Get started
US SP 500 CFDUS SP 500 CFDUS SP 500 CFD

US SP 500 CFD

No trades
See on Supercharts
OverviewNewsIdeasMindsTechnicalsSeasonals

Trade ideas

The S&P500 paused on AI valuation concerns and trade fears The US equity rally, driven by optimism over AI momentum, Fed rate-cut expectations, and solid consumer data, lost steam after President Trump’s combative remarks toward China. Delta Air Lines beat 3Q estimates with profit up 4.1% YoY and EPS at 1.71 USD, while Costco’s (COST) Sep sales rose 8% YoY, underscoring resilient US consumption. However, Trump’s threat of steep tariff hikes triggered the S&P; 500’s sharpest one-day drop in three months. US500 extended its sharp decline, briefly testing the support at 6530. The index broke below the ascending channel's lower bound, suggesting a potential shift toward bearish momentum. If US500 breaks below the support at 6530 again, the index may retreat toward the next support at 6420. Conversely, if US500 breaches above EMA21 and the resistance at 6700, the index may advance toward the psychological resistance at 6800.
CAPITALCOM:US500
by inkicho_exness
SPX | Daily Analysis #1Lets take a look at OANDA:SPX500USD at start of the Monday and being ready for the week. Last Week: well, as you may know last week was a struggle and flashy crashy market for all and at least about 80% of indexes was turning red in Friday amid US and China trade war escalation. Start Of the Week: Personally I think the market will open with huge gap in down side and flame the Fear factor for the start of Monday. Horizon: Well, during 2018-2019 trade war showed us that this romance not gonna end soon and this story will continue at least 3-6 months. And if any tension rises, the markets will shot again. 4H Time Frame: As you can see, the index passed trough the latest Demand zone and heading to Supply zone. this area may good for some buyers to take action for catching or creating correction for Friday's move. if this will happen the price would go in $6580 area. and make some range towards 1st of November. ✔️ Personally, I’m waiting and observing for market re-action for THIS first day of market.
OANDA:SPX500USD
by DibaPrism
2
S&P 500 Faces Earnings Test Amid Shutdown Fog and Tariff FearsStocks Face Earnings Test as S&P 500 Heads for Worst Shutdown Performance Since 1990 The S&P 500 slipped on Friday, just two days after hitting a record high, as renewed tariff fears and the ongoing U.S. government shutdown weighed on sentiment. This week marks a key test as major Wall Street banks open the third-quarter earnings season, potentially offering direction amid what analysts call a “vacuum of government data” due to the shutdown. On Wednesday, the S&P 500 logged its 33rd record close of 2025, even as the shutdown that began October 1 dragged on. But Trump’s threat of a “massive increase” in tariffs on Chinese imports erased gains, leaving the index down 2% since the shutdown began — its worst such stretch since 1990, per Dow Jones Market Data. The delay of key reports like CPI inflation data has added “fog” to the market, making it harder to gauge the impact of tariffs on core prices. Still, analysts expect solid Q3 results, especially from banks, with FactSet’s John Butters noting a rare increase in EPS estimates — the first since late 2021. Volatility Returns — But Will Investors Buy the Dip? October, historically the most volatile month, lived up to its reputation. Friday’s drop left traders debating whether it was triggered by Trump’s post or simply profit-taking after record highs. S&P 500 – Technical Outlook Merging with Fundamentals The price dropped sharply by $165 within just six hours, reflecting strong volatility driven by both technical factors and fundamental uncertainty. From now on, market movements are expected to remain highly sensitive, especially as third-quarter earnings season begins this week — a phase that could significantly influence the indices amid the ongoing U.S. government shutdown. Technically, a short-term correction is expected toward 6550 – 6577 before renewed bearish pressure resumes. However, if the price closes a 4H candle below 6484, it would confirm continuation of the bearish trend toward 6450 and 6425, with further downside potential toward 6347 and 6283. On the other hand, as long as the price trades above 6506, buyers may attempt to correct the move upward toward 6550 – 6577. A sustained break below 6484, however, would clearly reestablish the bearish momentum. Pivot Line: 6506 Support Levels: 6450, 6425, 6348 Resistance Levels: 6550, 6570, 6620 Summary Expectation: Next likely direction — bearish continuation, possibly after a minor corrective pullback toward 6,570 – 6,600, unless buyers reclaim control above 6,620.
OANDA:SPX500USDShort
by SroshMayi
S&P 500 - Buy Zone PlanThe S&P 500 remains in a strong long-term uptrend, trading within a rising channel. After months of steady gains, price has now pulled back sharply from the top of the channel — a healthy correction within the bigger trend. 🔹 Buy Targets • Target 1 (Buy Zone): ~6,400 – first key support near the 50 SMA • Target 2 (Buy Zone): ~6,200 – aligning with the 100 SMA • Target 3 (Worst Case – Buy): ~6,000 – near the 200 SMA and major trendline support These levels represent staggered accumulation points, allowing for gradual buying if the correction deepens. 🔹 RSI View The RSI has dropped near 40, showing a cooling-off phase. If it dips below this level, it could signal oversold conditions and mark a potential bottom. 🔹 Outlook • The pullback looks like a gap-fill and mean reversion within the uptrend. • I’ll look to accumulate quality U.S. stocks around these targets, focusing on strong fundamentals and large-cap names. • The broader structure stays bullish unless the 200 SMA breaks decisively. 🧠 “Pullbacks in bull markets are opportunities, not threats.” 📜 Disclaimer: This is general information only and not financial advice. Always do your own research before investing.
