THE MOST ACCURATE PRICE FORECAST IN THE WORLD #2-4

HEADER - This is a late follow up to #2-3.

SUMMARY - This is one hard, and also annoying. Hard because there's NO rhyme or reason here, it is just an attempt to make sense of a very irregular set of regressIons. Annoying because there's not a lot of value here. So I am not trying my best to make sense of it.

DETAILS - Of everything I've done since 9/12, this one I don't even want to do. I'd rather just wait until Monday. But if I have to guess, this is that guess.

LIVE FOR FRIDAY? ... NO - There's nothing here worth being live for, honestly... At the most, there's only 10 pts of vol I can see, anything over 1997 should get shot down immediately. And by the time we get to morning, unless things CHANGE DRASTICALLY, there will only be 5 pts of trade-able vol for all of Friday (looking from right now). Just take a day off.

Comment:

BTW - Wouldn't be surprised if price action is WAY MORE zig zag then that hi-light. The layers are UGLY looking so time-reward (as opposed to risk-reward), is very low here.

Comment:

BTW 2 - What had happened in #2-3 is that the move up was too early while the double check-downs I had said would happen, took WAY TOO LONG. This is bc lack of volume for "before-midnight-ET" session. Sometimes, literally nothing worth talking about actually happens. This "lack of interest" has left the short term regressions in a spiral with a slightly positive slope. So? Translated to price action that means SLOW SIDEWAYS TO UP ZIG ZAG not worth being up for.

Comment:

THAT'S A WRAP FOR THIS WEEK FROM THURSDAY:

1) in chart above, if you pray, there might be a spike up to 2005+
2) odds right now are 1 in 10 if that, bc you have to squint to see it
3) I will get something up Sunday afternoon for #2-5
4) sometimes, there's nothing worth going to bat for

Comment:

5) and if you want to scalp and scalp, there is no orange outcome

Comment:

8:17 AM ET, so here's this morning first look, blue is 7:3 right now, the check down has created value as high as ... 2010 again. I'm working on #2-5 will get it out soon.

Comment:

a) and it just popped as soon as I posted that
b) annoying AF, should've just ignored the noob and went to work

Comment:

8:31 AM 1982.XX, here's #2-5, short on time: