Black FridayUp to 80% OFF

Winrate

Top & Bottom Indicator with KDJ ConfirmationSimple Top & Bottom Indicator with confluence of the KDJ Indicator! Long Entry Example: -Background Switched from red to blue -Buy Label Printed -KDJ close above 50 Short Entry Example -Background Switched from blue to red -Sell Label Printed -KDJ close below 50 SL Placement: -Last Bullish/Bearish Candle of previous opposite chart background. Risk to Reward: 1:2 (recommended) 1.1.5 (higher Winrate) I coded it into a Strategy. Suitable for the 1min Chart.
Long
by EtherMatt
2
Winning rate (Course #1)The goal of this page is that you understand winning rate and how it works. Your win rate is how many trades are winning trades out of all the trades. This is fairly easy and straightforward. Did you know that you don’t need to win 100% of the time? As a matter of a fact, I found that algos with a VERY HIGH win rate (98-99%) are the worse ones, because the 1-2 % of losing trades represent a loss that is usually equal or bigger than all the gains altogether. See below one of my very first profitable algo. I never got that major loss with this algo, but I knew it would come. I got lucky because I stopped the algo right before a big move against me, which would have caused a liquidation event (similar to what happened to me with the PSAR bot from Swing Trade Pros, see the introduction post). This is basically 769 trades with no loss whatsoever. June July Mid August 2021. This is great right? Yes, but I never slept well because I knew my strategy had a flaw and I could get liquidated at anytime. This algo is one of the algo I run side by side with my hands free algo. I just turn it off when I know that I am at risk of being liquidated. Or, I turn it on when I am rather confident of the direction of the market overall. So what is the point of having a 99% win rate if the 1% loss can erase the 99% profits? In reality you will find that most traders or strategies varies between 25% and 45% win rate. You might think how come you can be profitable if you win only 25% of the time? Hang on I will prove it to you below. My best strategy has a 45% win rate approximately. I have great strategies with 25% win rate also. Most manual traders (no algo) are at about 30 to 35% win rate. Some of these guys on Twitter (very rare) have over 50% win rates, same as Market Cipher Crypto Face, he’s got a higher than 50% win rate I think. He is a very good trader, and this is why he’s very wealthy, because he knows how to manually trade. This benchmark should give you a good idea of what to expect. Another thing – the higher the time frame you use, the higher your win rate. For example, Bitcoin has a tendency to go up only – at least on the macro level, let’s say on the daily time frame. So right there you have what we call an edge, this is an advantage over the market. The advantage is a higher probability to go up than to go down. Because of that, you can easily develop an EMA crossover strategy that will win more than 50% of the time! EASY! Now if you trade on the 5 min timeframe, you literally have a 50% chance for the price to go in either direction. You can try to play the trends here and there, check the momentum, whatever, but if you have traded Bitcoin for long enough, you should know as much as me that ANYTHING can happen at ANYTIME – and even if you were over the 200 EMA, even if Market Cipher showed a bullish divergence and even if you were at a major horizontal support, ANYONE can dump the market (e.g. a whale – or Elon tweeting) and go against all the odds. Because anything can happen, it is much harder to have a really high win rate. So how can you make money if you win only 30% of the time? Check out the example : out of 10 trades, only 3 of them are in profit (3/10 = 30%) Does the order of the trades change the final profit? I shuffled the order of the trades – we can see that it doesn’t matter whether you have a losing strike or more losses before the wins, the results at the end is totally the same. So YES you can make money and lose the majority of the time. It doesn’t take anyone a Master’s degree to understand that this is due to the relative size of the wins to the losses. This also introduces the concept of R multiple, which I cover in Tutorial 5. Take a look below at the 10% win rate strategy. Personally I would love to have this strategy with a 10% win rate! Imagine this is 1 day worth of trades, you end up making 2.314% ! If you do this everyday, you can almost double your money in 1 month! This is true! This is also because of compounding, which I will cover in Tutorial 2. On this example, you can see the winner in relation to the losses, is much larger. 12% win is 12 times bigger than the average loss. What if I don’t compound at each trade? Well in this case, you would get 3% return overall. Before I jump into the conclusion, I want to talk about my 99% win rate strategy. Now that we have covered some examples, thing about a strategy that has a 1% win rate? QFL Luc is a great trader and in one of his videos, he talks about this guy who basically has a trading system with almost a 1% win rate. The thing is, each losses is super small. But 1 time out of 100, he gets right at a bottom or a top, and the trade goes in his favor, and he makes a huge gain, which covers for all his losses! Cool right! Conclusion: Most algos and manual traders have win rates in the 30-40% range. The profitability is the result of the size of my winners as compared to the size of my losers. “Keep your losses small and let your winners run”.
