Price held its tack so far, invalidating III and continuing adding credence to I - The overall expectation here is a reversal via an ectopic Point-5 pertaining to the smaller geo (I), and corroborating with II's Point-4, whose current residence remains highly speculative.
However, based on structural analysis, one can generally aim for a reasonable range, which is defined here from 95209 to 95.641.
Just released to Twitter/LinkedIn:
$AUDJPY: Speculative geo . interplay remains intact as price continues to rise to Pt-4:
$AUD $JPY $RBA $BOJ #forex
Predictive Analysis & Forecasting
Denver, Colorado - USA
CROW Signal Service:
I will post a chart for a cleared picture.
Here is what comes to sight:
1 - Your Geo is reproduced in the field with its plots. As a 5-prime is not completely drawn out, a reversal to the zone defined at the level of Point-4 remains a possibility versus a 1-4 Line (less probable)
2 - As defined before, in the IDEAL condition (so, not an absolute requirement), the 1-2 Line is composed of a symmetrical ab = cd.
Since my predictive model suggests that further, but limited upside exists, I decided to look at the possible residence of a Point-3 slightly ABOVE the point-a of the possible symmetrical ab = cd.
If such a level was indeed attained, it would mark a Point-3 of the larger Geo, corresponding to a Point-5 of your smaller Geo, and a reversal to the level of your Geo's Point-4 would correspond to the larger Geo's Point-4, all of which remains highly speculative at this point, but the narrative of this development is plausible.
However, the internal price action is what I have tended to look into, much like looking at a breed's DNA. For this reason, I established specific rules for myself that represent ideal conditions, such as the symmetrical ab = cd for the 1-2 Leg, and an idealized Elliott Wave Triple-ZZ, or W-X-Y-XX-Z price patterning for the 2-3 Leg, and a set of Fibonacci clusters, as you have already well demonstrated in your chart.
At this point, your Geo is as good as it can be, except for the lack of a symmetry at the 1-2 Leg, which (again) is not required, but idealized.
Very nice, @HamedAghajani!