4xForecaster
Long

$NZD v $CAD On Bullish Forecast Path; Geo Defined | #RBNZ #BOC

FX:NZDCAD   New Zealand Dollar/Canadian Dollar
861 17 21
Friends,


TRADE PREPARATION:

As some of you might know, I post some of the preliminary studies in my little "atelier" where I analyze Forex pairs, indices , stocks , ETFs - Here is the link for your review (I do not really take request, and I don't do much of a job answering questions, since I consider that space a "basement-level of activity" - Still, there is some jargon and some might find the process of analysis interesting, who knows: https://www.tradingview.com/chat/#5eHLst6YxeVqGlaO )

Just released on Twitter/LinkedIn is this post:
----------
$NZDCAD still forecast path; Ends oscillation; Eyes 0.85118 per Geo's Off-Set Rule:

snapshot

$NZD $CAD #RBNZ #BOC #forex
----------

Following are the sequential charts, as I prepared this trade:

snapshot


snapshot


Here is where we are now:

snapshot


FOREGROUND PREDICTIVE/FORECASTING MODEL:

The "Model" expressed the following Quant/Qual-Targets:

1 - TG-1 = 0.85450 - 01 SEP 2015

2 - TG-Hi = 0.86032 - 01 SEP 2015

and

3 - TG-Hix = 0.86408 - 01 SEP 2015


BACKGROUND GEO             STRATEGY:

In the background, the Geo             expressed its rarest Point-5 ectopia as price adversely excursed off of the 1-3 Line and validated a 2-4 Line projection originating from Point-1 ( geometric             rule defining 5-second, or 5'' as the rarest event. In contrast, 5' is the most common occurrence and results from the 2-4 Line projection originating from Point-3.

The Geo's 1-2 Line requirement is met as a reciprocal ab = cd symmetry, the 2-3 Line is usually an Elliott Wave complex zig-zag, such as a double-ZZ or triple-ZZ, or in this case, the internal construct of a bearish impulse, justifying the force the adverse excursion and definition of the 5''. The 2-4 Leg is usually a simple ZZ or simpler construct than the 2-3 Leg, whereas the 4-5 is often a mere ZZ.


GEO's OFFSET RULE:

In contrast to the Wolfe Wave pattern which declines any geometric             reliance             , the Geo             has above set of requirements, as it serves to determine highest-probability targets. These targets are the result of geometric             compensations when price moves off of the Geo's core 1-3 Line and 2-4 Line constructs, such that:

1 - Price reversing from Point-5 aims for the 1-4 Line as its highest probability target (Wolfe Wave rule);
2 - Price reversing from Point-5' aims for price level corresponding to Point-4 as its highest probability target;
and
3 - Price reversing from Point-5'' aims for price level corresponding to Point-3 as its highest probability target.

The frequency of these event occurring is as follows:

Point-5' > Point-5 > Point-5''.


OVERALL:

In the case of this chart, we are dealing with the rarest of the occurrence, and the Geo's Off-Set Rule aims for the price level corresponding to Point-3 as its highest probability target.

However, above target is based on the background geometry. In contrast, the foreground is held by the Predictive/Forecasting Model, which stands as an independent factor, and remains valid as far as the quantitative and qualitative targets defined above.

Best,


David Alcindor
Predictive Analysis & Forecasting
Durango, Colorado - USA


-----
Twitter:
@4xForecaster

LinkedIn:
David Alcindor
-----


.
David Alcindor, CMT Affiliate #227974
Alias: 4xForecaster (Twitter, LinkedIn, StockTwits)

Signal Service or Private Course - Contact: admin@KADAInstitute.com
All updates on https://twitter.com/4xForecaster
Great, thanks for summarizing the rules here.
Reply
04 SEP 2015 - Chart Update:

I hope you had the chance to enter at forecast and keep a tight SL. If not, here is a chance at an EAGLE strat:


snapshot



David Alcindor
+2 Reply
4xForecaster PRO 4xForecaster
a year ago
Tech-Note:

E.A.G.L.E. = Extremely Aggressive Level of Entry

MODEL's suggested support = 0.83193

Bullish targets remain intact.

Overall strat invalidation would occur if price < 0.83087.


David
+3 Reply
4xForecaster PRO 4xForecaster
a year ago
04 SEP 2015 - Price hits EAGLE Strat's validation level ...

... As the new week open, expect price to remain clear off of that level. Invalidation would occur as defined earlier today:


snapshot



David Alcindor
+1 Reply
shekhu27 4xForecaster
a year ago
Hi David,

I have a question on your NZDCAD chart. If your forecast is projecting a LONG on this pair, does that mean, on EURNZD, it wlll be going SHORT. This is what I noticed today.
+2 Reply
4xForecaster PRO shekhu27
a year ago
Hello @shekhu27 - If NZD were to lead the Forex markets in terms of strength ranking, it could be, but I would look instead at what the USD might do relative to EUR as well as NZD in order to have a better insight into how the $EURNZD might behave, $USD being the hammer that shapes the market in terms of net force.