Education
by Maddrix_club
Bitcoin Roadmap Chapter 3Since Dec 16, 2021 , I have 75% win rate on my analysis! (I'll mention a few public ideas in related ideas part) . But past analysis CAN NOT grantee this one. So be aware it is just an idea ! As I mentioned in the last idea , red harmonic is just a possibility for a bearish Max Gartley pattern. We are to see the stop loss hunt scenario and that's the point I get in! Also the 50 weekly Moving Average is a strong resistance for the asset , so take care of this one more than anything! On the right side you can see the volume profile for last 380 candles , this shows we have resistance about 48000 , don't be surprised if I tell you the 50 weekly MA is also 48000 😀 Follow this Idea so you can be notified for the updates I'll post. GOOD LUCK
INDEX:BTCUSD
by UnknownUnicorn23356524
1
Beating the rake - Know your trading feesLet’s talk about trading fees. This is an area that most people who trade don’t put enough thought into, but it can make a huge difference to your bottom line. This is especially the case when dealing with percentage based commissions in combination with leverage. Many people, especially those who mainly trade crypto, will be using services that charge percentage based commissions, with fees that can be as high as 0.5% ! But even if you’re trading at one of the more trader-friendly exchanges you’re likely to be paying in the region of 0.1% taker fees for spot trading and 0.04 - 0.06 % taker fees on futures. That sounds pretty cheap, right? 0.06% fee on a trade sounds almost negligible, which is why most casual traders don’t pay too much attention to it. Firstly though, you need to remember that this is the fee for both buying and selling, so for a round trip (buy and sell, assuming taker fee of 0.06% for each) you’re paying 0.12% Suddenly that starts to look a bit more significant, especially for short term intraday traders and scalpers. Let’s take a quick example. Let’s say you’re an intraday trader paying 0.06% taker fees on futures, and your typical Risk/Reward is aiming for a 1% gain and a 0.5% loss for an R of 2. The breakeven rate with an R of 2 is a 33.33% win rate, which is why many traders aim to trade this way. If they can achieve a win rate in the region of 50% they can be highly successful. But then we take your trading fees into account. That 1% average win becomes 0.88 % after your 0.12% round trip of taker fees. And your 0.5% average loss becomes 0.62 % after your round trip to fee-town. So now with an average win of 0.88% and average loss of 0.62% your R is down to 1.42! That means your breakeven win rate has changed from 33.33% to 41.33%! What if you’re aiming to catch even smaller percentage moves? If you were aiming for 0.5% average wins and 0.25% average losses for Risk/Reward of 2, but without considering fees, you might be in for a nasty surprise. Your average win would now be 0.38% and your average loss would be 0.37% after accounting for 0.12% round trip fees on all trades. The 2 R you were aiming for to require a 33.33% win rate actually becomes 1.02 R, requiring a 49.33% win rate to break even! And as a last example, let’s say you take a different approach. Perhaps you’re the type of trader aiming to take equal sized wins and losses but aiming for a 60 - 70% win rate to make your money. At 1% average win and loss (1 R), your wins become 0.88% and your losses become 1.12% after fees. Instead of a 50% break even rate you now require a 56% win rate just to break even! And if you aim for 0.5% average win and loss (1 R) your average wins become 0.38% and your losses become 0.62% after fees, requiring a 62% win rate to break even! Can you overcome those odds? The key takeaway here is that factoring trading fees into your trading plan is absolutely vital to understanding your risk/reward. The smaller the trading fees are as a percentage of your average trade, the less impactful the fees will be on your bottom line. To keep your trading fees small as a percentage of your average wins and losses, the simplest way is obviously to trade for larger average wins and losses, taking a swing trading approach with smaller position sizing. Alternatively, most exchanges/brokers will offer cheaper trading fees for “makers” using limit orders, as opposed to “takers” using market prices. This discount for maker fees will usually slash your fees by 50% - 80%. Many will also offer additional discounts for using a specific token for paying fees (e.g. BNB or KCS) or various discounts for VIP levels/tiers. Do not underestimate the value of these discounts, they can have a very substantial impact on your bottom line, especially if you are a short term intraday trader or scalper. Just a 50% saving on fees could be enough to turn a short term trader from a breakeven trader to a winning one.