SP:SPX
by Amer_Shouaeb
Bigger Market Correction ahead??? We can see a bigger correction in markets??? Its a nice probability. Its that happened could be a great opportunity to longs entry before we can see a new leg up in markets until the Q2-Q3 2026 for the end of 5 or 6 years current liquidity cycle . Then we can spect the beggining of the bigger bear market that we ever see in our times. (nobody know's) This its not finantial advice, just a trading idea for entertaiment and educational porpuose, dont follow this idea! Keep your owns idea in play , do your own reaserch and manage properly your money. The markets have bigger risks escenarios right now.
TVC:SPX
by ProfeBitcoin
1
SP500 4H🔹 Overall Outlook and Potential Price Movements In the charts above, we have outlined the overall outlook and possible price movement paths. As shown, each analysis highlights a key support or resistance zone near the current market price. The market’s reaction to these zones — whether a breakout or rejection — will likely determine the next direction of the price toward the specified levels. ⚠️ Important Note: The purpose of these trading perspectives is to identify key upcoming price levels and assess potential market reactions. The provided analyses are not trading signals in any way. ✅ Recommendation for Use: To make effective use of these analyses, it is advised to manually draw the marked zones on your chart. Then, on the 5-minute time frame, monitor the candlestick behavior and look for valid entry triggers before making any trading decisions.
VANTAGE:SP500
by Deltafx_Broker
The History of War, Gold, Fiat, and EquitiesGold vs. Equities — The 45-Year Cycle and a Pending Monetary Reset The interplay of war, gold, fiat money, and equities has long been a barometer of real wealth and economic stability. A recurring pattern emerges across modern history: approximately 45-year intervals when gold strengthens relative to equities. From the Panic of 1893 to the present, these cycles have coincided with major monetary shifts and geopolitical shocks. With a broadening 100-year pattern, rising geopolitical tension, and roughly $300 trillion in global debt, a monetary reset by the early 2030s is plausibly on the horizon. The 45-Year Cycle — Gold’s Strength at Equity Troughs The pattern’s first trough is traced to 1896, when William Jennings Bryan’s “Cross of Gold” speech preceded the Gold Standard Act of 1900. Equities were weak after the Panic of 1893, and gold gained prominence. Thirteen years later, the Federal Reserve would be created. More on the 45-year cycle later. The 50-Year Jubilee Cycle The Torah’s 50-year Jubilee cycle, as outlined in Leviticus 25:8–12, is a profound economic and social reset that follows seven 7-year Shemitah cycles, totaling 49 years, with the 50th year designated as the Jubilee. Each Shemitah cycle concludes with a sabbatical year (year 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49), during which the land rests, debts are released, and economic imbalances are addressed (Leviticus 25:1–7). The Jubilee, occurring in the 50th year, amplifies this reset by mandating the return of ancestral lands, freeing of slaves, and further debt forgiveness, symbolizing a divine restoration of societal equity. While built on the 49-year framework of seven Shemitahs, the 50th year stands distinct, marking a transformative culmination rather than a simple extension of the Shemitah cycle. The five-year Jubilee windows highlighted at the base of the chart compliment the 45-year cycles previously noted. The 4 year Jubilee windows are projected from the roaring 20s peak in 1929 and the 1932 bear market low four years later. The next Jubilee window is scheduled to occur some time between 2029 and 2031. Returning to History and the 45-Year Cycles: The Panic of 1907 and the Fed The Panic of 1907 was a severe crisis, with bank runs, failing trust companies, and a liquidity crunch centered in New York. The collapse of copper speculators (F. Augustus Heinze and Charles W. Morse) triggered runs on institutions like the Knickerbocker Trust. Private bankers led by J.P. Morgan injected liquidity (over $25 million) to stabilize the system. The shock exposed the absence of a lender of last resort and precipitated reforms. Congress responded with the Aldrich–Vreeland Act (1908) and the National Monetary Commission, whose 1911 report recommended a central bank to supply “elastic currency.” After debate and hearings, President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913, creating a decentralized central bank with 12 regional banks. Some alternative accounts (e.g., The Creature from Jekyll Island) argue that the panic was exploited to centralize financial control. Mainstream history, however, treats the panic as the genuine catalyst for reform. Whatever the intent, the Fed’s creation shifted the tools available to manage crises—and, over time, central banks have played an instrumental role in financing wars and expanding Fiat currency. The Fed and World War I World War I began in Europe in 1914 (U.S. entry in 1917). The Fed began operations in November 1914 and later supported wartime financing by: Marketing Liberty Bonds (~$21.5 billion raised, 1917–1919). Providing low-interest loans to banks buying Treasury securities (via 1916-era amendments). Expanding the money supply, which contributed to wartime inflation. Although the Fed was created primarily to prevent panics and stabilize banking, its early role in war finance shifted expectations about central banking’s functions. From Confiscation to Bretton Woods to the Nixon Shock In 1933, during the Great Depression, the U.S. effectively nationalized gold—private ownership was outlawed, and the official price was later reset at $35/oz by the Gold Reserve Act of 1934. Private ownership remained restricted until President Ford legalized it again in 1974. World War II and the Bretton Woods Agreement (1944) cemented gold’s role: the dollar became the anchor of the system, and other currencies pegged to it. That status persisted until August 15, 1971, when President Nixon suspended dollar-gold convertibility—the “Nixon Shock”—moving the world toward fiat currencies. The Petrodollar and Post-1971 Arrangements After 1971, the U.S. worked to preserve dollar demand. The petrodollar system emerged in the early 1970s: following the 1973 oil shock, a U.S.