Get started

Multiple Time Frame Analysis

Dow Jones | Is the Fifth Wave Expanding?Wave (IV) in pink, the highest degree of this structure, ended in March 2009. From that point, the market entered a structure that may be the beginning of Wave (V) of the highest degree. In equities, an extended fifth wave is also possible. So the key question is this: We were looking for an Impulse pattern, where V? in turquoise was expected to mark the end of the structure. But what does the equality with the initial wave tell us? Are we dealing with an extended fifth wave, or is the current structure part of (V) in blue? At this stage, it is also possible that I, II, III and IV have already completed and the market is now developing V in turquoise — or that we are still within III, with the structure expanding to a higher degree. Within the orange structure, if a correction develops, our initial expectation is for a sideways pattern, particularly considering alternation with Wave II in orange. However, the black structure also remains important. Conservative Scenario If Wave I is extended, Wave III may be shorter than Wave I. In that case, the relationship between I, III and V becomes especially important, and Wave V cannot develop in a way that conflicts with the guidelines of an Impulse structure. One more subtle point: at the beginning of such a structure, a Diagonal pattern may also need to be considered; its internal boundaries cannot be ignored. Even if a deeper correction develops and First Price Invalidation — 45,419.12 is broken, the larger scenario does not necessarily fail. The corrective pattern and wave degree would need to be reassessed. Ultimately, we are not trying to predict price. We are looking for the structure that best fits the rules and guidelines of the Wave Principle. The pattern comes first. The rules decide the count. Mr. Nobody — Patterns whisper. I listen. 🎧📊 Dow Jones Industrial Average Index Jun 8 Dow Jones Industrial Average — A 130‑Year Elliott Wave Perspecti May 7, 2023 To higher prices in the bull market? Higher or Flat?
DJ:DJILong
by Mehdi_Abbasi_EWP
Crude Oil: Is a Larger Wave III Beginning?From an Elliott Wave perspective, the current structure suggests that Waves I and II of the current degree may be complete, placing the market at a critical stage. Wave I developed as a five-wave Impulse, followed by Wave II unfolding as a corrective structure. Therefore, under the aggressive scenario, the current structure may be preparing to enter Wave III, which, if confirmed, would be expected to develop with greater strength and momentum than the initial wave. The initial advance from the recent low appears to have formed a five-wave Impulse. This is one of the main reasons why, at this stage, the aggressive scenario appears more likely. If the initial invalidation level holds, we would expect price to continue higher and, by breaking above the corrective channel and the nearby structural resistance, provide confirmation that Wave III is developing. However, the market may also develop a nested 1-2, 1-2, 1-2 structure across different degrees within this area. Such a structure could require more time to complete and may create several smaller corrective phases before the larger Wave III begins to accelerate. Another possibility is that the initial wave from the recent low is actually part of a larger extended Wave III. If so, the bullish advance could continue with significantly greater strength. Therefore, the initial invalidation level remains important. As long as it holds, the aggressive scenario remains the more likely interpretation. However, if the highlighted invalidation levels are broken, the conservative scenario becomes active. Under this interpretation, the current structure may represent part of a larger-degree Wave (II), which, as discussed in my previous Daily Crude Oil analysis, could be unfolding as a Classic Zigzag and may require additional time and price movement to complete. For those who have followed my previous long-term Crude Oil analysis, this is the same black Conservative Scenario presented in that Daily analysis, and it remains valid until invalidated. At the end of this analysis, I have shared both scenarios together so that the market can determine which structure is actually developing. I have also included my previous Daily Crude Oil analysis for additional context. At this stage, there is no need to force either scenario onto the market. Ultimately, it will be the structure that the market develops from here that determines the correct scenario. Price comes first; the wave count comes second. Patterns whisper. I listen. — Mr. Nobody 🎧📊 CFDs on Crude Oil (Brent) Jul 29 Is Wave 3 Beginning, or Is One More Zigzag Still Ahead? 4 days ago Is Wave 3 Beginning, or Is One More Correction Still Ahead?