BINANCE:BTCUSD.PEducation
by HayeTrading
1
EURUSD long so far so good 📈👀As stated in my last idea I'm ending today sharing some trades I still have running. We are using our trend following EDGE strategy for this trade. Entry details are shown on the chart trade. Trade has been live since 12:00 UK time, Working the H1 time frame here and we're only looking for TP3 looking for a 98 pip move to hit that target. This is a 1:5 RR strategy so natuallry the win rate is lower than some other ideas I post on my page. Win rate isn't everything in trading and despite the 28% win rate this strategy has as you will see it still makes profit. 1% risked each time but 5% gained on the trades that win see this strategy still return profit. The trade history can be seen at the foot of this trade idea too for full transparency. In that box every trade is logged and can be viewed by clicking the tabs in the report box. You as the viewer of this idea can also do that so go ahead and have a play. ------------------------------------------ I try and share as many ideas as I can as and when I have time. My trades are automated so I am not sat in front of a screen daily. Jumping on random trade ideas 'willy-nilly' on Trading View trying to find that one trade that you can retire from is not a sustainable way to trade. You might get lucky, but it will always end one way. ------------------------------------------ Please hit the 👍 LIKE button if you like my ideas🙏 Also follow my profile, then you will receive a notification whenever I post a trading idea - so you don't miss them. 🙌 No one likes missing out, do they? Also, see my 'related ideas' below to see more just like this. The stats for this pair are shown below too. Thank you. Darren.
Long
by pow_removetheguesswork
GBPNZD short running ⤵️👇Utilising our POW reversal strategy for this trade a GBPNZD short. Trade details for current trade are shown on the chart. We are working the 2H time frame on this strategy. We're looking for the green line which is take profit target. Little red arrow is entry point and purple line is stop loss. Previous trades also can be seen on chart a long which closed for profit on the new short presenting. Trade history can be seen at the foot of this trade idea too for full transparency. In that box every trade is logged and can be viewed by clicking the tabs in the report box. You as the viewer of this idea can also do that so go ahead and have a play. ------------------------------------------ I try and share as many ideas as I can as and when I have time. My trades are automated so I am not sat in front of a screen daily. Jumping on random trade ideas 'willy-nilly' on Trading View trying to find that one trade that you can retire from is not a sustainable way to trade. You might get lucky, but it will always end one way. ------------------------------------------ Please hit the 👍 LIKE button if you like my ideas🙏 Also follow my profile, then you will receive a notification whenever I post a trading idea - so you don't miss them. 🙌 No one likes missing out, do they? Also, see my 'related ideas' below to see more just like this. The stats for this pair are shown below too. Thank you. Darren
Short
by pow_removetheguesswork
EURAUD short is live 📉🙌Trade details for current trade are shown on the chart. Trade has been live since 7:00 UK time and we are using our POW reversal script. We are working the 15M time frame on this strategy. We're looking for the green line which is take profit target. Little red arrow is entry point and purple line is stop loss. Previous two trades can be seen on chart. One hit TP and one hit SL but hey no one strategy is right all the time. Trade history can be seen at the foot of this trade idea too for full transparency. ------------------------------------------ I try and share as many ideas as I can as and when I have time. My trades are automated so I am not sat in front of a screen daily. Jumping on random trade ideas 'willy-nilly' on Trading View trying to find that one trade that you can retire from is not a sustainable way to trade. You might get lucky, but it will always end one way. ------------------------------------------ Please hit the 👍 LIKE button if you like my ideas🙏 Also follow my profile, then you will receive a notification whenever I post a trading idea - so you don't miss them. 🙌 No one likes missing out, do they? Also, see my 'related ideas' below to see more just like this. The stats for this pair are shown below too. Thank you. Darren