–Saudi understanding (1974) helped ensure oil continued to be priced in dollars and that oil revenues were recycled into U.S. Treasuries—supporting the dollar’s global role despite its fiat status. Devaluations, Floating Rates, and the End of Bretton Woods Two formal “devaluations” followed the Nixon Shock: Smithsonian Agreement (Dec 18, 1971): Raised the official gold price from $35 to $38/oz (an 8.57% change) as a stopgap attempt to stabilize fixed rates without restoring convertibility. It widened exchange banding but proved unsustainable. On February 12, 1973, the official gold price was revalued to $42.22/oz (roughly a 10% change), a symbolic acknowledgment that Bretton Woods was collapsing. By March 1973, major economies had effectively moved to floating exchange rates, and market gold prices surged. These moves were reactive attempts to adjust the dollar’s value amid trade deficits, inflation, and speculative pressures. They ultimately ushered in a fiat era, where market forces, not official pegs, set the price of gold. Triffin’s Dilemma — Then and Now Triffin’s Dilemma describes the structural tension faced by a reserve currency issuer: it must supply enough currency to ensure global liquidity (running deficits) while risking domestic instability and a loss of confidence. Britain faced this under the gold standard; the U.S. faced it under Bretton Woods and again after 1971, albeit in a different form. Modern manifestations include inflation, persistent fiscal and external deficits, and mounting debt. International policy coordination (e.g., the Plaza and Louvre Accords) repeatedly tried—and only partially succeeded—to manage these tensions. The Plaza (1985) and Louvre (1987) Accords Plaza Accord (Sept 22, 1985): G5 nations coordinated to depreciate the dollar (it had appreciated ~50% since 1980). The goal was to ease U.S. trade imbalances. The dollar fell substantially vs. the yen and mark by 1987. Louvre Accord (Feb 22, 1987): G6 sought to stabilize the dollar after its rapid decline following the Plaza Accord, setting informal target zones and coordinating intervention. It temporarily checked volatility but did not solve underlying imbalances. Both accords illustrate the extreme difficulty in balancing global liquidity needs with domestic economic health in a fiat system. De-industrialization, Bubbles, and the Broadening Pattern Orthodox history would argue that U.S. de-industrialization in the 1990s was rational at the time. Globalization and cost arbitrage provided short-term benefits, but they increased trade deficits, foreign dependency, and robbed the middle class of high-paying jobs. That loss of capacity heightens vulnerability to dollar shocks and complicates any re-industrialization efforts today. Measured in gold, equities have experienced expanding ranges: Equity peaks (1929, 1967, 1999) were followed by troughs where gold outperformed (1896, 1941, 1980/86). Gold peaked in 1980, even though the cyclical trough in the broader pattern was nearer 1986—showing that cycles can shift. The dot-com peak (1999) marked a secular low for gold relative to equities. The ensuing crashes, 9/11, and the War in Afghanistan, followed by the 2008–2009 Financial Crisis (GFC), moved markets profoundly—both nominally and in terms of gold. From 1999, relative equity values fell until a trough around 2011 (coinciding with the European debt crisis). Quantitative easing and policy responses (2010 onward) restored growth, but frailties remained (e.g., repo market stress in 2018). COVID produced another shock; aggressive fiscal and monetary responses engineered a V-shaped asset recovery but also higher inflation. Relative to gold, equities peaked in 1999 and have trended lower since. As nominal stock prices register all-time-highs in dollars—fueled by AI and other themes—equities are historically overvalued. When priced against gold, the apparent bubble in nominal terms looks more like an extended bear market ready for its next down-leg. The Broadening Pattern and the Next Trough A broadening pattern illustrates the gold equity ratio range expanding with each major peak and trough. If we accept a roughly 45-year rhythm from the 1980/86 period, the next cyclical trough may fall between 2025 and 2031, with 2031 a focal point. Whether this manifests as a runaway gold price, a sharp equity collapse, or both remains uncertain. If a sovereign-debt crisis or major war escalates, changes could accelerate—some scenarios even speculate about a negotiated new monetary framework (e.g., “Mar-A-Lago Accords”) in the next 5–15 years. Geopolitics and the $300 Trillion Debt Geopolitical tension compounds financial stress. The Russia-Ukraine war, plausibly the start of World War III, NATO involvement, and nuclear saber-rattling evoke systemic risk. Global debt—estimated at around $300 trillion (over 300% of GDP per the Institute of International Finance)—is unsustainable. U.S. public debt (~$38 trillion) now carries interest costs comparable to defense spending. Central bank money creation to service debt erodes confidence in fiat currencies and boosts demand for gold. Historical monetary resets (Bretton Woods, Nixon Shock) followed similar pressures of debt and conflict. A modern reset could push gold well beyond current records—potentially into the high thousands or five-figure territory if confidence collapses. Implications of a Pending Monetary Reset A reset might take various forms: A partial return to a gold-linked standard, perhaps supplemented by tokenized/digital assets. Forced debt restructuring or coordinated global defaults. Rapid adoption of digital currencies (including state-issued tokens—CBDCs) as part of a new settlement architecture. Given Triffin’s Dilemma, inflated financial assets, and interconnected global linkages, a modern reset could be far larger in scale and speed than past adjustments. Assets, trade, and supply chains are far larger and more intertwined than in 1971, increasing contagion risk. Practical takeaway: investors should consider gold’s role in portfolios; policymakers must confront debt sustainability or risk a market-driven reckoning that could disrupt global finance. Conclusion The Torah's 50-year Jubilee, the 45-year cycle and the century-long broadening pattern suggest we are approaching a structural turning point. Triffin’s Dilemma, decades of accumulated imbalances, de-industrialization, and escalating geopolitical risk suggest a monetary reset is plausible between 2030 and 2035—possibly sooner under severe stress. A modern reset would be more disruptive than past episodes because today’s global economy is larger, more integrated, and technologically complex. The question is not only whether such a reset will occur, but how policymakers and markets will manage it. The stakes—global financial stability and the relative value of fiat versus real assets—could not be higher.