OANDA:BCOUSD
by Mehdi_Abbasi_EWP
DXY | The Diagonal Test DXY | The Diagonal Test 🌀 In this update, our focus remains on the Aggressive Scenario—a higher-degree interpretation in which the recent structure may represent either Wave (C) or Wave (III). A closer examination of the 4-hour chart suggests that the current structure could initially be interpreted as a Double Zigzag. However, the ongoing price development also raises the possibility that the market is building a Leading Diagonal. At this stage, the more compelling structural interpretation is a Leading Diagonal with a 3-3-3-3-3 subdivision. The recent decline also appears internally impulsive and could represent part of Wave (C) or Wave (III) at a higher degree. If this structure continues to develop as expected, we should see the Leading Diagonal complete, followed by a distinct corrective phase. The market's behavior during that correction will be critical, as its depth and structure may provide valuable information about the true degree and position of the pattern within the larger count. Once the diagonal is complete, the following correction could develop at least as a Simple Zigzag for Wave (IV). There is also a possibility that a Double Zigzag could function as Wave (X) at a higher degree. Therefore, we are not forcing the market into a predefined pattern; we are allowing price action to reveal the structure. The Conservative Scenario has not been invalidated, but for now it is no longer our primary focus. Our analytical priority remains the Aggressive Scenario and the behavior of price within the current structure. The major invalidation level remains critical. If price breaks through that area and subsequently develops a valid motive structure, it could provide the first meaningful green light for the Conservative Scenario. Even then, however, a price break alone will not be sufficient. We must examine the corrective structure that follows the motive move and determine whether it conforms to the rules and guidelines of the Elliott Wave Principle. For now, the Conservative Scenario is being set aside through Wave (B), while the Aggressive Scenario remains under active observation. We are not trying to force the market to fit our count. We observe the structure, maintain the valid alternatives, and allow price action to determine what pattern the market is actually building. Ultimately, everything comes back to one principle: Structure First — Scenario Second. Patterns whisper. I listen. — Mr. Nobody 🌀📊 U.S. Dollar Currency Index Jun 5 The DXY Time Paradox: Monday Engineering & Elliott Wave Dissecti Jun 7 DXY Structural Analysis: Navigating the Diagonal
VANTAGE:USDXLong
by Mehdi_Abbasi_EWP
USDJPY 60m: Observing a Fresh Rally-Base-Rally Demand ZoneMarket Context On the 60-minute USDJPY chart, price is currently near a previously identified Demand Zone . The zone originated from a Rally-Base-Rally (RBR) structure, followed by a strong directional departure. This area is being observed from a technical market-structure perspective because the original move away from the base suggests a notable imbalance between buyers and sellers at the time of formation. Technical Characteristics Fresh zone: The zone has not been confirmed as having a prior meaningful revisit, making its current interaction particularly relevant from a price-action observation standpoint. Rally-Base-Rally structure: Price rallied, formed a relatively compact base, and subsequently rallied again. This structure is commonly studied in Demand & Supply analysis as a potential area where buying pressure previously became dominant. Strong leg-out: The pronounced move away from the base provides evidence of significant directional displacement following the consolidation. Quality basing structure: The relatively defined base provides a clear technical reference for studying how price behaves when it returns to the area. What Traders Often Observe at a Demand Zone When price revisits a previously identified Demand Zone, traders commonly study the interaction between price and the zone rather than assuming that the zone will necessarily hold. Rejection from the zone followed by renewed upward price movement. Short-term consolidation within or around the zone. A deeper penetration of the zone before any directional response develops. A clean breakdown through the zone, indicating that the previous demand may no longer be influencing price in the same way. Possible Market Scenarios Bullish Scenario: If price enters the zone and subsequently produces constructive price action, one possible scenario could involve a reaction from the area and a continuation of the broader upward structure. Confirmation through actual price behaviour would be important rather than assuming that the zone will automatically produce a reaction. Bearish Scenario: If price moves through the zone with sustained bearish momentum, the demand structure could become invalidated. In that situation, the previous zone may no longer provide the same technical context, and the surrounding market structure would warrant fresh analysis. Why Confirmation Matters A Demand Zone represents a historical area of interest based on prior price behaviour; it does not guarantee a future reaction. The actual response of price around the zone can provide additional information. Rejection, consolidation, displacement, or breakdown are different forms of price behaviour that can change the technical interpretation of the area. Risk Management — Educational Perspective From a general educational standpoint, risk management involves understanding that any technical zone can fail. Traders often consider factors such as position sizing, predefined invalidation conditions, and maximum acceptable exposure when studying a potential market scenario. These concepts are presented for educational purposes and are not recommendations for any particular trade. Key Observation The primary technical point on the USDJPY 60-minute chart is the interaction between current price and the previously formed Rally-Base-Rally Demand Zone . The eventual price response—whether rejection, consolidation, deeper penetration, or breakdown—would provide additional information about the relevance of the zone within the prevailing market structure. Educational Disclaimer This publication is intended solely for educational and informational purposes. It reflects a technical analysis of market structure and should not be interpreted as investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Always perform your own analysis and manage risk according to your individual circumstances.