Short
by pow_removetheguesswork
Winrate improvement: Avoiding trades with resistance until TGTHey. I recently wrote "Where to target and what to do once there?". I am now looking at targets again, but not the "target" target. The "targets" that are in the way. I call them resistances, regardless of them being above or below, since they resist me making money, they resist my position, the price going further. We want to make money, so we improve on every aspect, including winrate. And how do you improve winrate? By throwing away the bad setups, those with high uncertainty, and those with plenty of resistance in the way. When there is 1 ton of res clustered if the price breaks it usually is very powerful and goes far but this is an exception I won't cover in this article. Support is possibly more important as something that gets in your way when you are trying to hold a winner rather than a place to buy something. The main reason I see why support matters when you enter a position is because the price already tested that one, so that's 1 less obstacle, as well as you are as far away as humanly possible from the next one. Going to go over a dozen cherry picked examples Example 1 - Few resistances Example 2 - Much resistance Example 3 - The generational trade Example 4 - A long story Let's zoom in I can't see anything Let's clean a little And the conclusion How old were these resistances exactly? Example 5 - The round number Investing is not "simple" Educators with their laptops on their beach say: - Don't overcomplicate - Focus high winrate - Do indicators and only that - You can trade anything just the same, compost or rates, PA or TA is what matters - 2 schools: Full naked chart or full with indicators and 26 screens - You can spend 30 minutes a day on a laptop on the beach - Have very few rules and stick to that - Elliott Waves are magical and always work From this we can derive (and I can confirm true from my experience): - Overcomplicate! You won't compete with a 3 year old fischer price business plan. - Focus on low winrate, do NOT try to win very often (confirmed by George Soros, PTJ, WB, etc) - Avoid indicators, do everything else. Note: Moving averages that everyone looks at matter - You CANNOT trade anything just the same. Stupid claim. Makes my ears & eyes cry - Don't have a chart loaded with crap and don't take a trade from a "naked chart" (check res etc 1rst) - You can spend 12 hours a day with no holiday, from your office. Absolutely ridiculous "beach laptop" - Have many rules and change them when necessary: If you break them for no reason, because "muh feelings", then you do not need to "stick to your rules", you need to quit. Because you suck - Elliott Waves are stupid and never work. Perfect example of a guy creating a system that does not work and then changing it over and over and over, it's like with scientists in denial: "If the theory (EW overall) does not fit the data (EW rules) then change the data", Interlude - About round numbers Tech company Ilika (IKA) in a presentation where they talk about their solid-state battery tech plans (inclusing looking at prod costs etc) back in Dec 2019, they had a list of risks (Actually the investing bank Berenberg Bank wrote this for them I think, "normal people" didn't do this themselves, bank analysts did): Cost Risk #1 - Cobalt price increase is a major risk The presentation is online it is easy to find. Just type "Ilika Solid-state battery technology" and probably that's enough to find it. I really like it because you see how businesses conduct their business. So what happened to them? The hedgers buy low and sell high. The (profitable) speculators buy high and sell low, but they are not stupid, they avoid selling right on a multi-decade turning point (support). Example 6 - A stock Example 7 - Reaches Target but without you Example 8 - Falls like a rock Zooming in to check something Example 9 - Because hindsight works so well Example 10 - Ugliness attracts ugliness Example final - Something clean and pretty When you are actually "overcomplicating" your trading it's when you check every support for the last 10 years and draw them all. In this example after several years this "no resistance" area continues to show no resistance and the old res do provide resistance so...