SP:SPXEducation
by Wave-Tech
19
SPX Technical Levels to watchSPX (S&P 500) Technical Levels Quick Breakdown Current Price: 6,552.51 (as of Oct 10, 2025 close, down 2.71%; futures suggest mild rebound at Oct 11 open). Key Levels (Classic Pivots): Support: S1 $6,576 | S2 $6,562 (watch for breakdown below S2 toward $6,500). Resistance: R1 $6,613 | R2 $6,637 (clearing R1 eyes $6,700 round number). Pivot: $6,600 (neutral gravity point). Key Indicators (Daily Timeframe): RSI(14): 18.6 (deeply oversold—potential bounce setup above 30). MACD(12,26): -34.8 (strong sell signal, bearish momentum). Moving Averages: All sell (e.g., 5-day SMA $6,602; 50-day $6,717; 200-day $6,619—price well below, confirming downtrend). Overall: Strong sell across MAs and indicators, but oversold RSI flags exhaustion risk for a relief rally. Watch volume on any upside push.
SP:SPX
by daytraderrockstar
Bigger correction down for SPX500USDHi traders, I called the top in my outlook of last week for SPX500USD. After a small correction last week it went up one more time to make a new ATH. After that it dropped. Now it started the bigger correction down. So next week we could see a correction up and more downside for this pair. Let's see what the market does and react. Trade idea: Wait for a correction up and a change in orderflow to bearish on a lower timeframe to trade shorts. If you want to learn more about trading FVG's & liquidity sweeps with Elliott wavecount and patterns, then please make sure to follow me. This shared post is only my point of view on what could be the next move in this pair based on my technical analysis. Don't be emotional, just trade your plan! Eduwave
OANDA:SPX500USDShort
by EduwaveTrading
S&P 500 (US500) Multi-Timeframe StrategyS&P 500 (US500) Technical Analysis | October 11, 2025 UTC+4 Multi-Timeframe Strategy Closing Price: 6,508.2 | Market Context: Trading at all-time highs with institutional accumulation evident Market Structure Analysis The S&P 500 demonstrates robust bullish momentum, having broken through the critical 6,500 psychological barrier. Daily chart reveals a mature impulse wave in Elliott Wave terminology (Wave 5 extension), supported by expanding volume profiles. Wyckoff analysis indicates we're in a Phase E markup following successful re-accumulation between 5,800-6,200. The Ichimoku cloud on 4H timeframe shows price trading above all components (bullish alignment), with Tenkan-sen (9-period) at 6,485 providing dynamic support. Gann analysis using the Square of 9 identifies 6,528 as the next natural resistance level, with time-price squaring suggesting October 15-17 as a potential pivot zone. Technical Indicators Confluence RSI (14): Daily = 68 (approaching overbought but not extreme), 4H = 71 (caution zone). Bollinger Bands: Price riding the upper band on 4H (expansion phase), suggesting continuation with potential volatility. VWAP Analysis: Anchored from October 1st shows strong positioning above 6,465; volume profile indicates acceptance above 6,480 with 82% bullish volume dominance. Moving Averages: Golden cross intact (50 EMA > 200 EMA by 340 points), 21 EMA at 6,470 acting as immediate support. Harmonic pattern detection reveals a potential Butterfly completion near 6,550-6,580 zone (1.272-1.618 Fibonacci extension). Critical Levels & Pattern Recognition Support Structure: 6,485 (Tenkan-sen + 4H demand), 6,465 (VWAP anchor), 6,440 (daily pivot + Gann 45° angle), 6,400 (psychological + Wyckoff spring test). Resistance Zones: 6,528 (Gann Square of 9), 6,550-6,580 (Butterfly PRZ + 1.618 extension), 6,620 (weekly resistance). Pattern Alert: Watch for potential bull trap formation if price spikes above 6,580 on declining volume—this would signal exhaustion. Current candlestick structure shows consistent higher highs/higher lows with no reversal patterns (no shooting stars or bearish engulfing yet). Intraday Trading Strategy (5M-4H Charts) BUY ZONES: Primary entry: 6,485-6,495 (confluence of Ichimoku + VWAP support) | Stop Loss: 6,465 (risk 20-30 points) | Targets: T1: 6,520 (quick scalp, 25 points), T2: 6,545 (risk-reward 1:2), T3: 6,575 (swing extension). Secondary Entry: Aggressive long on breakout above 6,528 with volume confirmation (minimum 20% above 20-period average) | Stop: 6,510 | Target: 6,565-6,580. SELL/SHORT ZONES: Counter-trend short only if rejection at 6,580 with bearish divergence on RSI + shooting star formation | Entry: 6,575-6,585 | Stop: 6,595 | Target: 6,520, 6,485. Intraday Bias: 75% bullish until broken below 6,465. Swing Trading Strategy (Daily-Weekly) Position Building: Accumulate on pullbacks to 6,440-6,465 zone (25-35% position) with 4-6 day holding period | Full position stop: 6,390 (swing low violation). Profit Targets: Conservative: 6,580 (exit 50%), Aggressive: 6,650-6,720 (monthly target based on Elliott Wave projection and Gann time cycles suggesting completion by October 28-31). Risk Management: Trail stops below each daily higher low; current trail at 6,465. If price closes below 21 EMA on daily (6,470), reduce exposure by 60%. Wave Count: Currently in Wave 5 of (5) of larger degree—expect final parabolic move but prepare for 