You might be defining a new pattern here, congrats on that, I will be happy to see the results once you are finished backtesting, till then, your interpretation of the Cypher is even more random as my optimization of entry methods :)
If manipulating charts for you is allowed in your Trading plan, then go ahead, be my guest. But no matter how you turn it, according to the rules, this is not a valid cypher, not on the 60, not on the 240.
Nico then came to a chart of yours and pointed out you use the Fibonacci tool incorrectly, that your rules for the Cypher pattern are not the established rules, that your statement about how Jason and Akil trade / teach this pattern is untrue and that a 4H chart you posted is incorrect. And now you lose your cool and blame him for “starting a discussion” at your chart? That is funny. As you make your bed, so you must lie in it sir. Just my thoughts on this!
2. If you want to trade this pattern that is not a Cypher, good for you, maybe give it another name and get some credit for it.
3. The reason why I am still in demo is not something I even bother to explain to you and whether I have done my testing or not will be for me to know, not for you. At least I do not claim a pattern to be a cypher when clearly it is invalid.
4. I never at any moment expected you to agree to my rules or follow them ... as I said before, every trader makes up his own trading plan.
5. This site was created to give helpful feedback to others, but the way you provided feedback on my charts was never with the intention to help, only with the intention to bring me down. This was the reason why I checked your charts and what do you know ...
Anyway ... the lesson you can draw from this is that before you criticize someone else, make sure you're free from mistakes or it will backfire on you. I know I am a novice trader and I know I have a lot to learn, I am very open to supportive criticism but one thing is for sure, I do not take people looking down on me.