Education
by MrRenev
1
EURUSD sell in progress 👍Entry details are shown on the chart. We're only looking for TP3. Slight retrace on moment of posting this idea so lets see how this one plays out. Trade history can be seen below this trade idea too for full transparency. This strategy is a 1:5 RR but comes with a 28% win rate. I trade a plan based on the available test data to me. That data for this strategy tells me despite a 28% win rate I still have an edge as the strategy creates bigger wins than losses on average. All the trades can be found by pressing the 'list of trades' tab at bottom of the idea. ------------------------------------------ I try and share as many ideas as I can as and when I have time. My trades are automated so I am not sat in front of a screen daily. Jumping on random trade ideas 'willy-nilly' on Trading View trying to find that one trade that you can retire from is not a sustainable way to trade. You might get lucky, but it will always end one way. ------------------------------------------ Please hit the 👍 LIKE button if you like my ideas🙏 Also follow my profile, then you will receive a notification whenever I post a trading idea - so you don't miss them. 🙌 No one likes missing out, do they? Also, see my 'related ideas' below to see more just like this. The stats for this pair are shown below too. Thank you. Darren
Short
by pow_removetheguesswork
Winrates required to breakeven relative to stop & target sizesTaking AUDUSD as an example here, the spread is not the smallest relative to ATR nor the largest. The formula to get a breakeven winrate is 1/(1+reward/risk). Because we want winrate*reward = loserate*risk <=> winrate*reward = (1-winrate)*risk <=> winrate*reward + winrate*risk = risk (never 0) <=> winrate = 1/(1+reward/risk) For example with a 20 pip stop, base risk to reward of 1 to 5, and 2 point spread, reward or winners = 98 pips, risk or losers = 22 pips. So the reward/risk = 98/22 = 4.4545454545... So the breakeven winrate will be 1/5.4545454545 = 18.33% That is just the breakeven winrate. Profitability will of course depend on: - Frequency: How many trades you are able to take - Winrate: How much higher than the breakeven winrate it is - Position size: Profitability does not go up the higher it goes If a strategy or trader only gets a couple of trades a year and his winrate is barely above breakeven, he will not be very profitable, and it will be very easy to lose all profits. And as the stops & targets in pips go down, the hit rates needed to actually make money go up exponentially up to a point where the trader needs to own a crystal ball and be able to predict the future. Take costs into consideration with any strategy and before placing any trade. And 1 other thing to keep in mind is spreads can also fluctuate, depending on the broker, at certain hours they can go up 3 fold, sometimes more, it can really hurt. A cool thing you may notice is with a stop of 20 pips, the spread/stop = 10% and also the winrate to breakeven is increased by 10% for both risk to rewards. Same thing with the 5 pips stop. And so on. The required winrate to breakeven increases by 100*(spread/stop)%. Easy to quickly calculate when you are considering trades.
Education
by MrRenev
FALSE Trading Expectations #3... Win Rate (continued) I lose a lot of the time. A large amount of my trades are stopped-out for a loss. This does not make me a bad trader, it actually makes me a real trader! Most profitable traders are right only 40%-65% of the time. A lot of traders understand that there will be losing trades. What they don't understand is that there will be consecutive losing trades. Even a strategy that has a win rate of 65%, could have 10 consecutive losing trades, maybe even more! This does not make the strategy unprofitable or not worth using. Conclusion... Expect a lower win rate. A win rate of around 50% is ideal. Expect to have consecutive losing trades. Also expect to have consecutive winning trades.
Education
by Samuel_Morton_Trader
FALSE Trading Expectations #2... Win RateForex trading is not a 'get rich quick' scheme. It can make you rich, but it will do this slowly. In order to make large returns, a trader may have to take large risks. High risk trading guarantees greater emotional and psychological challenges. This may lead to quick short-term profits but it will also lead to discouraging long-term losses. Too many traders expect far too much far too quickly. They review their performance and results on a daily or weekly basis, this can lead to discouragement and disappointment. Profitable traders review their results much more longer-term. Conclusion... Trading can make you rich, but it will make you rich slowly. To make trading work long-term, you need to risk a minimum. Expect to be patient. Review profits once a quarter or once a year.
Education
by Samuel_Morton_Trader
2
WHY YOUR WIN RATE IS IRRELEVANT!Afternoon guys! quick video on WIN RATE and why having a higher or lower win rate is IRRELEVANT! Alot of traders out there like to advertise themselves having a 'High win' rate when really it IS irrelevant to how profitable you are as a trader! in this example we are reviewing ETHUSD. in the one example we have a win rate of almost 50% but only a net profit of 40%... And then we chnage our TP mode where we then have a WIN RATE of 31% but a net profit of 59%!