Long
by SurjeetKakkar
Can Bulls Finally Reclaim 65K?Hi traders!☀️ Bitcoin continues to press against the 65K level from below, with multiple attempts to break above it. The situation on the chart, which I discussed in detail on Friday, is still playing out. So far, however, Bitcoin has failed to establish itself above 65K. At the same time, price is not dropping back toward the moving averages on either the 1H or 4H timeframes, which remains a positive signal for the bulls🛡️🛡️🛡️ As a reminder: “The cluster of EMA 100 and 200 on the 1H and 4H initially acted as resistance during the move up from 62,500. However, now that price has confidently moved above them, they have started to act as solid support.” 🫪🏋🏽 The main scenarios remain unchanged. The 65K level remains the key: 🦬🚀 “The bullish scenario, with upside targets at 67K and 67.6K, will only come back into play if Bitcoin manages to reclaim 65K and, more importantly, hold above it.” 🐻🪓The bearish scenario comes into play if Bitcoin gets rejected from 65K. ”Such a rejection could send price first toward the cluster of moving averages around 64K. If that area fails to hold, the next major support remains at 62,500.” Peace! 🌄
COINBASE:BTCUSD
by inchartswetrust
2
BTCUSD 240m: Observing a Fresh Drop-Base-Drop Supply ZoneBTCUSD 240m: Observing a Fresh Drop-Base-Drop Supply Zone Market Context On the 240-minute BTCUSD chart, price is currently near a previously identified Supply Zone . The area originated from a Drop-Base-Drop (DBD) structure, followed by a strong bearish departure. From a technical market-structure perspective, the zone is being observed because the move away from the base displayed notable directional displacement, suggesting an imbalance between buying and selling pressure at the time of formation. Technical Characteristics Fresh zone: The Supply Zone is being observed without a confirmed prior meaningful revisit, making the current interaction relevant from a price-action perspective. Drop-Base-Drop structure: Price declined, formed a relatively defined base, and then continued lower with another bearish move. This structure is commonly studied as an area where selling pressure previously became dominant. Strong leg-out: The pronounced bearish departure from the base provides evidence of significant directional displacement. Quality basing structure: The relatively compact base creates a clearly defined technical area for studying subsequent price behaviour. Market structure context: The interaction between the Supply Zone and surrounding swing structure may provide additional information about whether the previous supply remains technically relevant. What Traders Often Observe at a Supply Zone When price revisits a previously identified Supply Zone, traders commonly observe how price behaves around the area rather than assuming that the zone will necessarily produce a reaction. Bearish rejection from the zone followed by renewed downward price movement. Consolidation around the zone as market participants reassess the balance between buying and selling pressure. A deeper penetration into the zone before a directional reaction develops. A sustained move through the zone, potentially indicating that the original supply imbalance has weakened or been absorbed. Possible Market Scenarios Bearish Scenario: If price reaches the Supply Zone and develops clear bearish price action, one possible scenario could involve a rejection from the area followed by renewed downward movement. The actual price response would be more relevant than the existence of the zone alone. Bullish Scenario: If price moves through the Supply Zone with sustained bullish momentum, the original supply structure could become invalidated. Such behaviour may indicate that the selling pressure previously associated with the area is no longer exerting the same influence on price. Why Price Action Confirmation Matters A Supply Zone represents a historical area derived from previous price behaviour. Its presence does not guarantee that price will react in the same way during a future revisit. Rejection, consolidation, displacement, and breakout are different forms of price behaviour that can provide additional context when evaluating the zone. Therefore, confirmation from actual price action is an important part of interpreting how the market is interacting with the area before any trading decision is considered. Zone Invalidation No Supply Zone remains technically valid indefinitely. A sustained move through the zone could indicate that the underlying imbalance has been weakened or absorbed. This possibility is an important part of studying Supply and Demand because both successful reactions and zone failures contribute information about the evolving market structure. Risk Management — Educational Perspective From a general educational perspective, risk management involves recognising that technical structures can fail and that market outcomes are uncertain. Concepts such as position sizing, predefined invalidation conditions, and controlled exposure are commonly discussed when studying how traders manage uncertainty. These concepts are presented for educational purposes and are not recommendations for any particular trade. Key Observation The main technical observation on the BTCUSD 240-minute chart is the interaction between price and the previously formed Drop-Base-Drop Supply Zone . The eventual response could involve rejection, consolidation, deeper penetration, or a sustained move through the zone. Each outcome could provide different information about the current market structure and the relevance of the original supply imbalance. Educational Disclaimer This publication is intended solely for educational and informational purposes. It reflects a technical analysis of market structure and should not be interpreted as investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Always perform your own analysis and manage risk according to your individual circumstances.