At this point, here is what the other charts suggest:

$EURUSD - Remains bearish with support in the 1.099/1.095 area - This is NET-BULL for $USD
snapshot



$NZDUSD - Last chart I posted, price simply steamed rolled through all expected supports. If you have any knowledge of Elliott Wave, I would look for wave counts and see whether it can be reduced to this week. I have not looked at it closely through the Predictive/Forecasting Model, but there appears to be a support forming (see PURPLE Line in the M15 chart) at 0.62536. If price carves a new structural low, I would thus not rely on this pair until the daily/weekly chart is done pummeling it (likely institutional players reacting to the Chinese significant downturn) - A peek at the $USDCNH and/or $USDCNY might give an alternate view into the $NZD strength, but I am not convinced that there are reliable proxies. Note that the Global Dairy trade came out at a +12.1% this SEP 01st in the pricing of Whole milk Powder (WMP), whereas OCT 2015 contracts currently stand at a whoping 42.4% in terms of WMP Price Index change relative to this SEP 01 ... This is in contrast to 9.9% for NOV 15, 14.8% DEC 15, 13.7% JAN 16, 11.4% FEB 16 and a sad 6.8% MAR 16 contract ... This should tell you that a 42.4% will require some discounting into the price (the exact % is not as important as the fact that this is a multiple of the baseline changes, and that sentiment for WMP Price Index is more than a mere directional bias shift ... I'd say that there is true consensus in this turn around, and the force of that consensus will likely show in the chart BEFORE OCT 15 prints.

snapshot


So, let's assume that the $NZDUSD is NET-BULL in favor of $NZD, or simply bearish on the $USD n this particular pair ... But that's on fundamentals, mainly, which really is what this commodity-based pair is known to rely upon, as a main export economy of agricultural products towards China and the broader Asian theater.



$USDCAD - The chart has remains tethered to the 3-5' Line, and continues to vacillate about the 1.414-FE level. $CAD is also reliant upon pricing in gold (as a major extractor, refiner and exporter), oil (largest reserves) and the US economy (its consumptive buffer). Still, on a pure technical consideration, I expect this pair to decline ... I'd wait for a BACA < 1.31156 for this confirmation of a bearish down-turn, although the aforementioned commodities are worth tracking as well.
snapshot


Nonetheless, this is a NET-BEAR in terms of $USD strength.


OVERALL:
EURUSD = USD BULL
NZDUSD = USD BEAR
USDCAD = USD BEAR

This +2 vs. -1 may reflect the level of consolidation that are forming in the chart. So, sticking to basic entry rules, such as the ones I have highlighted while standing on the sideline might not be an unreasonable stance for the time being. I expect that these directional bias will convert slowly to a grand-net USD bear.

Best,


David Alcindor
+4 Reply
4xForecaster PRO 4xForecaster
a year ago
ADDENDUM - Here is the link to the GDT site, marked to its different types of dairy products.

If you are interested in the Geo system, or have already developed a "mind's eye" to see it whenever it appears, then you might appreciate the GDT chart wherein a Geo lurks and justifies recent price action:

I am not sure whether the GDT Price Index can be found on TradingView (@admin, would it be possible to chart this index ... it'd be a nice one to track relative to $NZD)


https://www.globaldairytrade.info/en/product-results/


David
+2 Reply
iefan PRO 4xForecaster
a year ago
Great post David, thank you. KoD? More help for the bulls!
snapshot
+2 Reply
4xForecaster PRO iefan
a year ago
Hello @iefan - Yes, this is definitely a KoD.

The first parabola (left) is constructed by an Elliott Wave 4th wave correction, and the bearish impulse appears to be a 5th wave, both of which resulting in a truncation of the latter, as price printed a double-bottom. The folowing large parabola represents a similarly fashioned truncation of the next degree up. This double truncation is likely a supportive indication that bulls might be piling up positions at this level. Perhaps a volume analysis would come as an added technical support.

David
+2 Reply
iefan PRO 4xForecaster
a year ago
Excellent, thank you David. I assume one would like to see high volume levels at this point.....although I doubt its that simple!
+1 Reply
4xForecaster PRO iefan
a year ago
@iefan - It depends what the bar tells you relative to its close/open levels.

For example, using a M-60 or even H4 range instead of a M15 (so as to aggregate more information in each bar/candle), I would want to see a stop-volume at the 5'' bar, with a bar finishing positive (i.e.: close higher than open). A follow-through in increasing activity across the span of the second parabola would ideally reflect an increase in volume activity fading following the apex, and finally an unusual spike in volume with a smaller than average range in bar (a compressed activity where institution would load up while "holding the train down", so to speak) - The latter would be a big clue in terms of potential rally.