BITFINEX:ETHUSD
by congibb
Win rate. How to stay if profit zone...This painting is quite simple, but many novices can't use it because they don't have the patience. So, they close their profitable positions with 1/1 or 1/2 risk/reward ratio. But hold losses for a long time. Hope this post will save your money and time. You can be in profits even with low persentage of successfull trades but as you see only with 1/5 ratio! Keep calm! Use predictable ratio! Become better every day! Push like and write your comments. Thanks for your support!
TVC:GOLDEducation
by Yuriy_Bishko
17
Which method is the most profitable?Same strategy. 4 options on how to manage trades. Can use anything from a really tight stop and win very often but small to a very wide one and rarely win but win big. Which method really makes the most money? Let's look at the numbers after 100 trades: Strat 1 with a ridiculous winrate and profit factor => 1 RR 95 Wins 5 Losses => Get 90R out! Strat 2 with very high winrate and profit factor => 2 RR 80 Wins 20 Losses => 160 - 20 = 140! Strat 3 with a 50/50 winrate and high PF & RR => 4 RR 50 Wins 50 Losses => 200 - 50 = 150R! I think you see where this is going... Strat 4 with a rather low 1/3 winrate and high PF & very high RR => 8 RR 33 Wins 67 Losses => 264 - 67 = 197R / 200R! If you picked the one with the highest risk-to-reward as the most profitable congratulations, you fell for the bait :D Tihi Strat 5 with a very low winrate no one wants and ordinary PF => 16 RR 16 Wins 84 Losses => 256 - 84 = 172R The best strategy is the one that makes the most profit over the years, with the least risk. Another factor is how long it takes. Every market has its specificities. In the world of forex which is my specialty the realistic risk to rewards we get are in the 3 to 7 area. Less than 3 is not that great, and above 7 does not happen without big pullbacks (that take time). A reward to risk of above 10 is really not realistic. With crypto and stocks maybe, but with Forex no. With FX the time scale I prefer and think is best is 2 days to 2 weeks. The best moves with least noise happen on this one. Crypto and stocks holding times are also much longer (you could get 20 to 50R or even more with BTC in 2016-2017 but it's a holding period not of a couple of days no it's a couple of months instead). Commodities (Oil Gold Metals Grains) are close to FX I think. Of course as with everything else the best risk-to-reward and TF is the one you do best with. Typical FX strong moves: What day traders and signal providers do: And that's a really wide stop... Can you imagine? It's so stupid to day trade for so many reasons xd Horrible trends with big pullbacks, missing out on big wins, noise all the time, wasting one's time, gambling what will happen during a few hours, awful risk to rewards no matter what, a small spread decimates them. Lmao. Bitcoin. You won't get much out of Bitcoin swingtrading (and day trading is a joke) And then stocks And then Warren Buffet If you bought Ko with 10% of your money and risked 3.3% You can still trade with 96.7% (can use leverage to pretend it is 100%), and in 10 years you get a profit of 115% + dividends. Pretty nice! I don't think trading stocks for a few days or weeks makes sense with all the gaps there are, even if you participate in pre and post markets it still gaps alot between them. Once a decade stocks go absolutely vertical George Soros said it's not about how often you win, it's about how much you make when you win. Strat 1 "always win I am a legend" (I doubt anyone wins that often with a RR of 1) => 90R Strat 4 (PF of 4) => 200R (about twice as much) And if you risk 1% each time? Strat 1 = 144.7% profit Strat 4 = 546% profit xd Not twice as much. Lots as much! GG Compare strat 2 & 4 Strat 2 80% WR & RR 2 After 100 trades we make 140 R Strat 3 50% WR & RR 4 After 100 trades we make 150 R / 7% more 1% risk => Strat 2 = 299% profit (twice as much as 1 btw) Strat 3 = 330% profit / 10% more One more reason higher RR is better. This does not mean one should be obssessed with it and then get stopped all the time and blow up. It's just that first start with whatever strategy and it's ok to have a RR of 1.5 to 2 maybe, and then when improving it over time the most important goal is to try and increase the payout. Increasing the winrate is harder and pays less. If possible ok but not the main focus. Nothing increases profit more than improving the RR. And keep in mind while trailing a stop you are doing the same as if you closed your trade and are opening a new one (so if the stop is very wide it is like having a poor risk to reward on a new trade).
