Binary_Forecasting_Service

PRS #4 TRADE OF THE YEAR FINALE [300-PT SWING IN 5 DAYS]

OANDA:XAUUSD   Gold Spot / U.S. Dollar
PRS HAS CALLED THIS RALLY SINCE 6/19 WITHOUT A MAJOR CHANGE TO THE FINALE, UNTIL NOW.

First, replay derivative map from 6/19.


After eliminating the bearish outcome, all following updates has generally follow this route. With addition to PIRL-PIMA-PIVO database, this 300 point 5-day swing is now the projected outcome for this rally's finale. This route IS THE FAVORITE VS ALL OTHER OUTCOMES COMBINED. This route also draws 3-2 vs yesterday's map (of 3 routes remaining in black, red and blue). From a price perspective it's the same finale. But from a time perspective, the entire swing was originally projected to finish 8/5. Now it's projected to finish 7/17, or next Friday, New York open.




Comment:
Again I tranche like this: Divide your trade size into 4.

1 - 10%
2 - 20%
3 - 30%
4 - 40%

For trade size where I absolutely convinced, I add:

5 - 50% of (1 to 4)
6 - 100% of (1 to 5

Total of 1 to 6 should be a defined % of your bank roll. For me thats 1/8.

So lets say you dont have a lot.

1 - 500
2 - 1000
3 - 1500
4 - 2000

Total 1 to 4 - 5000
Bankroll 5000 × 8 = 40000

If you dont have 40 K, then lets say "x" is minimum entry. Then you need 80x bank roll.

1 - x
2 - 2x
3 - 3x
4 - 4x

Total trade is 10x. Total bankroll 80x.

That means at 200 entry you need 16000. Dont have 16000? Go get 16000.
Comment:
Comment:
The chart above describes volume for XAUUSD AND GC1!, SPOT VS FUTURES. After getting lucky in the last revamp of PIVO (Pham Infinite Volume Oscillator, I can report that they both agree that the next move is explosion up. While they both forecast a giant move up in 3-4 days, they DO NOT FORECAST A CRASH.

SO WHY WOULD I FORECAST A CRASH FOR TRADE #13? BC AFTER 6 YEARS OF RESEARCH, I HAVE PROVEN THAT THE IMPORTANT INDICATOR, AND ALWAYS LEADING INDICATOR IS !

This is where classical technical analysis is strong: THE FIRST BREAK OUT WILL BE IMMEDIATELY SOLD QUICKER THAN THE MOVE UP. So move up is 3 days then move down is 2 days. The only part that I am not confident about right now is if it really gets to 1820 in 2 days. I find 1850 very likely based on regression fractal on multiple time frames.
Comment:
On a side note: Since 6/19 the intermediate forecast has not changed.

1) ROUGH OUTLINE


2) FORMAL TRADE IDEA


3) DERIVATIVE MAP

Comment:
4) LEADING TO PRS LIVE TEST TRADE #3/4


5) LAST WEEK 7/02-7/16 DERIVATIVE MAP, WHICH IS REALLY CLOSE NEWEST UPDATE


6) WENESDAY'S 7/08-7-16 DERIVATIVE MAP
Comment:
TYPO, WED IS 7/08-7/17

Comment:
7) THURSDAY POSSIBLE VARIATIONS OF THE SAME ROUTE


AND FINALLY 8) THIS PAGE YOU ARE READING

So what I am saying is, it has been one consistent target, TEST OF ALL TIME HIGHS IN JULY. IT HAS NOT CHANGED. ALL IT HAS DONE IS INCREASE THE SPEED X3 FOR THIS NEXT WEEK.
Comment:
WHETHER OR NOT WE RETEST 1788 BEFORE MOVING UP HAS GIANT IMPLICATIONS FOR WED TO FRIDAY ACTION. THIS AFFECTS:

1) whether the 2 tops are 1910/1935 vs 1880 and 1905
2) if we DO NOT break all time high this week, that is a good signal we will NOT have the giant drop..
Comment:
I just realized that this isnt 300 pt swing.... more like 200 or 250 at best. 300 does sell better though.
Comment:
Tuesday, retest 1792 this morning. This pb is getting long in the tooth. Regressions point all the way up from here. Since we spent 40 hours going sideways, this map is outdates. Refer to any recent previous maps for general outline. Target 1900 by this Friday.
Comment:
While the map can morph a great deal at times, it is highly unlikely (from a PRS perspective) to not go strong from here. The pace from here on iut dictates what top formation it is fillinf out. There are two tops that are in play:

1: double top with the second top higher
2: a circular quadruple top with high volalitility, in this scenario the highest top is the second or third top.
Disclaimer

The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.