8-12% correction when complete (target retracement to 5,950-6,050 zone). Market Context & Catalyst Watch Geopolitical landscape shows stabilization in Middle East tensions, supporting risk-on sentiment. Fed policy remains neutral (hold position), but monitor October 17th retail sales data and October 23rd PMI releases—strong data could push us to 6,650; weak data triggers profit-taking. VIX at 13.2 (complacency zone) suggests low fear but increases gap-risk. Volume analysis critical: Declining volume on new highs would confirm distribution (Wyckoff Phase E to Phase A transition)—watch for volume 25% below 20-day average as warning signal. Institutional flow data shows continued net buying but decelerating pace. Execution Playbook Monday-Tuesday: Expect consolidation 6,485-6,520; ideal for range scalping. Wednesday-Thursday: Gann time window suggests volatility expansion; breakout likely. Friday: Monthly options expiry could create pinning effect near 6,500. Best trades: Long on dips to 6,485-6,495 with tight stops OR breakout long above 6,528 on volume. Avoid: Chasing above 6,550 without pullback; shorting below 6,580 without clear reversal confirmation. Risk no more than 0.5-1% account per intraday trade, 2% for swing positions. This market rewards patience at support and aggression at breakouts—trade the plan, not emotions.
PEPPERSTONE:US500
by sunya
SPX : How to play this DPrice has now reached our target as anticipated. The question is, when do we SELL? Anyway, for those who follow the D, I am sure it has saved you guys a lot of trouble. At least you know where/when to start SELLING. Many others who started selling EARLy had all lost their money. As we can see, there are 3 D's. Price can still move UP to 6,800. Bear that in mind. Or has already reached the max at 6,291!!! Price is at where they are, there are 2 choices: a) SELL now and SL @ 6,300 b) SELL when price touched the lower D @ 6,140 with SL @ 6,291 Whichever way, the R/R is still FANTASTIC. It is true that MARKET MAKER might still take advantage and try to screw short sellers. But even they would find it hard at the D. For even they need to respect it a bit. If you know your D, you trade safer. Good luck.
SP:SPXShort
by i_am_siew
S&P 500 - GRAND MARKET OUTLOOKS&P 500 - GRAND MARKET OUTLOOK BY FIBCOS This analysis integrates multiple layers of market interpretation, combining Elliott Wave Theory across Supercycle , Macro , Micro , and Sub-Micro degrees with Smart Money Concepts (SMC) , price action behavior, and Fibonacci retracements/extensions to project the S&P 500 ’s long-term trajectory. It captures how institutional capital rotates through accumulation and distribution phases, aligned with macroeconomic cycles, policy shifts, and investor sentiment. Each wave is grounded in historical and forward-looking fundamental events—from post-war booms to financial crises to the current AI-driven tech surge. The use of Fibonacci ratios (1.618, 3.618, 5.618) provides mathematical confluence for wave targets, while price structure confirms the ongoing impulsive behavior. Altogether, it creates a cohesive, multi-dimensional forecast expected to culminate in a Supercycle Wave (III) top around Q1 2029 , with an S&P 500 target between 20,000(20K). 🌀 Supercycle Wave (III) — The Final Ascent (1942–2029*) 🌍 SUPERCYCLE STRUCTURE: The Multi-Generational Bull We are inside Supercycle Wave (III) which began in 1942 and is unfolding in 5 Macro Impulse Waves . Each of these macro waves has further Micro and Sub-Micro waves. As of 2025, we're in the final stretch of this grand cycle, specifically: 👉 Sub-Micro Wave ③ of Micro Wave ⑤ of Macro Wave ⑤ of Supercycle Wave (III) Final top expected in Q1 2029 , around the 20,000 (20K) zone 📍 🧭 MACRO WAVE TIMELINE (Supercycle III) 🔹 Macro Wave ① (1942–1968): 🌟 Post-War Industrial Renaissance Fundamentals: WWII victory → economic dominance Baby boom, suburbanization, auto and housing expansion Bretton Woods system established USD supremacy 💵 Smart Money Insight: Institutional capital rotated from war manufacturing into consumer goods, construction, and tech foundations Price Action: Strong impulsive move with clean higher highs/lows Fibonacci Insight: Laid the base for 1.618 extension targets Ends in 1968 with rising inflation and Vietnam drag 🔹 Macro Wave ② (1968–1974): 🌪️ Stagflation Storm Fundamentals: Vietnam War expenditures Gold standard broken (1971 Nixon shock) Oil embargo, inflation > growth Price Action: Deep correction, volatile chop, broad distribution SMC Insight: Institutions exited cyclicals, quietly accumulated future outperformers (tech, defense) Fibonacci: 0.236% retracement of Super Cycle Wave ii 🔹 Macro Wave ③ (1974–2000): 🚀 Tech & Financialization Explosion Fundamentals: Reaganomics & deregulation PC revolution, Internet birth, globalization 🌐 Explosion in derivatives, S&P futures, ETFs SMC: Institutions accumulated during 70s lows, fueled tech IPO boom (Apple, Microsoft) Price Action: Violent rallies with accelerating slope — classic 3rd wave behavior Fibonacci: Extended well beyond 4.618% of Macro ① & ② — true power wave 🔹 Macro Wave ④ (2000–2009): 🌊 Dot-Com + Financial Crisis Correction Fundamentals: Dot-Com bust ➜ $5T in lost value 9/11 shocks & Iraq war GFC: Housing bubble → global banking collapse Price Action: Double top structure (2000 & 2007), multi-leg correction SMC Insight: Smart money cashed out in 2000 and 2007; bought again heavily in March 2009 Structure: WXY complex correction, bottoming with V-shape GFC recovery Fibonacci: 0.236% retracement of Macro ② 🔶 MACRO WAVE ⑤ (2009–2029): 🔥 The Final Ascent – AI, Liquidity & Euphoria This is the final macro wave of Supercycle (III), and it subdivides into 5 Micro Impulse Waves. We are now in Micro Wave ⑤ , which itself contains Sub-Micro Waves 1–5. 