OANDA:BTCUSDShort
by SurjeetKakkar
FATE: $120 retest possible in 50x move? - August 2026SYMBOL: NASDAQ:FATE | DIRECTION: LONG | TIMEFRAME: Weekly Published: August 2026 Right. Fate Therapeutics has gone from one hundred and twenty dollars to 80 cents. That is extraordinary. The share price has been murdered. Absolutely demolished. We are talking about a small cap biotech that lost ninety-seven percent of its value, and yet here we stand, looking at a chart that suggests the cremation might be over. The thing about catastrophic drawdowns is that they occasionally mark the end of a story rather than a continuation. This one has the fingerprints all over it. Volume is drying up on the way down while the daily chart is in a uptrend structure. Higher highs and higher lows. That is not noise. And yet. The crowd sees a dead company with a dead chart as financial wizards chase AI Tech and shiny metals. They see ninety-nine percent drops and assume another ninety-nine percent is coming. They're probably wrong, which is why we are here. On the above 3 week chart Fate Therapeutics Inc has bounced sharply from the wreckage and is now trading at the eighty-sixth percentile of its fifty-two week range. Four reasons now exist to expect a serious retest of prior resistance and potentially a run toward the all time high of 120. They include: 1) Five-year channel breakout, confirmed. The descending channel from the 2021 highs has contained every rally attempt for five years. Price has now broken above it and held. 2) Phase 2 registrational trial with FDA fast-track status attached. FT819 has RMAT designation. It has also been selected into the FDA’s CDRP programme, which is described as “highly selective” and which almost nobody has heard of, including, apparently, the people pricing this stock. RECLAIM-LN, a potentially registrational Phase 2 trial in lupus nephritis, begins dosing in the second half of 2026. That is this year. That is in the next few months. 3) Clinical responses without chemotherapy. Three out of three. In Regimen B of the Phase 1 study, three of three lupus patients achieved SRI-4 response and two of three reached low disease activity state, with no conditioning chemotherapy at all. For context, most CAR T-cell trials require up to three days of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine beforehand, which patients find about as pleasant as it sounds. Fate is producing responses without it. Small sample, early data, yes. Still three out of three. Twenty-seven patients treated to date, eight of them as outpatients. An off-the-shelf cell therapy you can receive without chemotherapy and go home afterwards is not an incremental improvement. It is a different product category. 4) Over 500 issued patents. And they cut costs 20%. The iPSC platform is protected by more than 500 issued patents and 500 pending applications. Meanwhile operating expenses fell 20% year on year in Q1 2026, which extended the runway into 2028. A biotech that reduces spending while accelerating its lead programme into registrational trials is not a company in trouble. It is a company being run properly. The market has not adjusted its opinion accordingly. It rarely does until something forces it to. Now the honest bit This is clinical-stage biotech. FATE loses approximately $31 million a quarter and has no approved product. The sample sizes are small. Phase 1 data becomes Phase 2 disappointment with some regularity in this sector. Cell therapy is difficult, expensive, and littered with companies that had promising early data and nothing else. Price has also already tripled from the lows near $0.96, so the easy part of this move is behind us. If RECLAIM-LN fails, this thesis fails with it, completely and without argument. Position size accordingly, and by that I mean properly, not the way you normally do it. The crowd Everybody left. Fate traded above $100 in 2021 during the cell therapy enthusiasm, then a partnership collapsed, the sector fell apart, and retail investors have spent five years watching it decline. They are not coming back to look at the pipeline. Institutional biotech money moved to obesity drugs, because that is where the returns were and fund managers are not paid to be interesting. So the company sat there with its 500 patents, its $175 million, its FDA designations, and its three-out-of-three responses, at a valuation that implied the science was worth roughly nothing. Everyone stopped watching at exactly the point the data started working. Then the chart broke out of a five-year channel and still nobody looked.   Could this go to zero? It is biotech. Obviously it could. I am not going to sit here and pretend otherwise. But a debt-free company with a registrational trial, RMAT designation, a thousand patents and a confirmed five-year channel breakout is currently valued at barely more than its bank balance. One of those things is mis-priced. I have a view on which. Good luck. Ww   Type: Speculative fundamental long / clinical-stage biotech  |  Timeframe: 12–24 months   =================================================== Disclaimer : This idea is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Fate Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with no approved products and no product revenue. It is currently loss-making. Clinical trial results are inherently uncertain, and early-phase data frequently fails to replicate in later-stage trials. Clinical-stage biotech investments carry a risk of total capital loss. Trial failures, regulatory setbacks, or the need to raise additional capital may result in substantial or complete loss of investment. Financial figures are taken from the Company’s Q1 2026 results published 13 May 2026 and predate the Q2 2026 results scheduled for 11 August 2026. Always do your own research and consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
NASDAQ:FATELong
by without_worries
1
Long trade Pair: BTCUSDC Direction: 🟢 Buyside Date: Sun 9th Aug 2026 Timeframe: 5-minute Trade Model: SNAP + AMD Classification: Sellside Manipulation → Bullish Breaker Reclaim → Distribution Trade Details Entry: 64,999.99 Stop: 64,950.78 Target: 65,273.60 Risk: ~0.075% Reward: ~0.42% Planned RR: ~5.95 Market Context BTC had been balancing around the 64,900–65,000 area, creating a visible short-term accumulation range. Price then broke lower, sweeping liquidity beneath the range before sharply reclaiming the prior structure. The sellside move did not sustain. Instead, price recovered back above the former breakdown area and established a bullish breaker zone around the 64,900 region. That reclaim changed the immediate order-flow narrative from bearish continuation to buyside delivery. AMD Read ACCUMULATION 64,900–65,000 range develops ↓ MANIPULATION Sellside liquidity raid toward 64,740–64,780 ↓ RECLAIM Price returns above the range ↓ BULLISH BREAKER 64,900 area holds as support ↓ DISTRIBUTION Price displaces through 65,000 ↓ BUYSIDE DRAW 65,149.11 → 65,273.60 Journal Summary BTCUSDC buyside at 64,999.99 - SNAP + AMD setup built on a sellside liquidity raid, bullish breaker reclaim and displacement, targeting 65,149.11 liquidity first and 65,273.60 as the final buyside objective with approximately 5.95RR.
