Last night I said it would drop to 8000 and then forming a "hill" before getting down with its tail./
Immediately it changed .....(?????)
I have to find out why.
But now I think it changed its tail!
It's not forming a (big) "hill" but already starting down.
How long, how deep (7000?, 6000?, 5000?) which way.
I will try to find out if it has copied another tail.
Do you remember the Google-announcement-drop?
There it changed from the january-graph to the february-graph!!
It looks like, the graph, when it changes direction, jumps to another part of the graph.
Could be nice to find out for what reason, and if there's a logic.
stay tuned.
Immediately it changed .....(?????)
I have to find out why.
But now I think it changed its tail!
It's not forming a (big) "hill" but already starting down.
How long, how deep (7000?, 6000?, 5000?) which way.
I will try to find out if it has copied another tail.
Do you remember the Google-announcement-drop?
There it changed from the january-graph to the february-graph!!
It looks like, the graph, when it changes direction, jumps to another part of the graph.
Could be nice to find out for what reason, and if there's a logic.
stay tuned.
Comment:
Last highest point made(?)
I think it has started to go down now!
I think it has started to go down now!
Comment:
well, maybe 1 more top....wait and see.
Comment:
Compare:
(J changed a lot)
(J changed a lot)
Comment:
I dOn't know how often I will say it (a lot I guess !): IT'S UNBELIEVABLE !!
Comment:
ratio has been 12:10
a piece taken at the feb graph gives 12 hours / today that same piece gives 10 hours
so today it a bit faster now.
a piece taken at the feb graph gives 12 hours / today that same piece gives 10 hours
so today it a bit faster now.
Comment:
till the 6000 it took 50 hours in the feb-graph.
so today ~41 hours (from now 20-03 / 12.30h)
(if, offcourse, nothing changes and the speed keeps the same ratio)
so today ~41 hours (from now 20-03 / 12.30h)
(if, offcourse, nothing changes and the speed keeps the same ratio)
Comment:
Hmmmm, what to say.
A correction? Still wants to make its "hill" ?
Nobody knows.
We have to wait what it is going to be.
A correction? Still wants to make its "hill" ?
Nobody knows.
We have to wait what it is going to be.
Comment:
Comment:
at first it follow marvelous, then it got lifting up every "mountain"/ "rocket".
I have the faintest idea why>
I have the faintest idea why>
Comment:
This correction:
compare:
compare:
the part straight down went up 180 degrees, the rise-part has been short and compressed and taken up in a top, and thus it is not going to reach that high (9200-9400) .
It looks like its following as expected.
Later on I will draw the situation.