🔷 Micro Wave ① (2009–Apr 2010): 🪙 The Bounce from Oblivion Fundamentals: Fed QE1 💉, bailouts (TARP), 0% rates Fear of deflation flipped to hunt for yield Price Action: Clean V-bottom, shallow pullbacks SMC: Institutions were loading REITs, tech, and banks post-GFC carnage 🔷 Micro Wave ② (Apr 2010–Jun 2010): 🩻 Flash Crash Flush Fundamentals: Euro debt scare, Greece bailout, volatility spike Price Action: Sharp correction, liquidity vacuum Fibonacci: Textbook 0.236% retracement SMC: Stop hunt phase — liquidity grab before next leg 🔷 Micro Wave ③ (Jun 2010–2018): 🚀 Passive Investing Boom Fundamentals: QE2, QE3 → massive central bank asset inflation Apple, Amazon, Google explode in earnings and valuation ETF revolution = automated capital flows Price Action: Relentless trend with low volatility Fibonacci: 2.618+ extension of Wave ① SMC: Institutions began multi-year hold strategies (FANGM), volatility sellers emerged 🔷 Micro Wave ④ (2018–2020): ⚠️ Volatility & COVID Shock Fundamentals: Rate hikes (2018), trade war (US-China) COVID black swan — global shutdown, crude oil collapse (went negative!) Price Action: Massive drop with record velocity (VIX > 80) SMC: Panic selling, smart money accumulation March 2020 🔵 MICRO WAVE ⑤ (2020–2029): 📈 The Final Climb Begins This is where we are now. This Micro Wave ⑤ is subdividing into: 🟢 Sub-Micro Wave ① (Mar 2020 – Nov 2021): 💹 Stimulus Mania Fundamentals: Unlimited QE, COVID relief checks Crypto/NFT mania, meme stocks (GME/AMC) Retail explosion via Robinhood & Reddit Price Action: Parabolic rally, overbought signals SMC: Institutions faded retail euphoria mid-2021 🟡 Sub-Micro Wave ② (Nov 2021 – Oct 2022): 🔻 Inflation Reckoning Fundamentals: CPI > 9%, Fed hikes aggressively Yield curve inversion, tech meltdown Price Action: 0.236% retracement SMC: Smart money rotated into energy, defense, and value stocks during panic Sentiment : Retail fled, fear extreme — perfect accumulation zone 🔴 Sub-Micro Wave ③ (Oct 2022 – Est. 2027): ⚡ AI Supercycle Ignites CURRENT WAVE IN PROGRESS Fundamentals: AI revolution (ChatGPT, LLMs, Robotics, Automation) Cloud, semiconductors, defense, biotech surge Fiscal policy dominance, wars & tech race 🧠 Price Action: Clean impulse structure Shallow pullbacks, breakout-retest continuation SMC: Institutions aggressively long AI/Defense (Nvidia, Palantir, defense contractors) Liquidity injections in dips, stealth breakouts Fibonacci Target: 3.618 extension ~11,200 Expected to peak in 2026 🟠 Sub-Micro Wave ④ (Est. 2027-2028): 🧯 Last Shakeout Before the Climax Expect: Profit-taking, geopolitical panic, credit stress Retest of broken trendline or previous resistance zone Fibonacci : Retrace 0.236–0.382 of Wave ③ SMC: Final accumulation before blow-off top 🔵 Sub-Micro Wave ⑤ (Est. 2028–Q1 2029): 🚨 Blow-Off Top: 20,000 Target Fundamentals: Peak optimism: “AI replaces everything”, euphoria Retail mania, influencer ETFs Fed/central banks possibly easing again to avoid slowdown Price Action: Parabolic, low pullbacks, extreme momentum, RSI divergence, volume climax SMC: Massive institutional distribution — quiet selling into strength Target: ~20,000 (5.618 of Wave ①), final top of Supercycle (III) 🛑 What Comes After? SUPERCYCLE WAVE (IV): 🔻 Decade-Long Reset (2029–2040?) Major correction, potentially multi-decade sideways or secular bear Catalyst? AI bust, geopolitical war, credit collapse "Stay focused on structure, not emotions." - FIBCOS 📘 Disclaimer: This is a structural, educational market outlook. Not financial advice. Please do your own due diligence and risk management. #FIBCOS #ElliottWave #SmartMoneyConcept #MarketAnalysis #Gold #XAUUSD #ElliottWave #WaveTheory #SuperCycle #MacroTrend #SmartMoney #Fibonacci #PriceAction #Commodities #TechnicalAnalysis #LongTermOutlook
SP:SPXLong
by fibcos
1
S&P 500 Daily Chart Analysis For Week of Oct 10, 2025Technical Analysis and Outlook: During the previous week's trading session, the S&P 500 Index experienced a notable decline in price activity after reaching the Key Resistance level of 6750 and the Outer Index Rally at 6946. At present, the index is positioned just above the newly established Mean Support level of 6550, which indicates the potential for further downward momentum. This trend could extend to subsequent Mean Support levels of 6485, 6371, and the Key Support level at 6240. It is imperative to recognize that the index may exhibit a strong rebound following its price contact at the Mean Support level of 6550. Furthermore, there exists the possibility of an upward extension that could reach the Key Resistance target of 6753.