BINANCE:BTCUSDLong
by davidjulien369
BTC M15 Bullish OpportunityTechnical Analysis: Price has just performed a liquidity sweep at the SSL level and immediately reacted to the SIBI area to regain upward momentum. With the Sell Side Liquidity structure cleared, the potential next move is to target the available liquidity above. Currently, price is sitting very close to the entry reaction area, anticipating an expansion move toward the nearest liquidity targets with defined risk below the recent swing low. Execution Scenario: Entry Zone: 64,790.0 Min Target: (+2R) 65,010.0 Max Target: (+4R) 65,230.0 Invalidation: (-1R) 64,680.0 Execution Protocol: Max Risk / Trade: < 2% Best Risk / Reward: 1:2 Note: Always practice proper risk management and execute trades according to your personal trading plan. This analysis is for educational purposes only and should not be taken as financial advice.
OKX:BTCUSDT.PLong
by CryptoForgeIndonesia
1
THE INSTITUTIONAL TRUTH BEHIND SMC, LIQUIDITY & MOMENTUMWhy a Perfect SMC Setup Can Still Fail One of the biggest mistakes in Smart Money Concepts is believing that a valid setup automatically means a valid trade. An order block can be valid. A liquidity sweep can be valid. A premium/discount location can be valid. A structural shift can be valid. And the trade can still fail. Why? Because a setup exists inside a market environment. The market doesn’t move because an order block exists on your chart. It moves because capital is being allocated, positions are being adjusted, liquidity is being consumed, risk is being transferred, and participants are responding to changing information and market conditions. That is where SMC becomes much more interesting. ⸻ 1. THE INSTITUTIONAL TRUTH Retail traders often experience the market as a collection of candles. Institutions experience it as an execution problem. A retail trader can enter a position with almost no concern about market impact. A large fund cannot. If a participant needs to execute hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, simply pressing buy or sell aggressively can move price against the participant. The larger the position, the more important liquidity becomes. That creates a completely different set of questions: Where is liquidity available? Where can orders be executed efficiently? What is volatility doing? Is momentum supporting the position? Where are other participants positioned? How much market impact will execution create? This is the underlying auction. The chart is simply the visual record of that auction. ⸻ 2. PRICE IS THE OUTPUT — NOT THE MACHINE This distinction is critical. An order block does not move price. A Fibonacci level does not move price. An FVG does not move price. A liquidity line does not move price. An EMA does not move price. Orders move price. Capital flows through markets. Positions are opened. Positions are closed. Funds rebalance. Participants hedge. Risk is transferred. Liquidity is consumed. Market expectations change. Systematic strategies respond to price and volatility conditions. All of those processes interact to produce the movement that eventually appears on our chart. Therefore, technical tools should be treated as ways of interpreting market behavior, not as the physical cause of that behavior. ⸻ 3. WHERE ALGORITHMIC TRADING ENTERS THE PICTURE Modern financial markets contain enormous amounts of systematic trading. High-frequency firms, market makers, quantitative funds, execution algorithms, CTA trend-following strategies, volatility strategies, and institutional portfolio models can all interact with the same market. They don’t all use the same indicators. They don’t all trade the same way. And they aren’t collectively watching one magical EMA. But many systematic strategies respond to mathematical characteristics of price. That includes things such as: ● trend persistence ● volatility ● rate of change ● price deviation ● momentum ● correlation ● liquidity ● risk ● historical relationships This is why mathematical transformations of price can sometimes provide useful information about the market’s current state. A moving average is one example. ⸻ 4. WHAT A MOVING AVERAGE ACTUALLY TELLS YOU A moving average doesn’t tell you where a bank placed an order. It doesn’t tell you that an institution is defending that exact price. Instead, it smooths historical price data and helps visualize the direction and persistence of the auction. For example, imagine a 20-period and 50-period moving average. During a strong directional market: ● the averages separate ● their slopes become directional ● price remains consistently displaced ● pullbacks tend to remain controlled ● directional persistence increases During a transitioning market: ● the averages begin compressing ● slopes flatten ● price repeatedly crosses the averages ● directional displacement decreases ● the market begins behaving more like equilibrium The important information isn’t the lines themselves. The information is what the underlying price behavior is doing. 