It has been a crazy past couple of months I must say, this post is going to give guidance to those who don't really know what is going on. With several years of experience looking into the company's future growth based on what they do, this token IMO is very cheap. Here are a few reasons why:
Strong is so cheap, you mean it's a rug?
- Okay now before we all start saying "it's a rug", let's realize a few factors first. The money in monetizing investors is in the new token stronger. Hands down? However, and really huge however is the utilization of the strong token itself. Strong is going to reach levels where we think "I should've definitely got into this", this is because of the positive effects it will give to investors and STRONGCHAIN itself. What type of positive effects? Well, you have governing rights, you have projects that we don't even know about that are going to incentivize strong dominance in the strongsphere. Now with all the latest last-minute changes the developers have done, it is important to realize that things can change pretty quickly. Strong itself is a safe haven asset because it has now turned into a stable coin, any endogeneity recorded in the strngr token will have a positive effect on the strong coin, this is because there is no selling pressure on the strong token. Now if the project remains sustainable by the end of the year and the road map is successful, we will see strong token having more of a value than strngr itself. Many investors on here are thinking short term, now if that is the case, just keep claiming rewards on stronger because that bubble will burst whereby the strong coin will have an upper advantage because the bubble has been popped and the influence on the coin will have along the road map will be significant. I think this is a genius move by David Moss and the developers themselves. They have just moved a step away from having a Ponzi eco structure.
I am claiming strngr, what shall I do?
- You can keep claiming the strngr token, its not a problem. Realize, however, we are missing the much much bigger picture here and that is STRONGs advantage in the whole project itself. The transition to strngr was just to solve liquidity issues and not to solve investors pockets. NaaS will still have somewhat significance but thats not the end goal there. There is a much bigger play in the role of Strong token we are actually missing out. I think for passive investors this coin is a very good purchase to liquidate on capital gains at the end of the year. Dont believe me ? Well lets wait and see where strong is in December end of Q4, you will see buying pressure will start to adapt once alot more new changes are made. The strngr/node marketplace is in such a volatile condition right now, many investors don't care about the project, this move is weeding out the weak for those who dont believe in the project. I see investors getting absolutely burned in strngr because what happens when the 10m tokens have been fully utilized ? Its not just the monetary gains we should be thinking about, its the logic behind the behaviors of investors and the project. The developers have released two tokens now. In an honest opinion here, we should be looking at the Strong token as a hedge against the strngr token because of the volatility strngr will endure. Strngr is a good investment medium term. Those looking to get in later on will face uncertainty. We may say nodes selling at a premium or at a discount, we may see investors bailing out their strngr tokens because of the fear of future sustainability, and in future I mean a years time from now.
This analysis has been conducted using an instinct/semi-strong hypothesis. Opinions are my own and are fully speculative.
Strong is so cheap, you mean it's a rug?
- Okay now before we all start saying "it's a rug", let's realize a few factors first. The money in monetizing investors is in the new token stronger. Hands down? However, and really huge however is the utilization of the strong token itself. Strong is going to reach levels where we think "I should've definitely got into this", this is because of the positive effects it will give to investors and STRONGCHAIN itself. What type of positive effects? Well, you have governing rights, you have projects that we don't even know about that are going to incentivize strong dominance in the strongsphere. Now with all the latest last-minute changes the developers have done, it is important to realize that things can change pretty quickly. Strong itself is a safe haven asset because it has now turned into a stable coin, any endogeneity recorded in the strngr token will have a positive effect on the strong coin, this is because there is no selling pressure on the strong token. Now if the project remains sustainable by the end of the year and the road map is successful, we will see strong token having more of a value than strngr itself. Many investors on here are thinking short term, now if that is the case, just keep claiming rewards on stronger because that bubble will burst whereby the strong coin will have an upper advantage because the bubble has been popped and the influence on the coin will have along the road map will be significant. I think this is a genius move by David Moss and the developers themselves. They have just moved a step away from having a Ponzi eco structure.
I am claiming strngr, what shall I do?
- You can keep claiming the strngr token, its not a problem. Realize, however, we are missing the much much bigger picture here and that is STRONGs advantage in the whole project itself. The transition to strngr was just to solve liquidity issues and not to solve investors pockets. NaaS will still have somewhat significance but thats not the end goal there. There is a much bigger play in the role of Strong token we are actually missing out. I think for passive investors this coin is a very good purchase to liquidate on capital gains at the end of the year. Dont believe me ? Well lets wait and see where strong is in December end of Q4, you will see buying pressure will start to adapt once alot more new changes are made. The strngr/node marketplace is in such a volatile condition right now, many investors don't care about the project, this move is weeding out the weak for those who dont believe in the project. I see investors getting absolutely burned in strngr because what happens when the 10m tokens have been fully utilized ? Its not just the monetary gains we should be thinking about, its the logic behind the behaviors of investors and the project. The developers have released two tokens now. In an honest opinion here, we should be looking at the Strong token as a hedge against the strngr token because of the volatility strngr will endure. Strngr is a good investment medium term. Those looking to get in later on will face uncertainty. We may say nodes selling at a premium or at a discount, we may see investors bailing out their strngr tokens because of the fear of future sustainability, and in future I mean a years time from now.
This analysis has been conducted using an instinct/semi-strong hypothesis. Opinions are my own and are fully speculative.