The right diagonals look good for the rest of the chart. The channels also. The problem is the purple acceleration angles don't match the big arc to get to 139420, but they do for 139548 on mar 11. I'd watch the aqua trendline really close. It's the key. If it breaks upwards, it's at least going for the top of the larger channel on Feb 28 or mar 11.
Everything is so accurate it seems like it's got to go there. See if I'm bang on. I'd still watch for the upside. Always monkey business possible, but this looks totally correct.
A little variation with the Donchian channels. I think that's the right name. These are my channels overlaid. See how each channel segment has 3 point hits, (not all), those can be used to carry the angle to the opposite side of the channel. I have a TXN chart at the very bottom of "my published" that explains how to use the "post" method...my discovery.
The angles are consistent. 322.71 is a potential stop point and bounce. 201.75 works...but, the data has to step over to match the steepest last blue acceleration angle. See what happens. I would also watch for the channel break upwards. If it breaks by much all bets are off. The internal data flow for the last channel angle looks good, so I think it's set at the...
Here it is to play with. Angles can be used to predict a line for meeting a point, but when used at their best, there are intersections from 2 different shoot points, which means 2 different protractor positions. Basically I have given you a matching protractor that can now shoot full 360.
Hard to believe this could happen. 2 points yes. 4 and 5 points...definitely design.
Just in case anyone wants to try angles out. These looked pretty good. Just leave the setting the way it is, and drag from any point BUT the circular drag points or you will mess it up. There is a hidden copy in the object tree if you need it.
This is a good spot is you think it's long, (purple arc) The arcs have been hitting good. This one lands right on a long term scissors angle, which also happens to be that the same line as a consistent red uptrend angle. The only problem I have is this breaks a very, very long weekly resistance line. If it does break it though, this is a good spot.
I did a chart previously with circles and right diagonals. It makes more sense that they should go together. This was done at a different scale. Some really good hits, especially from the tops going down, instead of sideways looking arcs. If it repeats enough it's usable. The aqua's are pretty right on. Tans are close and some reds farther back that are debatable....
The blue arc just outside the thick red arc, with the time and price stamps should be the high. I think he will drop some from his present point to go back up to it. By the way I turned the .1 circle center off to be able to draw the blue arc outside the thick red arc, so just put .1 back in that ratio to get the center back.
Using the same distance 2x. Next one from the next point.
This was a lot of work to do but the accuracy is stupendous. Check the wedges out on the chart. Some repeat. Arc distances are used by the specialists as part of the geometry. I don't know the whole thing but my EURUSD circles and ellipses proves the distances repeat. If you pick the right radius size you would literally nail the move within pips. Just "make it...
It's obvious the readings on the Arrow tool are incorrect according to the scale. These are almost exactly the same distances. I need 2 things to really make arc distances work well. The Arrow tool needs to measure distance according to the present scale. Secondly, the Fib wedges need to go around in a complete arc to encompass data above and below, behind and in...
There is a slight channel angle change to more up, at the bottom, (if I'm correct). Just another stock I'm doing a little practice on. I think it's potentially down to the bottom. When I make predictions, bear in mind that I don't fight an incorrect prediction until it's halfway to never land. If it breaks the top of my channels by even a small amount, then I...
Check out this weekly. My daily and 60 minute both say feb 27 to 28 to finish off the right side of the head and shoulders, then it looks like long term down from the looks of the weekly. It's probably made obvious so the insiders can get people dumping their shares when they want them too. This looks like a long way down for a while. If it's going up the blue...
Looks good. I set the chart up for arcs. They don't work unless you find the right diagonals first, which go with proper circle shapes, otherwise you should be using ellipses. I'm pretty sure on this one. Lot's of intersections and ratios on everything.
Can you figure out how to get from point to point? Tell me. I don't know either. I just made a right diagonal and filled the rest in.
I let the purple channel and the medium sized channel carry through, in case he goes top, top... bottom to either. The intersection where the purple channel is circled red is a good stopping point. The smallest arc hits there. I think my lowest point is still right though. I added some strong orange trendlines. They line up well with my possible top. One day...