5. THE MOMENTUM FEEDBACK LOOP This is where things become interesting. A directional move begins. Price starts producing persistent movement. Systematic strategies that respond to momentum or trend characteristics may maintain, initiate, or adjust exposure. Other participants see the developing trend. More positioning enters. Liquidity gets consumed. Price continues moving. The continued movement reinforces the trend characteristics. This can create a feedback loop: Price displacement → momentum → participation → additional displacement → stronger momentum. This doesn’t mean every trend is caused by algorithms. It means systematic participation is one component of a much larger market ecosystem. And when multiple participants respond to similar market conditions, their collective behavior can contribute to persistent directional movement. ⸻ 6. NOW BRING SMC INTO THE EQUATION This is where location becomes important. Suppose EUR/USD is in a clearly bullish higher-timeframe environment. Structure is bullish. Momentum is bullish. Price has displaced aggressively. A meaningful demand area forms during that displacement. Price eventually pulls back. Instead of buying simply because price touched the demand zone, we ask: What is happening around the zone? Where is liquidity? Has internal liquidity been taken? Is the higher-timeframe structure still intact? Is momentum still supporting the bullish thesis? Is price returning to a location where continuation makes sense? Now the SMC setup becomes contextual rather than mechanical. ⸻ 7. LOCATION ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH This is one of the biggest lessons. A demand zone gives you a location. It does not guarantee a reaction. A liquidity sweep gives you information about where orders may have been taken. It does not guarantee continuation. A structural shift gives you information about market behavior. It does not guarantee that the next move will reach your target. And an order block does not automatically deserve an entry. The setup needs to exist within a market environment that supports the thesis. That is the difference between: finding a setup and finding a trade. ⸻ 8. THE PERFECT-LOOKING SETUP THAT SHOULD BE IGNORED Imagine EUR/USD has a beautiful bullish demand zone. Price returns to it. Liquidity is swept. The lower timeframe produces a bullish shift. Everything looks perfect. But the broader momentum environment has deteriorated. The moving averages that were previously expanding are now flat. Price is repeatedly crossing through them. Directional displacement has weakened. The market is compressing. Now ask yourself: Is this still the same bullish environment that originally produced the demand zone? Maybe not. The location hasn’t changed. But the market state has changed. That distinction is extremely important. 9. FLAT MOMENTUM DOES NOT MEAN “THE ALGORITHMS TURNED OFF” This is where we need to be precise. A flattening or crossing moving-average structure does not prove that institutional algorithms have switched off. It tells us that the directional persistence represented by the price data has weakened. That can happen because the market is: ● consolidating ● transitioning ● distributing ● repricing ● losing momentum ● preparing for continuation ● preparing for reversal We don’t know which one simply from an EMA. But we do know something important: The previous momentum condition is no longer as strong. That should change the way we treat continuation setups. ⸻ 10. WHY SMC TRADERS GET CAUGHT HERE A mechanical trader might think: Demand + sweep + CHoCH = buy. But the professional question is: Demand + sweep + CHoCH + favorable market state = buy? That extra question changes everything. Because markets are not static. A setup that works beautifully during a strong trend can perform terribly during compression. A setup that works during expansion can fail during equilibrium. A setup that works with strong directional participation can fail when that participation disappears. Therefore: No SMC setup should be evaluated independently from the market environment surrounding it. ⸻ 11. THE RETAIL ILLUSION A large portion of retail trading education teaches traders to search for more setups. More patterns. More confirmations. More indicators. More entries. But professional decision-making can actually require the opposite: Fewer trades. If you require: ● meaningful location ● relevant liquidity ● confirmed structure ● favorable momentum ● proper execution you will naturally eliminate many potential trades. And that’s a feature, not a problem. The professional trader isn’t rewarded for finding the most setups. The objective is to participate when the conditions make the risk/reward asymmetry attractive. Sometimes the highest-quality decision is: No trade. ⸻ 12. THE HISTORICAL-DATA TRAP Backtesting is extremely valuable. But there is a major mistake traders can make with historical patterns: They assume that because a setup worked repeatedly in the past, the same setup must work whenever it appears again. But the setup doesn’t exist in isolation. Consider two identical-looking order blocks. Setup A ● Strong higher-timeframe trend ● Clean displacement ● Strong momentum ● Liquidity available ● Controlled pullback ● Continuation environment Setup B ● Weak momentum ● Compression ● Conflicting structure ● Nearby opposing liquidity ● Reduced displacement ● Transitional market The order block may look almost identical. The market state isn’t. That means the historical success of the pattern alone isn’t enough. The better question is: What conditions made this setup work historically, and are those conditions present right now? That is a much more robust way to use backtesting. 