Intel $26 and 5 nm in 13th gen and $100 in 2027
Despite the release of the GPU from Intel, the company's shares are getting cheaper.
I think this may be due to the unfulfilled expectations of the fans. They wanted Intel to switch to the same processes as AMD - 7 nanometers or 6 and 5 nanometers like Apple for example. But instead, Intel has gone as low as 10 nanometers and is deliberately misleading by disguising this as "Intel7" in their processor specs.
But the company has some good news as well, for example they have made support for high frequency 120Hz at 5120 x 3200, 144Hz at 4096 x 2160 and 60Hz at 7680 x 4320 for embedded GPUs in the 12th generation of desktop and mobile processors. They also added support for DDR5 RAM with frequencies of 5200 and higher, which will have a very good effect on performance gains, since the bottleneck at the moment is the low frequency of RAM, the GPU uses it as video memory, since it does not have its own. They also added support for PCI 4.0. I believe that the future belongs to integrated graphics. Now they already allow you to comfortably do without discrete graphics for surfing the Internet, watching YouTube in 4K and 8k resolution.
I hope that in the 13th or at least the 14th generation, Intel will make support for 120Hz for 8K, and YouTube will add support for 120Hz at 8K for their player. I think that Intel may drop to $26, but then it will go up, maybe it will update the maximum and reach a hundred. I have an assumption that Intel decided to make a knight's move in the next generation and switch to a 5 nanometer process technology, skipping 7 nanometers!
I think this may be due to the unfulfilled expectations of the fans. They wanted Intel to switch to the same processes as AMD - 7 nanometers or 6 and 5 nanometers like Apple for example. But instead, Intel has gone as low as 10 nanometers and is deliberately misleading by disguising this as "Intel7" in their processor specs.
But the company has some good news as well, for example they have made support for high frequency 120Hz at 5120 x 3200, 144Hz at 4096 x 2160 and 60Hz at 7680 x 4320 for embedded GPUs in the 12th generation of desktop and mobile processors. They also added support for DDR5 RAM with frequencies of 5200 and higher, which will have a very good effect on performance gains, since the bottleneck at the moment is the low frequency of RAM, the GPU uses it as video memory, since it does not have its own. They also added support for PCI 4.0. I believe that the future belongs to integrated graphics. Now they already allow you to comfortably do without discrete graphics for surfing the Internet, watching YouTube in 4K and 8k resolution.
I hope that in the 13th or at least the 14th generation, Intel will make support for 120Hz for 8K, and YouTube will add support for 120Hz at 8K for their player. I think that Intel may drop to $26, but then it will go up, maybe it will update the maximum and reach a hundred. I have an assumption that Intel decided to make a knight's move in the next generation and switch to a 5 nanometer process technology, skipping 7 nanometers!