SP:SPX
by TradeSelecter
Global Market Time Zone ArbitrageExploiting Temporal Gaps in Financial Trading. Introduction In the world of finance, time is money—literally. Global markets operate across multiple time zones, from Tokyo to London to New York, creating a continuous 24-hour trading cycle. This nonstop nature of global finance gives rise to an intriguing phenomenon known as “time zone arbitrage.” It refers to the opportunity traders have to profit from differences in asset prices across markets that open and close at different times. These discrepancies often occur due to variations in liquidity, news flow, investor sentiment, and economic data releases. While traditional arbitrage exploits price differences between identical assets in different locations or exchanges, time zone arbitrage takes advantage of temporal inefficiencies—how the same information is priced differently at different times of day across the globe. Understanding this concept requires a grasp of market interconnections, regional behaviors, and how global events ripple through the timeline of financial markets. 1. The 24-Hour Trading Clock Global financial markets never sleep. When the Asian markets wind down, Europe takes over, followed by the U.S. sessions, which eventually hand back momentum to Asia. This rotation ensures that trading activity continues around the clock, covering key financial hubs: Region Major Markets Trading Hours (GMT) Overlap With Asia-Pacific Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore 00:00 – 08:00 Europe (partial) Europe London, Frankfurt, Paris 07:00 – 15:30 Asia (early), U.S. (midday) North America New York, Chicago 12:00 – 21:00 Europe (early) The overlapping hours, especially between London and New York, see the highest liquidity and volatility. However, when one market closes and another opens, temporary inefficiencies can occur. These are the breeding grounds for time zone arbitrage opportunities. 2. Defining Time Zone Arbitrage Time zone arbitrage is a strategy that seeks to profit from price differences created by timing gaps between global markets. For instance, when an event occurs after the close of one market but before another opens, the latter reacts first. Traders anticipating how the closed market will respond once it opens can position themselves ahead of that reaction. Example: Suppose a major tech company listed on both the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) releases strong earnings after NYSE closes. The Tokyo market opens several hours later and reacts immediately to the news, pushing prices higher. A savvy trader could buy shares in Japan and later sell in New York when it opens, assuming the NYSE-listed shares will follow the same upward adjustment. This approach doesn’t involve “insider information”—it’s about acting faster within a global time structure. 3. The Mechanisms Behind Time Zone Arbitrage a. Information Lag Financial information doesn’t reach all investors at the same time. Even though digital news travels instantly, the interpretation and pricing of that information vary across regions. Asian traders may react differently to U.S. Federal Reserve comments than their European counterparts. Markets that close early might “miss” a late-breaking development, creating temporary mispricing. b. Fund Valuation Delays Mutual funds, ETFs, and index funds in certain markets are priced based on closing prices, which creates valuation lags. For example, U.S. mutual funds investing in Asian equities may value their holdings at stale prices, ignoring overnight moves in Asian markets. Arbitrageurs can exploit this discrepancy through stale price arbitrage, a form of time zone arbitrage. c. Cross-Listed Securities When the same company’s stock trades on multiple exchanges (e.g., London and New York), time zone differences can create arbitrage windows. Traders monitor price deviations and use derivatives or foreign exchange tools to hedge risk while exploiting temporary inconsistencies. d. Currency Influence Because cross-border trading involves multiple currencies, forex market movements play a critical role in time zone arbitrage. Exchange rates fluctuate continuously, impacting how international assets are priced in local currencies. 4. Real-World Examples of Time Zone Arbitrage i. Japan-U.S. Market Arbitrage When Wall Street closes, the Nikkei often reacts to the S&P 500’s performance overnight. Traders who anticipate these reactions can use index futures to capitalize on correlations between the two. ii. Asian ETFs in U.S. Markets Many U.S.-listed ETFs (like the iShares MSCI Japan ETF) track Asian indices. However, when the U.S. market opens, Asian exchanges are closed. If U.S. traders expect the Asian market to open higher the next day (based on global cues), they can buy the ETF in anticipation—earning profits when the ETF’s price aligns after Asia opens. iii. Currency Futures Currency markets, particularly USD/JPY or EUR/USD, exhibit strong correlations with regional stock markets. Traders use these as time-zone proxies, trading currencies in one time zone to predict or hedge equity movements in another. iv. Gold and Commodities Commodities like gold trade continuously across exchanges, but price adjustments often occur in waves. If Asian demand pushes gold higher overnight, U.S. traders can anticipate a catch-up rally during their session. 