BITMEX:XBTUSD   Bitcoin / US Dollar Perpetual Inverse Swap Contract
Spotted this strong bullish harmonic structure in an advanced form. The pattern pointing towards 32k as the next bullrun target on BTC .

Kindly go through the chart and do leave your comments about the expressed view. It sound real funny.

Moreover REMEMBER to appreciate my effort with your likes and always subscribe(Click follow) to my profile for fast and quick daily updates on all trading ideas

Thank you.
Trade active: Meanwhile, guys please dont call me names, part of my reason for this view is gold movement.

Trade active: Potential next move will take us towards 13k-14k zone.

Trade active: Very good market update which further strengthen my 32k view is here for you. Kudos to the author of this great view.
Trade active: BTC en routing to 14k

Join us on any of our platform below:

Group Talk:
Signal Channel:

Fx chat:
Tweet us @WCSERA


Total bogus, based on thin air. If these silly pure TA-patterns worked, you'd be rich algorithmically trading this, or selling the algorithm / a course on how to do it. There needs to be some type of substantial analysis and some recognition of the risk factors and uncertainty involved in the play. A trade plan without such defining qualities as what could send the asset price flying the opposite direction is like a measurement with no uncertainty. Which, as Dr. Lewin put it, "is MEANINGLESS!"
+27 Reply
Gunslinger2005 ralphschraven
@ralphschraven, you realize that patterns extends into 2022?
+8 Reply
ralphschraven Gunslinger2005
@Gunslinger2005, True, I would say, the longer the time-frame of the TA, the more subject it is to various dimensions of risk. If there were no such thing, you'd make a billion dollars leveraging the living heck out of your portfolio in options contracts, given that you "know for sure" where the asset price will be in due time.

However, we don't know if something will come along causing BTC to rise or to fall, and whether it will be sharp or smooth, repeated or just once... We don't know jack. Especially not because of some elaborate sequence of previous price action. And especially not over a time span of multiple years!

The longer the time frame, the stronger the prevalence of fundamentals and importance of risk analysis. It makes no sense trying to work out the price of an asset in several years from previous price action because future results depend largely on what the market will do, major global events such as major companies developing their own crypto and the sentiment towards substitutes of value such as gold, silver and BTC... All things that are hard to wrap your head around, and even harder to credibly ignore when trying to figure out asset prices years from now.

This is like trying to figure out where a plane is going to land in 200 flights from now based on where it is right now and has been for a few flights in the past. What new planes are in development? What edge does this plane have over the other ones? When is it due for maintenance? How is the airline doing? Whoops, Corona time, how does that affect the whole ordeal? You can't tell where it will be in a vast time span just based on some singular variable such as location. You could only sensibly do that on short time frames, where "how the airline is doing" is scarcely relevant compared to position.

I hope the above example illustrates, analogously, how certain variables affect predicted outcome differently based on the time between the prediction and the present. Historical asset pricing is not used by anyone who makes actual money in the trading realm to be a leading variable of asset prices years into the future.

If you want to do TA, at least do it on the appropriate time frames where it largely accounts for the constant swings that take place there!
greenmask9 ralphschraven
@ralphschraven, While I am not a great fan of harmonic patterns, many traders I respect do use them. And yes, even algorithms can be coded, but I didn't have the experience to with one to see if it delivers what its marketing says.
+1 Reply
ralphschraven greenmask9
@greenmask9, I do believe any pattern that is well-known will have some level of success. Besides the merits the patterns might actually have, they naturally tend to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. "If everyone believes stonk go up, then stonk go up", heh. If sufficiently many folks believe they see a pattern, they can trade it into existence every step of the way. But this needs to happen on a time frame where this "market behavior" and "herd mentality" are strong drivers of price movement.

In the long run, what really matters is intrinsic value which, for BTC, is a bit of a tough nut to crack, perhaps the toughest of all, admittedly. However, the fundamental principles of trying to calculate intrinsic value still apply. You still need to account for the market in general and how you think it'll develop, the market share and its development, competitive edge and how it could be retained, the uses and functionality of the asset or what it produces, and so on. That's what's going to drive price up or down long-term.

To torture the herd analogy a bit: in the short term, herd location is based on what some of the front of the herd is doing; the rest just follows. The front of the herd could be seen as the pattern that the rest of the herd (us traders) are keen to follow. We just go where we think we'll go, and the "losers" are those who follow too slowly or try to anticipate where the herd will go ahead of time and end up a stow-away. However, long-term, the herd is pushed to locations where resources reside, most notable being water. So, then, it would make sense in the short term to analyze the front of the herd and figure out where it's going. But over a span of two years, if you want to know their location, you'd need to figure out where the water's at; where the resources are at. Where safety's at. Where danger is at. Analyzing risk and reward; cost and benefit, as it pertains to the herd.

That's what fundamentals is to trading, and why I think it matters more than any particular sequence of price action data points over a span of two years!
+1 Reply
greenmask9 ralphschraven
@ralphschraven, I agree. Plus harmonic patterns often seem to include double bottom or double Bollinger bottom just like in this case. One more point you probably didn't think of: for successful traders, these patterns might be just a supporting/filtrating element, not the only argument for their trade. I think astrology traders are sometimes successful too because they do the ordinary analysis first, then they do cards/planets and then they consider the trade doing ordinary analysis again and reconsidering the trade.
ralphschraven greenmask9
@greenmask9, Yes, I completely agree that TA, especially once you move to larger time frames, should be used in conjunction with additional analysis. The four major factors of TA as well as the various aspects to fundamentals are sufficiently uncorrelated so that they provide new and useful information to base the trade off of, unlike, say, three momentum indicators.
TradingShot ralphschraven
@ralphschraven, Great idea Wes. My expectation for the end of the year is roughly $17000.

Home Stock Screener Forex Screener Crypto Screener Economic Calendar How It Works Chart Features Pricing Refer a friend House Rules Help Center Website & Broker Solutions Widgets Charting Solutions Lightweight Charting Library Blog & News Twitter
Profile Profile Settings Account and Billing Referred friends Coins My Support Tickets Help Center Ideas Published Followers Following Private Messages Chat Sign Out