Sanctions: Combining economic, trade, and diplomatic measures with cyber and informational tools.
Conclusion
Sanctions represent a powerful yet imperfect alternative to military conflict. Economic, trade, and diplomatic sanctions serve different but interconnected purposes: economic sanctions weaken financial capabilities, trade sanctions restrict goods and markets, and diplomatic sanctions isolate states politically.
Their effectiveness depends on global cooperation, the resilience of the targeted state, and the degree to which they align with broader strategic goals. While sanctions can promote peace and discourage aggression, they also risk unintended consequences, particularly humanitarian crises.
Ultimately, sanctions are tools—not solutions. They can pressure, isolate, and punish, but sustainable change requires diplomacy, dialogue, and international consensus. As the global order becomes increasingly multipolar and interconnected, sanctions will continue to evolve as instruments of statecraft—balancing between coercion, persuasion, and the pursuit of stability.