Education
by MrRenev
3
Transaction History from 1 July 2020 to 10 July 20201. GBPAUD and Sell Area (1/7/2020): TP2 reached (2) 2. GBPCHF and Buy Area (1/7/2020): plan cancelled 3. GBPNZD and Sell Area (1/7/2020): plan cancelled 4. USDJPY and Buy Area (1/7/2020): SL+1 (0) 5. EURAUD and Sell Area (2/7/2020): TP2 reached 6. EURCAD and Sell Area (2/7/2020): TP2 reached (2) 7. EURNZD and Sell Area (2/7/2020): plan cancelled 8. USDCAD and Sell Area (2/7/2020): TP3 reached (3) 9. GBPJPY and Buy Area (2/7/2020): plan canclled 10. EURGBP and Sell Area (2/7/2020): plan cancelled 11. AUDNZD and Sell Area (2/7/2020): Stop reached (-1) 12. GBPJPY and Buy Area (2/7/2020): TP2 reached (2) 13. GBPUSD and Buy Area (2/7/2020): plan cancelled 14. GBPCHF and Buy Area (2/7/2020): Stop reached (-1) 15. EURAUD and Sell Area (6/7/2020): TP2 reached (2) 16. EURGBP and Sell Area (6/7/2020): plan cancelled 17. EURCAD and Sell Area (6/7/2020): Stop reached (-1) 18. EURUSD and Buy Area (7/7/2020): Stop reached (-1) 19. EURCAD and Buy Area (7/7/2020): TP3 reached (3) 20. USDCHF and Sell Area (7/7/2020): Stop reached (-1) 21. EURNZD and Sell Area (7/7/2020): plan cancelled 22. GBPNZD and Sell Area (7/7/2020): Stop reached (-1) 23. GBPCHF and Buy Area (8/7/2020): Stop reached (-1) 24. GBPUSD and Buy Area (8/7/2020): Stop reached (-1) 25. GBPCAD and Buy Area (8/7/2020): plan cancelled 26. GBPAUD and Buy Area (9/7/2020): plan cancelled 27. GBPCAD and Buy Area (9/7/2020): plan cancelled 28. USDJPY and Sell Area (9/7/2020): plan cancelled 29. USDCHF and Sell Area (9/7/2020): plan cancelled 30. USDCAD and Sell Area (9/7/2020): Stop reached (-1) 31. EURNZD and Sell Area (9/7/2020): plan cancelled Total trade: 31 Win trade: 7 (16 point area) Loss trade: 8 (9 point area) Cancelled plan: 14
by Mas_Kahfi
Transaction History From 20 Jun 2020 to 30 Jun 2020Transaction History From 20 Jun 2020 to 30 Jun 2020 1. GBPCAD entry 22 Jun: Target reached 1:1 2. GBPCHF entry 22 Jun: Cancelled order 3. GBPCAD entry 22 Jun: Target reached 1:2 4. USDJPY entry 26 Jun: Target reached 1:2 5. NZDUSD entry 26 Jun: Target reached 1:1 6. EURUSD entry 26 Jun: Target reached 1:3 7. GBPAUD entry 29 Jun: Cancelled order 8. NZDCAD entry 29 Jun: Target reached 1:2 9. GBPCHF entry 29 Jun: Cancelled order 10. EURJPY entry 29 Jun: Cancelled order 11. EURCHF entry 29 Jun: Stop reached 12. EURGBP entry 29 Jun: Cancelled order 13. EURCAD entry 29 Jun: Cancelled order 14. GBPCHF entry 29 Jun: Target reached 1:2 15. EURAUD entry 30 Jun: Stop reached 16. EURGBP entry 30 Jun: Stop reached 17. GBPAUD entry 30 Jun: Cancelled order 18. GBPNZD entry 30 Jun: Cancelled order SUMMARY: TOTAL ENTRIES: 18 WIN: 7 entries LOSS: 3 entries Cancelled: 8 entries
by Mas_Kahfi