13. MOMENTUM WITHOUT LOCATION IS ALSO NOT ENOUGH There is another side to this. Suppose momentum is extremely bullish. The averages are beautifully separated. Price is expanding. Does that automatically mean: BUY NOW? No. Price could already be extended. It could be approaching higher-timeframe supply. It could be approaching external liquidity. You may be entering after the majority of the displacement has already occurred. Therefore: Momentum tells you about participation. Location tells you where participation may be attractive. You want the two to work together. ⸻ 14. LOCATION + LIQUIDITY + MOMENTUM This creates a much cleaner framework. LOCATION Where is price? Premium? Discount? HTF supply? HTF demand? Inside a meaningful range? LIQUIDITY What is price likely interacting with? Internal liquidity? External liquidity? Engineered liquidity? Resting stops? STRUCTURE What has price actually confirmed? Not what you predict. What has the market already proven? MOMENTUM Is directional participation still present? Is price expanding? Is momentum maintaining itself? Or is the market compressing? EXECUTION Only after the larger picture is aligned do we drop down to the execution timeframe. That is where the entry model becomes useful. ⸻ 15. THE PROFESSIONAL HIERARCHY Instead of starting with: “Where can I enter?” Start with: 1 — What is the higher-timeframe environment? 2 — Where is the meaningful location? 3 — What liquidity is relevant? 4 — What structure has been confirmed? 5 — Is momentum aligned with the thesis? 6 — What does the lower timeframe need to show? 7 — Is there actually a trade? Notice something important. Entry is almost last. That is intentional. Most retail traders begin with the entry. Professional analysis begins with the environment. ⸻ 16. THE REAL PURPOSE OF SMC SMC shouldn’t be viewed as a collection of magical institutional footprints. It is better understood as a framework for studying: structure + liquidity + location + displacement + reaction. The goal isn’t to know exactly what every bank is doing. You can’t. The goal is to recognize the observable consequences of market participation. Price leaves evidence. Structure changes. Liquidity gets taken. Displacement occurs. Momentum strengthens or weakens. Those observations allow us to construct a probability-based thesis. 17. THE FINAL TRUTH CHECK Money moves price. Liquidity facilitates execution. Information changes expectations. Volatility changes risk. Positioning influences future flows. Systematic strategies can reinforce trends. Market makers manage inventory and liquidity. Funds rebalance. Participants hedge. Orders get executed. And all of those interactions eventually appear on our charts. The lines don’t move the market. They help us read the market. The EMA doesn’t create momentum. It helps visualize momentum. The order block doesn’t create demand. It identifies a historical area where meaningful displacement and positioning occurred. The liquidity line doesn’t create the liquidity. It helps us identify where liquidity may exist. The chart is the map. The market is the machine. ⸻ THE SMC FRAMEWORK The highest-quality setup isn’t: Order Block + Liquidity Sweep = Entry It’s closer to: Higher-Timeframe Context
↓
Meaningful Location
↓
Relevant Liquidity
↓
Confirmed Structure
↓
Momentum Alignment
↓
Lower-Timeframe Execution
↓
Risk Management If those elements aren’t aligned, there is no requirement to trade. And that is the real upgrade: You are not trying to trade every SMC setup. You are trying to identify the SMC setups occurring inside the right market conditions. ⸻ THE INSTITUTIONAL IDEA IN ONE SENTENCE SMC tells you WHERE to pay attention. Liquidity tells you WHAT the market may be seeking. Structure tells you WHAT the auction has confirmed. Momentum tells you WHETHER directional participation is actually present. And when those pieces align? That’s when the chart starts telling one coherent story. When they don’t? You wait. Because sometimes the most professional position in the market… is no position at all. Leave the machine alone.
Education
by Juicemannn
Italian systems integrator breaks out as AI rollout acceleratesINTRODUCTION: The datacenter and general AI buildout continues across the globe, with the EU playing catch-up as much as it can. On this background, an Italian systems integrator in the server and embedded verticals forcefully breaks out of a multi-year downtrend. THE TA: A 7D timeframe provides the basis where all the major events of this classic resistance breakout can be observed. 1. Price action remained in downtrend since the November '19 top, at the end of which it lost market structure. 2. Following a period of horizontal consolidation with increasing volume under the market structure, the downtrend has now broken cleanly to the upside. 4. 7D RSI is also in breakout. 5. 7D MFI has broken out well, with a backtest of support on past resistance. 6. Price action is now back inside market structure just as the 7D Gaussian Channel turns green, first time in 5.7 years. 7. There are signs of a Hook Reversal Pattern forming on the 7D, indicating a good moment for entry (along with sRSI having cycled down). SUPPLEMENTAL TA: 1. The 5M chart has a confirmed DOJI that follows a fully developed Hook Reversal Pattern just as sRSI is about to cross up 20. Last time the 5M sRSI crossed up 20 a 6-year bull market followed. The 3M sRSI has already crossed up. SUMMARY: Classic resistance breakout on the three most important metrics: the PA, the MFI, and the RSI. This is a tiny market cap so best not overdo it. Horizontal dashed lines with decreased opacity above market structure indicate upcoming resistance levels. *** The above is not financial advice. The above was written by hand. I am not a professional trader/analyst.