You can get a much better explanation in similar price action and volume interplay studying Volume Spread Analysis from Tom Williams and/or his student/teacher: Galvin Holmes. I took that course several years ago, and remained a member of their VSA Club, even though I really do not use that technique anymore, except for gaining certain insights, as in this case ... Worth spending time and money on that site, but only if you have full faith in someone else's system. I have since moved on and developed my own, where volume does not constitute an element of the data.


David

+4 Reply
shekhu27 4xForecaster
a year ago
Thanks David, for the detailed explanation. Will keep an eye.
+2 Reply
08 SEP 2015 - Chart Update:

Note: I am not too sure how much of an interest there is in this thread or the TradingView community at-large in Elliott Wave analysis. As I am always quick to say, there are much better expert on this subject than I will ever be. However, I will start to add a few clues, pearls and lessons here and there, with the caveat that www.ElliottWave.com remains the sole and only site from which everyone else learns (see free lessons, great weekly insights and newsletter, all of which is a must-have for any serious, professional traders, or simply the audience I will always assume to address to).


Following is a chart highlighting two degrees of enumeration, wherein the squared-in numbers represent a larger move, encompassing the smaller ones - The right symbols would tend to "undress" the numbers, typically from a circle/square to parentheses (i.e.: broken down jackets, if you like the vestimentary allusion), all the way to naked (i.e.: no "cloths" on, or no encircling lines). I like to jump from squared-in to smaller Roman numericals, but this is actually breaking away with convention - I do this as a visual trader, where the stark difference keep my mind's eyes on task and in tune with the greater whole.


I will post the chart in a follow-through thread.

Best,


David Alcindor
+3 Reply
4xForecaster PRO 4xForecaster
a year ago
So, here is the chart in question, wherein several "cues" I have left for my own sake.


snapshot



Basically, the levels designated as "v" and "squared-in 5" represent a HIGH-PROBABILITY level of attainment from which the lesser degree impulse is likely to complete. This first completion would thus correspond to a Wave-1 of the larger degree, with a controlled retracement shown in the illustration, such that both the UP-side and the DOWN-side are bracketed in this probable pathway.

As I always mention, I am not interested in being right, but simply to follow the right rules. For instance, you will notice that larger moves will tend to reverse to the 4th wave termination level of the one-lesser degree. I can also tell you that three degrees are likely to complete and reverse to the level of termination of Wave-2 of the highest degree from which the move occurs ... Perhaps I wil have the chance to reveal this as we go along in this or other threads, so long as this remains an interesting subject to you (I tend to judge whether the topic is deadly boring or intereting via tumbs-up, so please do let me know in comments or the like).

So, let's keep an eye on this development and see whether these assumptions hold consistently.

By now, you know that I rely a lot on probabilities, not so numerical, but based on empirical experience and also based on the "Model". I have absolutely no opinion, no desire and no interest in the underlying asset, other than following what the Predictive/Forecasting Model tells me to do. So, there is no argument to be had, no excuse for me to fabricate, as I rely 100% on the "Model" as long as the targets are clearly stated as being defined by the "Model". In other occasions, I would produce Fibonacci-based targets, Geo or Wolfe Wave based targets, but I would refer to these as "background" analysis, as the "Model" will for ever remain the foreground generator of predictions and forecasts.

Hope this clear things up a bit.

Best,


David
+6 Reply
25 SEP 2015 - Chart Update:


Finally percolating from the EAGLE zone. This has been the most latent, indolent, lazy price action to wait for. The original Predictive/Forecasting Model's targets remain intact.


snapshot



David Alcindor
+4 Reply
08 OCT 2015 - Chart Update / Tech-Note: Hit All Targets ... Tedious M15 Timeframe:


As of this hour, all overhead targets have been reached, including the lesser-probability Watch Line ("WL") level. This typically calls for a greater-than-retracement (i.e.: a reversal to a Fibonacci level greater than 0.618) - I have moved the chart from a M15 level to a DAILY, so as to visually better encompass the entire trade, which has been quite tedious, considering that the timeframe that was initially offered was the M15 - Note that the Predictive/Forecasting Model is calibrated to serve best on the H4 level, and any level lesser than H4 would tend to decrease in precision - Nonetheless, here are all targets hit, all the way to WL, so consider possibility of a deep reversal, as shown in the DAILY chart:


snapshot



David Alcindor
+3 Reply
14 OCT 2015 - Chart Update:


Now that we hit all of the 15-minute chart targets, let's turn to the larger frame: Daily ... Expect a temporizing respite here, with depth sustained ultimately by EAGLE level:


snapshot



David Alcindor
+2 Reply
Ideas Scripts Chart
United States
United Kingdom
India
España
Italia
Brasil
Россия
Türkiye
日本
한국
Home Stock Screener Economic Calendar How It Works Chart Features House Rules Moderators For the WEB Widgets Stock Charting Library Priority Support Feature Request Blog & News FAQ Help & Wiki Twitter
Private Messages Chat Ideas Published Followers Following Priority Support Public Profile Profile Settings Billing Sign Out