STMXUSDT
We can say that the triangle is symmetrical and the exit from it must correspond to the previous movement. Indeed, there is such a rule. But this cannot be stated unequivocally.
1. I suppose that the correction will continue, which will eventually look flat. Wave (a) was 88%, decline (c) will be 88 * 0.618 = 55% decline approximately. Supposed wave (B) hit 0.786 Fibo.
There is a problem that creates the second movement option. The wave with of (B) was 1.618 from a of (b). Also now in II of (c) a triangle occurs, which is rare and causes me doubts about this line
2. Based on the above, the second variant of the movement is generated. - blue with targets in range. It is dangerous to enter, better if the yellow zone is broken or clearly held inside it.
Also in the profile description there is a channel, it is easier to ask something, both in Russian and in English (I AM FOR a constructive dialogue)
We can say that the triangle is symmetrical and the exit from it must correspond to the previous movement. Indeed, there is such a rule. But this cannot be stated unequivocally.
1. I suppose that the correction will continue, which will eventually look flat. Wave (a) was 88%, decline (c) will be 88 * 0.618 = 55% decline approximately. Supposed wave (B) hit 0.786 Fibo.
There is a problem that creates the second movement option. The wave with of (B) was 1.618 from a of (b). Also now in II of (c) a triangle occurs, which is rare and causes me doubts about this line
2. Based on the above, the second variant of the movement is generated. - blue with targets in range. It is dangerous to enter, better if the yellow zone is broken or clearly held inside it.
Also in the profile description there is a channel, it is easier to ask something, both in Russian and in English (I AM FOR a constructive dialogue)