If you want the details on this Inv- Check out my post a few days ago about the possibility of forming one, linked below.
This analysis is for the Tin Caps.
Lets do some Research and Creative Thinking!
I will try to not draw too many conclusions but I would like for people to take their naive hats on and put on their everything is "manipulated and has a bigger agenda hats on."
Yesterday Trump appoints a new chairman of SEC, Pierce
www.trustnodes.com/2...ter-peirce-chair-sec
Today she tweets, "Apparently, BTC is not ripe enough, respectable enough or regulated enough to be worthy of our markets. I dissent (disagree)" She seems to be talking about the other SEC influencers. She had recently been appointed to push a larger agenda and it looks like it could be to bolster BTC price for now. Maybe our government is now sufficiently invested in it for their goals, idk. But SOMETHING is going on.
There is also a new rule in the SEC that was considered about a month ago pertaining to making it easier to set up ETF's with less hoops to jump through. Which, as the article above tells us is Trumps general plan for our financial regulators to spur more innovation/entrepreneurship/market exposure etc.
www.bloomberg.com/ne...g-sought-by-industry
Now its time to get Funky!
NORTH KOREA its all about North Korea.
I Know that we sanctioned them, even though most of their wealth was in BTC. Sanctions really had no effect on them because they defensively moved to BTC to ensure that they couldn't be as effected by US sanctions. So we had to suppress the BTC market with news manipulation (every time a significant breakout could happen from our important resistances, Super FUD news would be blasted everywhere)
Now that we are still negotiating with them I think that we are letting BTC get a little air, but I am not sure the angle the powers at be are trying to take exactly with BTC and North Korea, but be sure that its being manipulated for some other bigger global reason.
Somethings afoot! that's all I know.
Any ideas guys?
This analysis is for the Tin Caps.
Lets do some Research and Creative Thinking!
I will try to not draw too many conclusions but I would like for people to take their naive hats on and put on their everything is "manipulated and has a bigger agenda hats on."
Yesterday Trump appoints a new chairman of SEC, Pierce
www.trustnodes.com/2...ter-peirce-chair-sec
Today she tweets, "Apparently, BTC is not ripe enough, respectable enough or regulated enough to be worthy of our markets. I dissent (disagree)" She seems to be talking about the other SEC influencers. She had recently been appointed to push a larger agenda and it looks like it could be to bolster BTC price for now. Maybe our government is now sufficiently invested in it for their goals, idk. But SOMETHING is going on.
There is also a new rule in the SEC that was considered about a month ago pertaining to making it easier to set up ETF's with less hoops to jump through. Which, as the article above tells us is Trumps general plan for our financial regulators to spur more innovation/entrepreneurship/market exposure etc.
www.bloomberg.com/ne...g-sought-by-industry
Now its time to get Funky!
NORTH KOREA its all about North Korea.
I Know that we sanctioned them, even though most of their wealth was in BTC. Sanctions really had no effect on them because they defensively moved to BTC to ensure that they couldn't be as effected by US sanctions. So we had to suppress the BTC market with news manipulation (every time a significant breakout could happen from our important resistances, Super FUD news would be blasted everywhere)
Now that we are still negotiating with them I think that we are letting BTC get a little air, but I am not sure the angle the powers at be are trying to take exactly with BTC and North Korea, but be sure that its being manipulated for some other bigger global reason.
Somethings afoot! that's all I know.
Any ideas guys?
Comment:
Today 7/31: FUD about possible insiders knowing the outcome of the ETF's beforehand.. If it were for disapproval of ETF why would they be trying so hard to suppress the price on exchanges with large sell orders above price action, not allowing them to get filled but to to scare people into selling.??