5. Institutional Exploitation and Algorithmic Trading Modern arbitrage has largely become the domain of institutions equipped with algorithmic trading systems. High-frequency trading (HFT) algorithms scan multiple markets, currencies, and time zones to detect fleeting inefficiencies. Key techniques include: Latency Arbitrage: Exploiting milliseconds of delay between data feeds from exchanges in different time zones. Cross-Exchange Hedging: Simultaneously buying in one market and selling in another as prices converge. AI-Powered Prediction Models: Using sentiment analysis and global event tracking to forecast market reactions in different time zones. Because these opportunities exist for only seconds to minutes, manual traders rarely succeed without advanced technology. 6. Risks and Limitations Despite its appeal, time zone arbitrage isn’t without challenges: a. Execution Risk Price discrepancies may vanish before the trade is executed, especially in high-frequency environments. Latency and order execution speed are critical. b. Currency Risk Cross-border transactions expose traders to exchange rate volatility. A profitable price move could be offset by an unfavorable currency fluctuation. c. Transaction Costs Commissions, spreads, and taxes can erode the small profit margins typical in arbitrage strategies. Institutions often rely on large volumes to make such trades worthwhile. d. Market Correlations With globalization, asset correlations have increased, reducing inefficiencies. Arbitrage opportunities are rarer and shorter-lived. e. Regulatory Barriers Different countries have distinct trading regulations, taxes, and capital controls. Navigating these legal frameworks requires compliance expertise. 7. Time Zone Arbitrage in Different Asset Classes a. Equities Cross-listed stocks and ETFs provide the most direct time-zone arbitrage routes. Example: ADRs (American Depository Receipts) and their foreign counterparts often show price mismatches. b. Bonds Fixed-income markets move slower but still present opportunities. Global bond ETFs can react late to sovereign yield changes, creating short-term valuation gaps. c. Currencies Forex markets operate 24/7, making them the backbone of time zone arbitrage. Traders use currency pairs as early indicators for equity and commodity moves. d. Commodities Oil, gold, and copper often see price leadership shifts between Asia, Europe, and the U.S. as regional demand and supply updates roll out. e. Cryptocurrencies Crypto markets are open 24/7, yet time-zone trading patterns persist due to regional investor behavior. Asian sessions often set the tone for early momentum, while U.S. traders influence volatility later in the day. 8. Case Study: The Asia–U.S. Price Reaction Cycle Consider a simplified chain reaction: U.S. closes higher on positive economic data. Asian markets open hours later and react to the U.S. optimism by rallying. European markets open next, digesting both U.S. and Asian sessions, adding or adjusting momentum. The U.S. reopens, responding to global sentiment formed overnight. Traders who understand this cyclical information flow can position themselves to profit. For instance, buying Asian index futures before the open after a strong U.S. session often yields short-term gains—an example of inter-temporal correlation arbitrage. 9. The Future of Time Zone Arbitrage Technological advancement is both a blessing and a curse for arbitrageurs. On one hand, machine learning and big data analytics enhance detection of global mispricings. On the other, automation has drastically reduced the lifespan of opportunities. Emerging technologies shaping the future include: Quantum computing for ultra-fast data analysis. AI-driven sentiment analysis tracking news flow across time zones. Decentralized trading platforms reducing latency barriers. Moreover, as financial institutions seek a “follow-the-sun” trading model, with teams operating in shifts across continents, time zone arbitrage could evolve into real-time global arbitrage networks. 10. Conclusion Time zone arbitrage stands as a testament to the interconnectedness of modern finance. It reveals how geography and time, despite technological progress, still shape global asset pricing. By leveraging differences in market hours, traders exploit short-lived inefficiencies caused by delayed reactions to information. However, succeeding in this space requires precision, speed, and understanding of cross-market correlations. What began as a manual strategy has now evolved into a highly automated, algorithm-driven endeavor dominated by institutions. In essence, time zone arbitrage is the art of turning time itself into a tradable asset—where every second counts, and every sunrise in Tokyo or sunset in New York opens a new chapter of global opportunity.
TVC:SPXEducation
by GlobalWolfStreet