MIL:ETHLong
by Ehrlichman
XAU/USD 10 August 2026 Intraday AnalysisH4 Analysis: -> Swing: Bullish. -> Internal: Bearish. Bias and analysis to remain the same as analysis dated 30 June 2026. Price did not print bullish CHoCH to indicate bullish pullback phase initiation. Price instead printed a new low followed by a bullish CHoCH Price is currently trading within and established internal range, however, I will continue to monitor price with respect to depth of pullback. Intraday expectation: Price to trade up to either premium of internal 50% EQ, or H4 demand zone before targeting weak internal low, currently priced at 3,942.100. Note: Gold remains volatile as tensions between the US, Israel, and Iran keep safe‑haven demand elevated. Markets are reacting quickly to every headline, while uncertainty around the Fed’s easing path and shifting U.S. policy under President Trump, especially tariffs continues to fuel choppy price action. For newer traders, the key is simple, stay flexible and manage risk carefully, as fast spikes and sudden reversals are a normal part of the current XAU/USD environment. H4 Chart: M15 Analysis: -> Swing: Bearish. -> Internal: Bullish. As I mentioned in my analysis dated 06 August 2026 whereby I mentioned price printed a bearish CHoCH but I would be monitor depth of pullback. Price did not pullback with any significance, therefore, I will not classify the previous iBOS. I have however marked this is in red for illustration purposes. Price has since printed higher. CHoCH positioning is denoted with a blue dotted horizontal line. Price is currently trading within a fractal high and internal low. Intraday expectation: Price to print bearish CHoCH to indicate bearish pullback phase initiation. Price to then trade down to either discount of internal 50% EQ, or M15 supply zone before targeting weak internal high, priced at 4,371.840. Note: Gold remains highly reactive on M15 as geopolitical risk continues to drive quick, headline‑led moves. The tension between the US, Israel, and Iran is keeping safe‑haven demand elevated, with markets still sensitive to any sign of escalation. At the same time, shifting US tariff policy under President Trump is adding extra uncertainty, fuelling sharp intraday swings and increasing the likelihood of sudden sentiment flips. Liquidity pockets and whipsaws remain common, making disciplined risk management essential. Gold’s geopolitical premium is still firmly in place, and until tensions ease, short‑term volatility is likely to stay front‑loaded. M15 Chart:
OANDA:XAUUSD
by Khan_YIK
BTC M15 Bullish OpportunityTechnical Analysis: Price action just executed a liquidity sweep on the sell-side liquidity (SSL) area around 64800.0 and immediately showed a significant reversal response. With the current price floating at 65209.5—already moving above the entry zone (65118.3)—this setup anticipates a further expansion leg towards the primary buy-side liquidity (BSL) target above, supported by Open Interest (OI) expansion and accumulated positive response from the Fair Value Gap (BISI) area. Execution Scenario: Entry Zone: 65118.3 Min Target: (+2R) 65766.3 Max Target: (+4R) 66414.3 Invalidation: (-1R) 64794.3 Execution Protocol: Max Risk / Trade: < 5% Best Risk / Reward: 1:2 Note: Always practice proper risk management and execute trades according to your personal trading plan. This analysis is for educational purposes only and should not be taken as financial advice.
OKX:BTCUSDT.PLong
by CryptoForgeIndonesia
$BTC 15M Market OutlookTechnical Analysis: Price has just performed a liquidity sweep at the BSL area before facing rejection and moving into consolidation. Currently, price action is pulling down toward the BISI demand area (H4) as a retest zone to gauge buyer response. A dip toward the BISI area is projected to act as a bounce zone before the expansion resumes toward the liquidity targets above. The Learning Point: Movements that sweep BSL first typically signal a clearing of short/seller positions before price seeks a new equilibrium in the fair value gap (BISI) area. Waiting for price to enter and confirm within the BISI zone is crucial to avoid a premature entry before the orderflow revalidates bullish. Note: This outlook is intended solely as a daily view for mapping market structure, not as an immediate execution signal. Stay alert and always conduct independent research. Stay safe, traders!
OKX:BTCUSDT.PLong
by CryptoForgeIndonesia
1
Long trade ETHUSDC Buyside Pair: ETHUSDC Perpetual Direction: 🟢 Buyside Date: Sun 9th Aug 2026 Session: LND Session AM Entry Time: 4:45 AM NY Time Timeframe: 15-minute Trade Model: SNAP + AMD Buyside Entry: 1914.34 Profit Level: 1940.84 Stop Level: 1912.19 Reward: +1.384% Risk: -0.112% RR: 12.33 Market Context ETH had been trading inside a relatively tight intraday range around the 1914–1924 region. Price repeatedly interacted with the lower boundary before failing to sustain bearish delivery beneath it. The important shift came when price reclaimed the 1914 area, held above the lower range and began printing bullish displacement. This converted the lower-range test from a possible breakdown into a sellside manipulation and reclaim setup. 🔺 AMD Structure Buyside liquidity above 1922–1924 1914–1924 accumulation range Sellside liquidity below 1912–1914 Manipulation Sellside probe → lower pricing rejected → 1914 reclaimed → bearish continuation fails Distribution 1914 reclaim → bullish displacement → higher low → higher high → 1924 clearance → 1930+ → 1940.84 target Journal Summary ETHUSDC buyside from 1914.34 is a SNAP + AMD trade built on a failed sellside move and 1914 reclaim, targeting 1940.84 with a structurally protected 1912.19 stop and 12.33 planned RR.
COINBASE:ETHUSDC.PLong
by davidjulien369