I don't think that user10000 is trying to imply that EW is an infallible mathematical projection either.
So to summarise: a lot of your posts have had a mildly accusatory tone, either asking for dates or noting when user10000 is mistaken. Perhaps this is due to your idea that user10000 is posting as if his predictions are infallible. but EW predictions are NEVER infallible, and that if there's any shortcoming in user1000's work, it's not that he assumes infallibility, but that he doesn't post multiple potential outcomes instead of just his favoured wave count.
EW is a very flexible system, and never hard and fast. As a result, I think we should all interpret user10000's posts accordingly, as hypotheses – best guesses – which is all they can ever be.
Of course his favorite wave count is mine too, because it sees BTC go way up, but I think if he wants to be taken seriously for his hard work, he has to be more objective, admit that this is the wave count he CHOSE from several others, and of course, stop putting date projections in his posts.
I have never accused him of anything, only asked for explanation, and I have consistently thanked him for his work and for sharing it with us.