In these charts, you can see the performance of Tesla, Lucid, NIO, and Rivian in 2022, which is -22%, -36%, -43%, and -59% respectively..!
In the below analysis I added the Technical rating and Analysts ratings from the overview page of these tickers:
My observations:
1- Technical rating show "Sell" for all 4 tickers!
2- Analyst ratings show Strong buy for NIO, buy for Tesla & Rivian, and Neutral for Lucid.
It seems this new feature "Analyst Rating" completely indicates the opposite direction..!?!?
Questions:
1-Who is/are the analyst(s)?
2-Why their opinion is so different from numbers and indicators/Oscillators?
3- What are the metrics these analysts use???
4- How should users interpret these contradictory ratings?
5- Do contradictory make trading easier???
As a user who use this platform for more than a decade, I think this is not good to add non-quantitative ratings to a platform that should move toward quantifiable trading/investing models..!
Why?
Because in the past decade Quantitative funds beat the performance of the market, hedge funds, and asset managers..!
Conclusions:
1- Indicator ratings are closer to the reality of the performance of the underlying assets because they are not emotional..!
2- Analyst ratings is far far far away from markets reality
Best,
Dr. Moshkelgosha M.D
DISCLAIMER
I’m not a certified financial planner/advisor, a certified financial analyst, an economist, a CPA, an accountant, or a lawyer. I’m not a finance professional through formal education. The contents on this site are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, accounting, or legal advice. I can’t promise that the information shared on my posts is appropriate for you or anyone else. By using this site, you agree to hold me harmless from any ramifications, financial or otherwise, that occur to you as a result of acting on information found on this site.
In the below analysis I added the Technical rating and Analysts ratings from the overview page of these tickers:
My observations:
1- Technical rating show "Sell" for all 4 tickers!
2- Analyst ratings show Strong buy for NIO, buy for Tesla & Rivian, and Neutral for Lucid.
It seems this new feature "Analyst Rating" completely indicates the opposite direction..!?!?
Questions:
1-Who is/are the analyst(s)?
2-Why their opinion is so different from numbers and indicators/Oscillators?
3- What are the metrics these analysts use???
4- How should users interpret these contradictory ratings?
5- Do contradictory make trading easier???
As a user who use this platform for more than a decade, I think this is not good to add non-quantitative ratings to a platform that should move toward quantifiable trading/investing models..!
Why?
Because in the past decade Quantitative funds beat the performance of the market, hedge funds, and asset managers..!
Conclusions:
1- Indicator ratings are closer to the reality of the performance of the underlying assets because they are not emotional..!
2- Analyst ratings is far far far away from markets reality
Best,
Dr. Moshkelgosha M.D
DISCLAIMER
I’m not a certified financial planner/advisor, a certified financial analyst, an economist, a CPA, an accountant, or a lawyer. I’m not a finance professional through formal education. The contents on this site are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, accounting, or legal advice. I can’t promise that the information shared on my posts is appropriate for you or anyone else. By using this site, you agree to hold me harmless from any ramifications, financial or otherwise, that occur to you as a result of acting on information found on this site.